LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 8 of total 8

Search options

  1. Article: Safety and Efficacy of Insulins in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Enteral Nutrition.

    Ni, Kevin / Hawkins, R Matthew / Smyth, Heather L / Seggelke, Stacey A / Gibbs, Joanna / Lindsay, Mark C / Kaizer, Laura K / Low Wang, Cecilia C

    Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists

    2024  Volume 30, Issue 4, Page(s) 367–371

    Abstract: Objective: There is a relative lack of consensus regarding the optimal management of hyperglycemia in patients receiving continuous enteral nutrition (EN), with or without a diagnosis of diabetes.: Methods: This retrospective study examined 475 ... ...

    Abstract Objective: There is a relative lack of consensus regarding the optimal management of hyperglycemia in patients receiving continuous enteral nutrition (EN), with or without a diagnosis of diabetes.
    Methods: This retrospective study examined 475 patients (303 with known diabetes) hospitalized in critical care setting units in 2019 in a single center who received continuous EN. Rates of hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and glucose levels within the target range (70-180 mg/dL) were compared between patients with and without diabetes, and among patients treated with intermediate-acting (IA) biphasic neutral protamine Hagedorn 70/30, long-acting (LA) insulin, or rapid-acting insulin only.
    Results: Among those with type 2 diabetes mellitus, IA and LA insulin regimens were associated with a significantly higher proportion of patient-days in the target glucose range and fewer hyperglycemic days. Level 1 (<70 mg/dL) and level 2 (<54 mg/dL) hypoglycemia occurred rarely, and there were no significant differences in level 2 hypoglycemia frequency across the different insulin regimens.
    Conclusion: Administration of IA and LA insulin can be safe and effective for those receiving insulin doses for EN-related hyperglycemia.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy ; Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects ; Retrospective Studies ; Enteral Nutrition ; Critical Illness/therapy ; Blood Glucose ; Insulin/adverse effects ; Hypoglycemia/chemically induced ; Hypoglycemia/epidemiology ; Hypoglycemia/drug therapy ; Insulin, Long-Acting/therapeutic use ; Hyperglycemia/drug therapy ; Hyperglycemia/prevention & control ; Hyperglycemia/chemically induced ; Glucose/therapeutic use ; Insulin, Isophane/adverse effects
    Chemical Substances Hypoglycemic Agents ; Blood Glucose ; Insulin ; Insulin, Long-Acting ; Glucose (IY9XDZ35W2) ; Insulin, Isophane (53027-39-7)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-02-01
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1473503-9
    ISSN 1530-891X
    ISSN 1530-891X
    DOI 10.1016/j.eprac.2024.01.009
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Hitting the target for inpatient glycemic management.

    Seggelke, Stacey A

    The Nurse practitioner

    2011  Volume 36, Issue 5, Page(s) 24–31; quiz 31–2

    Abstract: Hyperglycemia in the hospital setting can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Many factors can influence glucose levels including critical illness, supplemental feeding, and glucocorticoid administration. An understanding of glycemic treatment ... ...

    Abstract Hyperglycemia in the hospital setting can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Many factors can influence glucose levels including critical illness, supplemental feeding, and glucocorticoid administration. An understanding of glycemic treatment options for hospitalized patients is essential for good patient outcomes.
    MeSH term(s) Critical Illness/nursing ; Critical Illness/therapy ; Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis ; Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy ; Diabetes Mellitus/nursing ; Education, Nursing, Continuing ; Humans ; Hyperglycemia/diagnosis ; Hyperglycemia/drug therapy ; Hyperglycemia/nursing ; Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use ; Nurse Practitioners ; Prediabetic State/diagnosis ; Prediabetic State/drug therapy ; Prediabetic State/nursing
    Chemical Substances Hypoglycemic Agents
    Language English
    Publishing date 2011-05
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 604085-8
    ISSN 1538-8662 ; 0361-1817
    ISSN (online) 1538-8662
    ISSN 0361-1817
    DOI 10.1097/01.NPR.0000396471.76436.ef
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article: Insulin Resistance in a Hospitalized COVID-19 Patient: A Case Review.

