LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 9 of total 9

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Non-COVID-19 UK clinical trials and the COVID-19 pandemic

    Ava Lorenc / Leila Rooshenas / Carmel Conefrey / Julia Wade / Nicola Farrar / Nicola Mills / Sangeetha Paramasivan / Alba Realpe / Marcus Jepson

    Trials, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-

    impact, challenges and possible solutions

    2023  Volume 8

    Abstract: Abstract Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the operationalisation of non-COVID-19 clinical trials globally, particularly site and participant recruitment and trial success/stoppage. Trials which anticipate recruitment challenges may embed ... ...

    Abstract Abstract Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the operationalisation of non-COVID-19 clinical trials globally, particularly site and participant recruitment and trial success/stoppage. Trials which anticipate recruitment challenges may embed methods such as the QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI) to help identify and understand the sources of challenges. Such interventions can help shed light on pandemic-related challenges. This paper reports our experience of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on conducting clinical trials with an embedded QRI, highlighting how the QRI aided in identifying challenges and potential solutions, particularly related to the site set-up and participant recruitment. Main body We report on 13 UK clinical trials which included a QRI. Information is from QRI data and researchers’ experience and reflections. In most trials, recruitment was lower than even the lowest anticipated rates. The flexibility of the QRI facilitated rapid data collection to understand and document, and in some instances respond to, operational challenges. Challenges were mostly logistical, pandemic-related and beyond the control of the site or central trial teams. Specifically: disrupted and variable site opening timelines —often due to local research and development (R&D) delays— shortages of staff to recruit patients; fewer eligible patients or limited access to patients; and intervention-related factors. Almost all trials were affected by pandemic-related staffing issues including redeployment, prioritisation of COVID-19 care and research, and COVID-19-related staff illness and absence. Trials of elective procedures were particularly impacted by the pandemic, which caused changes to care/recruitment pathways, deprioritisation of services, reduced clinical and surgical capacity and longer waiting lists. Attempted solutions included extra engagement with staff and R&D departments, trial protocol changes (primarily moving online) and seeking additional resourcing. Conclusion We have highlighted ...
    Keywords COVID-19 ; Pandemics ; Randomised controlled trials ; Patient selection ; Recruitment ; Medicine (General) ; R5-920
    Subject code 610
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-06-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMC
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Recruiters’ perspectives and experiences of trial recruitment processes

    Leila Rooshenas / Jenny Donovan / Marcus Jepson / Daisy Elliott / Nicola Farrar / Catherine Houghton

    BMJ Open, Vol 11, Iss

    a qualitative evidence synthesis protocol

    2021  Volume 10

    Keywords Medicine ; R
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-10-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Development of a new adapted QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI-Two) for rapid application to RCTs underway with enrolment shortfalls—to identify previously hidden barriers and improve recruitment

    Jenny L. Donovan / Marcus Jepson / Leila Rooshenas / Sangeetha Paramasivan / Nicola Mills / Daisy Elliott / Julia Wade / Domenic Reda / Jane M. Blazeby / Drew Moghanaki / E. Shelley Hwang / Louise Davies

    Trials, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-

    2022  Volume 14

    Abstract: Abstract Background Many randomised controlled trials (RCTs) struggle to recruit, despite valiant efforts. The QRI (QuinteT Recruitment Intervention) uses innovative research methods to optimise recruitment by revealing previously hidden barriers related ...

