Article ; Online: Editorial Commentary: Two-Year Follow-Up Is Too Short to Determine the Effectiveness of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Repair.
2024 Volume 40, Issue 3, Page(s) 868
Abstract: Although recent studies have shown good results of anterior cruciate ligament primary repair at 2-year follow-up, one must be careful in adopting this technique. Historically, the classic study from West Point showed repair fails at 5 years. Perhaps ... ...
Abstract | Although recent studies have shown good results of anterior cruciate ligament primary repair at 2-year follow-up, one must be careful in adopting this technique. Historically, the classic study from West Point showed repair fails at 5 years. Perhaps future results will be improved with scaffolds, augmentation, or biologics. Only time will tell. For now, what's the (West) Point? |
---|---|
MeSH term(s) | Humans ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods |
Language | English |
Publishing date | 2024-01-11 |
Publishing country | United States |
Document type | Editorial ; Comment |
ZDB-ID | 632528-2 |
ISSN | 1526-3231 ; 0749-8063 |
ISSN (online) | 1526-3231 |
ISSN | 0749-8063 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.10.045 |
Database | MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE |
More links
Kategorien
In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter
Zs.A 2046: Show issues | Location: Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand) bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (1.OG) ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG) |
Order via subito
This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.