LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 3 of total 3

Search options

  1. Article: Tandem Resonance metallic double-J ureteral stents in a single ureter for salvage management of chronic ureteral obstruction.

    Navetta, Andrew F / Durdin, Trey D / Thai, Kim / Wagner, Kristofer R / Reilly, T Philip / Patel, Belur J / Tayeb, Marawan M El

    Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)

    2019  Volume 32, Issue 4, Page(s) 510–513

    Abstract: For chronic malignant and benign ureteral obstruction, the metal construction of the Resonance ureteral stent has been developed to maintain ureteral patency for up to 12 months, obviating the need for the frequent exchange required for conventional ... ...

    Abstract For chronic malignant and benign ureteral obstruction, the metal construction of the Resonance ureteral stent has been developed to maintain ureteral patency for up to 12 months, obviating the need for the frequent exchange required for conventional plastic ureteral stents. We report our experience placing tandem Resonance stents (TRS) in a single ureter of patients who failed management with a single Resonance stent. A retrospective review of patients who had TRS for management of ureteral obstruction between February 2014 and May 2017 was performed. Seven renal units from four patients with a median age of 62 years were managed with TRS. All but one renal unit was successfully managed with TRS initially. Hydronephrosis resolved in 80% of renal units at a median of 33 days, and creatinine reached its nadir a median of 38 days after placement, with a median improvement of 0.68 ng/mL. However, the median length of management with TRS was only 123.5 days with one exchange, and there was an overall success rate of 28.5% at 1 year. TRS placement is a feasible option for short-term management in a challenging population that would like to avoid nephrostomy and has failed other modalities.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-07-31
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2703932-8
    ISSN 1525-3252 ; 0899-8280
    ISSN (online) 1525-3252
    ISSN 0899-8280
    DOI 10.1080/08998280.2019.1633005
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Vena cava air embolism after traumatic Foley catheter placement.

    Chavez, Anthony H / Reilly, T Philip / Bird, Erin T

    Urology

    2009  Volume 73, Issue 4, Page(s) 748–749

    Abstract: We report a case of traumatic Foley catheter placement and manipulation that resulted in a large, symptomatic, vena cava air embolism confirmed on computed tomography. To the best of our knowledge, our report represents the first case of a large, ... ...

    Abstract We report a case of traumatic Foley catheter placement and manipulation that resulted in a large, symptomatic, vena cava air embolism confirmed on computed tomography. To the best of our knowledge, our report represents the first case of a large, symptomatic, vena cava air embolism as a direct result of Foley catheter trauma. The included computed tomography images are unique in that they simultaneously show an improperly positioned Foley catheter and a large vena cava air embolism.
    MeSH term(s) Catheterization/adverse effects ; Catheterization/instrumentation ; Embolism, Air/etiology ; Humans ; Male ; Vena Cava, Inferior/injuries ; Young Adult
    Language English
    Publishing date 2009-04
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Case Reports ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 192062-5
    ISSN 1527-9995 ; 0090-4295
    ISSN (online) 1527-9995
    ISSN 0090-4295
    DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.043
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.

    Parker, Brian D / Frederick, Robert W / Reilly, T Philip / Lowry, Patrick S / Bird, Erin T

    Urology

    2004  Volume 64, Issue 6, Page(s) 1102–6; discussion 1106

    Abstract: Objectives: To compare the success rates, cost effectiveness, and efficiency of ureteroscopy (URS) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for proximal ureteral stones.: Methods: In a retrospective manner, 220 patients who underwent ... ...

    Abstract Objectives: To compare the success rates, cost effectiveness, and efficiency of ureteroscopy (URS) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for proximal ureteral stones.
    Methods: In a retrospective manner, 220 patients who underwent treatment for proximal ureteral stones were included in the study. The patient records, radiographs, and billing statements of all patients treated for upper ureteral stones between January 1997 and June 2001 at Scott and White Memorial Hospital were reviewed. The patients were placed into two treatment groups according to the method of their stone's initial treatment. The stones were categorized as less than 1 cm and 1 cm or greater.
    Results: A total of 111 patients were in the ESWL group, 73 of whom had stones less than 1 cm, and 109 patients in the URS group, 81 of whom had stones less than 1 cm. In the URS group, 91% were successfully treated with one treatment intervention, and 55% of the ESWL group were successfully treated with their initial intervention (P <0.0001). Of the patients with URS failure, all but one was treated successfully with a second URS. Of the patients with ESWL failure, 52% were treated successfully by subsequent URS. The remaining patients with ESWL failure were treated with repeat ESWL, with a 62% success rate. The efficiency quotient for stones less than 1 cm for URS and ESWL was 0.79 and 0.51, respectively. For stones 1 cm or greater, URS had an efficiency quotient of 0.72 and ESWL of 0.46. The URS group required fewer days to be stone free (8 versus 25.5 days, P <0.0001). No statistically significant difference was found in the overall complication rates (P = 0.43). URS had significantly lower charges for the initial procedure (7575 dollars versus 9507 dollars, P <0.0001). The total charges were also lower for URS (9378 dollars versus 15,583, dollars P <0.0001). Complications were similar in the two groups. The URS group had two ureteral strictures.
    Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that URS is more efficient and cost-effective for stones up to and larger than 1 cm with similar complication rates compared with ESWL.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Aged ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Female ; Humans ; Lithotripsy/economics ; Lithotripsy, Laser/economics ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Failure ; United States ; Ureteral Calculi/economics ; Ureteral Calculi/therapy ; Ureteroscopy/economics
    Language English
    Publishing date 2004-12
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Comparative Study ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 192062-5
    ISSN 1527-9995 ; 0090-4295
    ISSN (online) 1527-9995
    ISSN 0090-4295
    DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2004.07.040
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top