LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 2 of total 2

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Quality of information about urologic pathology in English and Spanish from ChatGPT, BARD, and Copilot.

    Szczesniewski, J J / Ramos Alba, A / Rodríguez Castro, P M / Lorenzo Gómez, M F / Sainz González, J / Llanes González, L

    Actas urologicas espanolas

    2024  

    Abstract: Introduction and objective: Generative artificial intelligence makes it possible to ask about medical pathologies in dialog boxes. Our objective was to analyze the quality of information about the most common urological pathologies provided by ChatGPT ( ... ...

    Abstract Introduction and objective: Generative artificial intelligence makes it possible to ask about medical pathologies in dialog boxes. Our objective was to analyze the quality of information about the most common urological pathologies provided by ChatGPT (OpenIA), BARD (Google), and Copilot (Microsoft).
    Methods: We analyzed information on the following pathologies and their treatments as provided by AI: prostate cancer, kidney cancer, bladder cancer, urinary lithiasis, and benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH). Questions in English and Spanish were posed in dialog boxes; the answers were collected and analyzed with DISCERN questionnaires and the overall appropriateness of the response. Surgical procedures were performed with an informed consent questionnaire.
    Results: The responses from the three chatbots explained the pathology, detailed risk factors, and described treatments. The difference is that BARD and Copilot provide external information citations, which ChatGPT does not. The highest DISCERN scores, in absolute numbers, were obtained in Copilot; however, on the appropriacy scale it was noted that their responses were not the most appropriate. The best surgical treatment scores were obtained by BARD, followed by ChatGPT, and finally Copilot.
    Conclusions: The answers obtained from generative AI on urological diseases depended on the formulation of the question. The information provided had significant biases, depending on pathology, language, and above all, the dialog box consulted.
    Language Spanish
    Publishing date 2024-02-17
    Publishing country Spain
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2173-5786
    ISSN (online) 2173-5786
    DOI 10.1016/j.acuroe.2024.02.009
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Vacuum-assisted access sheath in supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL).

    Szczesniewski, J J / Boronat Catalá, J / García-Cano Fernández, A M / Rodríguez Castro, P M / Torres Pérez, D / Llanes González, L

    Actas urologicas espanolas

    2023  Volume 47, Issue 10, Page(s) 681–687

    Abstract: Introduction: The vacuum-assisted access sheath is a new device for the treatment of kidney stones with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).: Objective: Our aim was to compare the stone-free rate (SFR) and complications between standard mini ... ...

    Abstract Introduction: The vacuum-assisted access sheath is a new device for the treatment of kidney stones with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
    Objective: Our aim was to compare the stone-free rate (SFR) and complications between standard mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) and vacuum-assisted PCNL (Va-PCNL).
    Methods: Retrospective study of patients undergoing Mini-PCNL and Va-PCNL from January 2018 to June 2022. Va-PCNL was performed with a disposable sheath (ClearPetra®) with continuous high-flow irrigation and vacuum fluid dynamics for easier stone fragment removal. Baseline patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, perioperative and postoperative data were collected. We compared SFR and complications.
    Results: A total of 136 patients were identified, 57 (41,9%) underwent Va-PCNL and 79 (58,15%) Mini-PCNL. Mean operative time was significantly shorter in the Va-PCNL group (95 min.) than in Mini-PCNL (146 min; P = ,001) group. The tubeless technique was performed more frequently in Va-PCNL group (61,4% vs. 34,2%; P = ,002). We did not observe any differences in postoperative complications. The mean hospital stay was significantly lower in Va-PCNL with 1,7 ± 1,9 days per patient compared with 2,7 ± 1,5 days in the Mini-PCNL group (P = ,001). There were no differences in SFR at 3 months between Va-PCNL (71,9%) and Mini-PCNL (71,8%; P =v ,848).
    Conclusion: Patients treated with Va-PCNL had comparable results to Mini-PCNL, showing equal SFR with similar infectious complications rates. Potential benefits of Va-PCNL include shorter operative time and postoperative stay.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous/adverse effects ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Kidney Calculi/etiology ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications/etiology
    Language Spanish
    Publishing date 2023-06-22
    Publishing country Spain
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2173-5786
    ISSN (online) 2173-5786
    DOI 10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.06.004
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top