LIVIVO - Das Suchportal für Lebenswissenschaften

switch to English language
Erweiterte Suche

Ihre letzten Suchen

  1. AU="Olaf Booy"
  2. AU=Skorski Tomasz
  3. AU="Sanayeh, Elie Bou"
  4. AU="Echeverría, J.L."
  5. AU="Balasubramanian, Ramnath"
  6. AU="Adam Orłowski"
  7. AU="Tumanov A"
  8. AU="Hsu, Rafael M C S"
  9. AU=Perfect John R
  10. AU="Francini, Saverio"
  11. AU="Hurley, David"
  12. AU=Thomas L
  13. AU="French, M S"
  14. AU=Bonek Krzysztof
  15. AU="Noviello, Colleen M"
  16. AU="Jill A. Hollenbach"
  17. AU="Bansal, Ramesh C."
  18. AU="Huang, Xuhua"
  19. AU="Latorre, Víctor"
  20. AU="Simon J. Waddell"
  21. AU="Luo, Yueming"

Suchergebnis

Treffer 1 - 5 von insgesamt 5

Suchoptionen

  1. Artikel ; Online: Risk Management Assessment Improves the Cost-Effectiveness of Invasive Species Prioritisation

    Peter A. Robertson / Aileen C. Mill / Tim Adriaens / Niall Moore / Sonia Vanderhoeven / Franz Essl / Olaf Booy

    Biology, Vol 10, Iss 1320, p

    2021  Band 1320

    Abstract: International agreements commit nations to control or eradicate invasive alien species. The scale of this challenge exceeds available resources and so it is essential to prioritise the management of invasive alien species. Species prioritisation for ... ...

    Abstract International agreements commit nations to control or eradicate invasive alien species. The scale of this challenge exceeds available resources and so it is essential to prioritise the management of invasive alien species. Species prioritisation for management typically involves a hierarchy of processes that consider the likelihood and scale of impact (risk assessment) and the feasibility, costs and effectiveness of management (risk management). Risk assessment processes are widely used, risk management less so, but are a crucial component of resource decision making. To assess the cost-effectiveness of prioritisation, we considered 26 high-risk species considered for eradication from Great Britain (GB) with pre-existing risk assessment and risk management outputs. We extracted scores to reflect the overall risk to GB posed by the species, together with the estimated cost and the overall feasibility of eradication. We used these to consider the relative reduction in risk per unit cost when managing prioritised species based on different criteria. We showed that the cost-effectiveness of prioritisation within our sample using risk assessment scores alone, performed no better than a random ranking of the species. In contrast, prioritisation including management feasibility produced nearly two orders of magnitude improvement compared to random. We conclude that basing management actions on priorities based solely on risk assessment without considering management feasibility risks the inefficient use of limited resources. In this study, the cost-effectiveness of species prioritisation for action was greatly increased by the inclusion of risk management assessment.
    Schlagwörter Aichi Target 9 ; Europe ; invasive alien species of Union Concern ; management cost ; management feasibility ; prioritisation ; Biology (General) ; QH301-705.5
    Thema/Rubrik (Code) 650
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2021-12-01T00:00:00Z
    Verlag MDPI AG
    Dokumenttyp Artikel ; Online
    Datenquelle BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (Lebenswissenschaftliche Auswahl)

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  2. Artikel ; Forschungsdaten: (mit Forschungsdaten) Assessing patterns in introduction pathways of alien species by linking major invasion data bases

    Saul, Wolf‐Christian / Colin A. Harrower / Helen E. Roy / Hsuan‐Ju Chen / Jan Pergl / Jonathan M. Jeschke / Lucilla Carnevali / Olaf Booy / Philip E. Hulme / Piero Genovesi / Shyama Pagad

    Journal of applied ecology. 2017 Apr., v. 54, no. 2

    2017  

    Abstract: Preventing the arrival of invasive alien species (IAS) is a major priority in managing biological invasions. However, information on introduction pathways is currently scattered across many data bases that often use different categorisations to describe ... ...

