LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 92

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Frail patients dropping out of neoadjuvant treatment: what should we do?

    Morgagni, Paolo / Monti, Manlio / Solaini, Leonardo / Foca, Flavia / Ercolani, Giorgio

    Updates in surgery

    2022  Volume 75, Issue 2, Page(s) 403–408

    Abstract: Perioperative oncological treatment is currently the gold standard approach in Europe for Advanced Gastric Cancer patients. Unfortunately, patients dropping out due to worsening conditions has been frequently observed, but these data are seldomly ... ...

    Abstract Perioperative oncological treatment is currently the gold standard approach in Europe for Advanced Gastric Cancer patients. Unfortunately, patients dropping out due to worsening conditions has been frequently observed, but these data are seldomly considered and reported. To analyze frequency and propose solutions to support these patients, we reconsidered our results from the GASTRODOC randomized trial performed by [blinded for reviewers] and GIRCG on 91 patients. Thirty-four patients (37.4%) suspended chemotherapy and five (5.4%) did not reach surgery. Ten patients (11%) presented unacceptable toxicity related to gastrointestinal symptoms, six ended the treatment for investigator decision and six for progression, five patients withdrew their consent, five patients were excluded because of surgical complications and long hospitalization, and two patients died. Even though not significant, survival rates for patients who interrupted treatment in the whole trial were lower (5-year OS completed 64.6 vs. interrupted 41.8 p 0.07). Promptness in giving patient support for gastrointestinal symptoms, careful evaluation of anemia and patient nutritional status, and psychological programs from the beginning of the oncologic treatment may improve the final results.
    MeSH term(s) Aged ; Humans ; Europe ; Frail Elderly ; Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects ; Stomach Neoplasms/therapy ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-12-03
    Publishing country Italy
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2572692-4
    ISSN 2038-3312 ; 2038-131X
    ISSN (online) 2038-3312
    ISSN 2038-131X
    DOI 10.1007/s13304-022-01422-2
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Anatomic Laparoscopic Liver Resection in the Scenario of the Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Solaini, Leonardo / Bocchino, Antonio / Cucchetti, Alessandro / Ercolani, Giorgio

    Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A

    2020  Volume 30, Issue 10, Page(s) 1076–1081

    Abstract: Aim: ...

    Abstract Aim:
    MeSH term(s) Blood Loss, Surgical ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery ; Conversion to Open Surgery ; Hepatectomy/adverse effects ; Hepatectomy/methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy/adverse effects ; Length of Stay ; Liver Neoplasms/surgery ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications/etiology ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-08-11
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Systematic Review
    ZDB-ID 1381909-4
    ISSN 1557-9034 ; 1092-6429
    ISSN (online) 1557-9034
    ISSN 1092-6429
    DOI 10.1089/lap.2020.0562
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Solaini, Leonardo / Cavaliere, Davide / Avanzolini, Andrea / Rocco, Giuseppe / Ercolani, Giorgio

    Journal of robotic surgery

    2021  Volume 16, Issue 4, Page(s) 775–781

    Abstract: The aim of this study was to review the latest evidence on the robotic approach (RHR) for inguinal hernia repair comparing the pooled outcome of this technique with those of the standard laparoscopic procedure (LHR). A systematic literature search was ... ...