    Seggelke, Stacey A / Ingram, Claire C / Crawley, Svitlana / Low Wang, Cecilia C

    Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association

    2021  Volume 39, Issue 2, Page(s) 228–232

    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-04-16
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Case Reports
    ZDB-ID 1025953-3
    ISSN 0891-8929
    ISSN 0891-8929
    DOI 10.2337/cd20-0036
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Pilot study of using neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin to counteract the effect of methylprednisolone in hospitalized patients with diabetes.

    Seggelke, Stacey A / Gibbs, Joanna / Draznin, Boris

    Journal of hospital medicine

    2011  Volume 6, Issue 3, Page(s) 175–176

    MeSH term(s) Cystic Fibrosis/complications ; Cystic Fibrosis/drug therapy ; Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy ; Diabetes Mellitus/etiology ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Insulin, Isophane/therapeutic use ; Methylprednisolone/antagonists & inhibitors ; Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use ; Pilot Projects
    Chemical Substances Insulin, Isophane (53027-39-7) ; Methylprednisolone (X4W7ZR7023)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2011-03
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Comparative Study ; Letter
    ZDB-ID 2233783-0
    ISSN 1553-5606 ; 1553-5592
    ISSN (online) 1553-5606
    ISSN 1553-5592
    DOI 10.1002/jhm.874
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Cardiovascular Safety of Antidiabetic Drugs in the Hospital Setting.

    Seggelke, Stacey A / Lindsay, Mark C / Hazlett, Ingrid / Sanagorski, Rebecca / Eckel, Robert H / Low Wang, Cecilia C

    Current diabetes reports

    2017  Volume 17, Issue 8, Page(s) 64

    Abstract: Purpose of review: Patients with diabetes and/or stress hyperglycemia requires good glycemic control in the hospital setting, often requiring the use of glucose-lowering therapy. Standard-of-care dictates that non-insulin therapy be discontinued, with ... ...

    Abstract Purpose of review: Patients with diabetes and/or stress hyperglycemia requires good glycemic control in the hospital setting, often requiring the use of glucose-lowering therapy. Standard-of-care dictates that non-insulin therapy be discontinued, with insulin therapy initiated using a basal-bolus approach. However, insulin is associated with a high risk for hypoglycemia and medical errors. Alternatives to insulin are needed in the inpatient setting, but the cardiovascular (CV) safety of non-insulin therapy is a concern.
    Recent findings: Most studies of antidiabetic drugs have been performed in the outpatient setting, and except for insulin therapy, trials in the inpatient setting have been insufficient to establish CV safety. Randomized controlled trials support the safety of insulin with more moderate glycemic control in the hospital, when hypoglycemia is minimized. Two recent multicenter randomized controlled clinical trials support the safety of sitagliptin, a dipeptidylpeptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i), in hospitalized patients, although the sample sizes were likely too small to detect CV events. Small trials suggest a possible CV benefit of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist therapy. A paucity of evidence and presence of side effects and cautions with insulin secretagogues, sodium glucose-co-transporter-2 inhibitors, and metformin preclude their routine use in the hospital setting. Available evidence is inadequate to evaluate the CV safety of most antidiabetic drug classes in the hospital setting. However, preliminary data from randomized clinical trials suggest the potential safety of the DPP4i sitagliptin.
    MeSH term(s) Cardiovascular System/drug effects ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects ; Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use ; Risk Factors
    Chemical Substances Hypoglycemic Agents
    Language English
    Publishing date 2017
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 2065167-3
    ISSN 1539-0829 ; 1534-4827
    ISSN (online) 1539-0829
    ISSN 1534-4827
    DOI 10.1007/s11892-017-0884-1
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article: Transitional care clinic for uninsured and medicaid-covered patients with diabetes mellitus discharged from the hospital: a pilot quality improvement study.

