LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 27

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: [PREPRINT] "Somebody Who Does Something Other Than Osteopathy".

    Sajjadi, Nicholas B / Shepard, Samuel

    The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association

    2020  

    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-11-16
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 410350-6
    ISSN 1945-1997 ; 0003-0287 ; 0098-6151
    ISSN (online) 1945-1997
    ISSN 0003-0287 ; 0098-6151
    DOI 10.7556/jaoa.2020.159
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Public interest in cardiac arrest in the United States following Damar Hamlin's injury on Monday Night Football.

    Jacobs, Hayden R / Haight, Macy A / Nguyen, Amy / Sajjadi, Nicholas B / Hartwell, Micah

    Resuscitation

    2023  Volume 186, Page(s) 109789

    MeSH term(s) Humans ; United States/epidemiology ; Football/injuries ; Heart Arrest/etiology ; Heart Arrest/therapy
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-04-05
    Publishing country Ireland
    Document type Letter
    ZDB-ID 189901-6
    ISSN 1873-1570 ; 0300-9572
    ISSN (online) 1873-1570
    ISSN 0300-9572
    DOI 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109789
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: The impact of COVID-19 on otolaryngology research: a cross-sectional analysis of discontinued trials.

    Rucker, Brayden M / Sajjadi, Nicholas B / Brame, Lacy S / Vassar, Matt / Hartwell, Micah L

    Journal of osteopathic medicine

    2022  Volume 122, Issue 8, Page(s) 393–399

    Abstract: Context: The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced the capacity to conduct medical research due to recruitment difficulties, supply chain shortages, and funding deficits. The clinical practice of otolaryngology was especially impacted due to a reduction in ... ...

    Abstract Context: The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced the capacity to conduct medical research due to recruitment difficulties, supply chain shortages, and funding deficits. The clinical practice of otolaryngology was especially impacted due to a reduction in elective procedures, such as facial plastic surgeries and vocal fold injections.
    Objectives: The primary objective was to examine the extent of clinical trial (CTs) disruption secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic in the field of otolaryngology.
    Methods: On August 1, 2021, we conducted a systematic search utilizing ClinicalTrials.gov for CTs related to common otolaryngology disorders. We utilized the date range January 1, 2020 through August 1, 2021 to identify all trials potentially affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Investigators performed screening and data extraction in a duplicate, masked fashion. Trials resulting from the search were extracted for trial status, condition treated, enrollment number, funding, study type, study design, last update posted date, and trial location. Trials that explicitly mentioned COVID-19 as a reason for discontinuation or suspension were coded as such. For trials that did not explicitly mention COVID-19, we coded the reason provided from ClinicalTrials.gov. The Oklahoma State University Center for Health Science Institutional Review Board determined that this project did not qualify as human subject research.
    Results: A total of 1,777 CTs met the inclusion criteria, and 223 CTs were discontinued between January 1, 2020 and August 1, 2021. Thirty-three (14.8%) of the 223 CTs reported discontinuation explicitly due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The 33 studies had 1,715 participants enrolled in total. Among the primary interventions, 11 (33.3%) were devices, 10 (30.3%) were drugs, 5 (15.2%) were behavioral, 4 (12.1%) were diagnostic tests, 1 (3.0%) was dietary, and 2 (6.1%) were labeled as "other." Regarding the CT location, 20 (60.6%) were conducted in the United States, and 13 (39.4%) were conducted internationally. Of the 33 CTs, 19 (57.6%) were suspended, 9 (27.3%) were terminated, and 5 (15.2%) were withdrawn. The overall most common reason for trial disruption was recruitment difficulties (24.2%). Median enrollment for discontinued trials due to COVID-19 was 37 (interquartile range [IQR], 19-71) and for other reasons was 6 (IQR, 0-27), for which the Mann-Whitney test showed a statistically significant difference between the two (z=-3.913, p<0.001). There were no significant associations between trial location, funding source, randomization, or whether a study involved masked vs unmasked participants.
    Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has incited an impact on clinical research in the field of otolaryngology. To preserve trial continuation amid future threats to participant interaction and communication, we recommend further exploration of remote monitoring practices and virtual procedures-those that will maintain the effectiveness and accuracy needed to establish novel therapeutics. We encourage future trials to gauge which remote assessments show the greatest validity, with the long-term goal of establishing innovative study designs resilient to future pandemics.
    MeSH term(s) COVID-19/epidemiology ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Humans ; Otolaryngology ; Pandemics ; SARS-CoV-2
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-04-01
    Publishing country Germany
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2702-3648
    ISSN (online) 2702-3648
    DOI 10.1515/jom-2021-0278
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Clinical Trial Discontinuation in Anesthesiology: Cross-sectional Analysis.

