LIVIVO - Das Suchportal für Lebenswissenschaften

switch to English language
Erweiterte Suche

Ihre letzten Suchen

  1. AU="Rhodes, Rosamond"
  2. AU="Gromova, Alexandra S"
  3. AU=Ockene Ira
  4. AU=Hirsch Daniela
  5. AU=Navaratnam Annalan MD
  6. AU="Johnson, Matthew Thomas"
  7. AU=Wagstaff Peter GK
  8. AU="Almahboub, Sarah A"
  9. AU="Tuana Aksu"
  10. AU="Bozin, Tonci"
  11. AU="Rachel Marie Towle"
  12. AU="Soriano-Ursúa, Marvin A"
  13. AU="Cagnin, A"
  14. AU="Ivens, Al C"
  15. AU="Juan Mucci"
  16. AU="Alejandro Hlavnika"
  17. AU="Makarenko V."

Suchergebnis

Treffer 1 - 10 von insgesamt 136

Suchoptionen

  1. Buch ; Online ; E-Book: The trusted doctor

    Rhodes, Rosamond

    Medical ethics and professionalism

    2020  

    Abstract: The Trusted Doctor rejects the reigning view that medical ethics is nothing more than the application of everyday ethics to dilemmas that arise in today's medical practice. Instead, it presents a new theory of medical ethics that is actually in line with ...

    Verfasserangabe Rosamond Rhodes
    Abstract The Trusted Doctor rejects the reigning view that medical ethics is nothing more than the application of everyday ethics to dilemmas that arise in today's medical practice. Instead, it presents a new theory of medical ethics that is actually in line with the codes of ethics and professional oaths proclaimed by physicians around the world.

    Intro -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Contents -- List of Illustrations -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- 1. Why a New Approach to Medical Ethics Is Needed: The Argument -- 2. The Distinctive Ethics of Medicine -- The first duty of medical ethics is to seek trust and be deserving of it. -- The second duty of medical ethics is promote the interests of patients and society. -- 3. Medicine's Core Responsibilities -- The third duty of medical ethics is professional competence. -- The fourth duty of medical ethics is to provide care. -- The fifth duty of medical ethics is mindfulness. -- 4. The Commitment to Science -- The sixth duty of medical ethics is the commitment to science. -- 5. Duties of Behavior Toward Patients -- The seventh duty of medical ethics is nonjudgmental regard. -- The eighth duty of medical ethics is nonsexual regard. -- The ninth duty of medical ethics is confidentiality. -- 6. Duties to Respect Patients' Autonomy and Assess Capacity -- The tenth duty of medical ethics is respect for autonomy. -- The eleventh duty of medical ethics is to assess patients' decisional capacity. -- 7. Medicine's Commitment to Truth -- Truth-telling is the twelfth duty of medical ethics. -- 8. Commitments to Fellow Professionals -- The thirteenth duty of medical ethics is peer responsiveness. -- The fourteenth duty of medical ethics is peer communication. -- The fifteenth duty of medical ethics is peer scrutiny. -- 9. Why Trustworthy Stewardship Requires Justice -- The sixteenth duty of medical ethics is medical justice. -- 10. Why Doctors Must Develop a Doctorly Character -- 11. Resolving Moral Dilemmas -- 12. Problems with Doctors Invoking the Best Interest Standard -- 13. Professional Responsibility and Conscientious Objection -- 14. Concluding Thoughts -- Appendix -- The Hippocratic Oath -- Oath of Maimonides.
    Schlagwörter Electronic books
    Sprache Englisch
    Umfang 1 Online-Ressource (332 Seiten)
    Verlag Oxford University Press
    Erscheinungsort Oxford
    Erscheinungsland Vereinigtes Königreich
    Dokumenttyp Buch ; Online ; E-Book
    Anmerkung Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources
    Bemerkung Zugriff für angemeldete ZB MED-Nutzerinnen und -Nutzer
    HBZ-ID HT020444690
    ISBN 978-0-19-085993-0 ; 9780190859909 ; 0-19-085993-8 ; 0190859903
    Datenquelle ZB MED Katalog Medizin, Gesundheit, Ernährung, Umwelt, Agrar

    Kategorien

  2. Artikel ; Online: Competing Duties and Professional Roles.

    Rhodes, Rosamond

    The American journal of bioethics : AJOB

    2023  Band 23, Heft 12, Seite(n) 25–28

    Mesh-Begriff(e) Humans ; Professional Role
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2023-11-27
    Erscheinungsland United States
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 2060433-6
    ISSN 1536-0075 ; 1526-5161
    ISSN (online) 1536-0075
    ISSN 1526-5161
    DOI 10.1080/15265161.2023.2272934
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  3. Buch: The Blackwell guide to medical ethics