    Seggelke, Stacey A / Hawkins, R Mathew / Gibbs, Joanna / Rasouli, Neda / Wang, Cecilia / Draznin, Boris

    Hospital practice (1995)

    2014  Volume 42, Issue 1, Page(s) 46–51

    Abstract: Transitioning from the inpatient to outpatient setting is often a problematic aspect of diabetes mellitus (DM) care. Different factors during hospitalization may adversely affect glycemic control in patients, who are frequently discharged on regimens ... ...

    Abstract Transitioning from the inpatient to outpatient setting is often a problematic aspect of diabetes mellitus (DM) care. Different factors during hospitalization may adversely affect glycemic control in patients, who are frequently discharged on regimens that differ markedly from prehospitalization outpatient regimens. Moreover, the discharge recommendations may not have been tested adequately during a relatively short hospital length of stay and pose a significant threat to patient safety upon discharge. Our pilot study evaluated the effect on hospital utilization of the transitional care clinic (TCC), where patients with DM are seen within 2 to 5 days of hospital discharge. One hundred patients with DM, who were either medically indigent (no insurance or Medicaid and no primary care providers) or covered by Medicaid, and who did not have a primary care provider, were randomized into either a control or an intervention group upon discharge from the hospital. Subjects from the intervention group (n = 50) were seen in the TCC. All subjects were contacted 90 days after discharge to collect information about emergency department visits and readmissions. Thirteen subjects from the control group and 13 from the intervention group visited the emergency department within 90 days of discharge. Fourteen control subjects (28%) and 10 intervention patients (20%) were rehospitalized for various medical conditions during the follow-up period (P = not significant). Among patients originally admitted for DM-related issues, 6 of 14 in the control group (42.9%) and 2 out of 16 in the intervention group (12.5%) were readmitted during follow-up (P < 0.05). We conclude that the TCC may be effective for the prevention of rehospitalizations in indigent patients admitted for DM-related problems and who did not have primary care providers. The benefit of the TCC was not seen when patients with DM were admitted for other medical problems. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this preliminary finding.
    MeSH term(s) Colorado ; Continuity of Patient Care/statistics & numerical data ; Diabetes Mellitus/therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medicaid ; Medically Uninsured ; Middle Aged ; Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data ; Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data ; Pilot Projects ; Quality Improvement ; United States
    Language English
    Publishing date 2014-02
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
    ZDB-ID 2570453-9
    ISSN 2377-1003 ; 2154-8331 ; 8750-2836
    ISSN (online) 2377-1003
    ISSN 2154-8331 ; 8750-2836
    DOI 10.3810/hp.2014.02.1091
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article: Effect of glargine insulin delivery method (pen device versus vial/syringe) on glycemic control and patient preferences in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

    Seggelke, Stacey A / Hawkins, R Matthew / Gibbs, Joanna / Rasouli, Neda / Wang, Cecilia C Low / Draznin, Boris

    Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists

    2013  Volume 20, Issue 6, Page(s) 536–539

    Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the effects of two different glargine insulin delivery methods (pen device vs. vial/syringe) on glycemic control and patient preferences in a randomized, open-label, crossover, comparative effectiveness study.: Methods: Thirty- ... ...

