LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 8 of total 8

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Acceptability of 'as needed' biologic therapy in psoriasis: insights from a multi-stakeholder mixed methods study.

    Gleeson, David / Naveed, Maneeha / Moorhead, Lucy / McAteer, Helen / Sewell, Georgia / McGuire, Arlene / Weinman, John / Barker, Jonathan N W N / Norton, Sam / Chapman, Sarah C E / Smith, Catherine H / Mahil, Satveer K

    The British journal of dermatology

    2024  

    Abstract: Objectives: Biologic therapies have led to increasing numbers of patients with psoriasis who have clear or nearly clear skin. Current practice is that biologic therapy is continued indefinitely in these patients, contributing to a substantial long-term ... ...

    Abstract Objectives: Biologic therapies have led to increasing numbers of patients with psoriasis who have clear or nearly clear skin. Current practice is that biologic therapy is continued indefinitely in these patients, contributing to a substantial long-term drug and healthcare burden. 'As needed' biologic therapy in psoriasis may address this, however our understanding of patient and clinician perceptions of this strategy is limited.
    Methods: We first conducted UK-wide online scoping surveys of patients with psoriasis and dermatology clinicians to explore their views on 'as needed' biologic therapy. Using topic guides informed by these survey findings, we then carried out qualitative focus groups with patients and clinicians. Themes were identified using reflexive thematic analysis.
    Results: Of 67 patients and 27 clinicians completing the scoping surveys, 67% (43/64) and 78% (21/27), respectively, supported the use of 'as needed' biologic therapy. Respondents highlighted advantages such as a reduction in healthcare burden and greater ownership of care. Challenges included logistics of 'as needed' drug provision and potential risks of disease flare and drug immunogenicity. Focus groups comprised 15 patients with psoriasis (9 female [60%], average disease duration 32 years [range 9-64 years]) and 9 dermatology clinicians (8 female [89%], average dermatology experience 20 years [range 8-33 years]). Both patients and clinicians felt that an 'as needed' treatment approach will deliver a reduction in treatment burden and present an opportunity for patient-led ownership of care. Both groups highlighted the importance of ensuring ongoing access to medication and discussing the potential impact of psoriasis recurrence. Patient preferences were influenced by their lived experiences, particularly previous difficulties with medication delivery logistics and establishing disease control. Clinician perspectives were informed by personal experience of their patients adapting their own dosing schedules. Clinicians highlighted the importance of targeted patient selection for an 'as needed' approach, ongoing disease monitoring, and prompt re-access to medications upon psoriasis recurrence.
    Conclusion: These data indicate that 'as needed' biologic therapy in psoriasis is acceptable for both patients and clinicians. Formal assessment of clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness is warranted, to enable the real-world potential of this approach to be realised.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-02-17
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 80076-4
    ISSN 1365-2133 ; 0007-0963
    ISSN (online) 1365-2133
    ISSN 0007-0963
    DOI 10.1093/bjd/ljae068
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Nonadherence to systemic immune-modifying therapy in people with psoriasis during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from a global cross-sectional survey.

    Quirke-McFarlane, Sophia / Weinman, John / Cook, Emma S / Yiu, Zenas Z N / Dand, Nick / Langan, Sinead M / Bechman, Katie / Tsakok, Teresa / Mason, Kayleigh J / McAteer, Helen / Meynell, Freya / Coker, Bolaji / Vincent, Alexandra / Urmston, Dominic / Vesty, Amber / Kelly, Jade / Lancelot, Camille / Moorhead, Lucy / Barbosa, Ines A /
    Bachelez, Herve / Capon, Francesca / Contreras, Claudia R / De La Cruz, Claudia / Di Meglio, Paola / Gisondi, Paolo / Jullien, Denis / Lambert, Jo / Naldi, Luigi / Puig, Lluís / Spuls, Phyllis / Torres, Tiago / Warren, Richard B / Waweru, Hoseah / Galloway, James B / Griffiths, Christopher E M / Barker, Jonathan N / Norton, Sam / Smith, Catherine H / Mahil, Satveer K

    The British journal of dermatology

    2023  Volume 188, Issue 5, Page(s) 610–617

    Abstract: Background: Nonadherence to immune-modifying therapy is a complex behaviour which, before the COVID-19 pandemic, was shown to be associated with mental health disorders in people with immune-mediated diseases. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a rise in ... ...

