LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 55

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Response to Raj et al Abdominoperineal resection by trans-anal TME approach: are we refuting the technology a bit too early?

    Patel, Sunil V / Brown, Carl J / Caycedo-Marulanda, Antonio

    Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland

    2023  Volume 25, Issue 7, Page(s) 1538–1539

    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Anal Canal ; Proctectomy ; Technology
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-05-03
    Publishing country England
    Document type Letter ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 1440017-0
    ISSN 1463-1318 ; 1462-8910
    ISSN (online) 1463-1318
    ISSN 1462-8910
    DOI 10.1111/codi.16567
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Smartphone Application Versus Standard Instruction for Colonoscopic Preparation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Patel, Sunil V / Yu, David / Taylor, Connie / McKay, Jackie / Hookey, Lawrence

    Journal of clinical gastroenterology

    2024  

    Abstract: Objective: To compare smartphone application (Colonoscopic Preparation) instructions versus paper instructions for bowel preparation for colonoscopy.: Background: Adhering to bowel preparation instructions is important to ensure a high-quality ... ...

    Abstract Objective: To compare smartphone application (Colonoscopic Preparation) instructions versus paper instructions for bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
    Background: Adhering to bowel preparation instructions is important to ensure a high-quality colonoscopy.
    Patients and methods: This randomized controlled trial included individuals undergoing colonoscopy at a tertiary care hospital. Individuals were randomized (1:1) to receive instructions through a smartphone application or traditional paper instructions. The primary outcome was the quality of the bowel preparation as measured by the Boston Bowel Preparation Score. Secondary outcomes included cecal intubation and polyp detection. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a previously developed questionnaire.
    Results: A total of 238 individuals were randomized (n = 119 in each group), with 202 available for the intention-to-treat analysis (N = 97 in the app group and 105 in the paper group). The groups had similar demographics, indications for colonoscopy, and type of bowel preparation. The primary outcome (Boston Bowel Preparation Score) demonstrated no difference between groups (Colonoscopic Preparation app mean: 7.26 vs paper mean: 7.28, P = 0.91). There was no difference in cecal intubation (P = 0.37), at least one polyp detected (P = 0.43), or the mean number of polyps removed (P = 0.11). A higher proportion strongly agreed or agreed that they would use the smartphone app compared with paper instructions (89.4% vs 70.1%, P = 0.001).
    Conclusions: Smartphone instructions performed similarly to traditional paper instructions for those willing to use the application. Local patient preferences need to be considered before making changes in the method of delivery of medical instructions.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-03-15
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 448460-5
    ISSN 1539-2031 ; 0192-0790
    ISSN (online) 1539-2031
    ISSN 0192-0790
    DOI 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001988
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Applying the fragility index to randomized controlled trials evaluating total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: A methodological survey.

    McKechnie, Tyler / Brennan, Kelly / Eskicioglu, Cagla / Farooq, Ameer / Patel, Sunil V

    Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology

    2024  Volume 194, Page(s) 110148

    Abstract: Background: Recently, there has been significant interest in, and adoption of, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We designed the present study to assess the robustness of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ... ...

