LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 2 of total 2

Search options

  1. Article: Rates of tooth movement and bone remodeling activity: Self-ligating versus conventional brackets.

    do Nascimento, Leonard-Euler-Andrade-Gomes / Pithon, Matheus-Melo / Ruellas, Antônio-Carlos de O / Franzotti, Eduardo-Sant Anna / Filho, Antônio-Cruz-Gonçalves / de Souza, Margareth-Maria-Gomes / Bolognese, Ana-Maria

    Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry

    2020  Volume 12, Issue 4, Page(s) e391–e398

    Abstract: Background: Bracket systems have been developed with the purpose of reducing frictional resistance between the archwire and accessories. The aim of this research was to compare rates of tooth movement and regions of cellular bone modeling activity along ...

    Abstract Background: Bracket systems have been developed with the purpose of reducing frictional resistance between the archwire and accessories. The aim of this research was to compare rates of tooth movement and regions of cellular bone modeling activity along tooth root surfaces of teeth moved with conventional vs. self-ligating brackets.
    Material and methods: The experiments were conducted in 20 male dogs. Bands were cemented in all intermediate incisors, with conventional brackets (Morelli) on the right side and hybrid self-ligating ones (T3-American Orthodontics) on the left side. A 0.019" x 0.025" stainless steel wire was inserted passively in the slot of these brackets with chain elastics (250 gf) to perform sliding mechanics. Clinical records of the orthodontic mechanics were made before and after 15 days of the tooth movement. The dental segments of the animals were prepared for light microscopy. Statistical analysis of variance and the Tukey correction with a P value at 5% were used.
    Results: There were no significant differences in tooth movement rates between the two types of brackets but differences, in the bone modeling activity, suggested that tooth movement with the self-ligating brackets resulted in more tipping and less translational movement than tooth movement with the conventional brackets.
    Conclusions: The rates of tooth movement were similar between the two systems. The histological evaluation of cellular bone modeling activity along tooth root surfaces showed more translation movement of teeth with the conventional brackets, and more tipping movement of teeth with self-ligating brackets.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-04-01
    Publishing country Spain
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2586647-3
    ISSN 1989-5488
    ISSN 1989-5488
    DOI 10.4317/jced.56615
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Colonization of Streptococcus mutans on esthetic brackets: self-ligating vs conventional.

    do Nascimento, Leonard Euler Andrade Gomes / Pithon, Matheus Melo / dos Santos, Rogério Lacerda / Freitas, Amanda Osório Ayres / Alviano, Daniela Sales / Nojima, Lincoln Issamu / Nojima, Matilde Cunha G / Ruellas, Antônio Carlos de O

    American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics

    2013  Volume 143, Issue 4 Suppl, Page(s) S72–7

    Abstract: Introduction: Self-ligating orthodontic brackets rely on clips, rather than ligatures, to hold the archwire in place. It is unknown whether replacing ligatures with clips affects the adherence of Streptococcus mutans. The aim of this research was to ... ...

    Abstract Introduction: Self-ligating orthodontic brackets rely on clips, rather than ligatures, to hold the archwire in place. It is unknown whether replacing ligatures with clips affects the adherence of Streptococcus mutans. The aim of this research was to evaluate whether self-ligating brackets have an advantage over conventional brackets as determined by the adherence of S mutans.
    Methods: The sample consisted of 50 esthetic brackets, divided into 3 experimental groups and 2 control groups of 10 brackets each. Two experimental groups were active self-ligating brackets (QuicKlear; Forestadent, Pforzheim, Germany; and In-Ovation C; Dentsply GAC, Bohemia, NY); the other was a passive self-ligating bracket (Damon 3; Ormco, Glendora, Calif). The 2 control groups were conventional brackets (Mystique; Dentsply GAC; and Clarity; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif). The brackets were randomly bonded to the canines, first and second premolars, and first and second molars in the mandibular left hemiarch of 10 male participants. Biofilm was collected from the tooth surfaces before bonding and from the brackets on day 21 and placed in Petri dishes containing Mitis salivarius agar. The brackets were removed on day 28 and examined by using scanning electron microscopy. Statistical analysis, analysis of variance, and the Tukey correction with a P value of 0.05 were used.
    Results: The greatest numbers of colonies were found in an active self-ligating bracket group (In-Ovation C), and the fewest colonies were in a conventional bracket group (Clarity). The largest colonies formed on active self-ligating brackets. In the slot, the greatest formation was in a control group (Mystique).
    Conclusions: Self-ligating esthetic brackets do not promote greater or lesser S mutans colonization when compared with conventional brackets. Differences were found to be related to the material composition of the bracket.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Bacterial Adhesion ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Esthetics, Dental ; Humans ; Male ; Orthodontic Appliance Design ; Orthodontic Brackets/microbiology ; Streptococcus mutans/physiology
    Language English
    Publishing date 2013-04
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Comparative Study ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 356699-7
    ISSN 1097-6752 ; 0889-5406 ; 0002-9416
    ISSN (online) 1097-6752
    ISSN 0889-5406 ; 0002-9416
    DOI 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.07.017
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top