LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 150

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance

    Rüffin, Nicolas

    Research Policy ; Vol. 49 ; Iss. 1 ; Elsevier

    Ambitions, constraints and options for action

    2020  

    Abstract: Science diplomacy recently has gained a remarkable foothold in European policymaking. Both the European Commission and many Member States use the term to label a whole range of issues and activities in their respective policies. This prompts the question ...

    Abstract Science diplomacy recently has gained a remarkable foothold in European policymaking. Both the European Commission and many Member States use the term to label a whole range of issues and activities in their respective policies. This prompts the question what exactly is the current role of the European Commission in the field of external research policies as compared to the Member States traditionally in charge of it. The article draws on the conceptual framework of multi-level governance, in particular the distinction between Type I and Type II governance systems. The aim is to show that the well-established setups for science policy and foreign affairs in the EU at present channel most of the Commission's activities in ways that not run counter to the interests of the Member States. The institutionally set parameters entail a focus on existing programs and activities. However, the Type II character of science diplomacy governance in principle leaves room for changes in jurisdictions and the division of labor, which are subsequently discussed. The paper's argument rests upon the qualitative analysis of expert interviews conducted with representatives from Member States, the Commission, Switzerland, and the US.
    Keywords science diplomacy ; foreign policy ; science policy ; international relations ; multi-level governance
    Subject code 320
    Language English
    Publisher Amsterdam: Elsevier
    Publishing country de
    Document type Article ; Online
    ZDB-ID 1491698-8
    ISSN 1873-7625 ; 0048-7333
    ISSN (online) 1873-7625
    ISSN 0048-7333
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance

    Rüffin, Nicolas

    Research Policy ; Vol. 49 ; Iss. 1 ; Elsevier

    Ambitions, constraints and options for action

    2020  

    Abstract: Science diplomacy recently has gained a remarkable foothold in European policymaking. Both the European Commission and many Member States use the term to label a whole range of issues and activities in their respective policies. This prompts the question ...

    Abstract Science diplomacy recently has gained a remarkable foothold in European policymaking. Both the European Commission and many Member States use the term to label a whole range of issues and activities in their respective policies. This prompts the question what exactly is the current role of the European Commission in the field of external research policies as compared to the Member States traditionally in charge of it. The article draws on the conceptual framework of multi-level governance, in particular the distinction between Type I and Type II governance systems. The aim is to show that the well-established setups for science policy and foreign affairs in the EU at present channel most of the Commission's activities in ways that not run counter to the interests of the Member States. The institutionally set parameters entail a focus on existing programs and activities. However, the Type II character of science diplomacy governance in principle leaves room for changes in jurisdictions and the division of labor, which are subsequently discussed. The paper's argument rests upon the qualitative analysis of expert interviews conducted with representatives from Member States, the Commission, Switzerland, and the US.
    Keywords science diplomacy ; foreign policy ; science policy ; international relations ; multi-level governance
    Subject code 320
    Language English
    Publisher Amsterdam: Elsevier
    Publishing country de
    Document type Article ; Online
    ZDB-ID 1491698-8
    ISSN 1873-7625 ; 0048-7333
    ISSN (online) 1873-7625
    ISSN 0048-7333
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance

    Rüffin, Nicolas

    Research Policy ; Vol. 49 ; Iss. 1 ; Elsevier

    Ambitions, constraints and options for action

    2020  

    Abstract: Science diplomacy recently has gained a remarkable foothold in European policymaking. Both the European Commission and many Member States use the term to label a whole range of issues and activities in their respective policies. This prompts the question ...

