LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 1 of total 1

Search options

Article ; Online: A randomized clinical trial comparing early active motion programs: Earlier hand function, TAM, and orthotic satisfaction with a relative motion extension program for zones V and VI extensor tendon repairs.

Collocott, Shirley J F / Kelly, Edel / Foster, Michael / Myhr, Heidi / Wang, Amy / Ellis, Richard F

Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists

2019  Volume 33, Issue 1, Page(s) 13–24

Abstract: Study design: Randomized clinical trial with parallel groups.: Introduction: Early active mobilization programs are used after zones V and VI extensor tendon repairs; two programs used are relative motion extension (RME) orthosis and controlled ... ...

Abstract Study design: Randomized clinical trial with parallel groups.
Introduction: Early active mobilization programs are used after zones V and VI extensor tendon repairs; two programs used are relative motion extension (RME) orthosis and controlled active motion (CAM). Although no comparative studies exist, use of the RME orthosis has been reported to support earlier hand function.
Purpose of the study: This randomized clinical trial investigated whether patients managed with an RME program would recover hand function earlier postoperatively than those managed with a CAM program.
Methods: Forty-two participants with zones V-VI extensor tendon repairs were randomized into either a CAM or RME program. The Sollerman Hand Function Test (SHFT) was the primary outcome measure of hand function. Days to return to work, QuickDASH (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand) questionnaire, total active motion (TAM), grip strength, and patient satisfaction were the secondary measures of outcome.
Results: The RME group demonstrated better results at four weeks for the SHFT score (P = .0073; 95% CI: -10.9, -1.8), QuickDASH score (P = .05; 95% CI: -0.05, 19.5), and TAM (P = .008; 95% CI: -65.4, -10.6). Days to return to work were similar between groups (P = .77; 95% CI: -28.1, 36.1). RME participants were more satisfied with the orthosis (P < .0001; 95% CI: 3.5, 8.4). No tendon ruptures occurred.
Discussion: Participants managed using an RME program, and RME finger orthosis demonstrated significantly better early hand function, TAM, and orthosis satisfaction than those managed by the CAM program using a static wrist-hand-finger orthosis. This is likely due to the less restrictive design of the RME orthosis.
Conclusions: The RME program supports safe earlier recovery of hand function and motion when compared to a CAM program following repair of zones V and VI extensor tendons.
MeSH term(s) Adult ; Exercise Therapy/methods ; Female ; Hand Injuries/physiopathology ; Hand Injuries/rehabilitation ; Hand Injuries/surgery ; Hand Strength ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Orthotic Devices ; Patient Satisfaction ; Range of Motion, Articular/physiology ; Recovery of Function ; Tendon Injuries/physiopathology ; Tendon Injuries/rehabilitation ; Tendon Injuries/surgery ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult
Language English
Publishing date 2019-03-21
Publishing country United States
Document type Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
ZDB-ID 639284-2
ISSN 1545-004X ; 0894-1130
ISSN (online) 1545-004X
ISSN 0894-1130
DOI 10.1016/j.jht.2018.10.003
Shelf mark
Zs.A 2300: Show issues Location:
Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (2.OG)
ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)
Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

More links

Kategorien

To top