LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 3 of total 3

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Developing the POTOMAC Model: A Novel Prediction Model to Study the Impact of Lymphopenia Kinetics on Survival Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer Via an Ensemble Tree-Based Machine Learning Approach.

    Kut, Carmen / Midthune, Doug / Lee, Emerson / Fair, Peyton / Cheunkarndee, Tia / McNutt, Todd / DeWeese, Theodore / Fakhry, Carole / Kipnis, Victor / Quon, Harry

    JCO clinical cancer informatics

    2023  Volume 7, Page(s) e2300058

    Abstract: Purpose: Lymphopenia is associated with poor survival outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), yet there is no consensus on whether we should limit lymphopenia risks during treatment. To fully elucidate the prognostic role of baseline ... ...

    Abstract Purpose: Lymphopenia is associated with poor survival outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), yet there is no consensus on whether we should limit lymphopenia risks during treatment. To fully elucidate the prognostic role of baseline versus treatment-related lymphopenia, a robust analysis is necessary to investigate the relative importance of various lymphopenia metrics (LMs) in predicting survival outcomes.
    Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 363 patients were eligible for analysis (patients with newly diagnosed, nonmetastatic HNSCC treated with neck radiation with or without chemotherapy in 2015-2019). Data were acquired on 28 covariates: seven baseline, five disease, seven treatment, and nine LMs, including static and time-varying features for absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and immature granulocytes (IGs). IGs were included, given their hypothesized role in inhibiting lymphocyte function. Overall, there were 4.0% missing data. Median follow-up was 2.9 years. We developed a model (POTOMAC) to predict survival outcomes using a random survival forest (RSF) procedure. RSF uses an ensemble approach to reduce the risk of overfitting and provides internal validation of the model using data that are not used in model development. The ability to predict survival risk was assessed using the AUC for the predicted risk score.
    Results: POTOMAC predicted 2-year survival with AUCs at 0.78 for overall survival (primary end point) and 0.73 for progression-free survival (secondary end point). Top modifiable risk factors included radiation dose and max ALC decrease. Top baseline risk factors included age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Karnofsky Performance Score, and baseline IGs. Top-ranking LMs had superior prognostic performance when compared with human papillomavirus status, chemotherapy type, and dose (up to 2, 8, and 65 times higher in variable importance score).
    Conclusion: POTOMAC provides important insights into potential approaches to reduce mortality in patients with HNSCC treated by chemoradiation but needs to be validated in future studies.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy ; Prospective Studies ; Lymphopenia/etiology ; Lymphopenia/diagnosis ; Lymphocyte Count ; Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnosis ; Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy ; Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-12-14
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2473-4276
    ISSN (online) 2473-4276
    DOI 10.1200/CCI.23.00058
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article: Social Desirability Trait Influences on Self-Reported Dietary Measures among Diverse Participants in a Multicenter Multiple Risk Factor Trial

    Hebert, James R / Hurley, Thomas G / Peterson, Karen E / Resnicow, Ken / Thompson, Frances E / Yaroch, Amy L / Ehlers, Margaret / Midthune, Doug / Williams, Geoffrey C / Greene, Geoffrey W / Nebeling, Linda

    Journal of nutrition. 2008 Jan., v. 138, no. 1

    2008  

    Abstract: Data collected at 4 Behavioral Change Consortium sites were used to assess social desirability bias in self-reports derived from a dietary fat screener (PFat), a dietary fruit and vegetable screener (FVS), and a 1-item question on fruit and vegetable ... ...