    Abstract Objective: To evaluate the effects of two different glargine insulin delivery methods (pen device vs. vial/syringe) on glycemic control and patient preferences in a randomized, open-label, crossover, comparative effectiveness study.
    Methods: Thirty-one patients discharged from the hospital were recruited for this study. In the hospital, all patients were treated with a basal-bolus insulin regimen. Upon discharge, 21 patients received glargine by pen device for 3 months and were then switched to vial/syringe for the next 3 months (group 1). Group 2 consisted of 10 patients discharged on vial/syringe and converted to pen device after 3 months. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was measured at enrollment and at 3 and 6 months. A questionnaire assessing patient preference was administered at 3 and 6 months.
    Results: Groups 1 and 2 had similar baseline HbA1c (10.7 ± 2.2% and 11.2 ± 2.5%, respectively) and similar reduction in HbA1c at 3 months (7.8 ± 1.7% and 7.3 ± 1.4%, respectively; P<.001 vs. baseline). However, after crossover, the changes in HbA1c from 3 to 6 months were significantly different between groups. HbA1c increased to 8.5 ± 2.0% at 6 months in group 1 after switching to the vial/syringe but remained unchanged (7.1 ± 1.6%) in group 2 after switching to a pen device (P<.01, group 1 vs. group 2). Patient questionnaires after each phase of the trial revealed that patients found the pen device more convenient and were more likely to recommend this insulin delivery method to someone else.
    Conclusion: Patients switching to a glargine pen device achieved lower HbA1c at the 6-month follow-up. Patients in both groups overwhelmingly preferred glargine pens over vials/syringes.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Aged ; Blood Glucose/analysis ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy ; Female ; Glycated Hemoglobin A/analysis ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage ; Insulin Glargine/administration & dosage ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Preference
    Chemical Substances Blood Glucose ; Glycated Hemoglobin A ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; hemoglobin A1c protein, human ; Insulin Glargine (2ZM8CX04RZ)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2013-09-26
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 1473503-9
    ISSN 1530-891X
    ISSN 1530-891X
    DOI 10.4158/EP13404.OR
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Comparison of 70/30 biphasic insulin with glargine/lispro regimen in non-critically ill diabetic patients on continuous enteral nutrition therapy.

    Hsia, Elisa / Seggelke, Stacey A / Gibbs, Joanna / Rasouli, Neda / Draznin, Boris

    Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

    2011  Volume 26, Issue 6, Page(s) 714–717

    Abstract: Despite significant advances in inpatient diabetes management, it is still a challenge to choose the safest and most efficacious subcutaneous insulin regimen for diabetic patients on continuous enteral nutrition (EN) therapy. The authors conducted a ... ...

    Abstract Despite significant advances in inpatient diabetes management, it is still a challenge to choose the safest and most efficacious subcutaneous insulin regimen for diabetic patients on continuous enteral nutrition (EN) therapy. The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of glycemic control in 22 non-critically ill diabetic patients, receiving at least 3 days of continuous EN. Patients received different insulin regimens while on continuous EN, including a basal/bolus glargine/lispro regimen (group 1, n = 8), 70/30 biphasic insulin twice daily (group 2, n = 8), and 70/30 biphasic insulin 3 times a day (group 3, n = 6). The glucose data from 72 hours from the initiation of EN were analyzed (12 point-of-contact glucose measurements per patient). Overall, the degree of control was comparable in all groups, with target range maintained more consistently in group 3 (70/30 insulin administered 3 times daily). In this group, 69% of values were in the target range (140-180 mg/dL) as compared with 24% in glargine/lispro group and 22% in the 70/30 insulin bid group. Eight hypoglycemic episodes occurred among the 3 groups: 5 episodes in group 1 (5.4%), 2 episodes in group 2 (2.1%), and 1 episode in group 3 (1.4%) (P = .05, groups 2 and 3 vs group 1). Administration of 70/30 biphasic insulin 3 times daily is a safe therapeutic regimen in diabetic patients on continuous EN as it maintains glycemia in the target range and might produce fewer episodes of hypoglycemia.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Aged ; Biphasic Insulins/administration & dosage ; Biphasic Insulins/analysis ; Blood Glucose ; Diabetes Mellitus/therapy ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Enteral Nutrition/methods ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Hypoglycemia/therapy ; Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage ; Hypoglycemic Agents/analysis ; Insulin Glargine ; Insulin Lispro/administration & dosage ; Insulin Lispro/analysis ; Insulin, Long-Acting/administration & dosage ; Insulin, Long-Acting/analysis ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Young Adult
    Chemical Substances Biphasic Insulins ; Blood Glucose ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; Insulin Lispro ; Insulin, Long-Acting ; Insulin Glargine (2ZM8CX04RZ)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2011-12
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Comparative Study ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 645074-x
    ISSN 1941-2452 ; 0884-5336
    ISSN (online) 1941-2452
    ISSN 0884-5336
    DOI 10.1177/0884533611420727
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top