LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 4 of total 4

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Association between maternal satisfaction and other indicators of quality of care at childbirth: a cross-sectional study based on the WHO standards.

    Lazzerini, Marzia / Mariani, Ilaria / Semenzato, Chiara / Valente, Emanuelle Pessa

    BMJ open

    2020  Volume 10, Issue 9, Page(s) e037063

    Abstract: Objectives: This study aimed to explore the association between maternal satisfaction and other indicators of quality of care (QoC) at childbirth, as defined by WHO standards.: Design: Cross-sectional study.: Setting: Referral hospital in ... ...

    Abstract Objectives: This study aimed to explore the association between maternal satisfaction and other indicators of quality of care (QoC) at childbirth, as defined by WHO standards.
    Design: Cross-sectional study.
    Setting: Referral hospital in Northeast Italy.
    Participants: 1244 consecutive mothers giving birth in the hospital participated in a survey.
    Data collection and analysis: Univariate analyses were performed to evaluate the association between maternal satisfaction and 61 variables, including measures of 'provision of care', 'experience of care', 'availability of resources' and other maternal characteristics. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to create groups of correlated variables, which were used in multivariate analysis.
    Results: Overall, 509 (40.9%) of women were >35 years of age, about half (52.7%) were highly educated, most (95.2%) were married/living with partner and employed (79.3%) and about half (52.9%) were primiparous. Overall, 189 (15.2%) were not born in Italy and 111 (8.9%) did not have Italian citizenship. Most women (84.2%) were highly satisfied (score ≥7/10) with the care received. Among the 61 variables explored, 46 (75.4%) were significantly associated with women's satisfaction, 33 with higher satisfaction and 13 with lower satisfaction. Multivariate analysis largely confirmed univariate findings, with six out of eight groups of correlated variables being statistically significantly associated with women's satisfaction. Factors most strongly associated with women's satisfaction were 'effective communication, involvement, listening to women's needs, respectful and timely care' (OR 16.84, 95% CI 9.90 to 28.61, p<0.001) and 'physical structure' (OR 6.51, 95% CI 4.08 to 10.40, p<0.001). Additionally, 'victim of abuse, discrimination, aggressiveness' was inversely associated with the wish to return to the facility or to recommend it to a friend (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.70, p<0.003).
    Conclusion: This study suggested that many variables are strongly associated with women's satisfaction with care during childbirth and support the use of multiple measures to monitor the QoC at childbirth.
    MeSH term(s) Cross-Sectional Studies ; Delivery, Obstetric ; Female ; Humans ; Italy ; Maternal Health Services ; Patient Satisfaction ; Personal Satisfaction ; Pregnancy ; Quality of Health Care ; World Health Organization
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-09-14
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2599832-8
    ISSN 2044-6055 ; 2044-6055
    ISSN (online) 2044-6055
    ISSN 2044-6055
    DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037063
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Women's suggestions on how to improve the quality of maternal and newborn hospital care: a qualitative study in Italy using the WHO standards as framework for the analysis.

    Lazzerini, Marzia / Semenzato, Chiara / Kaur, Jaspreet / Covi, Benedetta / Argentini, Giorgia

    BMC pregnancy and childbirth

    2020  Volume 20, Issue 1, Page(s) 200

    Abstract: Background: A recent systematic review identified very few studies on women's views on how to improve the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC). This study aimed at exploring the suggestions provided by women, after hospital delivery in Italy, on ... ...

    Abstract Background: A recent systematic review identified very few studies on women's views on how to improve the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC). This study aimed at exploring the suggestions provided by women, after hospital delivery in Italy, on how to improve the QMNC.
    Methods: A questionnaire, containing open questions to capture suggestions on how to improve QMNC, was used to collect suggestions of mothers who gave birth a tertiary care referral hospital in Northeast Italy, between December 2016 and September 2018. Two authors independently used thematic analysis to analyse women's comments, using the WHO Standards for improving the QMNC as framework for the analysis.
    Results: Overall 392 mothers provided a total of 966 comments on how to improve the QMNC. Overall 45 (11.5%) women made suggestions pertinent to "provision of care", 222 (56.6%) to the "experience of care", 217 (55.4%) to "physical or to human resources". The top five suggestions were: 1) increase presence of a companion during the whole hospitalization (28.3% of women); 2) improve bathrooms and showers (18.4%); 3) improve effective communication from staff (14.0%); 4) improve staff professionalism, empathy, and kindness (13.5%); 5) increase support and information on how to provide care to the newborn (11.2%). Overall, 158 (16.4%) suggestions could not be classified in any WHO Standards, and among these most (72.1%) were related to physical structures, such as: decrease the number of patients per room; create areas for visitors; avoid case mixing in the same room; reduce rooming-in/better support the mother. Overall 62 (15.8%) women expressed appreciations.
    Conclusions: Collecting the women's views on how to improve the QMNC after hospital delivery highlighted critical inputs on aspects of care that should be improved in the opinion of service-users. More investments should be made for establishing routine systems for monitoring patients experience of care. Data collected should be used to improve QMNC. WHO Standards may be further optimized by adding items emerging as relevant for women in high-income countries.
    MeSH term(s) Adolescent ; Adult ; Delivery of Health Care/standards ; Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Italy ; Maternal Health Services/standards ; Middle Aged ; Midwifery ; Mothers/statistics & numerical data ; Parturition ; Patient Satisfaction ; Pregnancy ; Qualitative Research ; Quality Improvement ; Quality of Health Care ; Suggestion ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tertiary Care Centers/standards ; Women ; World Health Organization ; Young Adult
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-04-06
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2059869-5
    ISSN 1471-2393 ; 1471-2393
    ISSN (online) 1471-2393
    ISSN 1471-2393
    DOI 10.1186/s12884-020-02893-0
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: WHO standards-based tool to measure women's views on the quality of care around the time of childbirth at facility level in the WHO European region: development and validation in Italy.