    Abstract Background: Nonadherence to immune-modifying therapy is a complex behaviour which, before the COVID-19 pandemic, was shown to be associated with mental health disorders in people with immune-mediated diseases. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a rise in the global prevalence of anxiety and depression, and limited data exist on the association between mental health and nonadherence to immune-modifying therapy during the pandemic.
    Objectives: To assess the extent of and reasons underlying nonadherence to systemic immune-modifying therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic in individuals with psoriasis, and the association between mental health and nonadherence.
    Methods: Online self-report surveys (PsoProtectMe), including validated screens for anxiety and depression, were completed globally during the first year of the pandemic. We assessed the association between anxiety or depression and nonadherence to systemic immune-modifying therapy using binomial logistic regression, adjusting for potential cofounders (age, sex, ethnicity, comorbidity) and country of residence.
    Results: Of 3980 participants from 77 countries, 1611 (40.5%) were prescribed a systemic immune-modifying therapy. Of these, 408 (25.3%) reported nonadherence during the pandemic, most commonly due to concerns about their immunity. In the unadjusted model, a positive anxiety screen was associated with nonadherence to systemic immune-modifying therapy [odds ratio (OR) 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.76]. Specifically, anxiety was associated with nonadherence to targeted therapy (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01-1.96) but not standard systemic therapy (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.81-1.67). In the adjusted model, although the directions of the effects remained, anxiety was not significantly associated with nonadherence to overall systemic (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.92-1.56) or targeted (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.94-1.89) immune-modifying therapy. A positive depression screen was not strongly associated with nonadherence to systemic immune-modifying therapy in the unadjusted (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.94-1.57) or adjusted models (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.87-1.49).
    Conclusions: These data indicate substantial nonadherence to immune-modifying therapy in people with psoriasis during the pandemic, with attenuation of the association with mental health after adjusting for confounders. Future research in larger populations should further explore pandemic-specific drivers of treatment nonadherence. Clear communication of the reassuring findings from population-based research regarding immune-modifying therapy-associated adverse COVID-19 risks to people with psoriasis is essential, to optimize adherence and disease outcomes.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; COVID-19/epidemiology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Pandemics ; Anxiety/epidemiology ; Anxiety/psychology ; Psoriasis/drug therapy ; Psoriasis/epidemiology ; Depression/epidemiology
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-02-10
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 80076-4
    ISSN 1365-2133 ; 0007-0963
    ISSN (online) 1365-2133
    ISSN 0007-0963
    DOI 10.1093/bjd/ljac144
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Vaccine hesitancy and access to psoriasis care during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from a global patient-reported cross-sectional survey.

    Bechman, Katie / Cook, Emma S / Dand, Nick / Yiu, Zenas Z N / Tsakok, Teresa / Meynell, Freya / Coker, Bolaji / Vincent, Alexandra / Bachelez, Herve / Barbosa, Ines / Brown, Matthew A / Capon, Francesca / Contreras, Claudia R / De La Cruz, Claudia / Meglio, Paola Di / Gisondi, Paolo / Jullien, Denis / Kelly, Jade / Lambert, Jo /
    Lancelot, Camille / Langan, Sinead M / Mason, Kayleigh J / McAteer, Helen / Moorhead, Lucy / Naldi, Luigi / Norton, Sam / Puig, Lluís / Spuls, Phyllis I / Torres, Tiago / Urmston, Dominic / Vesty, Amber / Warren, Richard B / Waweru, Hoseah / Weinman, John / Griffiths, Christopher E M / Barker, Jonathan N / Smith, Catherine H / Galloway, James B / Mahil, Satveer K

    The British journal of dermatology

    2022  Volume 187, Issue 2, Page(s) 254–256

    MeSH term(s) COVID-19/prevention & control ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Humans ; Pandemics ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Psoriasis/drug therapy ; Vaccination ; Vaccination Hesitancy
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-05-03
    Publishing country England
    Document type Letter
    ZDB-ID 80076-4
    ISSN 1365-2133 ; 0007-0963
    ISSN (online) 1365-2133
    ISSN 0007-0963
    DOI 10.1111/bjd.21042
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Factors associated with adverse COVID-19 outcomes in patients with psoriasis-insights from a global registry-based study.

    Mahil, Satveer K / Dand, Nick / Mason, Kayleigh J / Yiu, Zenas Z N / Tsakok, Teresa / Meynell, Freya / Coker, Bola / McAteer, Helen / Moorhead, Lucy / Mackenzie, Teena / Rossi, Maria Teresa / Rivera, Raquel / Mahe, Emmanuel / Carugno, Andrea / Magnano, Michela / Rech, Giulia / Balogh, Esther A / Feldman, Steven R / De La Cruz, Claudia /
    Choon, Siew Eng / Naldi, Luigi / Lambert, Jo / Spuls, Phyllis / Jullien, Denis / Bachelez, Hervé / McMahon, Devon E / Freeman, Esther E / Gisondi, Paolo / Puig, Luis / Warren, Richard B / Di Meglio, Paola / Langan, Sinéad M / Capon, Francesca / Griffiths, Christopher E M / Barker, Jonathan N / Smith, Catherine H

    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology

    2020  Volume 147, Issue 1, Page(s) 60–71

    Abstract: Background: The multimorbid burden and use of systemic immunosuppressants in people with psoriasis may confer greater risk of adverse outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but the data are limited.: Objective: Our aim was to characterize ... ...

