LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 8 of total 8

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Non-beneficial admission to the intensive care unit

    Jean-Pierre Quenot / Marine Jacquier / Isabelle Fournel / Nicolas Meunier-Beillard / Clotilde Grangé / Fiona Ecarnot / Marie Labruyère / Jean-Philippe Rigaud / RESC Study group

    PLoS ONE, Vol 18, Iss 2, p e

    A nationwide survey of practices.

    2023  Volume 0279939

    Abstract: Introduction In a nationwide survey of practices, we sought to define the criteria, circumstances and consequences of non-beneficial admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU), with a view to proposing measures to avoid such situations. Methods ICU ... ...

    Abstract Introduction In a nationwide survey of practices, we sought to define the criteria, circumstances and consequences of non-beneficial admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU), with a view to proposing measures to avoid such situations. Methods ICU physicians from a French research in ethics network participated in an online survey. The first part recorded age, sex, and years' experience of the participants. In the second part, there were 8 to 12 proposals on each of 4 main domains: (1) What criteria could be used to qualify an ICU stay as non-beneficial? (2) What circumstances result in the admission of a patient whose ICU stay may later be deemed non-beneficial? (3) What are the consequences of a non-beneficial stay in the ICU? (4) What measures could be implemented to avoid admissions that later come to be considered as non-beneficial? Responses were on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Strongly disagree" to "Strongly agree". Results Among 164 physicians contacted, 154 (94%) responded. The majority cited several criteria used to qualify a stay as non-beneficial. Similarly, >80% cited several possible circumstances that could result in non-beneficial admissions, including lack of knowledge of the case and the patient's history, and failure to anticipate acute deterioration. Possible consequences of non-beneficial stays included stress and anxiety for the patient/family, misunderstandings and conflict. Discussing the utility of possible ICU admission in the framework of the patient's overall healthcare goals was hailed as a means to prevent non-beneficial admissions. Conclusion The results of this survey suggest that joint discussions should take place during the patient's healthcare trajectory, before the acute need for ICU arises, with a view to limiting or avoiding ICU stays that may later come to be deemed "non-beneficial".
    Keywords Medicine ; R ; Science ; Q
    Subject code 900
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Results of a Qualitative Study Aimed at Building a Programme to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk in People with Severe Mental Illness

    Marie Costa / Nicolas Meunier-Beillard / Elise Guillermet / Lucie Cros / Vincent Demassiet / Wendy Hude / Anna Baleige / Jean-François Besnard / Jean-Luc Roelandt / Frédéric Denis

    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 19, Iss 6847, p

    2022  Volume 6847

    Abstract: People with severe mental illness (PSMI) have a shorter life expectancy and are more likely to have cardiovascular disease than the general population. Patients, carers, psychiatric professionals and primary care providers can all play a role in ... ...

    Abstract People with severe mental illness (PSMI) have a shorter life expectancy and are more likely to have cardiovascular disease than the general population. Patients, carers, psychiatric professionals and primary care providers can all play a role in increasing PSMI physical health. The present qualitative exploratory study aimed to explore the views of these four populations as part of the multi-phase COPsyCAT project, whose objective is to build and test a cardiovascular risk prevention programme for PSMI. Overall, 107 people participated in the study’s 16 focus groups, which were transcribed and analysed in a thematic analysis. With a view to building the health promotion programme, major themes identified in the corpus were translated into a list of needs as follows: communication, information, training and support. Results show that it is essential to improve communication between all the different stakeholders in mental health. The greatest challenge facing this programme will be to adapt it to the needs and expectations of PSMI while facilitating work between the various mental health stakeholders. Simple and inexpensive actions could be taken to improve the cardiovascular health of PSMI and will be experimented with during the programme’s feasibility study which will start in September 2022.
    Keywords qualitative study ; cardiovascular risk ; psychiatry ; mental health ; carers ; mental health service users ; Medicine ; R
    Subject code 360
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-06-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher MDPI AG
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: A qualitative study of reinforcement workers' perceptions and experiences of working in intensive care during the COVID-19 pandemic

    Florian Perraud / Fiona Ecarnot / Mélanie Loiseau / Alexandra Laurent / Alicia Fournier / Florent Lheureux / Christine Binquet / Jean-Philippe Rigaud / Nicolas Meunier-Beillard / Jean-Pierre Quenot

    PLoS ONE, Vol 17, Iss 3, p e

    A PsyCOVID-ICU substudy.