    Abstract Preventing the arrival of invasive alien species (IAS) is a major priority in managing biological invasions. However, information on introduction pathways is currently scattered across many data bases that often use different categorisations to describe similar pathways. This hampers the identification and prioritisation of pathways to meet the main targets of recent environmental policies. Therefore, we integrate pathway information from two major IAS data bases, IUCN's Global Invasive Species Database (GISD) and the DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gateway, applying the new standard categorisation scheme recently adopted by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). We describe the process of mapping pathways from the individual data bases to the CBD scheme and provide, for the first time, detailed descriptions of the standard pathway categories. The combined data set includes pathway information for 8323 species across major taxonomic groups (plants, vertebrates, invertebrates, algae, fungi, other) and environments (terrestrial, freshwater, marine). We analyse the data for major patterns in the introduction pathways, highlighting that the specific research question and context determines whether the combined or an individual data set is the better information source for such analyses. While the combined data set provides an improved basis for direction‐setting in invasion management policies on the global level, individual data sets often better reflect regional idiosyncrasies. The combined data set should thus be considered in addition to, rather than replacing, existing individual data sets. Pathway patterns derived from the combined and individual data sets show that the intentional pathways ‘Escape’ and ‘Release’ are most important for plants and vertebrates, while for invertebrates, algae, fungi and micro‐organisms unintentional transport pathways prevail. Differences in pathway proportions among marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments are much less pronounced. The results also show that IAS with highest impacts in Europe are on average associated with a greater number of pathways than other alien species and are more frequently introduced both intentionally and unintentionally. Synthesis and applications. Linking data bases on invasive alien species by harmonising and consolidating their pathway information is essential to turn dispersed data into useful knowledge. The standard pathway categorisation scheme recently adopted by the Convention on Biological Diversity may be crucial to facilitate this process. Our study demonstrates the value of integrating major invasion data bases to help managers and policymakers reach robust conclusions about patterns in introduction pathways and thus aid effective prevention and prioritisation in invasion management.
    Schlagwörter algae ; biodiversity ; data collection ; databases ; ecological invasion ; environmental policy ; freshwater ; fungi ; information sources ; introduced species ; invasive species ; invertebrates ; prioritization ; vertebrates ; Europe
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsverlauf 2017-04
    Umfang p. 657-669.
    Erscheinungsort John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
    Dokumenttyp Artikel ; Forschungsdaten
    Anmerkung JOURNAL ARTICLE
    ZDB-ID 410405-5
    ISSN 1365-2664 ; 0021-8901 ; 0021-8901
    ISSN (online) 1365-2664
    ISSN 0021-8901
    DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12819
    Datenquelle NAL Katalog (AGRICOLA)

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  3. Artikel ; Online: 80 questions for UK biological security.

    Luke Kemp / David C Aldridge / Olaf Booy / Hilary Bower / Des Browne / Mark Burgmann / Austin Burt / Andrew A Cunningham / Malcolm Dando / Jaimie T A Dick / Christopher Dye / Sam Weiss Evans / Belinda Gallardo / H Charles J Godfray / Ian Goodfellow / Simon Gubbins / Lauren A Holt / Kate E Jones / Hazem Kandil /
    Phillip Martin / Mark McCaughan / Caitríona McLeish / Thomas Meany / Kathryn Millett / Sean S ÓhÉigeartaigh / Nicola J Patron / Catherine Rhodes / Helen E Roy / Gorm Shackelford / Derek Smith / Nicola Spence / Helene Steiner / Lalitha S Sundaram / Silja Voeneky / John R Walker / Harry Watkins / Simon Whitby / James Wood / William J Sutherland

    PLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 1, p e

    2021  Band 0241190

    Abstract: Multiple national and international trends and drivers are radically changing what biological security means for the United Kingdom (UK). New technologies present novel opportunities and challenges, and globalisation has created new pathways and ... ...