    Abstract Background: The multimorbid burden and use of systemic immunosuppressants in people with psoriasis may confer greater risk of adverse outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but the data are limited.
    Objective: Our aim was to characterize the course of COVID-19 in patients with psoriasis and identify factors associated with hospitalization.
    Methods: Clinicians reported patients with psoriasis with confirmed/suspected COVID-19 via an international registry, Psoriasis Patient Registry for Outcomes, Therapy and Epidemiology of COVID-19 Infection. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the association between clinical and/or demographic characteristics and hospitalization. A separate patient-facing registry characterized risk-mitigating behaviors.
    Results: Of 374 clinician-reported patients from 25 countries, 71% were receiving a biologic, 18% were receiving a nonbiologic, and 10% were not receiving any systemic treatment for psoriasis. In all, 348 patients (93%) were fully recovered from COVID-19, 77 (21%) were hospitalized, and 9 (2%) died. Increased hospitalization risk was associated with older age (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.59 per 10 years; 95% CI = 1.19-2.13), male sex (OR = 2.51; 95% CI = 1.23-5.12), nonwhite ethnicity (OR = 3.15; 95% CI = 1.24-8.03), and comorbid chronic lung disease (OR = 3.87; 95% CI = 1.52-9.83). Hospitalization was more frequent in patients using nonbiologic systemic therapy than in those using biologics (OR = 2.84; 95% CI = 1.31-6.18). No significant differences were found between classes of biologics. Independent patient-reported data (n = 1626 across 48 countries) suggested lower levels of social isolation in individuals receiving nonbiologic systemic therapy than in those receiving biologics (OR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.50-0.94).
    Conclusion: In this international case series of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, biologic use was associated with lower risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization than with use of nonbiologic systemic therapies; however, further investigation is warranted on account of potential selection bias and unmeasured confounding. Established risk factors (being older, being male, being of nonwhite ethnicity, and having comorbidities) were associated with higher hospitalization rates.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Age Factors ; COVID-19/mortality ; COVID-19/therapy ; Female ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Psoriasis/mortality ; Psoriasis/therapy ; Registries ; Risk Factors ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Sex Factors
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-10-16
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Clinical Trial ; Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 121011-7
    ISSN 1097-6825 ; 1085-8725 ; 0091-6749
    ISSN (online) 1097-6825 ; 1085-8725
    ISSN 0091-6749
    DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.10.007
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Describing the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic in people with psoriasis: findings from a global cross-sectional study

    Mahil, Satveer K / Yates, Mark / Yiu, Zenas Z / Langan, Sinead M / Tsakok, Teresa / Dand, Nick / Mason, Kayleigh J / McAteer, Helen / Meynall, Freya / Coker, Bolaji / Vincent, Alexandra / Urmston, Dominic / Vesty, Amber / Kelly, Jade / Lancelot, Camille / Moorhead, Lucy / Bachelez, Herve / Capon, Francesca / Contreras, Claudia R /
    De La Cruz, Claudia / Di Meglio, Paola / Gisondi, Paolo / Jullien, Denis / Lambert, Jo / Naldi, Luigi / Norton, Sam / Puig, Luis / Spuls, Phyllis / Torres, Tiago / Warren, Richard B / Waweru, Hoseah / Weinman, John / Brown, Matt A / Galloway, James B / Griffiths, Christopher M / Barker, Jonathan N / Smith, Catherine H

    medRxiv

    Abstract: Background Indirect excess morbidity has emerged as a major concern in the COVID-19 pandemic. People with psoriasis may be particularly vulnerable to this because of prevalent anxiety and depression, multimorbidity and therapeutic use of ... ...