    Abstract Background: Recently, there has been significant interest in, and adoption of, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We designed the present study to assess the robustness of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating contemporary TNTs for LARC using the fragility index (FI).
    Materials and methods: Relevant articles were identified through a review article by Johnson et al. in the Canadian Journal of Surgery. Dichotomous outcomes within these RCTs were eligible for inclusion if the reported effect size had a p-value < 0.05. The main outcome was FI for each included outcome. Walsh et al.'s method of calculating FI was utilized. Correlations between FI and research characteristics were assessed using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane recommended tools.
    Results: Ten RCTs were identified with 25 outcomes having statistically significant differences between groups. Eleven outcomes were time-to-event outcomes, while the remainder were dichotomous outcomes. Approximately half (n = 13) were oncologic outcomes. The median FI was 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-16). The number of patients lost to follow-up exceeded the FI in 17 outcomes (68.0 %) and thus these results were considered "fragile". Lower FI was associated with high risk of bias (rho = -0.5594) and greater loss to follow-up (rho = -0.4394), while higher FI was associated with large study size (rho = 0.5120).
    Conclusions: The robustness of outcomes from trials assessing TNT for LARC was found to be questionable. Most outcomes were fragile, as determined by the FI. This survey is limited by the number of included studies.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Rectal Neoplasms/therapy ; Rectal Neoplasms/pathology ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-02-08
    Publishing country Ireland
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 605646-5
    ISSN 1879-0887 ; 0167-8140
    ISSN (online) 1879-0887
    ISSN 0167-8140
    DOI 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110148
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Venous invasion detectable only by elastic stain shows weak prognostic value in colon cancer.

    Fei, Linda Y N / Patel, Sunil V / Popa, Teodora / Boudreau, Lee / Caycedo-Marulanda, Antonio / Grin, Andrea / Wang, Tao

    Histopathology

    2024  Volume 84, Issue 6, Page(s) 1038–1046

    Abstract: Aims: Large venous invasion (VI) is prognostically significant in colon cancer. The increased use of elastic stains by pathologists results in higher VI detection rates compared to routine stains alone. This study assesses the prognostic value of VI ... ...

    Abstract Aims: Large venous invasion (VI) is prognostically significant in colon cancer. The increased use of elastic stains by pathologists results in higher VI detection rates compared to routine stains alone. This study assesses the prognostic value of VI detected by elastic versus routine stains.
    Methods and results: Colon cancers resected between 2014 and 2017 underwent pathology slide review for VI. Cases without VI on routine stain were stained by elastic trichrome and re-examined. Demographic, clinical, pathological and outcome data were gathered by retrospective review. Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests were performed for survival categorised by VI status. Cox regression was performed for multivariate analysis. Of 277 cases, 97 (35%) showed VI by routine stain alone, with an additional 58 (21%) discovered by subsequent elastic stains. Thus, elastic trichrome increased VI detection by 60%. However, only VI detected by routine stain showed worse overall survival (P < 0.001). VI detected by elastic stain only was not prognostically different from cases without VI (P = 0.428). For stage 2 cancers, VI was not prognostically significant regardless of method of detection. For stage 3 cases, only VI detected by routine stain was prognostic for overall survival (P = 0.002) with a hazard ratio of 4.04 by multivariate regression (P = 0.028).
    Conclusions: VI detectable only by elastic stains do not show prognostic significance for survival in colon cancer. For pathologists with high baseline VI detections rates on routine stain, reflexive use of elastic stain may be of limited value.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Prognosis ; Coloring Agents ; Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology ; Neoplasm Staging ; Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis ; Colonic Neoplasms/pathology ; Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology ; Retrospective Studies
    Chemical Substances Coloring Agents
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-01-22
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 131914-0
    ISSN 1365-2559 ; 0309-0167
    ISSN (online) 1365-2559
    ISSN 0309-0167
    DOI 10.1111/his.15149
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological outcomes with transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

    Neary, Emma / Ibrahim, Tarek / Verschoor, Chris P / Zhang, Lisa / Patel, Sunil V / Chadi, Sami A / Caycedo-Marulanda, Antonio

    Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland

    2024  

    Abstract: Aim: Transanal total mesorectal (taTME) excision is a method used to assist in the radical removal of the rectum. By adopting the concept of natural orifice surgery, it offers potential benefits over conventional techniques. Early enthusiasm for this ... ...

