LIVIVO - Das Suchportal für Lebenswissenschaften

switch to English language
Erweiterte Suche

Ihre letzten Suchen

  1. AU="Nicole Shaver"
  2. AU=Siegel Vivian
  3. AU="Calméjane, Louis"
  4. AU="Lombardi, S."
  5. AU="Hartmann, H"
  6. AU="Furuya Junior, Carlos Kyoshi"
  7. AU="Bo, L J"
  8. AU="Baxter, J"
  9. AU="Liu, Zhenhong"
  10. AU="Xiaochun Deng"
  11. AU="Anderson, Ciorsdan"
  12. AU="Xiaofang Zhang"
  13. AU=Stincarelli Maria Alfreda AU=Stincarelli Maria Alfreda
  14. AU="McNabb, Warren C."
  15. AU="Seker, Demet"
  16. AU="Braman, Sidney S"
  17. AU="Yerke, Lisa"
  18. AU="Antonella Lettieri"
  19. AU="Valdiviezo, Jesús"

Suchergebnis

Treffer 1 - 4 von insgesamt 4

Suchoptionen

  1. Artikel ; Online: Structural validity of a brief scale adapted to measure adolescent spiritual health

    Nicole Shaver / Valerie Michaelson / Ross Whitehead / William Pickett / Fiona Brooks / Jo Inchley

    SSM: Population Health, Vol 12, Iss , Pp 100670- (2020)

    2020  

    Abstract: Spiritual health is established as an important protective health asset in child populations. Measurement and assessment of this elusive concept are, however, challenging. Brief and age-appropriate instruments are required for surveys and related ... ...

    Abstract Spiritual health is established as an important protective health asset in child populations. Measurement and assessment of this elusive concept are, however, challenging. Brief and age-appropriate instruments are required for surveys and related population health research. One longstanding model describing child spirituality suggests that scales and measures consider four standard domains describing connections to self, others, nature, and the transcendent. In this validation study, we tested the structural validity and internal consistency of a brief, literacy-level appropriate instrument for adolescents that was based on prior adaptations of this model. The 2018 cross-national study population included 47,180 children aged 11–15 years from 9 countries. Based upon theory, factor pattern matrices, and Scree plots, the exploratory factor analysis best supported the four-factor model, with items organized according to the original four domains. Internal consistency of the items was acceptable (alpha>.7) to good (alpha>.8) within domains, again within each of the 9 countries. The confirmatory factor analysis again supported the four-factor model (by country, SRMR: 0.020 to 0.042; and AGFI and NFI fit: >0.98). Model fit indices for the four-factor model were improved compared with its unidimensional version. Moving forward, our analysis establishes the structural validity and internal consistency of this adapted brief spiritual health instrument to be used in surveys of adolescents.
    Schlagwörter Adolescence ; Epidemiology ; Psychometrics ; Spirituality ; Validation ; Public aspects of medicine ; RA1-1270 ; Social sciences (General) ; H1-99
    Thema/Rubrik (Code) 306
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2020-12-01T00:00:00Z
    Verlag Elsevier
    Dokumenttyp Artikel ; Online
    Datenquelle BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (Lebenswissenschaftliche Auswahl)

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  2. Artikel ; Online: Screening for hypertension in adults

    Nicole Shaver / Andrew Beck / Alexandria Bennett / Brenda J. Wilson / Chantelle Garritty / Melissa Subnath / Roland Grad / Navindra Persaud / Guylène Thériault / Jennifer Flemming / Brett D. Thombs / John LeBlanc / Janusz Kaczorowski / Peter Liu / Christopher E. Clark / Gregory Traversy / Eva Graham / Janusz Feber / Frans H. H. Leenen /
    Kamila Premji / Robert Pap / Becky Skidmore / Melissa Brouwers / David Moher / Julian Little

    Systematic Reviews, Vol 13, Iss 1, Pp 1-

    protocol for evidence reviews to inform a Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care guideline update

    2024  Band 20

    Abstract: Abstract Purpose To inform updated recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care on screening in a primary care setting for hypertension in adults aged 18 years and older. This protocol outlines the scope and methods for a series ... ...

    Abstract Abstract Purpose To inform updated recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care on screening in a primary care setting for hypertension in adults aged 18 years and older. This protocol outlines the scope and methods for a series of systematic reviews and one overview of reviews. Methods To evaluate the benefits and harms of screening for hypertension, the Task Force will rely on the relevant key questions from the 2021 United States Preventive Services Task Force systematic review. In addition, a series of reviews will be conducted to identify, appraise, and synthesize the evidence on (1) the association of blood pressure measurement methods and future cardiovascular (CVD)-related outcomes, (2) thresholds for discussions of treatment initiation, and (3) patient acceptability of hypertension screening methods. For the review of blood pressure measurement methods and future CVD-related outcomes, we will perform a de novo review and search MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and APA PsycInfo for randomized controlled trials, prospective or retrospective cohort studies, nested case–control studies, and within-arm analyses of intervention studies. For the thresholds for discussions of treatment initiation review, we will perform an overview of reviews and update results from a relevant 2019 UK NICE review. We will search MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycInfo, and Epistemonikos for systematic reviews. For the acceptability review, we will perform a de novo systematic review and search MEDLINE, Embase, and APA PsycInfo for randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and observational studies with comparison groups. Websites of relevant organizations, gray literature sources, and the reference lists of included studies and reviews will be hand-searched. Title and abstract screening will be completed by two independent reviewers. Full-text screening, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessment, and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) will be completed independently ...
    Schlagwörter Systematic review ; Overview of reviews ; Adults ; Guideline ; Primary care ; Hypertension ; Medicine ; R
    Thema/Rubrik (Code) 610
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Verlag BMC
    Dokumenttyp Artikel ; Online
    Datenquelle BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (Lebenswissenschaftliche Auswahl)