    Traxler, Brett D / Rucker, Brayden M / Greenough, Mary C / Sajjadi, Nicholas B / Hartwell, Micah

    JMIR perioperative medicine

    2022  Volume 5, Issue 1, Page(s) e34936

    Abstract: Background: The COVID-19 pandemic drastically altered perioperative medical practice owing to safety concerns, postponing elective or nonemergent procedures, supply chain shortages, and reallocating perioperative staff to care for patients with COVID-19. ...

    Abstract Background: The COVID-19 pandemic drastically altered perioperative medical practice owing to safety concerns, postponing elective or nonemergent procedures, supply chain shortages, and reallocating perioperative staff to care for patients with COVID-19. However, the impact of the pandemic on the conduct on anesthesiology clinical research is unknown.
    Objective: The primary objective was to quantify the magnitude of the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on anesthesiology clinical research.
    Methods: We performed a systematic search using ClinicalTrials.gov to identify clinical trials related to the practice of anesthesiology. We screened trials with status updates from January 1, 2020, through October 1, 2021, to capture trials potentially affected by the COVID-19 pandemic by the time of our search. Investigators screened for relevant studies and extracted trial characteristics along with the reason for discontinuation reported on the clinical trial registry.
    Results: A total of 823 clinical trials met inclusion criteria, and 146 clinical trials were discontinued within the designated date range. In total, 24 (16.4%) of the 146 clinical trials were halted explicitly owing to the COVID-19 pandemic. A significant association existed between trial enrollment numbers and the likelihood of discontinuation due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as larger trials were more likely to be disrupted (z=-2.914, P=.004).
    Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic is reportedly associated with the discontinuation of anesthesiology-related clinical trials. With the uncertain course of the COVID-19 pandemic, developing anesthesia trial protocols to help minimize social interaction and prevent premature trial disruption are imperative.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-04-05
    Publishing country Canada
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2561-9128
    ISSN (online) 2561-9128
    DOI 10.2196/34936
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: The use of telecommunication and virtualization among ongoing and discontinued COVID-19 clinical trials: A cross-sectional analysis.

    Greenough, Mary C / Sajjadi, Nicholas B / Rucker, Brayden / Vassar, Matt / Hartwell, Micah

    Contemporary clinical trials

    2022  Volume 114, Page(s) 106681

    Abstract: Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted clinical research due to safety measures such as social distancing and lockdowns. However, developing treatments for COVID-19 relies on conducting clinical trials. Using telemedicine or virtual methods may ... ...

    Abstract Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted clinical research due to safety measures such as social distancing and lockdowns. However, developing treatments for COVID-19 relies on conducting clinical trials. Using telemedicine or virtual methods may support ongoing trials and limit the pandemic's impact on clinical research.
    Objective: To examine the use of virtual methods among ongoing and discontinued COVID-19 clinical trials.
    Design: In this cross-sectional analysis, we performed a systematic search of ClinicalTrials.gov for COVID-19 related trials registered since the pandemic began. In masked, duplicate fashion, authors extracted data from included studies, noting whether trialists reported using telecommunication, virtualization, or remote data collection to deliver interventions and monitor outcome measures. The authors also coded the use of virtual methods for recruitment, enrollment, or follow-up visits. Chi-square tests and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess differences in the use of virtual methods between ongoing and discontinued studies and differences between intervention types.
    Results: Our search returned 2549 clinical trials, of which 2383 were included. Of included studies, 2109 (88.5%) were ongoing and 274 (11.5%) were discontinued. Overall, 519 (24.6%) ongoing COVID-19 trials reported using virtual methods for trial conduct and 43 (15.7%) discontinued trials reported using virtual methods. There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of reporting virtual methods between discontinued and ongoing trials (X
    Conclusions and relevance: The COVID-19 pandemic has presented an unprecedented need for safe and efficient clinical trial conduct. Nearly a quarter of ongoing COVID-19 clinical trials in our sample reported using virtual methods for supporting trial progress. Ongoing trials were more likely to report virtual methods compared to discontinued trials. Developing strategies that allow for continuing trials during emergencies may limit trial disruption. Exploring and developing remote trial methods may continue to be valuable in light of emerging COVID-19 variants and may persist beyond the pandemic.
    MeSH term(s) COVID-19 ; Communicable Disease Control ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Humans ; Pandemics ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Telemedicine
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-01-16
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2182176-8
    ISSN 1559-2030 ; 1551-7144
    ISSN (online) 1559-2030
    ISSN 1551-7144
    DOI 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106681
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: The impact of COVID-19 on autism research: A cross-sectional analysis of discontinued or suspended clinical trials.

