LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 1 of total 1

Search options

Article ; Online: The impact of digitisation of a virtual fracture clinic on referral quality, outcomes and assessment times.

Sephton, Benjamin M / Morley, Hannah / Mahapatra, Piyush / Shenouda, Michael / Al-Yaseen, Mustafa / Bernstein, Darryl E / Cross, George / Dalili, Daniel E / Gurung, Amrit / Kamat, Atul / Kuc, Andrew J / Mohammed, Aisha R / Paraouty, Mehreen / Ponniah, Amsanaa / Sluckis, Ben / Deierl, Krisztian

European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society

2021  Volume 48, Issue 2, Page(s) 1327–1334

Abstract: Background: Virtual fracture clinics (VFCs) have become widely adopted, aiming to improve efficiency, standardise patient care and reduce clinic appointments for injuries that can be managed conservatively. A variety of means exist to manage VFC ... ...

Abstract Background: Virtual fracture clinics (VFCs) have become widely adopted, aiming to improve efficiency, standardise patient care and reduce clinic appointments for injuries that can be managed conservatively. A variety of means exist to manage VFC referrals and assessment, including paper-based and digital methods. This study assesses VFC referral quality and outcomes before and after implementation of a digital VFC referral and management system.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of all VFC referrals and assessments from July 2017-March 2020 in a large UK district general hospital. All referrals and assessments were analysed for quality and completeness of referral information, grade of assessor, outcome of assessment, referral-to-assessment time, and assessment-to-surgery time (for those requiring operative management).
Results: 3038 paper and 9,228 digital referrals were analysed by 2 separate reviewers. Quality and completeness of referral information showed significant improvement in 11 predetermined key data points with the digital referral system (p < 0.001). Date and mechanism of injury were the most commonly missing data criteria (67.5% and 68.2%, respectively) with paper referrals. Significant improvements were noted in the proportion of Consultant delivered VFC assessments (84.2% vs 71.0%; p < 0.001), VFC discharge rate (20.8% vs 13.1%; p < 0.001) and patients recalled for urgent review (6.2% vs 0.8%; p < 0.001) with digital referrals. Mean referral-to-assessment (31.2 vs 49.9 h; p < 0.001) and assessment-to-surgery (9.2 vs 13.0 days; p = 0.01) times also reduced significantly with referral digitisation.
Conclusion: Improvements in virtual referral quality and completeness directly lead to facilitation of more thorough, detailed and appropriate virtual assessments; improving timely decision-making, reducing unnecessary appointments, and permitting better prioritisation of workload and earlier surgery for patients requiring operative treatment. Purpose-built digital solutions are an excellent means of achieving these aims.
MeSH term(s) Ambulatory Care Facilities ; Consultants ; Fractures, Bone/surgery ; Humans ; Referral and Consultation ; Retrospective Studies
Language English
Publishing date 2021-04-09
Publishing country Germany
Document type Journal Article
ZDB-ID 2275480-5
ISSN 1863-9941 ; 1863-9933
ISSN (online) 1863-9941
ISSN 1863-9933
DOI 10.1007/s00068-021-01661-9
Shelf mark
Zs.A 1221: Show issues Location:
Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (1.OG)
ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)
Zs.MO 607: Show issues
Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

More links

Kategorien

To top