LIVIVO - Das Suchportal für Lebenswissenschaften

switch to English language
Erweiterte Suche

Ihre letzten Suchen

  1. AU="Martin Reinhart"
  2. AU="Yi, Zinan"
  3. AU="Kyriacou, A"
  4. AU="Malek, K."
  5. AU="Chen, Dianhui"
  6. AU=Nunes Kelly
  7. AU="Heerfordt, Christian Kjer"
  8. AU="Arunachalam, Thilaka"
  9. AU="Alongi A."
  10. AU="Lou, Haifei"
  11. AU="Ourani, Sofia"
  12. AU="Ribichini, Flavio L"
  13. AU="Johnson, Christopher D"
  14. AU="Wang, YuMing"
  15. AU="Namminga, Krista L"
  16. AU="Nadal, Francisco Pérez"
  17. AU="Steimbach, Viviane Miranda Bispo"
  18. AU="Schmitz, Elena"
  19. AU="Abraham, Soman N"
  20. AU="David Mwamkita"
  21. AU="Gutnisky, Diego"
  22. AU="Shachter, Amy"
  23. AU="Hashemi, Behnaz"
  24. AU=Roshanravan Hila
  25. AU=Corva P M
  26. AU="Wang, XiaoFeng"
  27. AU="Khalfallah, Ali"
  28. AU="Kopecky, O."
  29. AU="Mueller, C L"
  30. AU="Moreira, Ângela Nunes"
  31. AU="Lutscher, Daniel"
  32. AU="Ceretta Moreira, Eduardo"
  33. AU="Nalbant, Elif"

Suchergebnis

Treffer 1 - 2 von insgesamt 2

Suchoptionen

  1. Artikel ; Online: The Rise of the Guest Editor—Discontinuities of Editorship in Scholarly Publishing

    Marcel Knöchelmann / Felicitas Hesselmann / Martin Reinhart / Cornelia Schendzielorz

    Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, Vol

    2022  Band 6

    Abstract: Scholarly publishing lives on traditioned terminology that gives meaning to subjects such as authors, inhouse editors and external guest editors, artifacts such as articles, journals, special issues, and collected editions, or practices of acquisition, ... ...

    Abstract Scholarly publishing lives on traditioned terminology that gives meaning to subjects such as authors, inhouse editors and external guest editors, artifacts such as articles, journals, special issues, and collected editions, or practices of acquisition, selection, and review. These subjects, artifacts, and practices ground the constitution of scholarly discourse. And yet, the meaning ascribed to each of these terms shifts, blurs, or is disguised as publishing culture shifts, which becomes manifest in new digital publishing technology, new forms of publishing management, and new forms of scholarly knowledge production. As a result, we may come to over- or underestimate changes in scholarly communication based on traditioned but shifting terminology. In this article, we discuss instances of scholarly publishing whose meaning shifted. We showcase the cultural shift that becomes manifest in the new, prolific guest editor. Though the term suggests an established subject, this editorial role crystallizes a new cultural setting of loosened discourse communities and temporal structures, a blurring of publishing genres and, ultimately, the foundations of academic knowledge production.
    Schlagwörter scholarly publishing ; editorship ; knowledge production ; scholarly communities ; publishing platforms ; guest editor ; Bibliography. Library science. Information resources ; Z
    Thema/Rubrik (Code) 070
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Verlag Frontiers Media S.A.
    Dokumenttyp Artikel ; Online
    Datenquelle BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (Lebenswissenschaftliche Auswahl)

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  2. Artikel ; Online: Measuring Scientific Misconduct—Lessons from Criminology

    Felicitas Hesselmann / Verena Wienefoet / Martin Reinhart

    Publications, Vol 2, Iss 3, Pp 61-

    2014  Band 70

    Abstract: This article draws on research traditions and insights from Criminology to elaborate on the problems associated with current practices of measuring scientific misconduct. Analyses of the number of retracted articles are shown to suffer from the fact that ...

    Abstract This article draws on research traditions and insights from Criminology to elaborate on the problems associated with current practices of measuring scientific misconduct. Analyses of the number of retracted articles are shown to suffer from the fact that the distinct processes of misconduct, detection, punishment, and publication of a retraction notice, all contribute to the number of retractions and, hence, will result in biased estimates. Self-report measures, as well as analyses of retractions, are additionally affected by the absence of a consistent definition of misconduct. This problem of definition is addressed further as stemming from a lack of generally valid definitions both on the level of measuring misconduct and on the level of scientific practice itself. Because science is an innovative and ever-changing endeavor, the meaning of misbehavior is permanently shifting and frequently readdressed and renegotiated within the scientific community. Quantitative approaches (i.e., statistics) alone, thus, are hardly able to accurately portray this dynamic phenomenon. It is argued that more research on the different processes and definitions associated with misconduct and its detection and sanctions is needed. The existing quantitative approaches need to be supported by qualitative research better suited to address and uncover processes of negotiation and definition.
    Schlagwörter scientific misconduct ; scientific retractions ; scientific fraud ; criminology ; labeling theory ; methodology ; Bibliography. Library science. Information resources ; Z
    Thema/Rubrik (Code) 170
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2014-07-01T00:00:00Z
    Verlag MDPI AG
    Dokumenttyp Artikel ; Online
    Datenquelle BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (Lebenswissenschaftliche Auswahl)

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

Zum Seitenanfang