    Abstract Multiple national and international trends and drivers are radically changing what biological security means for the United Kingdom (UK). New technologies present novel opportunities and challenges, and globalisation has created new pathways and increased the speed, volume and routes by which organisms can spread. The UK Biological Security Strategy (2018) acknowledges the importance of research on biological security in the UK. Given the breadth of potential research, a targeted agenda identifying the questions most critical to effective and coordinated progress in different disciplines of biological security is required. We used expert elicitation to generate 80 policy-relevant research questions considered by participants to have the greatest impact on UK biological security. Drawing on a collaboratively-developed set of 450 questions, proposed by 41 experts from academia, industry and the UK government (consulting 168 additional experts) we subdivided the final 80 questions into six categories: bioengineering; communication and behaviour; disease threats (including pandemics); governance and policy; invasive alien species; and securing biological materials and securing against misuse. Initially, the questions were ranked through a voting process and then reduced and refined to 80 during a one-day workshop with 35 participants from a variety of disciplines. Consistently emerging themes included: the nature of current and potential biological security threats, the efficacy of existing management actions, and the most appropriate future options. The resulting questions offer a research agenda for biological security in the UK that can assist the targeting of research resources and inform the implementation of the UK Biological Security Strategy. These questions include research that could aid with the mitigation of Covid-19, and preparation for the next pandemic. We hope that our structured and rigorous approach to creating a biological security research agenda will be replicated in other countries and regions. The world, not just the UK, is in need of a thoughtful approach to directing biological security research to tackle the emerging issues.
    Schlagwörter Medicine ; R ; Science ; Q
    Thema/Rubrik (Code) 300
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Verlag Public Library of Science (PLoS)
    Dokumenttyp Artikel ; Online
    Datenquelle BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (Lebenswissenschaftliche Auswahl)

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  4. Artikel: Developing a framework of minimum standards for the risk assessment of alien species

    Roy, Helen E / Wolfgang Rabitsch / Riccardo Scalera / Alan Stewart / Belinda Gallardo / Piero Genovesi / Franz Essl / Tim Adriaens / Sven Bacher / Olaf Booy / Etienne Branquart / Sarah Brunel / Gordon Howard Copp / Hannah Dean / Bram D'hondt / Melanie Josefsson / Marc Kenis / Marianne Kettunen / Merike Linnamagi /
    Frances Lucy / Angeliki Martinou / Niall Moore / Wolfgang Nentwig / Ana Nieto / Jan Pergl / Jodey Peyton / Alain Roques / Stefan Schindler / Karsten Schönrogge / Wojciech Solarz / Paul D. Stebbing / Teodora Trichkova / Sonia Vanderhoeven / Johan van Valkenburg / Argyro Zenetos

    Journal of applied ecology. 2018 Mar., v. 55, no. 2

    2018  

    Abstract: Biological invasions are a threat to biodiversity, society and the economy. There is an urgent need to provide evidence‐based assessments of the risks posed by invasive alien species (IAS) to prioritize action. Risk assessments underpin IAS policies in ... ...

    Abstract Biological invasions are a threat to biodiversity, society and the economy. There is an urgent need to provide evidence‐based assessments of the risks posed by invasive alien species (IAS) to prioritize action. Risk assessments underpin IAS policies in many ways: informing legislation; providing justification of restrictions in trade or consumer activities; prioritizing surveillance and rapid response. There are benefits to ensuring consistency in content of IAS risk assessments globally, and this can be achieved by providing a framework of minimum standards as a checklist for quality assurance. From a review of existing risk assessment protocols, and with reference to the requirements of the EU Regulation on IAS (1143/2014) and international agreements including the World Trade Organisation, Convention on Biological Diversity and International Plant Protection Convention, coupled with consensus methods, we identified and agreed upon 14 minimum standards (attributes) a risk‐assessment scheme should include. The agreed minimum standards were as follows: (1) basic species description; (2) likelihood of invasion; (3) distribution, spread and impacts; (4) assessment of introduction pathways; (5) assessment of impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems; (6) Assessment of impact on ecosystem services; (7) assessment of socio‐economic impacts; (8) consideration of status (threatened or protected) of species or habitat under threat; (9) assessment of effects of future climate change; (10) completion possible even when there is a lack of information; (11) documents information sources; (12) provides a summary in a consistent and interpretable form; (13) includes uncertainty; (14) includes quality assurance. In deriving these minimum standards, gaps in knowledge required for completing risk assessments and the scope of existing risk assessment protocols were revealed, most notably in relation to assessing benefits, socio‐economic impacts and impacts on ecosystem services but also inclusion of consideration of climate change. Policy implications. We provide a checklist of components that should be within invasive alien species risk assessments and recommendations to develop risk assessments to meet these proposed minimum standards. Although inspired by implementation of the European Union Regulation on invasive alien species, and as such developed specifically within a European context, the derived framework and minimum standards could be applied globally.
    Schlagwörter European Union ; World Trade Organization ; biodiversity ; climate change ; ecological invasion ; ecosystem services ; ecosystems ; environmental impact ; habitats ; information sources ; international agreements ; introduced species ; invasive species ; laws and regulations ; monitoring ; plant protection ; quality control ; risk ; risk assessment ; socioeconomics ; trade ; uncertainty
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsverlauf 2018-03
    Umfang p. 526-538.
    Erscheinungsort John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
    Dokumenttyp Artikel
    Anmerkung JOURNAL ARTICLE
    ZDB-ID 410405-5
    ISSN 1365-2664 ; 0021-8901
    ISSN (online) 1365-2664
    ISSN 0021-8901
    DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.13025
    Datenquelle NAL Katalog (AGRICOLA)