    Abstract Aim: Transanal total mesorectal (taTME) excision is a method used to assist in the radical removal of the rectum. By adopting the concept of natural orifice surgery, it offers potential benefits over conventional techniques. Early enthusiasm for this strategy led to its rapid and widespread adoption. The imposing of a local moratorium was precipitated by the discovery in Norway of an uncommon multifocal pattern of locoregional recurrence. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the incidence of local recurrence after taTME for rectal cancer.
    Method: Conforming to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines checklist, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. This included case series and comparative studies between taTME and preferentially laparoscopic procedures published between 2010 and 2021.
    Results: There were a total of 1175 studies retrieved. After removal and screening for quality and relevance, the final analysis contained 40 studies. The local recurrence rate following taTME was 3.4% (95% CI 2.9%-3.9%, I
    Conclusion: Our data suggest that the local recurrence for regular laparoscopic and transanal TME surgeries may be comparable, suggesting that taTME can be performed without influencing locoregional oncological outcomes in patients treated at specialized institutions and who have been cautiously selected.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-04-08
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 1440017-0
    ISSN 1463-1318 ; 1462-8910
    ISSN (online) 1463-1318
    ISSN 1462-8910
    DOI 10.1111/codi.16982
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: The impact of robotic rectal cancer surgery at a Canadian regional cancer centre: a retrospective cohort study.

    Patel, Sunil V / Wiseman, Vanessa / Zhang, Lisa / Merchant, Shaila J / Caycedo-Marulanda, Antonio / MacDonald, P Hugh

    Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie

    2024  Volume 67, Issue 3, Page(s) E206–E213

    Abstract: Background: Although robotic surgery has several advantages over other minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques for rectal cancer surgery, the uptake in Canada has been limited owing to a perceived increase in cost and lack of training. The objective ...

    Abstract Background: Although robotic surgery has several advantages over other minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques for rectal cancer surgery, the uptake in Canada has been limited owing to a perceived increase in cost and lack of training. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of access to robotic surgery in a Canadian setting.
    Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving consecutive adults undergoing surgical resection for rectal cancer between 2017 and 2020. The primary exposure was access to robotic surgery. Outcomes included MIS utilization, short-term outcomes, total cost of care, and quality of surgical resection. We completed univariate and multivariate analyses.
    Results: We included 171 individuals in this cohort study (85 in the prerobotic period and 86 in the robotic period). The 2 groups had similar baseline characteristics. A higher proportion of individuals underwent successful MIS in the robotic phase (86% v. 46%,
    Conclusion: Access to robotic rectal cancer surgery increased successful completion of MIS and shortened hospital stay, with a similar total cost of care. Robotic rectal cancer surgery can enhance patient outcomes in the Canadian setting.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/economics ; Retrospective Studies ; Rectal Neoplasms/surgery ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Canada ; Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data ; Cancer Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-05-01
    Publishing country Canada
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 410651-9
    ISSN 1488-2310 ; 0008-428X
    ISSN (online) 1488-2310
    ISSN 0008-428X
    DOI 10.1503/cjs.002523
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Reviewing the Reviewers Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest in Editorial Boards of Surgery Journals.

    Elsolh, Basheer / Brar, Amanpreet / Gyawali, Bishal / Patel, Sunil V

    Annals of surgery

    2021  Volume 276, Issue 6, Page(s) e1089–e1094

    Abstract: Objective: To assess the prevalence, magnitude, and disclosure status of industry funding in editorial boards of surgery journals.: Summary of background data: Financial COI can bias research. Although authors seeking to publish in peer-reviewed ... ...

