LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 4 of total 4

Search options

  1. Article: Sex, Lies, and Coronary Artery Disease.

    Martínez-Sellés, Helena / Martínez-Sellés, David / Martínez-Sellés, Manuel

    Journal of clinical medicine

    2021  Volume 10, Issue 14

    Abstract: Epidemiological and clinical data have shown clear differences in several aspects of cardiovascular disease, particularly in the case of coronary artery disease (CAD), between men and women, including risk factors, response to therapy, quality of care, ... ...

    Abstract Epidemiological and clinical data have shown clear differences in several aspects of cardiovascular disease, particularly in the case of coronary artery disease (CAD), between men and women, including risk factors, response to therapy, quality of care, and natural history.[...].
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-07-15
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Editorial
    ZDB-ID 2662592-1
    ISSN 2077-0383
    ISSN 2077-0383
    DOI 10.3390/jcm10143114
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

    Order via subito

    This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.

  2. Article ; Online: Ethical Issues in Decision-making Regarding the Elderly Affected by Coronavirus Disease 2019: An Expert Opinion.

    Martínez-Sellés, David / Martínez-Sellés, Helena / Martinez-Sellés, Manuel

    European cardiology

    2020  Volume 15, Page(s) e48

    Abstract: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is resulting in ethical decisions regarding resource allocation. Prioritisation reflects established practices that regulate the distribution of finite resources when demand exceeds supply. However, ... ...

    Abstract The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is resulting in ethical decisions regarding resource allocation. Prioritisation reflects established practices that regulate the distribution of finite resources when demand exceeds supply. However, discrimination based on sex, race or age has no role in prioritisation unless clearly justified. The risk posed by COVID-19 is higher for elderly people than for younger people, so older adults should be prioritised in preventive measures. In the case of people who already have COVID-19, healthcare professionals might prioritise those most likely to survive. Making decisions based on chronological age alone is not justified; in addition to age, other aspects that determine theoretical life expectancy must be taken into account. Individualised correct prioritisation in the allocation of scarce resources is essential to good clinical practice.
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-18
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ISSN 1758-3764
    ISSN (online) 1758-3764
    DOI 10.15420/ecr.2020.14
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

    Order via subito

    This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.

    Inter-library loan at ZB MED

    Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

  3. Article ; Online: Ethical Issues in Decision-making Regarding the Elderly Affected by Coronavirus Disease 2019

    Martínez-Sellés, David / Martínez-Sellés, Helena / Martínez-Sellés, Manuel

    European Cardiology Review

    An Expert Opinion

    2020  Volume 15

    Abstract: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is resulting in ethical decisions regarding resource allocation. Prioritisation reflects established practices that regulate the distribution of finite resources when demand exceeds supply. However, ... ...

    Abstract The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is resulting in ethical decisions regarding resource allocation. Prioritisation reflects established practices that regulate the distribution of finite resources when demand exceeds supply. However, discrimination based on sex, race or age has no role in prioritisation unless clearly justified. The risk posed by COVID-19 is higher for elderly people than for younger people, so older adults should be prioritised in preventive measures. In the case of people who already have COVID-19, healthcare professionals might prioritise those most likely to survive. Making decisions based on chronological age alone is not justified; in addition to age, other aspects that determine theoretical life expectancy must be taken into account. Individualised correct prioritisation in the allocation of scarce resources is essential to good clinical practice.
    Keywords Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ; covid19
    Language English
    Publisher Radcliffe Group Ltd
    Publishing country uk
    Document type Article ; Online
    ISSN 1758-3764
    DOI 10.15420/ecr.2020.14
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    Full text online

    More links

    Kategorien

    Order via subito

    This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.

    Inter-library loan at ZB MED

    Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

  4. Article ; Online: Ethical Issues in Decision-making Regarding the Elderly Affected by Coronavirus Disease 2019

    Martínez Sellés, David / Martínez Sellés, Helena / Martínez Sellés Oliveria Soares, Manuel

    An Expert Opinion

    2020  

    Abstract: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is resulting in ethical decisions regarding resource allocation. Prioritisation reflects established practices that regulate the distribution of finite resources when demand exceeds supply. However, ... ...

    Abstract The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is resulting in ethical decisions regarding resource allocation. Prioritisation reflects established practices that regulate the distribution of finite resources when demand exceeds supply. However, discrimination based on sex, race or age has no role in prioritisation unless clearly justified. The risk posed by COVID-19 is higher for elderly people than for younger people, so older adults should be prioritised in preventive measures. In the case of people who already have COVID-19, healthcare professionals might prioritise those most likely to survive. Making decisions based on chronological age alone is not justified; in addition to age, other aspects that determine theoretical life expectancy must be taken into account. Individualised correct prioritisation in the allocation of scarce resources is essential to good clinical practice.

    SIN FINANCIACIÓN

    0.366 SJR (2019) Q3, 227/362 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

    UEM
    Keywords Epidemias ; Ética médica ; COVID-19 ; Epidemia ; Virus ; covid19
    Language English
    Publishing country es
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    Full text online

    More links

    Kategorien

    Inter-library loan at ZB MED

    Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

To top