    Abstract The aim of this study was to review the latest evidence on the robotic approach (RHR) for inguinal hernia repair comparing the pooled outcome of this technique with those of the standard laparoscopic procedure (LHR). A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus for studies published between 2010 and 2021 concerning the comparison between RHR versus LHR. After screening 582 articles, 9 articles with a total of 64,426 patients (7589 RHRs) were eligible for inclusion. Among preoperative variables, a pooled higher ratio of ASA > 2 patients was found in the robotic group (12.4 vs 8.6%, p < 0.001). Unilateral hernia repair was more common in the laparoscopic group (79.9 vs 68.1, p < 0.001). Overall, operative time was longer in the robotic group (160 vs 90 min, p < 0.001); this was confirmed also in the sub-analysis on unilateral procedures (88 vs 68 min, p = 0.040). The operative time for robotic bilateral repair was similar to the laparoscopic one (111 vs 100, p = 0.797). Conversion to open surgery was 0% in the robotic group. The pooled rate of chronic pain and postoperative complications was similar between the groups. The standardized mean difference MD of the costs between LHR versus RHR was - 3270$ (95% CI - 4757 to - 1782, p < 0.001). In conclusion, laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair have similar safety parameters and postoperative outcomes. Robotic approach may require longer operative time if the unilateral repair is performed. Costs are higher in the robotic group.
    MeSH term(s) Hernia, Inguinal/surgery ; Herniorrhaphy/methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy/methods ; Operative Time ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-10-05
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Review ; Systematic Review
    ZDB-ID 2268283-1
    ISSN 1863-2491 ; 1863-2483
    ISSN (online) 1863-2491
    ISSN 1863-2483
    DOI 10.1007/s11701-021-01312-6
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Advantages of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and matched studies.

    Cucchetti, Alessandro / Bocchino, Antonio / Crippa, Stefano / Solaini, Leonardo / Partelli, Stefano / Falconi, Massimo / Ercolani, Giorgio

    Surgery

    2022  Volume 173, Issue 4, Page(s) 1023–1029

    Abstract: Background: We sought to provide a meta-analysis and credibility assessment of available randomized controlled trials and propensity score matched studies when assessing early and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy compared with ... ...

    Abstract Background: We sought to provide a meta-analysis and credibility assessment of available randomized controlled trials and propensity score matched studies when assessing early and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy compared with open distal pancreatectomy.
    Methods: The MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched for pertinent literature up to June 2022. Random-effect meta-analyses were applied. Trial sequential analysis was applied to verify whether results were true- or false-positive or -negative findings.
    Results: Thirteen studies were identified (2 randomized controlled trials and 11 propensity score matched studies). The early outcomes were assessed on 12 studies, including 4,346 patients. In this population, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy decreased postoperative stay (mean difference = 1.8 days; P = .001) and estimated blood loss (mean difference = 148 mL; P = .001), and trial sequential analysis confirmed these as true-positive findings. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open distal pancreatectomy had similar operating times (P = .165), and trial sequential analysis confirmed this as a true-negative finding. Major morbidity, mortality, and readmission were similar, but results were inconclusive by trial sequential analysis. Oncologic outcomes were assessed on 5 studies, including 2,430 patients. In this population, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy showed higher R0 resection rate (OR = 1.46; P = .001) and shorter time to adjuvant therapy (mean difference 4.0 days P = .003). A survival benefit was observed at 1 year after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (OR = 1.45; P = .001), which was not confirmed at 3 years (P = .650).
    Conclusion: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is superior to open distal pancreatectomy for most of the early outcomes analyzed. The operating time was equalized as a result of the learning curve. Results from patients with pancreatic cancer suggest at least an oncologic noninferiority of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy compared with open distal pancreatectomy.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Pancreatectomy/adverse effects ; Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery ; Postoperative Period ; Laparoscopy/adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome ; Postoperative Complications/etiology ; Length of Stay
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-12-21
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Meta-Analysis ; Systematic Review ; Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 202467-6
    ISSN 1532-7361 ; 0039-6060
    ISSN (online) 1532-7361
    ISSN 0039-6060
    DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2022.11.029
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Fluorescence Cholangiography Using Indocyanine Green Improves the Identification of Biliary Structures During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

    D'Acapito, Fabrizio / Cucchetti, Alessandro / Solaini, Leonardo / Serenari, Matteo / Framarini, Massimo / Ercolani, Giorgio

    World journal of surgery

    2022  Volume 47, Issue 3, Page(s) 666–673

    Abstract: Background: This cross-sectional survey aimed to determine whether fluorescence cholangiography using indocyanine green (ICG-FC) can improve the detection of the cystic duct and the main bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).: Methods: ... ...

