LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 2 of total 2

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Will clinical signs become myth? Developing structured Signs Circuits to improve medical students’ exposure to and confidence examining clinical signs

    Dominic Merriott / George Ransley / Shadman Aziz / Krushna Patel / Molly Rhodes / Deborah Abraham / Katba Imansouren / Daniel Turton

    Medical Education Online, Vol 27, Iss

    2022  Volume 1

    Abstract: Background Correctly eliciting and interpreting physical examination (PEx) signs contributes to successful diagnosis and is fundamental to patient care. A significant decline in the time spent acquiring these skills by medical students, and the decreased ...

    Abstract Background Correctly eliciting and interpreting physical examination (PEx) signs contributes to successful diagnosis and is fundamental to patient care. A significant decline in the time spent acquiring these skills by medical students, and the decreased ability to elicit and recognise signs is widely acknowledged. However, organising teaching to counteract this in the busy clinical environment is challenging. We evaluated the prior exposure to clinical signs, and experience of examination teaching among a cohort of final-year medical students. Following this, we assessed the utility of a structured circuit-based approach (Signs Circuits) using hospital inpatients and junior doctors to provide high-yield PEx teaching and overcome these limitations.Materials and methods Qualitative and quantitative survey feedback, including a standardised list of 62 clinical signs, was sought from final-year medical students during their rotations at a teaching hospital in London, UK, before and after the provision of Signs Circuits.Results Prior to the course the 63 students reported limited exposure to even the most common clinical signs. For example, the murmurs of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation and the sound of lung crackles eluded 43%, 87%, and 32%, respectively. From qualitative feedback, the reasons for this included that much of their prior PEx experience had focused on the performance of appropriate examination steps and techniques in patients without pathology. During the course, students were exposed to an average of 4.4 new signs, and left with increased confidence examining and eliciting signs, and a firmer belief in their importance to diagnosis.Conclusion Medical students continue to have limited exposure to clinical signs in medical school. This signs-focused approach to PEx teaching is an effective and reproducible way to counter the deficiencies identified in signs exposure.
    Keywords Physical examination ; clinical signs ; examination skills decline ; clinical skills ; Special aspects of education ; LC8-6691 ; Medicine (General) ; R5-920
    Subject code 420
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-12-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Taylor & Francis Group
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Improving the documentation quality of point-of-care ultrasound scans in the emergency department

    Shadman Aziz / James Bottomley / Vasant Mohandas / Arif Ahmad / Gemma Morelli / Sam Thenabadu

    BMJ Open Quality, Vol 9, Iss

    2020  Volume 1

    Abstract: A point-of-care ultrasound scan (POCUS) is a core element of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) specialty training curriculum. However, POCUS documentation quality can be poor, especially in the time-pressured environment of the emergency ... ...

    Abstract A point-of-care ultrasound scan (POCUS) is a core element of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) specialty training curriculum. However, POCUS documentation quality can be poor, especially in the time-pressured environment of the emergency department (ED). A survey of 10 junior ED clinicians at the Princess Royal University Hospital (PRUH) found that total POCUS documentation was as low as 38% in some examinations.This quality improvement project aimed to increase the coverage and quality of POCUS documentation in the ED. This was done by using a plan-do-study-act (PDSA) regime to improve the quality of POCUS documentation from the original baseline to 80%. There were three discreet PDSA cycles and the interventions included improving education and training about POCUS documentation and the introduction of an original proforma, which incorporated six minimum requirements for POCUS documentation as per the joint RCEM and Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) guidelines for POCUS documentation (patient details, indications, findings, conclusions, signature and date).The project team audited the quality of all documented scans in the resuscitation department of the PRUH against the RCEM/RCR guidelines at baseline and following three discrete PDSA cycles. This was done over an 8-week period, spanning 696 attendances to the resuscitation area of the ED and 42 documented POCUS examinations.Quality recording of the six RCEM/RCR elements of POCUS documentation was poor at baseline but improved following three successful PDSA cycles. There was a demonstrated improvement in five of six documentation elements: patient details on POCUS documentation increased from 53.3% to the 66.7%, indication from 60.0% to 66.7%, conclusion from 13.0% to 83.0%, signature from 86.7% to 100.0% and date from 46.7% to 66.7%.These results suggest that the introduction of a proforma and a vigorous education strategy are effective ways to improve the quality of documentation of ED POCUS.
    Keywords Medicine (General) ; R5-920
    Subject code 360
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-03-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top