    2022  Volume 0264287

    Abstract: Purpose During the COVID pandemic, many hospitals had to mobilize reinforcement healthcare workers, especially in intensive care (ICUs). We investigated the perceptions and experiences of reinforcement workers deployed to ICUs, and the impact of ... ...

    Abstract Purpose During the COVID pandemic, many hospitals had to mobilize reinforcement healthcare workers, especially in intensive care (ICUs). We investigated the perceptions and experiences of reinforcement workers deployed to ICUs, and the impact of deployment on their personal and professional lives. Methods For this qualitative study, a random sample of 30 reinforcement workers was drawn from 4 centres participating in the larger PsyCOVID-ICU study. Individual semi-structured interviews were held, recorded, transcribed and analyzed by thematic analysis. Results Thirty interviews were performed from April to May 2021 (22 nurses, 2 anesthesiology nurses, 6 nurses' aides). Average age was 36.8±9.5 years; 7 participants had no ICU experience. Four major themes emerged, namely: (1) Difficulties with integration, especially for those with no ICU experience; (2) lack of training; (3) difficulties with management, notably a feeling of insufficient communication; (4) Mental distress relating to the unusual work and fear of contaminating their entourage. Conclusion Healthcare workers deployed as reinforcements to ICUs at the height of the pandemic had a unique experience of the crisis, and identified important gaps in organisation and preparation. They also suffered from a marked lack of training, given the stakes in the management of critically ill patients in the ICU.
    Keywords Medicine ; R ; Science ; Q
    Subject code 360
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Non-readmission decisions in the intensive care unit

    Marine Jacquier / Nicolas Meunier-Beillard / Fiona Ecarnot / Audrey Large / François Aptel / Marie Labruyère / Auguste Dargent / Pascal Andreu / Jean-Baptiste Roudaut / Jean-Philippe Rigaud / Jean-Pierre Quenot

    PLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 1, p e

    A qualitative study of physicians' experience in a multicentre French study.

    2021  Volume 0244919

    Abstract: Purpose Deciding not to re-admit a patient to the intensive care unit (ICU) poses an ethical dilemma for ICU physicians. We aimed to describe and understand the attitudes and perceptions of ICU physicians regarding non-readmission of patients to the ICU. ...

    Abstract Purpose Deciding not to re-admit a patient to the intensive care unit (ICU) poses an ethical dilemma for ICU physicians. We aimed to describe and understand the attitudes and perceptions of ICU physicians regarding non-readmission of patients to the ICU. Materials and methods Multicenter, qualitative study using semi-directed interviews between January and May 2019. All medical staff working full-time in the ICU of five participating centres (two academic and three general, non-academic hospitals) were invited to participate. Participants were asked to describe how they experienced non-readmission decisions in the ICU, and to expand on the manner in which the decision was made, but also on the traceability and timing of the decision. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using textual content analysis. Results In total, 22 physicians participated. Interviews lasted on average 26±7 minutes. There were 14 men and 8 women, average age was 35±9 years, and average length of ICU experience was 7±5 years. The majority of respondents said that they regretted that the question of non-readmission was not addressed before the initial ICU admission. They acknowledged that the ICU stay did lead to more thorough contemplation of the overall goals of care. Multidisciplinary team meetings could help to anticipate the question of readmission within the patient's care pathway. Participants reported that there is a culture of collegial decision-making in the ICU, although the involvement of patients, families and other healthcare professionals in this process is not systematic. The timing and traceability of non-readmission decisions are heterogeneous. Conclusions Non-readmission decisions are a major issue that raises ethical questions surrounding the fact that there is no discussion of the patient's goals of care in advance. Better anticipation, and better communication with the patients, families and other healthcare providers are suggested as areas that could be targeted for improvement.
    Keywords Medicine ; R ; Science ; Q
    Subject code 170
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Non-readmission decisions in the intensive care unit under French rules

    Jean-Philippe Rigaud / Mikhael Giabicani / Nicolas Meunier-Beillard / Fiona Ecarnot / Marion Beuzelin / Antoine Marchalot / Auguste Dargent / Jean-Pierre Quenot

    PLoS ONE, Vol 13, Iss 10, p e

    A nationwide survey of practices.

    2018  Volume 0205689

    Abstract: PURPOSE:We investigated, using a multicentre survey of practices in France, the practices of ICU physicians concerning the decision not to readmit to the ICU, in light of current legislation. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Multicentre survey of practices among ... ...