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  5. Artikel: Alien Pathogens on the Horizon: Opportunities for Predicting their Threat to Wildlife

    Roy, Helen E / Helen Hesketh / Bethan V. Purse / Jørgen Eilenberg / Alberto Santini / Riccardo Scalera / Grant D. Stentiford / Tim Adriaens / Karolina Bacela‐Spychalska / David Bass / Katie M. Beckmann / Paul Bessell / Jamie Bojko / Olaf Booy / Ana Cristina Cardoso / Franz Essl / Quentin Groom / Colin Harrower / Regina Kleespies /
    Angeliki F. Martinou / Monique M. van Oers / Edmund J. Peeler / Jan Pergl / Wolfgang Rabitsch / Alain Roques / Francis Schaffner / Stefan Schindler / Benedikt R. Schmidt / Karsten Schönrogge / Jonathan Smith / Wojciech Solarz / Alan Stewart / Arjan Stroo / Elena Tricarico / Katharine M.A. Turvey / Andrea Vannini / Montserrat Vilà / Stephen Woodward / Anja Amtoft Wynns / Alison M. Dunn

    Conservation letters. 2017 July, v. 10, no. 4

    2017  

    Abstract: According to the Convention on Biological Diversity, by 2020 invasive alien species (IAS) should be identified and their impacts assessed, so that species can be prioritized for implementation of appropriate control strategies and measures put in place ... ...

    Abstract According to the Convention on Biological Diversity, by 2020 invasive alien species (IAS) should be identified and their impacts assessed, so that species can be prioritized for implementation of appropriate control strategies and measures put in place to manage invasion pathways. For one quarter of the IAS listed as the “100 of the world's worst” environmental impacts are linked to diseases of wildlife (undomesticated plants and animals). Moreover, IAS are a significant source of “pathogen pollution” defined as the human‐mediated introduction of a pathogen to a new host or region. Despite this, little is known about the biology of alien pathogens and their biodiversity impacts after introduction into new regions. We argue that the threats posed by alien pathogens to endangered species, ecosystems, and ecosystem services should receive greater attention through legislation, policy, and management. We identify 10 key areas for research and action, including those relevant to the processes of introduction and establishment of an alien pathogen and to prediction of the spread and associated impact of an alien pathogen on native biota and ecosystems. The development of interdisciplinary capacity, expertise, and coordination to identify and manage threats was seen as critical to address knowledge gaps.
    Schlagwörter animals ; biodiversity ; ecosystem services ; ecosystems ; endangered species ; environmental impact ; invasive species ; issues and policy ; laws and regulations ; pathogens ; plants (botany) ; pollution ; prediction ; wildlife
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsverlauf 2017-07
    Umfang p. 476-483.
    Erscheinungsort John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
    Dokumenttyp Artikel
    Anmerkung JOURNAL ARTICLE
    ISSN 1755-263X
    DOI 10.1111/conl.12297
    Datenquelle NAL Katalog (AGRICOLA)

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

Zum Seitenanfang