    Abstract Science diplomacy recently has gained a remarkable foothold in European policymaking. Both the European Commission and many Member States use the term to label a whole range of issues and activities in their respective policies. This prompts the question what exactly is the current role of the European Commission in the field of external research policies as compared to the Member States traditionally in charge of it. The article draws on the conceptual framework of multi-level governance, in particular the distinction between Type I and Type II governance systems. The aim is to show that the well-established setups for science policy and foreign affairs in the EU at present channel most of the Commission's activities in ways that not run counter to the interests of the Member States. The institutionally set parameters entail a focus on existing programs and activities. However, the Type II character of science diplomacy governance in principle leaves room for changes in jurisdictions and the division of labor, which are subsequently discussed. The paper's argument rests upon the qualitative analysis of expert interviews conducted with representatives from Member States, the Commission, Switzerland, and the US.
    Keywords science diplomacy ; foreign policy ; science policy ; international relations ; multi-level governance
    Subject code 320
    Language English
    Publisher Amsterdam: Elsevier
    Publishing country de
    Document type Article ; Online
    ZDB-ID 1491698-8
    ISSN 1873-7625 ; 0048-7333
    ISSN (online) 1873-7625
    ISSN 0048-7333
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance

    Rüffin, Nicolas

    Research Policy ; Vol. 49 ; Iss. 1 ; Elsevier

    Ambitions, constraints and options for action

    2020  

    Abstract: Science diplomacy recently has gained a remarkable foothold in European policymaking. Both the European Commission and many Member States use the term to label a whole range of issues and activities in their respective policies. This prompts the question ...

    Abstract Science diplomacy recently has gained a remarkable foothold in European policymaking. Both the European Commission and many Member States use the term to label a whole range of issues and activities in their respective policies. This prompts the question what exactly is the current role of the European Commission in the field of external research policies as compared to the Member States traditionally in charge of it. The article draws on the conceptual framework of multi-level governance, in particular the distinction between Type I and Type II governance systems. The aim is to show that the well-established setups for science policy and foreign affairs in the EU at present channel most of the Commission's activities in ways that not run counter to the interests of the Member States. The institutionally set parameters entail a focus on existing programs and activities. However, the Type II character of science diplomacy governance in principle leaves room for changes in jurisdictions and the division of labor, which are subsequently discussed. The paper's argument rests upon the qualitative analysis of expert interviews conducted with representatives from Member States, the Commission, Switzerland, and the US.
    Keywords science diplomacy ; foreign policy ; science policy ; international relations ; multi-level governance
    Subject code 320
    Language English
    Publisher Amsterdam: Elsevier
    Publishing country de
    Document type Article ; Online
    ZDB-ID 1491698-8
    ISSN 1873-7625 ; 0048-7333
    ISSN (online) 1873-7625
    ISSN 0048-7333
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance

    Rüffin, Nicolas

    Research Policy ; Vol. 49 ; Iss. 1 ; Elsevier

    Ambitions, constraints and options for action

    2020  

    Abstract: Science diplomacy recently has gained a remarkable foothold in European policymaking. Both the European Commission and many Member States use the term to label a whole range of issues and activities in their respective policies. This prompts the question ...

    Abstract Science diplomacy recently has gained a remarkable foothold in European policymaking. Both the European Commission and many Member States use the term to label a whole range of issues and activities in their respective policies. This prompts the question what exactly is the current role of the European Commission in the field of external research policies as compared to the Member States traditionally in charge of it. The article draws on the conceptual framework of multi-level governance, in particular the distinction between Type I and Type II governance systems. The aim is to show that the well-established setups for science policy and foreign affairs in the EU at present channel most of the Commission's activities in ways that not run counter to the interests of the Member States. The institutionally set parameters entail a focus on existing programs and activities. However, the Type II character of science diplomacy governance in principle leaves room for changes in jurisdictions and the division of labor, which are subsequently discussed. The paper's argument rests upon the qualitative analysis of expert interviews conducted with representatives from Member States, the Commission, Switzerland, and the US.
    Keywords science diplomacy ; foreign policy ; science policy ; international relations ; multi-level governance
    Subject code 320
    Language English
    Publisher Amsterdam: Elsevier
    Publishing country de
    Document type Article ; Online
    ZDB-ID 1491698-8
    ISSN 1873-7625 ; 0048-7333
    ISSN (online) 1873-7625
    ISSN 0048-7333
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance

    Rüffin, Nicolas

    Ambitions, constraints and options for action

    2020  

    Abstract: Science diplomacy recently has gained a remarkable foothold in European policymaking. Both the European Commission and many Member States use the term to label a whole range of issues and activities in their respective policies. This prompts the question ...