    Abstract PURPOSE:We investigated, using a multicentre survey of practices in France, the practices of ICU physicians concerning the decision not to readmit to the ICU, in light of current legislation. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Multicentre survey of practices among French ICU physicians via electronic questionnaire in January 2016. Questions related to respondents' practices regarding re-admission of patients to the ICU and how these decisions were made. Criteria were evaluated by the health care professionals as regards importance for non-readmission. RESULTS:In total, 167 physicians agreed to participate, of whom 165 (99%) actually returned a completed questionnaire from 58 ICUs. Forty-five percent were aged <35 years, 74% were full-time physicians. The findings show that decisions for non-readmission are taken at the end of the patient's stay (87%), using a collegial decision-making procedure (89% of cases); 93% reported that this decision was noted in the patient's medical file. While 73% indicated that the family/relatives were informed of non-readmission decisions, only 29% reported informing the patient, and 91% considered that non-readmission decisions are an integral part of the French legislative framework. CONCLUSION:This study shows that decisions not to re-admit a patient to the ICU need to be formally materialized, and anticipated by involving the patient and family in the discussions, as well as the other healthcare providers that usually care for the patient. The optimal time to undertake these conversations is likely best decided on a case-by-case basis according to each patient's individual characteristics.
    Keywords Medicine ; R ; Science ; Q
    Language English
    Publishing date 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: What are the characteristics that lead physicians to perceive an ICU stay as non-beneficial for the patient?

    Jean-Pierre Quenot / Audrey Large / Nicolas Meunier-Beillard / Paul-Simon Pugliesi / Pamina Rollet / Amaury Toitot / Pascal Andreu / Hervé Devilliers / Antoine Marchalot / Fiona Ecarnot / Auguste Dargent / Jean-Philippe Rigaud / INSTINCT study group

    PLoS ONE, Vol 14, Iss 9, p e

    2019  Volume 0222039

    Abstract: PURPOSE:We sought to describe the characteristics that lead physicians to perceive a stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) as being non-beneficial for the patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS:In the first step, we used a multidisciplinary focus group to define ...

    Abstract PURPOSE:We sought to describe the characteristics that lead physicians to perceive a stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) as being non-beneficial for the patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS:In the first step, we used a multidisciplinary focus group to define the characteristics that lead physicians to consider a stay in the ICU as non-beneficial for the patient. In the second step, we assessed the proportion of admissions that would be perceived by the ICU physicians as non-beneficial for the patient according to our focus group's definition, in a large population of ICU admissions in 4 French ICUs over a period of 4 months. RESULTS:Among 1075 patients admitted to participating ICUs during the study period, 155 stays were considered non-beneficial for the patient, yielding a frequency of 14.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.9, 19.9]. Average age of these patients was 72 ±12.8 years. Mortality was 43.2% in-ICU [95%CI 35.4, 51.0], 55% [95%CI 47.2, 62.8] in-hospital. The criteria retained by the focus group to define a non-beneficial ICU stay were: patient refusal of ICU care (23.2% [95%CI 16.5, 29.8]), and referring physician's desire not to have the patient admitted (11.6% [95%CI 6.6, 16.6]). The characteristics that led physicians to perceive the stay as non-beneficial were: patient's age (36.8% [95%CI 29.2, 44.4]), unlikelihood of recovering autonomy (61.9% [95%CI 54.3, 69.6]), prior poor quality of life (60% [95%CI 52.3, 67.7]), terminal status of chronic disease (56.1% [95%CI 48.3, 63.9]), and all therapeutic options have been exhausted (35.5% [95%CI 27.9, 43.0]). Factors that explained admission to the ICU of patients whose stay was subsequently judged to be non-beneficial included: lack of knowledge of patient's wishes (52% [95%CI 44.1, 59.9]); decisional incapacity (sedation) (69.7% [95%CI 62.5, 76.9]); inability to contact family (34% [95%CI 26.5, 41.5]); pressure to admit (from family or other physicians) (50.3% [95%CI 42.4, 58.2]). CONCLUSIONS:Non-beneficial ICU stays are frequent. ICU admissions need to ...
    Keywords Medicine ; R ; Science ; Q
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Influence of socioeconomic status on functional recovery after ARDS caused by SARS-CoV-2