    Abstract Abstract Background Many randomised controlled trials (RCTs) struggle to recruit, despite valiant efforts. The QRI (QuinteT Recruitment Intervention) uses innovative research methods to optimise recruitment by revealing previously hidden barriers related to the perceptions and experiences of recruiters and patients, and targeting remedial actions. It was designed to be integrated with RCTs anticipating difficulties at the outset. A new version of the intervention (QRI-Two) was developed for RCTs already underway with enrolment shortfalls. Methods QRIs in 12 RCTs with enrolment shortfalls during 2007–2017 were reviewed to document which of the research methods used could be rapidly applied to successfully identify recruitment barriers. These methods were then included in the new streamlined QRI-Two intervention which was applied in 20 RCTs in the USA and Europe during 2018–2019. The feasibility of the QRI-Two was investigated, recruitment barriers and proposed remedial actions were documented, and the QRI-Two protocol was finalised. Results The review of QRIs from 2007 to 2017 showed that previously unrecognised recruitment barriers could be identified but data collection for the full QRI required time and resources usually unavailable to ongoing RCTs. The streamlined QRI-Two focussed on analysis of screening/accrual data and RCT documents (protocol, patient-information), with discussion of newly diagnosed barriers and potential remedial actions in a workshop with the RCT team. Four RCTs confirmed the feasibility of the rapid application of the QRI-Two. When the QRI-Two was applied to 14 RCTs underway with enrolment shortfalls, an array of previously unknown/underestimated recruitment barriers related to issues such as equipoise, intervention preferences, or study presentation was identified, with new insights into losses of eligible patients along the recruitment pathway. The QRI-Two workshop enabled discussion of the newly diagnosed barriers and potential remedial actions to improve recruitment in collaboration ...
    Keywords Randomised trials ; Recruitment ; Enrolment ; Recruitment intervention ; Recruitment shortfall ; Remedial strategies ; Medicine (General) ; R5-920
    Subject code 360
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-04-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMC
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: 147:oral Prioritisation in the United Kingdon national health service during a national emergency

    Leila Rooshenas / Baljit Singh / Jane Blazeby / Kerry Avery / Marcus Jepson / Natalie Blencowe / Daisy Elliott / Barry Main / David Messenger / Cynthia Ochieng / James Kinross / Carmel Conefrey / Angus McNair / Jo Bennett / Christin Hoffman / Sarah Squire / Anne Pullybank / Sarah Duff

    BMJ Global Health, Vol 7, Iss Suppl

    a qualitative case study of surgical teams’ experiences of colorectal cancer surgery in the acute early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic

    2022  Volume 2

    Keywords Medicine (General) ; R5-920 ; Infectious and parasitic diseases ; RC109-216
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-04-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Arthroscopic hip surgery compared with personalised hip therapy in people over 16 years old with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome

    Damian R Griffin / Edward J Dickenson / Felix Achana / James Griffin / Joanna Smith / Peter DH Wall / Alba Realpe / Nick Parsons / Rachel Hobson / Jeremy Fry / Marcus Jepson / Stavros Petrou / Charles Hutchinson / Nadine Foster / Jenny Donovan

    Health Technology Assessment, Vol 26, Iss

    UK FASHIoN RCT

    2022  Volume 16

    Abstract: Background: Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome is an important cause of hip pain in young adults. It can be treated by arthroscopic hip surgery or with physiotherapist-led conservative care. Objective: To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost- ... ...

    Abstract Background: Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome is an important cause of hip pain in young adults. It can be treated by arthroscopic hip surgery or with physiotherapist-led conservative care. Objective: To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hip arthroscopy with best conservative care. Design: The UK FASHIoN (full trial of arthroscopic surgery for hip impingement compared with non-operative care) trial was a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial that was carried out at 23 NHS hospitals. Participants: Participants were included if they had femoroacetabular impingement, were aged ≥ 16 years old, had hip pain with radiographic features of cam or pincer morphology (but no osteoarthritis) and were believed to be likely to benefit from hip arthroscopy. Intervention: Participants were randomly allocated (1 : 1) to receive hip arthroscopy followed by postoperative physiotherapy, or personalised hip therapy (i.e. an individualised physiotherapist-led programme of conservative care). Randomisation was stratified by impingement type and recruiting centre using a central telephone randomisation service. Outcome assessment and analysis were masked. Main outcome measure: The primary outcome was hip-related quality of life, measured by the patient-reported International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) 12 months after randomisation, and analysed by intention to treat. Results: Between July 2012 and July 2016, 648 eligible patients were identified and 348 participants were recruited. In total, 171 participants were allocated to receive hip arthroscopy and 177 participants were allocated to receive personalised hip therapy. Three further patients were excluded from the trial after randomisation because they did not meet the eligibility criteria. Follow-up at the primary outcome assessment was 92% (N = 319; hip arthroscopy, n = 157; personalised hip therapy, n = 162). At 12 months, mean International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) score had improved from 39.2 (standard deviation 20.9) points to 58.8 ...
    Keywords femoroacetabular impingement ; hip arthroscopy ; physiotherapy ; Medical technology ; R855-855.5
    Subject code 796
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-02-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher NIHR Journals Library
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Correction to