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  3. Artikel ; Online: Screening for depression among the general adult population and in women during pregnancy or the first-year postpartum

    Andrew Beck / Candyce Hamel / Micere Thuku / Leila Esmaeilisaraji / Alexandria Bennett / Nicole Shaver / Becky Skidmore / Ian Colman / Sophie Grigoriadis / Stuart Gordon Nicholls / Beth K. Potter / Kerri Ritchie / Priya Vasa / Beverley J. Shea / David Moher / Julian Little / Adrienne Stevens

    Systematic Reviews, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-

    two systematic reviews to inform a guideline of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care

    2022  Band 21

    Abstract: Abstract Background Depression affects an individual’s physical health and mental well-being and, in pregnant and postpartum women, has specific adverse short- and long-term effects on maternal, child, and family health. The aim of these two systematic ... ...

    Abstract Abstract Background Depression affects an individual’s physical health and mental well-being and, in pregnant and postpartum women, has specific adverse short- and long-term effects on maternal, child, and family health. The aim of these two systematic reviews is to identify evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for depression compared to no screening in the general adult and pregnant and postpartum populations in primary care or non-mental health clinic settings. These reviews will inform recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library using a randomized controlled trial filter, where applicable, October 4, 2018, and updated to May 11, 2020. We also searched for gray literature (e.g., websites of organizations of health professionals and patients). Study selection for depression screening trials was performed first on title and abstract, followed by full-text screening. Data extraction, assessment of the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and application of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation were performed by one reviewer and validated by a second reviewer. Results A total of three trials were included. All three trials were included in the general adult review, while one of the three trials was included in the pregnant and postpartum review. We did not pool results due to substantial differences between studies and high risk of bias. In the general adult review, the first trial (n = 1001) evaluated whether screening for depression in adults with acute coronary syndrome compared to usual care improves health-related quality of life, depression symptoms, or harms of screening at 6, 12, and 18 months. There were little to no differences between the groups at 18 months for the outcomes. The second trial included adults (n = 1412) undergoing initial consultation for osteoarthritis, evaluated for depression and general health (mental and physical) after ...
    Schlagwörter Depression ; Screening ; Systematic review ; Adults ; Pregnancy ; Postpartum ; Medicine ; R
    Thema/Rubrik (Code) 150
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2022-08-01T00:00:00Z
    Verlag BMC
    Dokumenttyp Artikel ; Online
    Datenquelle BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (Lebenswissenschaftliche Auswahl)

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  4. Artikel ; Online: Screening for prostate cancer

    Alexandria Bennett / Andrew Beck / Nicole Shaver / Roland Grad / Allana LeBlanc / Heather Limburg / Casey Gray / Ahmed Abou-Setta / Scott Klarenbach / Navindra Persaud / Guylène Thériault / Brett D. Thombs / Keith J. Todd / Neil Bell / Philipp Dahm / Andrew Loblaw / Lisa Del Giudice / Xiaomei Yao / Becky Skidmore /
    Elizabeth Rolland-Harris / Melissa Brouwers / Julian Little / David Moher

    Systematic Reviews, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-

    protocol for updating multiple systematic reviews to inform a Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care guideline update

    2022  Band 19

    Abstract: Abstract Purpose To inform updated recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care on screening for prostate cancer in adults aged 18 years and older in primary care. This protocol outlines the planned scope and methods for a series ... ...

    Abstract Abstract Purpose To inform updated recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care on screening for prostate cancer in adults aged 18 years and older in primary care. This protocol outlines the planned scope and methods for a series of systematic reviews. Methods Updates of two systematic reviews and a de novo review will be conducted to synthesize the evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for prostate cancer with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or digital rectal examination (DRE) (with or without additional information) and patient values and preferences. Outcomes for the benefits of screening include reduced prostate cancer mortality, all-cause mortality, and incidence of metastatic prostate cancer. Outcomes for the harms of screening include false-positive screening tests, overdiagnosis, complications due to biopsy, and complications of treatment including incontinence (urinary or bowel), and erectile dysfunction. The quality of life or functioning (overall and disease-specific) and psychological effects outcomes are considered as a possible benefit or harm. Outcomes for the values and preferences review include quantitative or qualitative information regarding the choice to screen or intention to undergo screening. For the reviews on benefits or harms, we will search for randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized, and controlled studies in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. For the review on values and preferences, we will search for experimental or observational studies in MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycInfo. For all reviews, we will also search websites of relevant organizations, gray literature, and reference lists of included studies. Title and abstract screening, full-text review, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments will be completed independently by pairs of reviewers with any disagreements resolved by consensus or by consulting with a third reviewer. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and ...
    Schlagwörter Systematic review ; Adults ; Guideline ; Primary care ; Prostate cancer ; Screening ; Medicine ; R
    Thema/Rubrik (Code) 610
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2022-10-01T00:00:00Z
    Verlag BMC
    Dokumenttyp Artikel ; Online
    Datenquelle BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (Lebenswissenschaftliche Auswahl)

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

Zum Seitenanfang