    Abstract Science diplomacy recently has gained a remarkable foothold in European policymaking. Both the European Commission and many Member States use the term to label a whole range of issues and activities in their respective policies. This prompts the question what exactly is the current role of the European Commission in the field of external research policies as compared to the Member States traditionally in charge of it. The article draws on the conceptual framework of multi-level governance, in particular the distinction between Type I and Type II governance systems. The aim is to show that the well-established setups for science policy and foreign affairs in the EU at present channel most of the Commission's activities in ways that not run counter to the interests of the Member States. The institutionally set parameters entail a focus on existing programs and activities. However, the Type II character of science diplomacy governance in principle leaves room for changes in jurisdictions and the division of labor, which are subsequently discussed. The paper's argument rests upon the qualitative analysis of expert interviews conducted with representatives from Member States, the Commission, Switzerland, and the US.
    Keywords ddc:330 ; science diplomacy ; foreign policy ; science policy ; international relations ; multi-level governance
    Subject code 320
    Language English
    Publisher Amsterdam: Elsevier
    Publishing country de
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance

    Rüffin, Nicolas

    Research Policy ; Vol. 49 ; Iss. 1 ; Elsevier

    Ambitions, constraints and options for action

    2020  

    Abstract: Science diplomacy recently has gained a remarkable foothold in European policymaking. Both the European Commission and many Member States use the term to label a whole range of issues and activities in their respective policies. This prompts the question ...

    Abstract Science diplomacy recently has gained a remarkable foothold in European policymaking. Both the European Commission and many Member States use the term to label a whole range of issues and activities in their respective policies. This prompts the question what exactly is the current role of the European Commission in the field of external research policies as compared to the Member States traditionally in charge of it. The article draws on the conceptual framework of multi-level governance, in particular the distinction between Type I and Type II governance systems. The aim is to show that the well-established setups for science policy and foreign affairs in the EU at present channel most of the Commission's activities in ways that not run counter to the interests of the Member States. The institutionally set parameters entail a focus on existing programs and activities. However, the Type II character of science diplomacy governance in principle leaves room for changes in jurisdictions and the division of labor, which are subsequently discussed. The paper's argument rests upon the qualitative analysis of expert interviews conducted with representatives from Member States, the Commission, Switzerland, and the US.
    Keywords science diplomacy ; foreign policy ; science policy ; international relations ; multi-level governance
    Subject code 320
    Language English
    Publisher Amsterdam: Elsevier
    Publishing country de
    Document type Article ; Online
    ZDB-ID 1491698-8
    ISSN 1873-7625 ; 0048-7333
    ISSN (online) 1873-7625
    ISSN 0048-7333
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance

    Rüffin, Nicolas

    Research Policy ; Vol. 49 ; Iss. 1 ; Elsevier

    Ambitions, constraints and options for action

    2020  

    Abstract: Science diplomacy recently has gained a remarkable foothold in European policymaking. Both the European Commission and many Member States use the term to label a whole range of issues and activities in their respective policies. This prompts the question ...

