LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 5 of total 5

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Understanding the impact of alcohol on blood pressure and hypertension: From moderate to excessive drinking.

    Algharably, Engi Abdelhady / Meinert, Fabian / Januszewicz, Andrzej / Kreutz, Reinhold

    Kardiologia polska

    2024  Volume 82, Issue 1, Page(s) 10–18

    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Blood Pressure/physiology ; Hypertension/etiology ; Ethanol ; Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects
    Chemical Substances Ethanol (3K9958V90M)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-01-17
    Publishing country Poland
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 411492-9
    ISSN 1897-4279 ; 0022-9032
    ISSN (online) 1897-4279
    ISSN 0022-9032
    DOI 10.33963/v.kp.98704
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Sex and gender in hypertension guidelines.

    Meinert, Fabian / Thomopoulos, Costas / Kreutz, Reinhold

    Journal of human hypertension

    2023  Volume 37, Issue 8, Page(s) 654–661

    Abstract: This paper reviews 11 current and previous international and some selected national hypertension guidelines regarding sex and gender-related differences. Those differences can be attributed to biological sex and to gender differences that are determined ... ...

    Abstract This paper reviews 11 current and previous international and some selected national hypertension guidelines regarding sex and gender-related differences. Those differences can be attributed to biological sex and to gender differences that are determined by socially constructed norms. All reviewed guidelines agree on a higher hypertension prevalence in men than in women. They also concur that evidence does not support different blood pressure thresholds and targets for treatment between men and women. Differences refer in addition to the differences in epidemiological aspects to differences in some morphometric diagnostic indices, e.g., left ventricular mass or the limits for daily alcohol intake. Concerning practical management, there are hardly any clear statements on different procedures that go beyond the consensus that blockers of the renin-angiotensin system should not be used in women of childbearing age wishing to become pregnant. Some further sex-specific aspects are related to differences in tolerability or drug-specific side effects of BP-lowering drugs. There is also a consensus about the need for blood pressure monitoring before and during the use of contraceptive pills. For management of pregnancy, several guidelines still recommend no active treatment in pregnant women without severe forms of hypertension, despite a wide consensus about the definition of hypertension in pregnancy. A disparity in treatment targets when treating severe and non-severe hypertension in pregnancy is also observed. Overall, sex-specific aspects are only very sparsely considered or documented in the evaluated guidelines highlighting an unmet need for future clinical research on this topic.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Male ; Female ; Hypertension/diagnosis ; Hypertension/drug therapy ; Hypertension/epidemiology ; Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use ; Guidelines as Topic ; Sex Factors ; Blood Pressure
    Chemical Substances Antihypertensive Agents
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-01-10
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 639472-3
    ISSN 1476-5527 ; 0950-9240
    ISSN (online) 1476-5527
    ISSN 0950-9240
    DOI 10.1038/s41371-022-00793-8
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Response to letter to the editor "Should women have lower thresholds for hypertension diagnosis and treatment".

    Meinert, Fabian / Thomopoulos, Costas / Kreutz, Reinhold

    Journal of human hypertension

    2023  Volume 37, Issue 8, Page(s) 755

    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-05-12
    Publishing country England
    Document type Letter ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 639472-3
    ISSN 1476-5527 ; 0950-9240
    ISSN (online) 1476-5527
    ISSN 0950-9240
    DOI 10.1038/s41371-023-00839-5
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Efficacy and quality of life for FOLFOX/bevacizumab +/- irinotecan in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer-final results of the AIO CHARTA trial.

    Schmoll, Hans-Joachim / Mann, Julia / Meinert, Fabian / Garlipp, Benjamin / Borchert, Kersten / Vogel, Arndt / Goekkurt, Eray / Kaiser, Ulrich / Hoeffkes, Heinz-Gert / Rüssel, Jörn / Kanzler, Stephan / Edelmann, Thomas / Forstbauer, Helmut / Göhler, Thomas / Hannig, Carla / Hildebrandt, Bert / Roll, Carsten / Bokemeyer, Carsten / Steighardt, Jörg /
    Cygon, Franziska / Ibach, Stefan / Stein, Alexander / Tintelnot, Joseph

    British journal of cancer

    2023  Volume 130, Issue 2, Page(s) 233–241

    Abstract: Background: FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab has demonstrated benefits for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, challenges arise in its clinical implementation due to expected side effects and a lack of stratification criteria.: Methods: ... ...