    Abstract Background: This cross-sectional survey aimed to determine whether fluorescence cholangiography using indocyanine green (ICG-FC) can improve the detection of the cystic duct and the main bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
    Methods: The survey was distributed to 214 surgeons (residents/faculties) in 2021. The confidence in the identification of the cystic duct and of the main bile duct was elicited on a 10-point Likert scale before/after the use of ICG-FC. This was repeated for three LCs ranging from a procedure deemed easy to a LC for acute cholecystitis.
    Results: There were 149 responses. ICG-FC increased the responders' confidence in identifying the cystic duct, raising the median value from 6 (IQR, 5-8) with white light up to 9 (IQR, 9-10) with ICG-FC (paired p < 0.001). This increase was even more evident when identifying the main bile duct, where the median confidence value increased from 5 (IQR, 4-7) with white light to 9 (IQR, 8-10) with the use of ICG-FC (p < 0.001). ICG-FC significantly increased the detection of residents of the main bile duct in case of intermediate difficulty LCs and in LCs for acute cholecystitis.
    Conclusions: The results support that the use of near-infrared imaging can ameliorate detection of biliary structures, especially of the main bile duct and this was particularly true for young surgeons and in more complex situations.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Indocyanine Green ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/methods ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Cholangiography/methods ; Cholecystitis, Acute ; Coloring Agents
    Chemical Substances Indocyanine Green (IX6J1063HV) ; Coloring Agents
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-12-02
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 224043-9
    ISSN 1432-2323 ; 0364-2313
    ISSN (online) 1432-2323
    ISSN 0364-2313
    DOI 10.1007/s00268-022-06854-w
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Solaini, Leonardo / Bocchino, Antonio / Avanzolini, Andrea / Annunziata, Domenico / Cavaliere, Davide / Ercolani, Giorgio

    International journal of colorectal disease

    2022  Volume 37, Issue 7, Page(s) 1497–1507

    Abstract: Background: This study aimed to review the new evidence to understand whether the robotic approach could find some clear indication also in left colectomy.: Methods: A systematic review of studies published from 2004 to 2022 in the Web of Science, ... ...

    Abstract Background: This study aimed to review the new evidence to understand whether the robotic approach could find some clear indication also in left colectomy.
    Methods: A systematic review of studies published from 2004 to 2022 in the Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases and comparing laparoscopic (LLC) and robotic left colectomy (RLC) was performed. All comparative studies evaluating robotic left colectomy (RLC) versus laparoscopic (LLC) left colectomy with at least 20 patients in the robotic arm were included. Abstract, editorials, and reviews were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies was used to assess the methodological quality. The random-effect model was used to calculate pooled effect estimates.
    Results: Among the 139 articles identified, 11 were eligible, with a total of 52,589 patients (RLC, n = 13,506 versus LLC, n = 39,083). The rate of conversion to open surgery was lower for robotic procedures (RR 0.5, 0.5-0.6; p < 0.001). Operative time was longer for the robotic procedures in the pooled analysis (WMD 39.1, 17.3-60.9, p = 0.002). Overall complications (RR 0.9, 0.8-0.9, p < 0.001), anastomotic leaks (RR 0.7, 0.7-0.8; p < 0.001), and superficial wound infection (RR 3.1, 2.8-3.4; p < 0.001) were less common after RLC. There were no significant differences in mortality (RR 1.1; 0.8-1.6, p = 0.124). There were no differences between RLC and LLC with regards to postoperative variables in the subgroup analysis on malignancies.
    Conclusions: Robotic left colectomy requires less conversion to open surgery than the standard laparoscopic approach. Postoperative morbidity rates seemed to be lower during RLC, but this was not confirmed in the procedures performed for malignancies.
    MeSH term(s) Colectomy/adverse effects ; Colectomy/methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy/adverse effects ; Laparoscopy/methods ; Length of Stay ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications/etiology ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-06-01
    Publishing country Germany
    Document type Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Review ; Systematic Review
    ZDB-ID 84975-3
    ISSN 1432-1262 ; 0179-1958
    ISSN (online) 1432-1262
    ISSN 0179-1958
    DOI 10.1007/s00384-022-04194-8
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy: a propensity score matched analysis from a bi-centric experience.