    Neale, Monika / Landers, Elizabeth / Sajjadi, Nicholas B / Mazur-Mosiewicz, Anya / Hartwell, Micah

    Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research

    2022  Volume 15, Issue 8, Page(s) 1560–1564

    Abstract: Due to uncertainties associated with the COVID-19 public health crisis, several clinical trials had to be withdrawn or postponed. Our investigation aimed to assess the rate of discontinuation of clinical trials focusing on Autism Spectrum Disorder. Of ... ...

    Abstract Due to uncertainties associated with the COVID-19 public health crisis, several clinical trials had to be withdrawn or postponed. Our investigation aimed to assess the rate of discontinuation of clinical trials focusing on Autism Spectrum Disorder. Of the 197 registered trials included in our systematic review, 15 (7.6%) were discontinued, with nearly half of these explicitly citing COVID-19 as their reason for discontinuation. Pharmacological trials were six times more likely to be discontinued during the pandemic than non-pharmacological studies. The difference between the likelihood of discontinuation was statistically significant (OR: 6.13; 95% CI: 1.22-30.71). There was no evidence of association between funding source and reasons for discontinuation. Limitations, along with implications for future trials are discussed. LAY SUMMARY: We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the discontinuation rate of autism clinical trials. We found that drug trials were six times more likely to be discontinued during the pandemic compared to behavioral, diagnostic, and nutritional trials. The overall discontinuation rate was notably lower in autism clinical trials than in other areas of medical research. We recommend an examination of the methodology of the continued autism trials to assess their applicability in other fields.
    MeSH term(s) Autism Spectrum Disorder/epidemiology ; Autistic Disorder/epidemiology ; COVID-19 ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Humans ; Pandemics
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-06-07
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Systematic Review
    ZDB-ID 2481338-2
    ISSN 1939-3806 ; 1939-3792
    ISSN (online) 1939-3806
    ISSN 1939-3792
    DOI 10.1002/aur.2764
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: The impact of COVID-19 on psychiatry research: A cross-sectional analysis of discontinued clinical trials for depressive disorders.

    Sajjadi, Nicholas B / Howard, Conner / Papa, Colton / Mashigian, Evan / Vassar, Matt / Hartwell, Micah

    Psychiatry research

    2022  Volume 319, Page(s) 114999

    MeSH term(s) Humans ; COVID-19 ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Depressive Disorder ; Psychiatry ; Clinical Trials as Topic
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-12-05
    Publishing country Ireland
    Document type Letter
    ZDB-ID 445361-x
    ISSN 1872-7123 ; 1872-7506 ; 0925-4927 ; 0165-1781
    ISSN (online) 1872-7123 ; 1872-7506
    ISSN 0925-4927 ; 0165-1781
    DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114999
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Social determinants of health in patients with arthritis: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

    Webb, Jason / Emmert, Ryan / Reddy, Arjun / Sajjadi, Nicholas B / Greiner, Ben / Bray, Natasha / Hartwell, Micah

    Journal of osteopathic medicine

    2023  Volume 124, Issue 2, Page(s) 69–75

    Abstract: Context: Social determinants of health (SDOH) are economic, social, and political conditions that affect a person's overall health or the health of a group of people. Researchers have investigated the effects of SDOH on various diseases, such as asthma, ...

    Abstract Context: Social determinants of health (SDOH) are economic, social, and political conditions that affect a person's overall health or the health of a group of people. Researchers have investigated the effects of SDOH on various diseases, such as asthma, obesity, and chronic stress, but few publications have been made regarding its effects on arthritis.
    Objectives: Our primary objective was to analyze the implications of SDOH on disease severity relating to pain levels and limitations experienced among people with diagnosed arthritis.
    Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). We included individuals who reported having arthritis, were over the age of 45, and who also completed the SDOH module. Pain scores from the four-question Arthritis Burden Module were correlated to question responses pertaining to SDOH to determine their associations.
    Results: For the analysis, our sample size was 25,682, with response rates varying slightly among the SDOH questions. Individuals diagnosed with arthritis were more likely to report functional limitations if they experienced food insecurity (χ
    Conclusions: Our results show that SDOH profoundly impact pain levels and limitations experienced by patients with arthritis. Although work has already begun to help alleviate burdens associated with SDOH, more research and actions are required to create equitable health throughout the population.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Social Determinants of Health ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System ; Arthritis/epidemiology ; Pain/epidemiology
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-10-23
    Publishing country Germany
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2702-3648
    ISSN (online) 2702-3648
    DOI 10.1515/jom-2022-0162
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Associations of intimate partner violence and maternal comorbidities: a cross-sectional analysis of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.

