LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 5 of total 5

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Ethnic inclusion in medicine: the ineffectiveness of the 'Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic' metric to measure progress.

    Sarfo-Annin, Jason Kwasi

    BJGP open

    2020  Volume 4, Issue 5

    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-12-15
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2398-3795
    ISSN (online) 2398-3795
    DOI 10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0155
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article: Should trainees be the 'eyes and the ears' of both good and bad practice in hospitals?

    Sarfo-Annin, Jason Kwasi

    Future hospital journal

    2019  Volume 2, Issue 1, Page(s) 11–12

    Abstract: A strong voice is critical for junior doctors to report witnessed poor care delivery. Current incident reporting systems foster a sense of vulnerability and under-reporting of events. Provision of adequate incident report feedback and dedicated time to ... ...

    Abstract A strong voice is critical for junior doctors to report witnessed poor care delivery. Current incident reporting systems foster a sense of vulnerability and under-reporting of events. Provision of adequate incident report feedback and dedicated time to undertake audit and quality improvement projects are required to facilitate discussion and learning from errors that take place in the workplace. A independent whistleblowing centre specific to healthcare is required to reduce the likelihood of future inquiries into poor patient care.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-05-13
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2775176-4
    ISSN 2055-3331 ; 2055-3323
    ISSN (online) 2055-3331
    ISSN 2055-3323
    DOI 10.7861/futurehosp.2-1-11
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Critical appraisal in rapid systematic reviews of COVID-19 studies: implementation of the Quality Criteria Checklist (QCC).

    Duval, Daphne / Pearce-Smith, Nicola / Palmer, Jennifer C / Sarfo-Annin, Jason Kwasi / Rudd, Paul / Clark, Rachel

    Systematic reviews

    2023  Volume 12, Issue 1, Page(s) 55

    Abstract: In this letter, we briefly describe how we selected and implemented the quality criteria checklist (QCC) as a critical appraisal tool in rapid systematic reviews conducted to inform public health advice, guidance and policy during the COVID-19 pandemic. ... ...

    Abstract In this letter, we briefly describe how we selected and implemented the quality criteria checklist (QCC) as a critical appraisal tool in rapid systematic reviews conducted to inform public health advice, guidance and policy during the COVID-19 pandemic. As these rapid reviews usually included a range of study designs, it was key to identify a single tool that would allow for reliable critical appraisal across most experimental and observational study designs and applicable to a range of topics. After carefully considering a number of existing tools, the QCC was selected as it had good interrater agreement between three reviewers (Fleiss kappa coefficient 0.639) and was found to be easy and fast to apply once familiar with the tool. The QCC consists of 10 questions, with sub-questions to specify how it should be applied to a specific study design. Four of these questions are considered as critical (on selection bias, group comparability, intervention/exposure assessment and outcome assessment) and the rating of a study (high, moderate or low methodological quality) depends on the responses to these four critical questions. Our results suggest that the QCC is an appropriate critical appraisal tool to assess experimental and observational studies within COVID-19 rapid reviews. This study was done at pace during the COVID-19 pandemic; further reliability analyses should be conducted, and more research is needed to validate the QCC across a range of public health topics.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; COVID-19 ; Reproducibility of Results ; Pandemics ; Checklist ; Public Health
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-03-27
    Publishing country England
    Document type Observational Study ; Letter ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2662257-9
    ISSN 2046-4053 ; 2046-4053
    ISSN (online) 2046-4053
    ISSN 2046-4053
    DOI 10.1186/s13643-023-02219-z
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: A patient with chest pain and electrocardiographic changes.

    Sarfo-Annin, Jason Kwasi / Stafford, Peter James

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

    2013  Volume 347, Page(s) f6839

    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Brugada Syndrome/complications ; Brugada Syndrome/diagnosis ; Brugada Syndrome/therapy ; Chest Pain/etiology ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Electrocardiography/methods ; Humans ; Male ; Syncope/etiology
    Language English
    Publishing date 2013-11-20
    Publishing country England
    Document type Case Reports ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1362901-3
    ISSN 1756-1833 ; 0959-8154 ; 0959-8146 ; 0959-8138 ; 0959-535X ; 1759-2151
    ISSN (online) 1756-1833
    ISSN 0959-8154 ; 0959-8146 ; 0959-8138 ; 0959-535X ; 1759-2151
    DOI 10.1136/bmj.f6839
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 over distances greater than two metres: a rapid systematic review

    Palmer, Jennifer C / Duval, Daphne / Tudge, Isobel / Sarfo-Annin, Jason Kwasi / Pearce-Smith, Nicola / O’Connell, Emer / Bennett, Allan / Clark, Rachel

    medRxiv

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the potential for long-distance (over two metres) airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in indoor community settings and investigate factors which may impact this transmission. Design Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Data ... ...

    Abstract Objective To evaluate the potential for long-distance (over two metres) airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in indoor community settings and investigate factors which may impact this transmission. Design Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Data source MEDLINE, Embase, medRxiv, Arxiv and WHO COVID-19 Research Database for studies published from 27 July 2020 to 21 April 2021; existing relevant rapid systematic reviews for studies published between 1 January to 27 July 2020. Eligibility criteria for study selection Observational studies that included a thorough epidemiological assessment of routes of transmission and which reported on the likelihood of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 at a distance greater than two metres in indoor community settings. Data extraction and synthesis Data extraction was completed by one reviewer and independently checked by a second reviewer. Primary outcomes were COVID-19 infections via airborne transmission over distances greater than two metres and any factors that may have modified transmission risk. Included studies were rated using a quality criteria checklist (QCC) for primary research and certainty of key outcomes was determined using GRADE. Narrative synthesis was themed by setting. Results Of the 3,780 articles screened for inclusion, 15 publications reporting on 13 epidemiological investigations were included (three high, six medium and four low quality). Airborne transmission at distances greater than two metres was likely to have occurred for some or all transmission events in 12 studies and was unclear in one study (GRADE: very low certainty). In all studies, one or more factors plausibly increased the likelihood of long-distance airborne transmission occurring, particularly insufficient air replacement (GRADE: very low certainty), recirculating air flow (GRADE: very low certainty) and singing (GRADE: very low certainty). In nine studies, the primary cases were reported as being asymptomatic, presymptomatic or around symptom onset at the time of transmission. Conclusion This rapid systematic review found evidence of long-distance airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in indoor community settings and identified factors that likely contributed to this transmission in all included studies. These results strengthen the need for adequate mitigation measures in indoor community settings, particularly adequate ventilation with fresh air, and caution required with the use of recirculating air flow systems. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42021236762
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-10-20
    Publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    Document type Article ; Online
    DOI 10.1101/2021.10.19.21265208
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

To top