LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 3 of total 3

Search options

  1. Article: Study of Serum Cystatin C and Serum Creatinine in Different Stages of Chronic Kidney Disease Patients.

    Pandey, Vikas Kumar / Mani / Mazumdar, Prajit / Vidyapati / Prasad, Manohar Lal

    The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India

    2022  Volume 70, Issue 4, Page(s) 11–12

    Abstract: There is lack of consistent surrogate markers of kidney function to identify established disease, especially in early stages of CKD. Creatinine remains within normal levels until a significant reduction in renal function has occured. Cystatin C appears ... ...

    Abstract There is lack of consistent surrogate markers of kidney function to identify established disease, especially in early stages of CKD. Creatinine remains within normal levels until a significant reduction in renal function has occured. Cystatin C appears to be unaffected by muscle mass, diet, or gender. Its clearance is only by glomerular filtration. The plasma concentration is not influenced by inflammation or liver disease. It is not affected by optical interferences. Considering these benefits, it is more useful when trying to detect mild to moderate impairment of kidney function.
    Material: An observational, analytical study was conducted over a duration of 18 months. The study participants were divided into 2 groups based on eGFR.
    Observation: 67.5% patients had raised Cystatin C as compared to only 12.5% who had raised Creatinine. In our study, we found that Serum Creatinine (r=-0.85, p< 0.001) was better than Cystatin C (r=-0.55, p< 0.001) in all stages of CKD. However, in patients with eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min/m2. Cystatin C (r = -0.68, p<0.001) was a more sensitive marker to detect renal dysfunction at an early stage as compared to Serum Creatinine (r = -0.48, p<0.001). Overall, the AUC (Area Under the Curve) for Serum Creatinine is more than Cystatin C. However, in patients with eGFR≥ 60ml/ min/1.73m2, AUC for cystatin C is more. Thus, Cystatin C is more sensitive than Serum Creatinine to detect early renal dysfunction.
    Conclusion: We found out that both serum creatinine and serum cystatin C were significantly increased across CKD groups but cystatin C is a better predictor of CKD than creatinine in stages with eGFR≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 as serum cystatin C was found to be raised contrary to serum creatinine which was within normal limits, although in stages with eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73 m2 there was no significant difference between the two. We found out that normal serum creatinine levels during the stage of kidney disease with eGFR≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 does not necessarily mean normal renal function. Cystatin C should be encouraged as a screening tool for early renal impairment in the patient as the risk of developing CKD, especially in long-standing hypertensive and diabetic patients as an adjunct to creatinine estimation. It should also be included in the management protocol for these patients.
    MeSH term(s) Biomarkers ; Creatinine ; Cystatin C ; Female ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Humans ; Male ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis
    Chemical Substances Biomarkers ; Cystatin C ; Creatinine (AYI8EX34EU)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-04-20
    Publishing country India
    Document type Journal Article ; Observational Study
    ZDB-ID 800766-4
    ISSN 0004-5772
    ISSN 0004-5772
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: An audit of Grade III or more skin reactions in consecutively assessed patients at a modern radiation oncology center.

    Pandey, Vikas Kumar / Munshi, Anusheel / Mohanti, Bidhu Kalyan / Bansal, Kanika / Rastogi, Khushboo / Ganesh, Tharmarnadar / Chauhan, Rohit Singh / Chaudhari, Bhavini / Pandey, Pramod

    Journal of cancer research and therapeutics

    2022  Volume 18, Issue 1, Page(s) 84–88

    Abstract: Purpose: Radiation dermatitis is most common and debilitating side effects of radiotherapy leading to treatment interruption, thereby compromising the local control, and effecting quality of life. With the invent of modern imaging and recent advances in ...

    Abstract Purpose: Radiation dermatitis is most common and debilitating side effects of radiotherapy leading to treatment interruption, thereby compromising the local control, and effecting quality of life. With the invent of modern imaging and recent advances in megavoltage radiotherapy, radiation-related side effects have reduced. In this audit, we report the risk factors associated with Grade III dermatitis in modern centers.
    Materials and methods: We analyzed 172 patients treated with volume modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and static field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SFIMRT) at our center. All head and neck, breast, gynecological, GU malignancies, and sarcoma patients treated with a dose of >45 Gy from April 2018 to December 2019 were included in the study. On couch, treatment verification was done with cone-beam computer tomography (CBCT). Slice-by-slice verification of planning target volume (PTV) with CBCT was done in the first three fractions and weekly thereafter. Skin evaluation was done using CTCAE v. 5. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS v. 22.
    Results: Of the 172 patients treated with VMAT and SFIMRT, 15 patients (8.7%) had Grade III dermatitis. Grade III dermatitis was mostly seen in breast cancer followed by head-and-neck patients. More reactions were observed in patients with advanced stage disease. Treatment verification is important at the later course of treatment, especially in head-and-neck cases where the treatment volume is large and PTV may extend outside skin. Contributing factors of radiation dermatitis at modern radiotherapy center are gene mutation, use of concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and bolus.
    Conclusion: We hereby conclude that PTV mismatch in weekly treatment verification, genetic mutations, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy, use of thermoplastic mask, and bolus are the contributing factors for Grade III dermatitis in modern radiotherapy centers.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Quality of Life ; Radiation Oncology ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-04-05
    Publishing country India
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2187633-2
    ISSN 1998-4138 ; 0973-1482
    ISSN (online) 1998-4138
    ISSN 0973-1482
    DOI 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_611_20
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article: A study on electromagnetic property during friction stir weld failure

    Mukherjee, S. K / Muthukumaran, S / Pallav, Kumar / Pandey, Vikas Kumar

    The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology Vol. 36, No. 3/4 , p. 249-253

    2008  Volume 36, Issue 3, Page(s) 249–253

    Author's details S. Muthukumaran; Kumar Pallav; Vikas Kumar Pandey; S. K. Mukherjee
    Language English
    Size Ill., graph. Darst.
    Publisher Springer
    Publishing place London
    Document type Article
    ZDB-ID 52651-4
    Database ECONomics Information System

    More links

    Kategorien

To top