    Hartwell, Micah / Keener, Ashley / Robling, Kristyn / Enmeier, Mackenzie / Sajjadi, Nicholas B / Greiner, Benjamin / Price, Jameca

    Journal of osteopathic medicine

    2023  Volume 123, Issue 8, Page(s) 405–410

    Abstract: Context: Intimate partner violence (IPV) occurs when an intimate partner inflicts physical, sexual, and/or emotional assault with coercive control and is a traumatic experience with repercussions that can be exacerbated when a woman is pregnant. While ... ...

    Abstract Context: Intimate partner violence (IPV) occurs when an intimate partner inflicts physical, sexual, and/or emotional assault with coercive control and is a traumatic experience with repercussions that can be exacerbated when a woman is pregnant. While screening for IPV during pregnancy is recommended to occur regardless of risk, less than 50% of pregnant women are screened.
    Objectives: Identifying clinical factors commonly associated with IPV during pregnancy may improve screening rates, thus our primary objective was to examine associations between IPV and maternal comorbidities.
    Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) Phase 8 spanning 2016 through 2019. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression was utilized to calculate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) to determine associations between IPV and diabetes, anxiety, hypertension, depression, asthma, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and thyroid disease.
    Results: More than 40% of women experiencing IPV reported a history of depression or anxiety. The occurrence of IPV was higher among women with depression (AOR 3.48, CI 3.14-3.85), anxiety (AOR 2.98, CI 2.64-3.37), hypertension (AOR 1.21, CI 1.02-1.44), and asthma (AOR 1.37; CI 1.17-1.59) than women without those respective conditions, but not among diagnoses of diabetes, PCOS, or thyroid disorders.
    Conclusions: Our findings show that pregnant individuals reporting having experienced IPV were more likely to report having certain comorbidities compared to those who did not report experiencing IPV. Given the low rates of screening, knowing clinically relevant associations may increase screening sensitivity among clinicians and, in turn, increase the likelihood that individuals experiencing IPV receive supportive care.
    MeSH term(s) Pregnancy ; Female ; Humans ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Intimate Partner Violence/psychology ; Risk Assessment ; Asthma ; Hypertension
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-03-22
    Publishing country Germany
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2702-3648
    ISSN (online) 2702-3648
    DOI 10.1515/jom-2023-0018
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Delayed discovery: the COVID-19 pandemic's influence on osteoarthritis clinical trials.

    Sajjadi, Nicholas B / Anderson, Jon Michael / Hughes, Griffin K / Abraham, Christena E / Malik, Jamal / Hartwell, Micah / Vassar, Matt

    Journal of osteopathic medicine

    2023  Volume 124, Issue 1, Page(s) 5–11

    Abstract: Context: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted clinical research in many medical and surgical fields, resulting in research waste and loss of treatment for patients. Although other areas have been explored, the extent of the pandemic's influence on ... ...

    Abstract Context: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted clinical research in many medical and surgical fields, resulting in research waste and loss of treatment for patients. Although other areas have been explored, the extent of the pandemic's influence on osteoarthritis (OA) trials is currently unknown.
    Objectives: This study aims to explore the reasons for termination of clinical trials investigating OA during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Methods: We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for OA trials and characterized their reason for discontinuation, noting where trialists directly cited the COVID-19 pandemic as the reason for trial discontinuation. We also coded other common reasons for trial discontinuation. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed to determine the difference in enrollment, funding source, trial phase, allocation, and intervention type between the trials terminated early due to pandemic and nonpandemic reasons.
    Results: Out of 135 clinical trials, 119 were included and 27 (22.7 %) of them reported the COVID-19 pandemic as a primary reason for discontinuation, which was the overall most common reason for OA trial discontinuation during the study period. We found statistically significant differences for trials discontinued due to pandemic vs. non-pandemic-related reasons, with trials having sites outside the United States, randomized allocation, and drug or device intervention type being most affected. However, there was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding trial phase, funding source, or enrollment.
    Conclusions: This study highlights the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the clinical trials related to OA. We found that many trials reported discontinuation directly due to the pandemic, which may lead to the loss or delay of novel treatments for OA. To avoid such discontinuation in the future, alternative methods for conducting OA-related clinical trials should be explored and implemented.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; United States/epidemiology ; COVID-19/epidemiology ; Pandemics ; Osteoarthritis/epidemiology ; Osteoarthritis/therapy
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-08-15
    Publishing country Germany
    Document type Randomized Controlled Trial ; Journal Article
    ISSN 2702-3648
    ISSN (online) 2702-3648
    DOI 10.1515/jom-2023-0028
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top