    Solaini, Leonardo / Giuliani, Giuseppe / Cavaliere, Davide / Bocchino, Antonio / Di Marino, Michele / Avanzolini, Andrea / Coratti, Andrea / Ercolani, Giorgio

    Journal of robotic surgery

    2023  Volume 17, Issue 5, Page(s) 2135–2140

    Abstract: The advantages of using the robotic platform may not be clearly evident in left colectomies, where the surgeon operates in an "open field" and does not routinely require intraoperative suturing. Current evidences are based on limited cohorts reporting ... ...

    Abstract The advantages of using the robotic platform may not be clearly evident in left colectomies, where the surgeon operates in an "open field" and does not routinely require intraoperative suturing. Current evidences are based on limited cohorts reporting conflicting outcomes regarding robotic left colectomies (RLC). The aim of this study is to report a bi-centric experience with robotic left colectomy in order to help in defining the role of the robotic approach for these procedures. This is a bi-centric propensity score matched study including patients who underwent RLC or laparoscopic left colectomy (LLC) between January 1, 2012 and May 1, 2022. RLC patients were matched to LLC patients in a 1:1 ratio. Main outcomes were conversion to open surgery and 30-day morbidity. In total, 300 patients were included. Of 143 (47.7%) RLC patients, 119 could be matched. After matching, conversion rate (4.2 vs. 7.6%, p = 0.265), 30-day morbidity (16.1 vs. 13.7%, p = 0.736), Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications (2.4 vs 3.2%, p = 0.572), transfusions (0.8 vs. 4.0%, p = 0.219), and 30-day mortality (0.8 vs 0.8%, p = 1.000) were comparable for RLC and LLC, respectively. Median operative time was longer for RLC (296 min 260-340 vs. 245, 195-296, p < 0.0001). Early oral feeding, time to first flatus, and hospital stay were similar between groups. RLC has safety parameters as well as conversion to open surgery comparable with standard laparoscopy. Operative time is longer with the robotic approach.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods ; Propensity Score ; Laparoscopy/methods ; Colectomy/adverse effects ; Colectomy/methods ; Operative Time ; Length of Stay ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications/etiology
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-05-29
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2268283-1
    ISSN 1863-2491 ; 1863-2483
    ISSN (online) 1863-2491
    ISSN 1863-2483
    DOI 10.1007/s11701-023-01634-7
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article: Gastric splenosis mimicking a gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A case report.

    Isopi, Claudio / Vitali, Giulia / Pieri, Federica / Solaini, Leonardo / Ercolani, Giorgio

    World journal of gastrointestinal surgery

    2020  Volume 12, Issue 10, Page(s) 435–441

    Abstract: Background: Mass lesions located in the wall of the stomach (and also of the bowel) are referred to as "intramural." The differential diagnosis of such lesions can be challenging in some cases. As such, it may occur that an inconclusive fine needle ... ...

    Abstract Background: Mass lesions located in the wall of the stomach (and also of the bowel) are referred to as "intramural." The differential diagnosis of such lesions can be challenging in some cases. As such, it may occur that an inconclusive fine needle aspiration (FNA) result give way to an unexpected diagnosis upon final surgical pathology. Herein, we present a case of an intramural gastric nodule mimicking a gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).
    Case summary: A 47-year-old Caucasian woman, who had undergone splenectomy for trauma at the age of 16, underwent gastroscopy for long-lasting epigastric pain and dyspepsia. It revealed a 15 mm submucosal nodule bulging into the gastric lumen with smooth margins and normal overlying mucosa. A thoraco-abdominal computed tomography scan showed in the gastric fundus a rounded mass (30 mm in diameter) with an exophytic growth and intense enhancement after administration of intravenous contrast. Endoscopic ultrasound scan showed a hypoechoic nodule, and fine needle FNA was inconclusive. Gastric GIST was considered the most probable diagnosis, and surgical resection was proposed due to symptoms. A laparoscopic gastric wedge resection was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on the seventh postoperative day. The final pathology report described a rounded encapsulated accumulation of lymphoid tissue of about 4 cm in diameter consistent with spleen parenchyma implanted during the previous splenectomy.
    Conclusion: Splenosis is a rare condition that should always be considered as a possible diagnosis in splenectomized patients who present with an intramural gastric nodule.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-11-16
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Case Reports
    ZDB-ID 2573700-4
    ISSN 1948-9366
    ISSN 1948-9366
    DOI 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i10.435
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and colorectal cancer: From physiology to surgery.