    Marcus Jepson / Michelle Lazaroo / Samir Pathak / Natalie Blencowe / Jane Collingwood / Madeleine Clout / Giles Toogood / Jane Blazeby / on behalf of the Sunflower Study Executive Group

    Trials, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-

    Making large-scale surgical trials possible: collaboration and the role of surgical trainees

    2021  Volume 1

    Keywords Medicine (General) ; R5-920
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-09-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMC
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Making large-scale surgical trials possible

    Marcus Jepson / Michelle Lazaroo / Samir Pathak / Natalie Blencowe / Jane Collingwood / Madeleine Clout / Giles Toogood / Jane Blazeby / on behalf of the Sunflower Study Executive Group

    Trials, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-

    collaboration and the role of surgical trainees

    2021  Volume 11

    Abstract: Abstract Background Recruitment to surgical randomised controlled trials (RCTs) can be challenging. The Sunflower study is a large-scale multi-centre RCT that seeks to establish the clinical and cost effectiveness of pre-operative imaging versus ... ...

    Abstract Abstract Background Recruitment to surgical randomised controlled trials (RCTs) can be challenging. The Sunflower study is a large-scale multi-centre RCT that seeks to establish the clinical and cost effectiveness of pre-operative imaging versus expectant management in patients with symptomatic gallstones undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at low or moderate risk of common bile duct stones. Trials such as Sunflower, with a large recruitment target, rely on teamworking. Recruitment can be optimised by embedding a QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI). Additionally, engaging surgical trainees can contribute to successful recruitment, and the NIHR Associate Principal Investigator (API) scheme provides a framework to acknowledge their contributions. Methods This was a mixed-methods study that formed a component part of an embedded QRI for the Sunflower RCT. The aim of this study was to understand factors that supported and hindered the participation of surgical trainees in a large-scale RCT and their participation in the API scheme. It comprised semi-structured telephone interviews with consultant surgeons and surgical trainees involved in screening and recruitment of patients, and descriptive analysis of screening and recruitment data. Interviews were analysed thematically to explore the perspectives of—and roles undertaken by—surgical trainees. Results Interviews were undertaken with 34 clinicians (17 consultant surgeons, 17 surgical trainees) from 22 UK hospital trusts. Surgical trainees contributed to patient screening, approaches and randomisation, with a major contribution to the randomisation of patients from acute admissions. They were often encouraged to participate in the study by their centre principal investigator, and career development was a typical motivating factor for their participation in the study. The study was registered with the API scheme, and a majority of the trainees interviewed (n = 14) were participating in the scheme. Conclusion Surgical trainees can contribute substantial activity to a large-scale multi-centre RCT. Benefits of trainee engagement were identified for trainees themselves, for local sites and for the study as a whole. The API scheme provided a formal framework to acknowledge engagement. Ensuring that training and support for trainees are provided by the trial team is key to optimise success for all stakeholders.
    Keywords Qualitative research ; Optimising RCT recruitment ; Trainees ; Trial conduct and management ; Associate PI scheme ; Medicine (General) ; R5-920
    Subject code 360
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-08-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMC
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Randomised controlled trial to establish the clinical and cost-effectiveness of expectant management versus preoperative imaging with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at low or moderate risk of common bile duct stones (The Sunflower Study)

    Chris Rogers / Lucy Culliford / Natalie S Blencowe / William Hollingworth / Kerry Avery / Marcus Jepson / Joanna Thorn / Raneem Albazaz / Barnaby Reeves / Madeleine Clout / Ravi Vohra / Samir Pathak / Ian Beckingham / Ashley Guthrie / Ewen A Griffiths / Giles Toogood / Michelle Lazaroo / Neil Jennings / Jane Collingwood /
    Elizabeth Booth

    BMJ Open, Vol 11, Iss

    a study protocol

    2021  Volume 6

    Abstract: Introduction Surgery to remove the gallbladder (laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)) is the standard treatment for symptomatic gallbladder disease. One potential complication of gallbladder disease is that gallstones can pass into the common bile duct (CBD) ...