    Cyrille Delpierre / Pierre-louis Declercq / Vanessa Bironneau / Nicolas Terzi / Jean Dellamonica / Jean-Pierre Quenot / Saad Nseir / Christine Binquet / Laura Federici / Elise Artaud-Macari / Gaetan Beduneau / Agathe Delbove / Nicholas Sedillot / Jean-Philippe Rigaud / Isabelle Fournel / Nicolas Meunier-Beillard / Julio Badie / Julien Maizel / Gaetan Plantefeve /
    Thierry Vanderlinden / Marjolaine Georges / Paul Abraham / David Schnell / Bertrand Sauneuf / Matthieu Demeyere / Eléa Ksiazek / Antoine Rivière / Caroline Clarot / Alexandre Ampere / Cédric Daubin / Pierre Kalfon / Élise Redureau / Mehdi Bousta / Laurie Lagache / Béatrice La Combe / Gaël Bourdin / Mehran Monchi / Martine Nyunga / Michel Ramakers / Walid Oulehri / Hugues Georges / Charlotte Salmon Gandonniere / Xavier Monnet / Nicolas Delberghe / Gurvan Le Bouar / Arnaud-Felix Miailhe / Sami Hraiech / Marie-Anne Hoppe / Saber Davide Barbar / George-Daniel Calcaianu

    BMJ Open, Vol 12, Iss

    a multicentre, observational study

    2022  Volume 4

    Keywords Medicine ; R
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-04-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Women and health professionals’ perspectives on a conditional cash transfer programme to improve pregnancy follow-up

    Celine Chauleur / Jacob Hannigsberg / Philippe Merviel / Marc Bardou / Franck Perrotin / Thomas Schmitz / Olivier Picone / Jeanne Sibiude / Karine Chemin / Dominique Dallay / Frédéric Coatleven / Loïc Sentilhes / Céline Brochot / Astrid Eckman-Lacroix / Elise Thellier / Frédérique Falchier / Philippe Deruelle / Muriel Doret / Xavier Carcopino-Tusoli /
    Nicolas Meunier-Beillard / Hervé Fernandez / Vincent Villefranque / Caroline Diguisto / Damien Subtil / Clémence Houssin / Philippe Gillard / Laurent Mandelbrot / Aurelie Godard-Marceau / Nathalie Lesavre / Claude Virtos / Elodie Debras / Aude Bourtembourg / Claire Toubin / Danièle Addes / Véronique Uguen / Cleo Tourbot / Caroline Lelievre / Christophe Tremouilhac / Anne-Hélène Saliou / Aurelie Derrieu / Stephanie Auget / Anne Legourrierec / Anne Leroux / Julie Fort-Jacquier / Marion Serclerat / Nathalie Laurenceau / Audrey Renouleau / Eliane Catteau / Julie Blanc / Candice Ronin / Laurence Piechon / Séverine Puppo / Fanny Greco / Sandrine Pettazzoni / Muriel Athlani / Amina Desvignes / Annie Petiteau / Amina El Yaakoubi / Valérie Bechadergue / Valérie Vaugirard / Marie-Emmanuelle Neveu / Caroline Geyl / Marie-Victoire Senat / Claire Colmant / Marie Houllier / Myriam Virlouet / Marion Mir / Yasmina Bejaoui / Hélène Le Cornu / Lauriane Nikel / Elodie Gustave / Amandine Stadler / Ahmad Mehdi / Tiphaine Barjat / Suzanne Lima / Thomas Corsini / Anne Genod / Charlotte Vermesch / Cécile Fanget / Marianne Perrot / Manuela Munoz / Sylvie Pitaval / Fanny Magand / Françoise Baldi / Stephanie Bret / Anne-Lise Verdier / Christelle Denis / Carine Arlicot / Jérôme Potin / Stéphanie Chretien / Julie Paternotte / Nathalie Trignol / Élisabeth Blin / Camille Mathieu / Anne Dubreuil / Anne Viallon Pelletier / Catherine Guerin / Chloé Arthuis / Christophe Vayssieres / Olivier Parant / Marion Groussolles / Maria Denis / M Mathieu Morin / Marie-Thérèse Bavoux / Juliette Pelloux / Anne-Claire Jambon / Madeleine Santraine / Veronique Lebuffe / Pascale Broux / Thierry Dzukou / Magloire Gnansounou / Didier Hubert / Claire Djazet / Ludivine Destoop / Marine Derue / Pierrick Theret / Dominique Delzenne / Stéphanie Daussin / Alice Fraissinet / Mélanie Vannerum / Cyril Faraguet / Laurence Landais / Mariana Radu / Anne Rouget / Sena Al Sudani / Bernard Guillon / Estelle Wucher / Véronique Selva / Sandrine Reviron / Francis Schwetterlé / Cécile Chassande / Véronique Grandin / Eliane Krtoliza / Patrick Becher / Marie Sarrau / Claire Lecoq / Elsa Lutringer / Denis Roux / Noémie Berge / Clémentine Barbier / Anne Heron / Audrey Farina-Bracquart / Marie-Paule Curtet / Evelyne Lefebure / Marie-Hélène Le Douarin / Hassan Al Rayes / Émilie Magne / Nathalie Destampes / Émilie Ricard / Pascale Ghezzi / Catherine Guillen / Fanny Alazard / Marie-Thé Campanaro / Florence Mojard / Magalie David-Reynard / Patricia Fuma / Remy De Montgolfier / Capucine Neel / Guillaume Legendre / Isabelle Andre / Sylvie Nordstrom / Brigitte Guionnet / Catherine Crenn Hebert / Chloé Dussaux / Karine Achaintre / Anne Wagner / Martine Werveake / Eloïse De Gouville / George Theresin / Marie Pierre Couetoux / Lydia Caillaud / Marie-Pierre Fernandez / Sabrina Bottet / M Alain Almodovar / Elisa Etienne / Véronique Guiteras / Angélique Torres / N. Roche / Myriam Nassef / Christine Abel-Faure / Marie Louvet / Carole Ettori / Guillaume Ducarme / Valérie Bonnenfant-Mezeray / Laurence Szezot-Renaudeau / Marie-Pierre Berte / Elodie Netier-Herault / Stéphanie Manson-Gallone / Franck Mauviel / Nathalie Agostini / Marine Mazeaud / Jean-Claude Dausset / Isabelle De Murcia / Emilie Alliot / Anne-Marie Bes / Magali Biferi Magali / Hélène Heckenroth / Sophie Morange / Gersende Chiuot / Audrey Gnisci / Annie Allegre / Laetitia Lecq / Eva Balenbois / Claire Tourette / Aude Figarella / Dio Andriamanjay / Pauline Vignoles / Catherine Cazelles / Véronique Lejeune Saada / Benafsheh Kashani / Isabelle Chevalier / Muriel Terrieres / Audrey Cointement / Valérie Benhaïm / Najat Lindoune / Anne-Sophie Maisonneuve / M Frédéric Daubercy / Guilia Mencattini / Vanessa Combaud / Isabelle Moya / Xavier-Côme Donato / Raoul Desbriere / Marie Lafon / Véronique Baudet

