LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 2 of total 2

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: "I was having an internal conflict with myself." COVID-19 vaccination decision-making processes among pregnant women.

    Narasimhan, Subasri / Perry, Tahira L / Johnson, Leslie Cm

    Women's health (London, England)

    2023  Volume 19, Page(s) 17455057231218211

    Abstract: Background: Vaccination serves as an efficient primary means of control for infectious diseases. However, in the case of the COVID-19 pandemic, pregnant women within the United States had the lowest rates of COVID-19 vaccination and reported the lowest ... ...

    Abstract Background: Vaccination serves as an efficient primary means of control for infectious diseases. However, in the case of the COVID-19 pandemic, pregnant women within the United States had the lowest rates of COVID-19 vaccination and reported the lowest intent to vaccinate.
    Objectives: To explore the decision-making process for COVID-19 vaccination for people pregnant during the pandemic.
    Design: A secondary analysis of data from a mixed-methods study that examined the impact of COVID-19 on experiences of prenatal care, birth support, and delivery in the Southern United States.
    Methods: This study used a descriptive phenomenological approach to thematically analyze in-depth interviews (
    Results: Two themes emerged, the weighing of parallel risks and priorities from different sources resulting in vaccine decisional conflict and the need to reconcile that conflict via multiple strategies. All participants weighed priorities and risks from multiple areas of their lives and described internal conflict around vaccination. Participants described tailoring decisions to household dynamics, reconciling public and private values around vaccination, and the impact of their identities on the decision-making process. While many described concerns over vaccine safety and fetal health, uniquely, many highlighted weighing the impact of prior pregnancy loss history, with some choosing other preventive measures like social distancing or mask-wearing, which they deemed less risky.
    Conclusion: Pregnant people make complex COVID-19 vaccination decisions, which must be considered in future vaccine messaging and advocacy for this group.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Pregnancy ; COVID-19/prevention & control ; COVID-19/psychology ; COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use ; Pandemics ; Pregnant Women/psychology ; Vaccination/psychology ; Decision Making ; United States
    Chemical Substances COVID-19 Vaccines
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-12-21
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2274503-8
    ISSN 1745-5065 ; 1745-5057
    ISSN (online) 1745-5065
    ISSN 1745-5057
    DOI 10.1177/17455057231218211
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Truth or DARE (Digital Anal Rectal Examination): Gynecologist Viewpoints on Anal Cancer Screening.

    Gaydos, Laura M / Blemur, Danielle / Perry, Tahira / Stier, Elizabeth A / Khan, Michelle J / Flowers, Lisa

    Journal of lower genital tract disease

    2023  Volume 27, Issue 4, Page(s) 351–355

    Abstract: Methods: The authors conducted a survey for practicing gynecologists recruited through academic institutions, professional societies, and professional groups on social media resulting in 196 respondents. The survey, fielded between January and June 2022, ...

    Abstract Methods: The authors conducted a survey for practicing gynecologists recruited through academic institutions, professional societies, and professional groups on social media resulting in 196 respondents. The survey, fielded between January and June 2022, included questions on knowledge, attitudes, training, and practices regarding anal cancer prevention (ACP). Descriptive statistics and χ 2 analysis were completed.
    Results: In terms of knowledge regarding ACP, over 80% of respondents identified certain clinical indications for anal cancer screening. However, only 36% respondents selected the 3 correct ACP screening tools. Twenty-seven (13.9%) respondents reported receiving training on ACP in medical school, whereas 50 (25.9%) reported receiving training during residency. Only 21% of respondents reported that they perform anal cytology, and 32% reported that they perform digital anal rectal examinations. One hundred thirty-six respondents (75.56%) affirmed that they needed additional training on ACP to be able to provide this service to their patients, and 95 (53.1%) stated they were extremely likely to participate in ACP training if given the opportunity.
    Conclusion: Although a limited proportion of practicing gynecologists are trained in ACP, there is willingness to participate in training if it were made available and to incorporate ACP into their practices.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Early Detection of Cancer ; Gynecologists ; Anus Neoplasms/diagnosis ; Anus Neoplasms/prevention & control ; Internship and Residency ; Social Media
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-08-16
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2041332-4
    ISSN 1526-0976 ; 1089-2591
    ISSN (online) 1526-0976
    ISSN 1089-2591
    DOI 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000762
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top