LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 2 of total 2

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: The association of frailty with chronic kidney disease in older adults using the ASPirin in reducing events in the elderly cohort.

    Walker, Rowan G / Wolfe, Rory / Bongetti, Elisa / Polkinghorne, Kevan R / Woods, Robyn L / Ryan, Joanne / Espinoza, Sara / Murray, Anne / Ernst, Michael E / Mcneil, John J

    Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.)

    2022  Volume 28, Issue 1, Page(s) 72–77

    Abstract: Frailty and chronic kidney disease (CKD) both increase with age and are prevalent in older adults. However, studies in older adults examining the relationship between frailty and milder impairments of kidney function are relatively sparse. We examined ... ...

    Abstract Frailty and chronic kidney disease (CKD) both increase with age and are prevalent in older adults. However, studies in older adults examining the relationship between frailty and milder impairments of kidney function are relatively sparse. We examined the cross-sectional association of baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), albuminuria and CKD ([eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Aged ; Frailty/diagnosis ; Frailty/epidemiology ; Albuminuria/diagnosis ; Albuminuria/epidemiology ; Aspirin/adverse effects ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Risk Factors
    Chemical Substances Aspirin (R16CO5Y76E)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-10-22
    Publishing country Australia
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1303661-0
    ISSN 1440-1797 ; 1320-5358
    ISSN (online) 1440-1797
    ISSN 1320-5358
    DOI 10.1111/nep.14123
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Are clinicians using routinely collected data to drive practice improvement? A cross-sectional survey.

    Gawthorne, Julie / Fasugba, Oyebola / Levi, Chris / Mcinnes, Elizabeth / Ferguson, Caleb / Mcneil, John J / Cadilhac, Dominique A / Everett, Bronwyn / Fernandez, Ritin / Fry, Margaret / Goldsmith, Helen / Hickman, Louise / Jackson, Deborah / Maguire, Jane / Murray, Edel / Perry, Lin / Middleton, Sandy

    International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care

    2021  Volume 33, Issue 4

    Abstract: Background: Clinical registry participation is a measure of healthcare quality. Limited knowledge exists on Australian hospitals' participation in clinical registries and whether this registry data informs quality improvement initiatives.: Objective: ...

    Abstract Background: Clinical registry participation is a measure of healthcare quality. Limited knowledge exists on Australian hospitals' participation in clinical registries and whether this registry data informs quality improvement initiatives.
    Objective: To identify participation in clinical registries, determine if registry data inform quality improvement initiatives, and identify registry participation enablers and clinicians' educational needs to improve use of registry data to drive practice change.
    Methods: A self-administered survey was distributed to staff coordinating registries in seven hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. Eligible registries were international-, national- and state-based clinical, condition-/disease-specific and device/product registries.
    Results: Response rate was 70% (97/139). Sixty-two (64%) respondents contributed data to 46 eligible registries. Registry reports were most often received by nurses (61%) and infrequently by hospital executives (8.4%). Less than half used registry data 'always' or 'often' to influence practice improvement (48%) and care pathways (49%). Protected time for data collection (87%) and benchmarking (79%) were 'very likely' or 'likely' to promote continued participation. Over half 'strongly agreed' or 'agreed' that clinical practice improvement training (79%) and evidence-practice gap identification (77%) would optimize use of registry data.
    Conclusions: Registry data are generally only visible to local speciality units and not routinely used to inform quality improvement. Centralized on-going registry funding, accessible and transparent integrated information systems combined with data informed improvement science education could be first steps to promote quality data-driven clinical improvement initiatives.
    MeSH term(s) Australia ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Humans ; Quality Improvement ; Registries ; Routinely Collected Health Data ; Surveys and Questionnaires
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-10-06
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1194150-9
    ISSN 1464-3677 ; 1353-4505
    ISSN (online) 1464-3677
    ISSN 1353-4505
    DOI 10.1093/intqhc/mzab141
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top