    Abstract Objective: To assess the prevalence, magnitude, and disclosure status of industry funding in editorial boards of surgery journals.
    Summary of background data: Financial COI can bias research. Although authors seeking to publish in peer-reviewed surgery journals are required to provide COI disclosures, editorial board members' COI disclosures are generally not disclosed to readers.
    Methods: We present a cross-sectional analysis of industry funding to editorial board members of high-impact surgery journals. We reviewed top US-based surgery journals by impact factor to determine the presence of financial COI in members of each journal's editorial board. The prevalence and magnitude of COI was determined using 2018 industry reported payments found in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments database. Journal websites were also reviewed looking for the presence of editorial board disclosure statements.
    Results: A total of 1002 names of editorial board members from the top 10 high-impact American surgery journals were identified. Of 688 individual physicians based in the USA, 452 (65.7%) were found to have received industry payments in 2018, totaling $21,916,503 with a median funding amount per physician of $1253 (interquartile range $156-$10,769). Funding levels varied by surgical specialty and journal. Editorial board disclosure information was found in only 3.3% of physicians.
    Conclusions: Industry funding to editorial board members of high impact surgery journals is prevalent and underreported. Mechanisms of disclosure for COI are needed at the editorial board level to provide readers full transparency. This would acknowledge this COI of editorial board members, and thereby attempt to potentially further reduce the risk of bias in editorial decisions.
    MeSH term(s) Aged ; United States ; Humans ; Conflict of Interest ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Medicare ; Periodicals as Topic ; Disclosure
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-06-02
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Review ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 340-2
    ISSN 1528-1140 ; 0003-4932
    ISSN (online) 1528-1140
    ISSN 0003-4932
    DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004929
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Delayed vs. Early Appendectomy (DELAY) trial for adult patients with acute appendicitis: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

    Zhang, Lisa / Lemke, Madeline / Mir, Zuhaib M / Patel, Sunil V

    Contemporary clinical trials

    2021  Volume 102, Page(s) 106288

    Abstract: Introduction: Early appendectomy in patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis is the current standard of treatment in North America. Timely intervention is suggested to avoid the complications associated with perforated appendicitis; however, safety of ...

    Abstract Introduction: Early appendectomy in patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis is the current standard of treatment in North America. Timely intervention is suggested to avoid the complications associated with perforated appendicitis; however, safety of nighttime operating is a competing concern, with mixed results demonstrated thus far.
    Objectives: This multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial aims to assess whether delaying appendectomy until the following morning versus early appendectomy overnight affects the rate of surgical complications in adult patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis in the evening hours.
    Methods: This is a randomized, controlled trial across two academic institutions with blinded outcome assessors. Patients presenting with imaging-confirmed appendicitis with an expected appendectomy between 8 pm and 4 am and within 6 h of decision to operate will be randomized to early appendectomy (with 6 h of randomization, control arm) or delayed to the following morning (after 6 am, intervention arm). Primary outcome will be 30 day postoperative complications, defined as a composite of: mortality, readmission to hospital, emergency department visit, percutaneous drain insertion, reoperation, prolonged hospital stay (>7 days), and postoperative complications. Secondary outcome measures are operative time, length of stay, time to emergency department visit and compliance to treatment.
    Discussion: This is a feasible and pragmatic clinical trial, intended to provide evidence for challenging decision making for the most common surgical disease worldwide. Results of this study will aid surgeons and health care administrators on how to appropriately triage appendectomies for patients with acute appendicitis who present overnight.
    MeSH term(s) Acute Disease ; Adult ; Appendectomy ; Appendicitis/surgery ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Multicenter Studies as Topic ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology ; Prospective Studies ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-01-23
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Clinical Trial Protocol ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2182176-8
    ISSN 1559-2030 ; 1551-7144
    ISSN (online) 1559-2030
    ISSN 1551-7144
    DOI 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106288
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Delayed Versus Early Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Adult Patients With Acute Appendicitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Patel, Sunil V / Zhang, Lisa / Mir, Zuhaib M / Lemke, Madeline / Leeper, William R / Allen, Laura J / Walser, Eric / Vogt, Kelly

    Annals of surgery

    2023  Volume 279, Issue 1, Page(s) 88–93

    Abstract: Objective: To assess whether delaying appendectomy until the following morning is non-inferior to immediate surgery in those with acute appendicitis presenting at night.: Background: Despite a lack of supporting evidence, those with acute ... ...

