LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 3 of total 3

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: The effect of systematic screening of older women for urinary incontinence on treatment uptake: the URINO trial.

    Visser, Els / Dekker, Janny H / Vermeulen, Karin M / Messelink, Embert J / Schram, Aaltje J / Berger, Marjolein Y / de Bock, Geertruida H

    Maturitas

    2013  Volume 74, Issue 4, Page(s) 334–340

    Abstract: Background: Female urinary incontinence is a common condition that has a negative influence on quality of life and generates high costs, but spontaneous help-seeking is limited. In the URINO trial the effects and cost-effectiveness of actively ... ...

    Abstract Background: Female urinary incontinence is a common condition that has a negative influence on quality of life and generates high costs, but spontaneous help-seeking is limited. In the URINO trial the effects and cost-effectiveness of actively encouraging older women to undergo diagnostics and treatment for urinary incontinence were compared with usual care.
    Objectives: To describe the design of the URINO trial and to give data on the effect of treatment uptake after screening. In the discussion, the criteria of Wilson and Jungner are applied to discuss whether screening for urinary incontinence is suitable.
    Methods: In a cluster randomized trial all registered female patients aged ≥55 years received a screening questionnaire. The intervention consisted of actively encouraging women to undergo diagnostics, after which tailored treatment was offered. In the control group care as usual was offered, but uptake of diagnostics and treatment was not encouraged. Results The response rate was 76%. 31% reported urinary incontinence; of these, 47% was willing to participate. All patients in the intervention group underwent diagnostics and treatment uptake was 80%; in the control group this was 2%.
    Conclusion: To increase treatment uptake, screening must be followed by active encouragement for further diagnostics and treatment. Based on the principles of Wilson and Jungner, female urinary incontinence is a condition suitable for screening. The effect of treatment however needs further evaluation before screening can be recommended. The results of the URINO trial will fill this gap in knowledge.
    MeSH term(s) Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Female ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Mass Screening/economics ; Mass Screening/methods ; Mass Screening/psychology ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Pelvic Floor/physiopathology ; Quality of Life ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Urinary Incontinence/diagnosis ; Urinary Incontinence/physiopathology ; Urinary Incontinence/psychology ; Urinary Incontinence/therapy
    Language English
    Publishing date 2013-04
    Publishing country Ireland
    Document type Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 80460-5
    ISSN 1873-4111 ; 0378-5122
    ISSN (online) 1873-4111
    ISSN 0378-5122
    DOI 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.12.015
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Active encouragement of older women with urinary incontinence in primary care to undergo diagnosis and treatment: a matched-pair cluster randomized controlled trial.

    Visser, Els / de Bock, Geertruida H / Messelink, Embert J / Schram, Aaltje J / Kollen, Boudewijn J / la Bastide-van Gemert, Sacha / van den Heuvel, Edwin R / Berger, Marjolein Y / Dekker, Janny H

    Maturitas

    2015  Volume 80, Issue 2, Page(s) 212–219

    Abstract: Objectives: The URINO trial investigated the effect of offering treatment to older women with urinary incontinence in the general population, who had not sought help on their own initiative.: Study design: In a cluster randomized trial, 14 general ... ...

    Abstract Objectives: The URINO trial investigated the effect of offering treatment to older women with urinary incontinence in the general population, who had not sought help on their own initiative.
    Study design: In a cluster randomized trial, 14 general practitioners were matched into pairs and randomly allocated to an intervention or a control group. Women aged ≥ 55 years registered in the participating practices were asked about urinary incontinence via a postal questionnaire. Patients in the intervention group were assessed and treated whereas patients in the control group received standard care.
    Main outcome measures: Primary outcome was improvement (yes or no) of the severity of symptoms at 12-month follow-up measured with the Incontinence Severity Index. Secondary outcomes were the number of incontinence episodes per day and quality of life. The primary analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis with multiple imputation of missing data. A logistic regression model with correction for cluster randomization was fitted to estimate odds ratios (ORs).
    Results: At 12 months, the severity of symptoms had improved in more patients in the intervention group (n166) than in the controls (n184) (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.3). Also, the number of patients with fewer episodes of incontinence had increased (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.5-4.1). No between-group differences in changes in quality of life were apparent (p0.14).
    Conclusions: It is recommended to encourage women in the general population aged ≥ 55 years with urinary incontinence to undergo diagnosis and treatment.
    MeSH term(s) Aged ; Directive Counseling ; Female ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Mass Screening ; Middle Aged ; Odds Ratio ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Primary Health Care ; Quality of Life ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Urinary Bladder, Overactive/diagnosis ; Urinary Bladder, Overactive/therapy ; Urinary Incontinence/diagnosis ; Urinary Incontinence/therapy
    Language English
    Publishing date 2015-02
    Publishing country Ireland
    Document type Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 80460-5
    ISSN 1873-4111 ; 0378-5122
    ISSN (online) 1873-4111
    ISSN 0378-5122
    DOI 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.11.015
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Pelvic floor muscle training versus watchful waiting or pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POPPS): design and participant baseline characteristics of two parallel pragmatic randomized controlled trials in primary care.

    Wiegersma, Marian / Panman, Chantal M C R / Kollen, Boudewijn J / Vermeulen, Karin M / Schram, Aaltje J / Messelink, Embert J / Berger, Marjolein Y / Lisman-Van Leeuwen, Yvonne / Dekker, Janny H

    Maturitas

    2014  Volume 77, Issue 2, Page(s) 168–173

    Abstract: Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and pessaries are commonly used in the conservative treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Because there is a lack of evidence regarding the optimal choice between these two interventions, we designed the "Pelvic ... ...

    Abstract Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and pessaries are commonly used in the conservative treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Because there is a lack of evidence regarding the optimal choice between these two interventions, we designed the "Pelvic Organ prolapse in primary care: effects of Pelvic floor muscle training and Pessary treatment Study" (POPPS). POPPS consists of two parallel open label randomized controlled trials performed in primary care, in women aged ≥55 years, recruited through a postal questionnaire. In POPPS trial 1, women with mild POP receive either PFMT or watchful waiting. In POPPS trial 2, women with advanced POP receive either PFMT or pessary treatment. Patient recruitment started in 2009 and was finished in December 2012. Primary outcome of both POPPS trials is improvement in POP-related symptoms. Secondary outcomes are quality of life, sexual function, POP-Q stage, pelvic floor muscle function, post-void residual volume, patients' perception of improvement, and costs. All outcomes are measured 3, 12, and 24 months after the start of treatment. Cost-effectiveness will be calculated based on societal costs, using the PFDI-20 and the EQ-5D as outcomes. In this paper the POPPS design, the encountered challenges and our solutions, and participant baseline characteristics are presented. For both trials the target numbers of patients in each treatment group are achieved, giving this study sufficient power to lead to promising results.
    MeSH term(s) Aged ; Exercise Therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Pelvic Floor/physiology ; Pelvic Organ Prolapse/therapy ; Pessaries ; Research Design
    Language English
    Publishing date 2014-02
    Publishing country Ireland
    Document type Journal Article ; Pragmatic Clinical Trial ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 80460-5
    ISSN 1873-4111 ; 0378-5122
    ISSN (online) 1873-4111
    ISSN 0378-5122
    DOI 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.10.014
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top