    Abstract Data collected at 4 Behavioral Change Consortium sites were used to assess social desirability bias in self-reports derived from a dietary fat screener (PFat), a dietary fruit and vegetable screener (FVS), and a 1-item question on fruit and vegetable intake. Comparisons were made with mean intakes derived from up to 3 24-h recall interviews at baseline and follow-up (at 12 mo in 3 sites, 6 mo in the fourth). A social-desirability-related underestimate in fat intake on the PFat relative to the 24HR (percentage energy as fat) was evident in women [baseline b = -0.56 (P = 0.005); follow-up b = -0.62 (P < 0.001)]. There was an overestimate in FVS-derived fruit and vegetable consumption (servings/week) in men enrolled in any intervention at follow-up (b = 0.39, P = 0.05) vs. baseline (b = 0.04, P = 0.75). The 1-item fruit and vegetable question was associated with an overestimate at baseline in men according to SD score (b = 0.14, P = 0.02), especially men with less than college education (b = 0.23, P = 0.01). Women with less than college education expressed a similar bias at follow-up (b = 0.13, P = 0.02). Differences in the magnitude of bias according to gender, type of instrument used, and randomization condition are comparable to what has been seen for other instruments and have important implications for both measuring change in studies of diet and health outcomes and for developing methods to control for such biases.
    Keywords behavior change ; screening ; adults ; fruits (food) ; vegetables ; validity ; risk factors ; nutritional intervention ; diet recall ; psychosocial factors ; men ; women ; gender differences
    Language English
    Dates of publication 2008-01
    Size p. 226S-234S.
    Publishing place American Society for Nutrition
    Document type Article
    Note In the special section: The importance of calcium, potassium, and acid-base homeostasis in bone health and osteoporosis prevention / edited by F.A. Tylavsky, L.A. Spence, and L. Harkness.
    ZDB-ID 218373-0
    ISSN 1541-6100 ; 0022-3166
    ISSN (online) 1541-6100
    ISSN 0022-3166
    Database NAL-Catalogue (AGRICOLA)

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Social desirability trait influences on self-reported dietary measures among diverse participants in a multicenter multiple risk factor trial.

    Hebert, James R / Hurley, Thomas G / Peterson, Karen E / Resnicow, Ken / Thompson, Frances E / Yaroch, Amy L / Ehlers, Margaret / Midthune, Doug / Williams, Geoffrey C / Greene, Geoffrey W / Nebeling, Linda

    The Journal of nutrition

    2007  Volume 138, Issue 1, Page(s) 226S–234S

    Abstract: Data collected at 4 Behavioral Change Consortium sites were used to assess social desirability bias in self-reports derived from a dietary fat screener (PFat), a dietary fruit and vegetable screener (FVS), and a 1-item question on fruit and vegetable ... ...

    Abstract Data collected at 4 Behavioral Change Consortium sites were used to assess social desirability bias in self-reports derived from a dietary fat screener (PFat), a dietary fruit and vegetable screener (FVS), and a 1-item question on fruit and vegetable intake. Comparisons were made with mean intakes derived from up to 3 24-h recall interviews at baseline and follow-up (at 12 mo in 3 sites, 6 mo in the fourth). A social-desirability-related underestimate in fat intake on the PFat relative to the 24HR (percentage energy as fat) was evident in women [baseline b = -0.56 (P = 0.005); follow-up b = -0.62 (P < 0.001)]. There was an overestimate in FVS-derived fruit and vegetable consumption (servings/week) in men enrolled in any intervention at follow-up (b = 0.39, P = 0.05) vs. baseline (b = 0.04, P = 0.75). The 1-item fruit and vegetable question was associated with an overestimate at baseline in men according to SD score (b = 0.14, P = 0.02), especially men with less than college education (b = 0.23, P = 0.01). Women with less than college education expressed a similar bias at follow-up (b = 0.13, P = 0.02). Differences in the magnitude of bias according to gender, type of instrument used, and randomization condition are comparable to what has been seen for other instruments and have important implications for both measuring change in studies of diet and health outcomes and for developing methods to control for such biases.
    MeSH term(s) Adolescent ; Adult ; Bias ; Diet ; Dietary Fats ; Energy Intake ; Feeding Behavior ; Female ; Fruit ; Humans ; Male ; Mental Recall ; Middle Aged ; Risk Factors ; Social Desirability ; Vegetables
    Chemical Substances Dietary Fats
    Language English
    Publishing date 2007-12-03
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
    ZDB-ID 218373-0
    ISSN 1541-6100 ; 0022-3166
    ISSN (online) 1541-6100
    ISSN 0022-3166
    DOI 10.1093/jn/138.1.226S
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top