    Abstract Background: FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab has demonstrated benefits for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, challenges arise in its clinical implementation due to expected side effects and a lack of stratification criteria.
    Methods: The AIO "CHARTA" trial randomised mCRC patients into clinical Group 1 (potentially resectable), 2 (unresectable/risk of rapid progression), or 3 (asymptomatic). They received FOLFOX/bevacizumab +/- irinotecan. The primary endpoint was the 9-month progression-free survival rate (PFSR@9). Secondary endpoints included efficacy in stratified groups, QoL, PFS, OS, ORR, secondary resection rate, and toxicity.
    Results: The addition of irinotecan to FOLFOX/bevacizumab increased PFSR@9 from 56 to 67%, meeting the primary endpoint. The objective response rate was 61% vs. 69% (P = 0.21) and median PFS was 10.3 vs. 12 months (HR 0.83; P = 0.17). The PFS was (11.4 vs. 12.9 months; HR 0.83; P = 0.46) in potentially resectable patients, with a secondary resection rate of 37% vs. 51%. Moreover, Group 3 (asymptomatic) patients had a PFS of 11.1 vs. 16.1 months (HR 0.6; P = 0.14). The addition of irinotecan did not diminish QoL.
    Conclusion: The CHARTA trial, along with other studies, confirms the efficacy and tolerability of FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for mCRC. Importantly, clinical stratification may lead to its implementation.
    Trial registration: The trial was registered as NCT01321957.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use ; Bevacizumab/therapeutic use ; Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy ; Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology ; Irinotecan/therapeutic use ; Quality of Life ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
    Chemical Substances Bevacizumab (2S9ZZM9Q9V) ; Irinotecan (7673326042)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-11-23
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 80075-2
    ISSN 1532-1827 ; 0007-0920
    ISSN (online) 1532-1827
    ISSN 0007-0920
    DOI 10.1038/s41416-023-02496-4
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Efficacy of Pazopanib With or Without Gemcitabine in Patients With Anthracycline- and/or Ifosfamide-Refractory Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Final Results of the PAPAGEMO Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Schmoll, Hans-Joachim / Lindner, Lars H / Reichardt, Peter / Heißner, Klaus / Kopp, Hans-Georg / Kessler, Torsten / Mayer-Steinacker, Regine / Rüssel, Jörn / Egerer, Gerlinde / Crysandt, Martina / Kasper, Bernd / Niederwieser, Dietger / Kunitz, Annegret / Eigendorff, Ekkehard / Petersen, Iver / Steighardt, Jörg / Cygon, Franziska / Meinert, Fabian / Stein, Alexander

    JAMA oncology

    2020  Volume 7, Issue 2, Page(s) 255–262

    Abstract: Importance: Pazopanib and gemcitabine have shown good tolerability, albeit modest single-agent activity in pretreated soft tissue sarcoma. A combined regimen to improve outcomes is required.: Objective: To determine the efficacy of gemcitabine and ... ...

    Abstract Importance: Pazopanib and gemcitabine have shown good tolerability, albeit modest single-agent activity in pretreated soft tissue sarcoma. A combined regimen to improve outcomes is required.
    Objective: To determine the efficacy of gemcitabine and pazopanib compared with pazopanib alone.
    Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter, randomized phase 2 clinical trial was conducted in Germany from September 2011 to July 2014 and included patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 to 2, adequate organ function, measurable lesion, and progression after at least 1 prior treatment with anthracyclines and/or ifosfamide. Data analysis was performed during 2019 and 2020.
    Interventions: Patients were randomized to pazopanib with gemcitabine (A) or without gemcitabine (B).
    Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was progression-free survival rate (PFSR) at 12 weeks; secondary end points included toxicity, quality of life, overall survival, and response rates.
    Results: A total of 90 patients were randomized, and 86 eligible patients (43 women [50%]) were evaluable, with a median age of 57 (range, 22-84) years and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0/1 in 77 participants (90%). The predominant histological subtypes were leiomyosarcoma (22 [26%]) and liposarcoma (16 [19%]). After a median follow-up of 12.4 (range, 1-48) months, the primary end point was met, with a PFSR at 12 weeks of 74% (A) vs 47% (B) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.60; 90% CI, 1.15-2.23; P = .01). In the combination arm, PFSR was significantly longer, with a median of 5.6 vs 2.0 months (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36-0.92; P = .02) compared with single-agent pazopanib, whereas overall survival was similar, with 13.1 vs 11.2 months (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.60-1.58; P = .83). The objective response rate was overall low, with 11% (A) vs 5% (B) (P = .10). The toxicity of the combination of pazopanib and gemcitabine was increased, but it was manageable and mainly hematological.
    Conclusions and relevance: This phase 2 randomized clinical trial of patients with soft tissue sarcoma found that the addition of gemcitabine to pazopanib was tolerable, and PFSR at 12 weeks was significantly higher compared with pazopanib alone. These results suggest clinical activity of the combination, but they should be confirmed in a phase 3 trial in a more homogeneous population (eg, leiomyosarcoma).
    Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Identifier: DRKS00003139.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anthracyclines/therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects ; Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives ; Female ; Humans ; Ifosfamide/adverse effects ; Indazoles ; Middle Aged ; Pyrimidines ; Quality of Life ; Sarcoma/drug therapy ; Sulfonamides ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult
    Chemical Substances Anthracyclines ; Indazoles ; Pyrimidines ; Sulfonamides ; Deoxycytidine (0W860991D6) ; pazopanib (7RN5DR86CK) ; gemcitabine (B76N6SBZ8R) ; Ifosfamide (UM20QQM95Y)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-12-28
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Clinical Trial, Phase II ; Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Randomized Controlled Trial
    ISSN 2374-2445
    ISSN (online) 2374-2445
    DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6564
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top