    Abstract Introduction Surgery to remove the gallbladder (laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)) is the standard treatment for symptomatic gallbladder disease. One potential complication of gallbladder disease is that gallstones can pass into the common bile duct (CBD) where they may remain dormant, pass spontaneously into the bowel or cause problems such as obstructive jaundice or pancreatitis. Patients requiring LC are assessed preoperatively for their risk of CBD stones using liver function tests and imaging. If the risk is high, guidelines recommend further investigation and treatment. Further investigation of patients at low or moderate risk of CBD stones is not standardised, and the practice of imaging the CBD using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in these patients varies across the UK. The consequences of these decisions may lead to overtreatment or undertreatment of patients.Methods and analysis We are conducting a UK multicentre, pragmatic, open, randomised controlled trial with internal pilot phase to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of preoperative imaging with MRCP versus expectant management (ie, no preoperative imaging) in adult patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease undergoing urgent or elective LC who are at low or moderate risk of CBD stones. We aim to recruit 13 680 patients over 48 months. The primary outcome is any hospital admission within 18 months of randomisation for a complication of gallstones. This includes complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the treatment of gallstones and complications of LC. This will be determined using routine data sources, for example, National Health Service Digital Hospital Episode Statistics for participants in England. Secondary outcomes include cost-effectiveness and patient-reported quality of life, with participants followed up for a median of 18 months.Ethics and dissemination This study received approval from Yorkshire & The Humber – South Yorkshire Research Ethics Committee. Results will be ...
    Keywords Medicine ; R
    Subject code 610
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-06-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Conveying Equipoise during Recruitment for Clinical Trials

    Leila Rooshenas / Daisy Elliott / Julia Wade / Marcus Jepson / Sangeetha Paramasivan / Sean Strong / Caroline Wilson / David Beard / Jane M Blazeby / Alison Birtle / Alison Halliday / Chris A Rogers / Rob Stein / Jenny L Donovan / ACST-2 study group / By-Band-Sleeve study group / Chemorad study group / CSAW study group / Optima prelim study group /
    POUT study group

    PLoS Medicine, Vol 13, Iss 10, p e

    Qualitative Synthesis of Clinicians' Practices across Six Randomised Controlled Trials.

    2016  Volume 1002147

    Abstract: Background Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are essential for evidence-based medicine and increasingly rely on front-line clinicians to recruit eligible patients. Clinicians' difficulties with negotiating equipoise is assumed to undermine recruitment, ...

    Abstract Background Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are essential for evidence-based medicine and increasingly rely on front-line clinicians to recruit eligible patients. Clinicians' difficulties with negotiating equipoise is assumed to undermine recruitment, although these issues have not yet been empirically investigated in the context of observable events. We aimed to investigate how clinicians conveyed equipoise during RCT recruitment appointments across six RCTs, with a view to (i) identifying practices that supported or hindered equipoise communication and (ii) exploring how clinicians' reported intentions compared with their actual practices. Methods and findings Six pragmatic UK-based RCTs were purposefully selected to include several clinical specialties (e.g., oncology, surgery) and types of treatment comparison. The RCTs were all based in secondary-care hospitals (n = 16) around the UK. Clinicians recruiting to the RCTs were interviewed (n = 23) to understand their individual sense of equipoise about the RCT treatments and their intentions for communicating equipoise to patients. Appointments in which these clinicians presented the RCT to trial-eligible patients were audio-recorded (n = 105). The appointments were analysed using thematic and content analysis approaches to identify practices that supported or challenged equipoise communication. A sample of appointments was independently coded by three researchers to optimise reliability in reported findings. Clinicians and patients provided full written consent to be interviewed and have appointments audio-recorded. Interviews revealed that clinicians' sense of equipoise varied: although all were uncertain about which trial treatment was optimal, they expressed different levels of uncertainty, ranging from complete ambivalence to clear beliefs that one treatment was superior. Irrespective of their personal views, all clinicians intended to set their personal biases aside to convey trial treatments neutrally to patients (in accordance with existing ...
    Keywords Medicine ; R
    Subject code 170
    Language English
    Publishing date 2016-10-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top