    Abstract Objective: To assess whether delaying appendectomy until the following morning is non-inferior to immediate surgery in those with acute appendicitis presenting at night.
    Background: Despite a lack of supporting evidence, those with acute appendicitis who present at night frequently have surgery delayed until the after morning.
    Methods: The delay trial is a noninferiority randomized controlled trial conducted between 2018 and 22 at 2 tertiary care hospitals in Canada. Adults with imaging confirmed acute appendicitis who presented at night (8:00 pm -4:00 am ). Delaying surgery until after 6:00 am was compared with immediate surgery. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative complications. An a prior noninferiority margin of 15% was deemed clinically relevant.
    Results: One hundred twenty-seven of the planned 140 patients were enrolled in the Delayed Versus Early Laparoscopic Appendectomy (DELAY) trial (59 in the delayed group and 68 in the immediate group). The two groups were similar at baseline. The mean time between the decision to operate and surgery was longer in the delayed group (11.0 vs 4.4 hours, P < 0.0001). The primary outcome occurred in 6/59 (10.2%) of those in the delayed group versus 15/67 (22.4%) of those in the immediate group ( P = 0.07). The difference between groups met the a priori noninferiority criteria of +15% (risk difference -12.2%, 95% CI: -24.4% to +0.4%, test of noninferiority P < 0.0001).
    Conclusions: The DELAY study is the first trial to assess delaying appendectomy in those with acute appendicitis. We demonstrate the noninferiority of delaying surgery until the after morning.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Humans ; Acute Disease ; Appendectomy/methods ; Appendicitis/surgery ; Appendicitis/complications ; Laparoscopy/methods ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications/surgery
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-07-13
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Equivalence Trial ; Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
    ZDB-ID 340-2
    ISSN 1528-1140 ; 0003-4932
    ISSN (online) 1528-1140
    ISSN 0003-4932
    DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005996
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Emergency Colorectal Surgery in Those with Cirrhosis: A Population-based Study Assessing Practice Patterns, Outcomes and Predictors of Mortality.

    Zhang, Lisa / Brennan, Kelly / Flemming, Jennifer A / Nanji, Sulaiman / Djerboua, Maya / Merchant, Shaila J / Caycedo-Marulanda, Antonio / Patel, Sunil V

    Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology

    2023  Volume 7, Issue 2, Page(s) 160–168

    Abstract: Background: Those with cirrhosis who require emergency colorectal surgery are at risk for poor outcomes. Although risk predictions models exists, these tools are not specific to colorectal surgery, nor were they developed in a contemporary setting. Thus, ...

    Abstract Background: Those with cirrhosis who require emergency colorectal surgery are at risk for poor outcomes. Although risk predictions models exists, these tools are not specific to colorectal surgery, nor were they developed in a contemporary setting. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess the outcomes in this population and determine whether cirrhosis etiology and/or the Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD-Na) is associated with mortality.
    Methods: This population-based study included those with cirrhosis undergoing emergent colorectal surgery between 2009 and 2017. All eligible individuals in Ontario were identified using administrative databases. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality.
    Results: Nine hundred and twenty-seven individuals (57%) (male) were included. The most common cirrhosis etiology was non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (50%) and alcohol related (32%). Overall 90-day mortality was 32%. Multivariable survival analysis demonstrated those with alcohol-related disease were at increased risk of 90-day mortality (hazards ratio [HR] 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-2.0 vs. NAFLD [ref]). Surgery for colorectal cancer was associated with better survival (HR 0.27, 95%CI 0.16-0.47). In the subgroup analysis of those with an available MELD-Na score (
    Conclusion: Individuals with cirrhosis who require emergent colorectal surgery have a high risk of postoperative complications, including mortality. Increasing MELD-Na score is associated with mortality and can be used to risk stratify individuals.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-10-20
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2940642-0
    ISSN 2515-2092 ; 2515-2084
    ISSN (online) 2515-2092
    ISSN 2515-2084
    DOI 10.1093/jcag/gwad040
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top