    BMJ Open, Vol 13, Iss

    a qualitative analysis of the NAITRE randomised controlled study

    2023  Volume 3

    Abstract: Objectives Women of low socioeconomic status have been described as having suboptimal prenatal care, which in turn has been associated with poor pregnancy outcomes. Many types of conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes have been developed, including ... ...

    Abstract Objectives Women of low socioeconomic status have been described as having suboptimal prenatal care, which in turn has been associated with poor pregnancy outcomes. Many types of conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes have been developed, including programmes to improve prenatal care or smoking cessation during pregnancy, and their effects demonstrated. However, ethical critiques have included paternalism and lack of informed choice. Our objective was to determine if women and healthcare professionals (HPs) shared these concerns.Design Prospective qualitative research.Setting We included economically disadvantaged women, as defined by health insurance data, who participated in the French NAITRE randomised trial assessing a CCT programme during prenatal follow-up to improve pregnancy outcomes. The HP worked in some maternities participating in this trial.Participants 26 women, 14 who received CCT and 12 who did not, mostly unemployed (20/26), and - 7 HPs.Interventions We conducted a multicentre cross-sectional qualitative study among women and HPs who participated in the NAITRE Study to assess their views on CCT. The women were interviewed after childbirth.Results Women did not perceive CCT negatively. They did not mention feeling stigmatised. They described CCT as a significant source of aid for women with limited financial resources. HP described the CCT in less positive terms, for example, expressing concern about discussing cash transfer at their first medical consultation with women. Though they emphasised ethical concerns about the basis of the trial, they recognised the importance of evaluating CCT.Conclusions In France, a high-income country where prenatal follow-up is free, HPs were concerned that the CCT programme would change their relationship with patients and wondered if it was the best use of funding. However, women who received a cash incentive said they did not feel stigmatised and indicated that these payments helped them prepare for their baby’s birth.Trial registration number NCT02402855
    Keywords Medicine ; R
    Subject code 300
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-03-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top