    Abstract Background Indirect excess morbidity has emerged as a major concern in the COVID-19 pandemic. People with psoriasis may be particularly vulnerable to this because of prevalent anxiety and depression, multimorbidity and therapeutic use of immunosuppression. Objective Characterise the factors associated with worsening psoriasis in the COVID-19 pandemic, using mental health status (anxiety and depression) as the main exposure of interest. Methods Global cross-sectional study using a primary outcome of self-reported worsening of psoriasis. Individuals with psoriasis completed an online self-report questionnaire (PsoProtectMe; Psoriasis Patient Registry for Outcomes, Therapy and Epidemiology of COVID-19 Infection Me) between May 2020 and January 2021. Each individual completed a validated screen for anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2) and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-2). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression. Results 4,043 people with psoriasis (without COVID-19) from 86 countries self-reported to PsoProtectMe (mean age 47.2 years [SD 15.1]; mean BMI 27.6kg/m2 [SD 6.0], 2,684 [66.4%] female and 3,016 [74.6%] of white European ethnicity). 1,728 (42.7%) participants (1322 [77%] female) reported worsening of their psoriasis in the pandemic. A positive screen for anxiety or depression associated with worsening psoriasis in age and gender adjusted (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.77-2.36), and fully adjusted (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.72-2.34) logistic regression models. Female sex, obesity, shielding behaviour and systemic immunosuppressant non-adherence also associated with worsening psoriasis. The commonest reason for non-adherence was concern regarding complications related to COVID-19. Conclusions These data indicate an association between poor mental health and worsening psoriasis in the pandemic. Access to holistic care including psychological support may mitigate potentially long-lasting effects of the pandemic on health outcomes in psoriasis. The study also highlights an urgent need to address patient concerns about immunosuppressant-related risks, which may be contributing to non-adherence.
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-05-06
    Publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    Document type Article ; Online
    DOI 10.1101/2021.05.04.21256507
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  6. Article: Factors associated with adverse COVID-19 outcomes in patients with psoriasis - insights from a global registry-based study

    Mahil, Satveer K / Dand, Nick / Mason, Kayleigh J / Yiu, Zenas Zn / Tsakok, Teresa / Meynell, Freya / Coker, Bola / McAteer, Helen / Moorhead, Lucy / Mackenzie, Teena / Rossi, Maria Teresa / Rivera, Raquel / Mahe, Emmanuel / Carugno, Andrea / Magnano, Michela / Rech, Giulia / Balogh, Esther A / Feldman, Steven R / De La Cruz, Claudia /
    Choon, Siew Eng / Naldi, Luigi / Lambert, Jo / Spuls, Phyllis / Jullien, Denis / Bachelez, Hervé / McMahon, Devon E / Freeman, Esther E / Gisondi, Paolo / Puig, Luis / Warren, Richard B / Di Meglio, Paola / Langan, Sinéad M / Capon, Francesca / Griffiths, Christopher Em / Barker, Jonathan N / Smith, Catherine H

    J. allergy clin. immunol

    Abstract: BACKGROUND: The multi-morbid burden and use of systemic immunosuppressants in people with psoriasis may confer greater risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes but data are limited. OBJECTIVE: Characterize the course of COVID-19 in psoriasis and identify ... ...

    Abstract BACKGROUND: The multi-morbid burden and use of systemic immunosuppressants in people with psoriasis may confer greater risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes but data are limited. OBJECTIVE: Characterize the course of COVID-19 in psoriasis and identify factors associated with hospitalization. METHODS: Clinicians reported psoriasis patients with confirmed/suspected COVID-19 via an international registry, PsoProtect. Multiple logistic regression assessed the association between clinical/demographic characteristics and hospitalization. A separate patient-facing registry characterized risk-mitigating behaviours. RESULTS: Of 374 clinician-reported patients from 25 countries, 71% were receiving a biologic, 18% a non-biologic and 10% no systemic treatment for psoriasis. 348 (93%) fully recovered from COVID-19, 77 (21%) were hospitalized and nine (2%) died. Increased hospitalization risk was associated with older age (multivariable-adjusted OR 1.59 per 10 years, 95% CI 1.19-2.13), male sex (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.23-5.12), non-white ethnicity (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.24-8.03) and comorbid chronic lung disease (OR 3.87, 95% CI 1.52-9.83). Hospitalization was more frequent in patients using non-biologic systemic therapy than biologics (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.31-6.18). No significant differences were found between biologic classes. Independent patient-reported data (n=1,626 across 48 countries) suggested lower levels of social isolation in individuals receiving non-biologic systemic therapy compared to biologics (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50-0.94). CONCLUSION: In this international moderate-severe psoriasis case series, biologics use was associated with lower risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization than non-biologic systemic therapies, however further investigation is warranted due to potential selection bias and unmeasured confounding. Established risk factors (being older, male, non-white ethnicity, comorbidities) were associated with higher hospitalization rates. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: We identify risk factors for COVID-19-related hospitalization in psoriasis patients, including older age, male sex, non-white ethnicity and comorbidities. Use of biologics was associated with lower hospitalization risk than non-biologic systemic therapies.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #866801
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Risk mitigating behaviours in people with inflammatory joint and skin disease during the COVID-19 pandemic differ by treatment type: a cross-sectional patient survey