    Lazzerini, Marzia / Argentini, Giorgia / Mariani, Ilaria / Covi, Benedetta / Semenzato, Chiara / Lincetto, O / Muzigaba, Moise / Valente, Emanuelle Pessa

    BMJ open

    2022  Volume 12, Issue 2, Page(s) e048195

    Abstract: Objectives: A comprehensive WHO standards-based tool to measure women's perceived quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) in health facilities is needed to allow for comparisons of data across settings and over time. This paper describes the ... ...

    Abstract Objectives: A comprehensive WHO standards-based tool to measure women's perceived quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) in health facilities is needed to allow for comparisons of data across settings and over time. This paper describes the development of such a tool, and its validation in Italy.
    Design: A multiphase, mixed-methods study involving qualitative and quantitative research methods.
    Setting: Nine health facilities in Italy.
    Methods: The questionnaire was developed in six phases: (1) Defining the scope, characteristics and a potential list of measures for the tool; (2) initial content and construct validation; (3) first field testing to assess acceptability and perceived utility for end-users (1244 women, 35 decision makers) and further explore construct validity; (4) content optimisation and score development; (5) assessment of face validity, intrarater reliability and internal consistency and (6) second field testing in nine maternity hospitals (4295 women, 78 decision-makers).
    Results: The final version of the tool included 116 questions accounting for 99 out of the 350 of the extended lists of WHO Quality Measures. Observed face validity was very good, with 100% agreement for 101 (87%) questions and Kappa exceeding 0.60 for remaining ones. Reliability was good, with either high agreement or Kappa exceeding 0.60 for all items. Cronbach alpha values ranged from 0.84 to 0.88, indicating very good internal consistency. Acceptability across seven hospitals was good (mean response rate: 57.4%, 95% CI 44.4% to 70.5%). The questionnaire proved to be useful, driving the development of actions plan to improve the QMNC in each facility.
    Conclusions: Study findings suggest that the tool has good content, construct, face validity, intrarater reliability and internal consistency, while being acceptable and useful. Therefore, it could be used in health facilities in Italy and similar context. More research should investigate how effectively use the tool in different countries for improving the QMNC.
    MeSH term(s) Female ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Parturition ; Pregnancy ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Health Care ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; World Health Organization
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-02-16
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2599832-8
    ISSN 2044-6055 ; 2044-6055
    ISSN (online) 2044-6055
    ISSN 2044-6055
    DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048195
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Use of WHO standards to improve quality of maternal and newborn hospital care: a study collecting both mothers' and staff perspective in a tertiary care hospital in Italy.

    Lazzerini, Marzia / Valente, Emanuelle Pessa / Covi, Benedetta / Semenzato, Chiara / Ciuch, Margherita

    BMJ open quality

    2019  Volume 8, Issue 1, Page(s) e000525

    Abstract: Background: WHO developed a list of standards for improving maternal and newborn hospital care. However, there is little experience on their use, and no precise guidance on their implementation. This study aimed at documenting the use of the WHO ... ...

    Abstract Background: WHO developed a list of standards for improving maternal and newborn hospital care. However, there is little experience on their use, and no precise guidance on their implementation. This study aimed at documenting the use of the WHO standards for improving the quality of maternal and neonatal care (QMNC) in a tertiary hospital, Northeast Italy.
    Methods: The study was conducted between May 2016 and May 2018, in three phases: phase I-sensitisation and training of health professionals; phase II-data collection on the WHO standards through a survey among service users and providers; phase III-based on the findings of phase II, development of recommendations for improving the QMNC.
    Results: Overall, 101 health professionals were successfully trained. 1050 mothers and 105 hospital staff participated in the survey. Key indicators of QMNC (and related prevalence) from the mothers survey included: caesarean section (23.1%); episiotomy (18.3%); restrictions to free movements during labour (46.5%), lithotomy position for staff choice (69.3%); skin to skin (80.8%); early breast feeding (67.2%); information on newborn danger signs (47.2%); high satisfaction with QMNC (68.8%). Only 1.2% and 0.7% of women respectively reported discrimination or abuse. Key indicators (and prevalence) reported from staff included: availability of clinical protocols (37%); regular training (14%); health information system used for quality improvement (16.3%); training on effective communication (9.7%) and on emotional support (19.6%); protocols to prevent mistreatment and abuse (6.9%). On several indicators, the opinions of mothers on QMNC was better than those of staff. Overall, 55 quality improvement recommendations were agreed.
    Conclusions: Information on the WHO standards can be collected from both services users and providers and can be proactively used for planning improvements on QMNC.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data ; Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data ; Episiotomy/statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Italy ; Male ; Maternal-Child Health Services/standards ; Mothers/psychology ; Nursing Staff, Hospital/education ; Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology ; Pregnancy ; Quality Improvement ; Tertiary Care Centers ; World Health Organization
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-02-13
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ISSN 2399-6641
    ISSN (online) 2399-6641
    DOI 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000525
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top