    Rhodes, Rosamond

    (Blackwell philosophy guides ; 21)

    2007  

    Titelvarianten Medical ethics
    Verfasserangabe ed. by Rosamond Rhodes
    Serientitel Blackwell philosophy guides ; 21
    Überordnung
    Schlagwörter Ethics, Medical ; Patient Rights / ethics ; Bioethical Issues / legislation & jurisprudence ; Public Policy ; Medizinische Ethik
    Schlagwörter Ärztliche Ethik ; Klinische Ethik ; Ärztliches Ethos ; Arzt ; Medizin ; Heilberuf ; Medizinethik
    Sprache Englisch
    Umfang XII, 435 S.
    Verlag Blackwell
    Erscheinungsort Malden, Mass. u.a.
    Erscheinungsland Vereinigte Staaten
    Dokumenttyp Buch
    HBZ-ID HT014784980
    ISBN 1-4051-2584-5 ; 978-1-4051-2584-0 ; 1-4051-2583-7 ; 978-1-4051-2583-3
    Datenquelle Katalog ZB MED Medizin, Gesundheit

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  4. Artikel ; Online: The Uncommon Ethics of the Medical Profession: A Response to My Critics.

    Rhodes, Rosamond

    Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees

    2022  Band 31, Heft 2, Seite(n) 212–219

    Abstract: In responding to my critics, James Childress, Tom Beauchamp, Soren Holm, and Ruth Macklin, I reprise my arguments for medical ethics being an uncommon morality. I also elaborate on points that required further clarification. I explain the role of trust ... ...

    Abstract In responding to my critics, James Childress, Tom Beauchamp, Soren Holm, and Ruth Macklin, I reprise my arguments for medical ethics being an uncommon morality. I also elaborate on points that required further clarification. I explain the role of trust and trustworthiness in the creation of a profession. I also describe my views on the relationship of the medical profession to the society in which medicine is practiced. Finally, I defend my claim that medical ethics "is constructed by medical professionals for medical professionals" by describing the profession's unique vantage point for regulating and policing the profession's uncommon powers and privileges.
    Mesh-Begriff(e) Bioethics ; Ethical Theory ; Ethics, Medical ; Humans ; Morals
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2022-03-04
    Erscheinungsland United States
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 1146581-5
    ISSN 1469-2147 ; 0963-1801
    ISSN (online) 1469-2147
    ISSN 0963-1801
    DOI 10.1017/S0963180121000670
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  5. Artikel ; Online: In Defense of Uncommon Morality.

    Rhodes, Rosamond

    Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees

    2022  Band 31, Heft 1, Seite(n) 144–149

    Mesh-Begriff(e) Ethical Theory ; Humans ; Morals
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2022-01-20
    Erscheinungsland United States
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 1146581-5
    ISSN 1469-2147 ; 0963-1801
    ISSN (online) 1469-2147
    ISSN 0963-1801
    DOI 10.1017/S096318012100089X
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  6. Buch: The human microbiome

    Rhodes, Rosamond / Gligorov, Nada / Schwab, Abraham P.

    ethical, legal and social concerns

    2013  

    Verfasserangabe ed. by Rosamond Rhodes ; Nada Gligorov and Abraham Paul Schwab
    Schlagwörter Microbiota ; Bioethical Issues / legislation & jurisprudence ; Genetic Privacy ; Ethics, Research
    Thema/Rubrik (Code) 616.9/041
    Sprache Englisch
    Umfang XIV, 266 S., 25 cm
    Verlag Oxford Univ. Press
    Erscheinungsort Oxford u.a.
    Erscheinungsland Vereinigtes Königreich
    Dokumenttyp Buch
    Anmerkung Includes bibliographical references and index
    HBZ-ID HT018254192
    ISBN 978-0-19-982941-5 ; 0-19-982941-1 ; 9780199322152 ; 0199322155
    Datenquelle Katalog ZB MED Medizin, Gesundheit

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  7. Buch: Medicine and social justice