    Mahil, Satveer K / Yates, Mark / Langan, Sinead M / Yiu, Zenas ZN / Tsakok, Teresa / Dand, Nick / Mason, Kayleigh J / McAteer, Helen / Meynall, Freya / Coker, Bolaji / Vincent, Alexandra / Urmston, Dominic / Vesty, Amber / Kelly, Jade / Lancelot, Camille / Moorhead, Lucy / Bachelez, Herve / Bruce, Ian N / Capon, Francesca /
    Contreras, Claudia Romina / Cope, Andrew P / De La Cruz, Claudia / Di Meglio, Paola / Gisondi, Paolo / Hyrich, Kimme / Jullien, Denis / Lambert, Jo / Waweru, Hoseah / Marzo-Ortega, Helena / McInnes, Iain / Naldi, Luigi / Norton, Sam / Puig, Lluis / Spuls, Phyllis / Sengupta, Raj / Torres, Tiago / Warren, RIchard B / Weinman, John / Griffiths, Christopher EM / Barker, Jonathan N / Brown, Matthew A / Galloway, James B / Smith, Catherine H

    medRxiv

    Abstract: Objectives Registry data suggest that people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) receiving targeted systemic therapies have fewer adverse COVID-19 outcomes compared to patients receiving no systemic treatments. We used international ... ...

    Abstract Objectives Registry data suggest that people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) receiving targeted systemic therapies have fewer adverse COVID-19 outcomes compared to patients receiving no systemic treatments. We used international patient survey data to explore the hypothesis that greater risk-mitigating behaviour in those receiving targeted therapies may account, at least in part, for this observation. Methods Online surveys were completed by individuals with Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (RMD) (UK only) or psoriasis (globally) between 4th May and 7th September 2020. We used multiple logistic regression to assess the association between treatment type and risk-mitigating behaviour, adjusting for clinical and demographic characteristics. We characterised international variation in a mixed effects model. Results Of 3,720 participants (2,869 psoriasis, 851 RMD) from 74 countries, 2,262 (60.8%) reported the most stringent risk-mitigating behaviour (classified here under the umbrella term shielding). A greater proportion of those receiving targeted therapies (biologics and JAK inhibitors) reported shielding compared to those receiving no systemic therapy (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.63, 95% CI 1.35-1.97) and standard systemic agents (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.22-1.56). Shielding was associated with established risk factors for severe COVID-19 (male sex [OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.05-1.24], obesity [OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.23-1.54], comorbidity burden [OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.15-1.78]), a primary indication of RMD (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.27-1.48) and a positive anxiety or depression screen (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.36-1.80). Modest differences in the proportion shielding were observed across nations. Conclusions Greater risk-mitigating behaviour among people with IMIDs receiving targeted therapies may contribute to the reported lower risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes. The behaviour variation across treatment groups, IMIDs and nations reinforces the need for clear evidence-based patient communication on risk mitigation strategies and may help inform updated public health guidelines as the pandemic continues.
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-11-07
    Publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    Document type Article ; Online
    DOI 10.1101/2020.11.05.20226662
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Factors associated with adverse COVID-19 outcomes in patients with psoriasis – insights from a global registry-based study

    Mahil, Satveer K. / Dand, Nick / Mason, Kayleigh J. / Yiu, Zenas ZN. / Tsakok, Teresa / Meynell, Freya / Coker, Bola / McAteer, Helen / Moorhead, Lucy / Mackenzie, Teena / Rossi, Maria Teresa / Rivera, Raquel / Mahe, Emmanuel / Carugno, Andrea / Magnano, Michela / Rech, Giulia / Balogh, Esther A. / Feldman, Steven R. / De La Cruz, Claudia /
    Choon, Siew Eng / Naldi, Luigi / Lambert, Jo / Spuls, Phyllis / Jullien, Denis / Bachelez, Hervé / McMahon, Devon E. / Freeman, Esther E. / Gisondi, Paolo / Puig, Luis / Warren, Richard B. / Di Meglio, Paola / Langan, Sinéad M. / Capon, Francesca / Griffiths, Christopher EM. / Barker, Jonathan N. / Smith, Catherine H.

    Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology ; ISSN 0091-6749

    2020  

    Keywords Immunology ; Immunology and Allergy ; covid19
    Language English
    Publisher Elsevier BV
    Publishing country us
    Document type Article ; Online
    DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.10.007
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top