    Ammerata, Giorgio / Filippo, Rosalinda / Laface, Carmelo / Memeo, Riccardo / Solaini, Leonardo / Cavaliere, Davide / Navarra, Giuseppe / Ranieri, Girolamo / Currò, Giuseppe / Ammendola, Michele

    World journal of clinical cases

    2022  Volume 10, Issue 30, Page(s) 10852–10861

    Abstract: The pursuit of this paper is to collect principal reviews and systematic reviews about hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) used in colorectal cancer (CRC). We focus on principal biological aspects of CRC, ... ...

    Abstract The pursuit of this paper is to collect principal reviews and systematic reviews about hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) used in colorectal cancer (CRC). We focus on principal biological aspects of CRC, hyperthermia effects, and surgical procedures. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE for the principal reviews and systematic reviews published from 2010 to 2021 regarding the bimodal treatment (CRS + HIPEC) against local and advanced CRC. In the literature, from several studies, it seems that the efficacy of bimodal treatment with an accurate CRS can extend overall survival. Despite these studies, there are not still any straight guidelines more detailed and scheduled about the use of combined treatment in patients with CRC. Even if the concept is still not very clear and shared, after a careful evaluation of the published data, and after some technical and pathophysiological descriptions, we concluded that it is possible to improve the overall survival and quality of life and to reduce the tumor relapse in patients affected by locally advanced (pT4) CRC with peritoneal metastases.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-11-02
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ISSN 2307-8960
    ISSN 2307-8960
    DOI 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i30.10852
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article: Conversion Surgery in Gastric Cancer Carcinomatosis.

    Morgagni, Paolo / Solaini, Leonardo / Saragoni, Luca / Monti, Manlio / Valgiusti, Martina / Vittimberga, Giovanni / Frassineti, Giovanni Luca / Framarini, Massimo / Ercolani, Giorgio

    Frontiers in oncology

    2022  Volume 12, Page(s) 852559

    Abstract: Background: After the REGATTA trial, patients with stage IV gastric cancer could only benefit from chemotherapy (CHT). However, some of these patients may respond extraordinarily to palliative chemotherapy, converting their disease to a radically ... ...

    Abstract Background: After the REGATTA trial, patients with stage IV gastric cancer could only benefit from chemotherapy (CHT). However, some of these patients may respond extraordinarily to palliative chemotherapy, converting their disease to a radically operable stage. We present a single centre experience in treating peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer.
    Methods: All patients with stage IV gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases as a single metastatic site operated at a single centre between 2005 and 2020 were included. Cases were grouped according to the treatment received.
    Results: A total of 118 patients were considered, 46 were submitted to palliative gastrectomy (11 were considered M1 because of an unsuspected positive peritoneal cytology), and 20 were submitted to Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) because of a <6 Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI). The median overall survival (OS) after surgery plus HIPEC was 46.7 (95% CI 15.8-64.0). Surgery (without HIPEC) after CHT presented a median OS 14.4 (8.2-26.8) and after upfront surgery 14.7 (10.9-21.1). Patients treated with upfront surgery and considered M1 only because of a positive cytology, had a median OS of 29.2 (25.2-29.2). The OS of patients treated with surgery plus HIPEC were 60.4 months (9.2-60.4) in completely regressed cancer after chemotherapy and 31.2 (15.8-64.0) in those partially regressed (
    Conclusions: Conversion surgery for peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer was associated with long survival and it should always be taken into consideration in this group of patients.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-03-08
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2649216-7
    ISSN 2234-943X
    ISSN 2234-943X
    DOI 10.3389/fonc.2022.852559
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top