    Rhodes, Rosamond

    essays on the distribution of health care

    2002  

    Verfasserangabe ed. by Rosamond Rhodes
    Schlagwörter Social medicine ; Medical economics ; Medical economics/Moral and ethical aspects ; Right to health care ; Medical ethics ; Medizinische Versorgung ; Soziale Gerechtigkeit ; Gesundheitsökonomie ; Medizinische Ethik
    Schlagwörter Gesundheitsversorgung ; Gesundheitliche Versorgung ; Patientenversorgung ; Ärztliche Ethik ; Klinische Ethik ; Ärztliches Ethos ; Arzt ; Medizin ; Heilberuf ; Medizinethik ; Gesundheitsökonomik ; Gesundheitswesen ; Medizinökonomie ; Medizinökonomik ; Medizinische Ökonomie ; Medizinische Ökonomik ; Health Economics
    Sprache Englisch
    Umfang XVII, 469 S.
    Verlag Oxford Univ. Press
    Erscheinungsort Oxford u.a.
    Erscheinungsland Vereinigtes Königreich
    Dokumenttyp Buch
    HBZ-ID HT013454903
    ISBN 0-19-514354-X ; 978-0-19-514354-6
    Datenquelle Katalog ZB MED Medizin, Gesundheit

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  8. Artikel ; Online: Justice in COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation: rethinking the approach.

    Rhodes, Rosamond

    Journal of medical ethics

    2021  Band 47, Heft 9, Seite(n) 623–631

    Abstract: Policies for the allocation of COVID-19 vaccine were implemented in early 2021 as soon as vaccine became available. Those responsible for the planning and execution of COVID-19 vaccination had to make choices about who received vaccination first while ... ...

    Abstract Policies for the allocation of COVID-19 vaccine were implemented in early 2021 as soon as vaccine became available. Those responsible for the planning and execution of COVID-19 vaccination had to make choices about who received vaccination first while numerous authors offered their own recommendations. This paper provides an account of how such decisions should be made by focusing on the specifics of the situation at hand. In that light, I offer an argument for prioritising those who are likely vectors of the disease and a criticism of the victim-focused priority proposals put forward by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, the UK National Health Service, and others. I also offer thoughts on how those authors may have gone astray.
    Mesh-Begriff(e) COVID-19 ; COVID-19 Vaccines ; Humans ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Social Justice ; State Medicine
    Chemische Substanzen COVID-19 Vaccines
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2021-06-09
    Erscheinungsland England
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 194927-5
    ISSN 1473-4257 ; 0306-6800
    ISSN (online) 1473-4257
    ISSN 0306-6800
    DOI 10.1136/medethics-2020-107117
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  9. Artikel ; Online: Justice and Guidance for the COVID-19 Pandemic.

    Rhodes, Rosamond

    The American journal of bioethics : AJOB

    2020  Band 20, Heft 7, Seite(n) 163–166

    Mesh-Begriff(e) Betacoronavirus ; Bioethics ; COVID-19 ; Coronavirus Infections ; Humans ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Social Justice
    Schlagwörter covid19
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2020-07-27
    Erscheinungsland United States
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 2060433-6
    ISSN 1536-0075 ; 1526-5161
    ISSN (online) 1536-0075
    ISSN 1526-5161
    DOI 10.1080/15265161.2020.1777354
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  10. Artikel ; Online: Medical Ethics: Common or Uncommon Morality?

    Rhodes, Rosamond

    Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees

    2020  Band 29, Heft 3, Seite(n) 404–420

    Abstract: This paper challenges the long-standing and widely accepted view that medical ethics is nothing more than common morality applied to clinical matters. It argues against Tom Beauchamp and James Childress's four principles; Bernard Gert, K. Danner Clouser ... ...

    Abstract This paper challenges the long-standing and widely accepted view that medical ethics is nothing more than common morality applied to clinical matters. It argues against Tom Beauchamp and James Childress's four principles; Bernard Gert, K. Danner Clouser and Charles Culver's ten rules; and Albert Jonsen, Mark Siegler, and William Winslade's four topics approaches to medical ethics. First, a negative argument shows that common morality does not provide an account of medical ethics and then a positive argument demonstrates why the medical profession requires its own distinctive ethics. The paper also provides a way to distinguish roles and professions and an account of the distinctive duties of medical ethics. It concludes by emphasizing ways in which the uncommon morality approach to medical ethics is markedly different from the common morality approach.
    Mesh-Begriff(e) Ethics, Medical ; Humans ; Morals
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2020-06-01
    Erscheinungsland United States
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1146581-5
    ISSN 1469-2147 ; 0963-1801
    ISSN (online) 1469-2147
    ISSN 0963-1801
    DOI 10.1017/S0963180120000146
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

Zum Seitenanfang