    Abstract Science diplomacy recently has gained a remarkable foothold in European policymaking. Both the European Commission and many Member States use the term to label a whole range of issues and activities in their respective policies. This prompts the question what exactly is the current role of the European Commission in the field of external research policies as compared to the Member States traditionally in charge of it. The article draws on the conceptual framework of multi-level governance, in particular the distinction between Type I and Type II governance systems. The aim is to show that the well-established setups for science policy and foreign affairs in the EU at present channel most of the Commission's activities in ways that not run counter to the interests of the Member States. The institutionally set parameters entail a focus on existing programs and activities. However, the Type II character of science diplomacy governance in principle leaves room for changes in jurisdictions and the division of labor, which are subsequently discussed. The paper's argument rests upon the qualitative analysis of expert interviews conducted with representatives from Member States, the Commission, Switzerland, and the US.
    Keywords science diplomacy ; foreign policy ; science policy ; international relations ; multi-level governance
    Subject code 320
    Language English
    Publisher Amsterdam: Elsevier
    Publishing country de
    Document type Article ; Online
    ZDB-ID 1491698-8
    ISSN 1873-7625 ; 0048-7333
    ISSN (online) 1873-7625
    ISSN 0048-7333
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance

    Rüffin, Nicolas

    Research Policy ; Vol. 49 ; Iss. 1 ; Elsevier

    Ambitions, constraints and options for action

    2020  

    Abstract: Science diplomacy recently has gained a remarkable foothold in European policymaking. Both the European Commission and many Member States use the term to label a whole range of issues and activities in their respective policies. This prompts the question ...

    Abstract Science diplomacy recently has gained a remarkable foothold in European policymaking. Both the European Commission and many Member States use the term to label a whole range of issues and activities in their respective policies. This prompts the question what exactly is the current role of the European Commission in the field of external research policies as compared to the Member States traditionally in charge of it. The article draws on the conceptual framework of multi-level governance, in particular the distinction between Type I and Type II governance systems. The aim is to show that the well-established setups for science policy and foreign affairs in the EU at present channel most of the Commission's activities in ways that not run counter to the interests of the Member States. The institutionally set parameters entail a focus on existing programs and activities. However, the Type II character of science diplomacy governance in principle leaves room for changes in jurisdictions and the division of labor, which are subsequently discussed. The paper's argument rests upon the qualitative analysis of expert interviews conducted with representatives from Member States, the Commission, Switzerland, and the US.
    Keywords science diplomacy ; foreign policy ; science policy ; international relations ; multi-level governance
    Subject code 320
    Language English
    Publisher Amsterdam: Elsevier
    Publishing country de
    Document type Article ; Online
    ZDB-ID 1491698-8
    ISSN 1873-7625 ; 0048-7333
    ISSN (online) 1873-7625
    ISSN 0048-7333
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: EU science diplomacy in a contested space of multi-level governance

    Rüffin, Nicolas

    Research Policy ; Vol. 49 ; Iss. 1 ; Elsevier

    Ambitions, constraints and options for action

    2020  

    Abstract: Science diplomacy recently has gained a remarkable foothold in European policymaking. Both the European Commission and many Member States use the term to label a whole range of issues and activities in their respective policies. This prompts the question ...

    Abstract Science diplomacy recently has gained a remarkable foothold in European policymaking. Both the European Commission and many Member States use the term to label a whole range of issues and activities in their respective policies. This prompts the question what exactly is the current role of the European Commission in the field of external research policies as compared to the Member States traditionally in charge of it. The article draws on the conceptual framework of multi-level governance, in particular the distinction between Type I and Type II governance systems. The aim is to show that the well-established setups for science policy and foreign affairs in the EU at present channel most of the Commission's activities in ways that not run counter to the interests of the Member States. The institutionally set parameters entail a focus on existing programs and activities. However, the Type II character of science diplomacy governance in principle leaves room for changes in jurisdictions and the division of labor, which are subsequently discussed. The paper's argument rests upon the qualitative analysis of expert interviews conducted with representatives from Member States, the Commission, Switzerland, and the US.
    Keywords science diplomacy ; foreign policy ; science policy ; international relations ; multi-level governance
    Subject code 320
    Language English
    Publisher Amsterdam: Elsevier
    Publishing country de
    Document type Article ; Online
    ZDB-ID 1491698-8
    ISSN 1873-7625 ; 0048-7333
    ISSN (online) 1873-7625
    ISSN 0048-7333
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top