LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 6 of total 6

Search options

  1. Article: Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab for Active Psoriatic Arthritis: 100-Week Results from the KEEPsAKE 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Östör, Andrew / Van den Bosch, Filip / Papp, Kim / Asnal, Cecilia / Blanco, Ricardo / Aelion, Jacob / Carter, Kyle / Stakias, Vassilis / Lippe, Ralph / Drogaris, Leonidas / Soliman, Ahmed M / Chen, Michael M / Padilla, Byron / Kivitz, Alan

    Rheumatology and therapy

    2024  

    Abstract: Introduction: Long-term therapeutic options providing durable response and tolerability are needed for psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The ongoing KEEPsAKE 2 trial is evaluating risankizumab treatment in patients with active PsA who previously had inadequate ...

    Abstract Introduction: Long-term therapeutic options providing durable response and tolerability are needed for psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The ongoing KEEPsAKE 2 trial is evaluating risankizumab treatment in patients with active PsA who previously had inadequate response/intolerance to ≥ 1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD-IR) and/or 1-2 biologic DMARDs (bDMARD-IR). Herein, we report results through 100 weeks of treatment.
    Methods: KEEPsAKE 2 is a global phase 3 trial. Patients with active PsA were randomized 1:1 to double-blind subcutaneous risankizumab 150 mg or placebo (weeks 0, 4, and 16). At week 24, all patients received open-label risankizumab every 12 weeks until end of study. Efficacy endpoints included achieving ≥ 20% improvement in PsA symptoms using American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20), attaining minimal disease activity (MDA; meeting ≥ 5/7 criteria of low disease activity and extent), and improving in other measures.
    Results: At the cutoff date, 345/443 (77.9%) patients were ongoing in the study. ACR20 was achieved in 57.1% and 52.5% of the continuous risankizumab and placebo/risankizumab cohorts, respectively, at week 100 and in 60.0% and 55.8%, respectively, at week 52. In week 52 responders, maintenance of ACR20 at week 100 was achieved in 74.8% (continuous risankizumab) and 78.7% (placebo/risankizumab) of patients. In the continuous risankizumab and placebo/risankizumab cohorts, respectively, MDA was achieved by 33.0% and 33.3% of patients at week 100 and by 27.2% and 33.8% at week 52. Among MDA responders at week 52, maintenance of MDA response was achieved by 83.6% and 73.0% of the continuous risankizumab and placebo/risankizumab cohorts, respectively. Risankizumab was well tolerated through week 100.
    Conclusions: Risankizumab demonstrated durable efficacy and tolerability through 100 weeks; most patients who achieved ACR20 and MDA responses at week 52 maintained this achievement through week 100. There were no new safety signals in patients who had csDMARD-IR and bDMARD-IR.
    Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03671148.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-03-18
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2783278-8
    ISSN 2198-6584 ; 2198-6576
    ISSN (online) 2198-6584
    ISSN 2198-6576
    DOI 10.1007/s40744-024-00657-2
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article: A Response to: Letter to the Editor Regarding Long-Term Benefit-Risk Profiles of Treatments for Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Network Meta-analysis.

    Armstrong, April W / Soliman, Ahmed M / Betts, Keith A / Wang, Yan / Gao, Yawen / Stakias, Vassilis / Puig, Luis

    Dermatology and therapy

    2022  Volume 12, Issue 12, Page(s) 2867–2870

    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-10-21
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Letter
    ZDB-ID 2680284-3
    ISSN 2190-9172 ; 2193-8210
    ISSN (online) 2190-9172
    ISSN 2193-8210
    DOI 10.1007/s13555-022-00812-z
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article: Long-Term Benefit-Risk Profiles of Treatments for Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Network Meta-Analysis.

    Armstrong, April W / Soliman, Ahmed M / Betts, Keith A / Wang, Yan / Gao, Yawen / Stakias, Vassilis / Puig, Luis

    Dermatology and therapy

    2021  Volume 12, Issue 1, Page(s) 167–184

    Abstract: Introduction: The long-term benefit-risk profiles of licensed and investigational treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis have not been fully characterized.: Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of licensed and investigational ... ...

    Abstract Introduction: The long-term benefit-risk profiles of licensed and investigational treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis have not been fully characterized.
    Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of licensed and investigational treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were identified through a systematic literature review through 2 May 2021. Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMAs) were conducted to compare the efficacy (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] 75/90/100 [at least a 75/90/100% reduction in PASI score from baseline] response) and safety outcomes (any adverse event [AE], any serious AE [SAE], and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation) of each treatment evaluated between weeks 48 and 56 after baseline. Surfaces under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRAs) were calculated to evaluate the relative ranking of treatments. The benefit-risk profiles of treatments were assessed by bidimensional plots of the NMA-estimated efficacy and safety outcomes.
    Results: In the efficacy NMA (N = 14 RCTs), the relative rankings for PASI 75/90/100 responses by weeks 48-56 were the highest for risankizumab (SUCRA: 98.5%) and bimekizumab (83.8% for dosing every 4 weeks [Q4W], 72.7% for dosing Q4W then every 8 weeks). The PASI response rates did not differ significantly between risankizumab and the two bimekizumab regimens. Additionally, risankizumab was associated with significantly higher PASI response rates than brodalumab, guselkumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab, ustekinumab, adalimumab, and etanercept. In the safety NMAs (N = 8 RCTs), risankizumab had the highest relative rankings for all three outcomes (SUCRA: 92.1%, 82.0%, and 91.0% for any AE, any SAE, and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, respectively). Risankizumab had a significantly lower rate of any AE than bimekizumab, ustekinumab, and secukinumab.
    Conclusions: Risankizumab was associated with the most favorable long-term benefit-risk profile for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Although ixekizumab and bimekizumab had favorable efficacy profiles, both treatments had lower rankings for safety outcomes.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-12-04
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2680284-3
    ISSN 2190-9172 ; 2193-8210
    ISSN (online) 2190-9172
    ISSN 2193-8210
    DOI 10.1007/s13555-021-00647-0
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Comparison of risankizumab and apremilast for the treatment of adults with moderate plaque psoriasis eligible for systemic therapy: results from a randomized, open-label, assessor-blinded phase IV study (IMMpulse).

    Stein Gold, Linda F / Bagel, Jerry / Tyring, Stephen K / Hong, H Chih-Ho / Pavlovsky, Lev / Vender, Ronald / Pinter, Andreas / Reich, Adam / Drogaris, Leonidas / Wu, Tianshuang / Patel, Manish / Soliman, Ahmed M / Photowala, Huzefa / Stakias, Vassilis / Richter, Sven / Papp, Kim A

    The British journal of dermatology

    2023  Volume 189, Issue 5, Page(s) 540–552

    Abstract: Background: Treatment of psoriasis with risankizumab has demonstrated superior efficacy to other treatments, such as adalimumab, ustekinumab and secukinumab.: Objectives: This study compared the efficacy and safety of risankizumab and apremilast in ... ...

    Abstract Background: Treatment of psoriasis with risankizumab has demonstrated superior efficacy to other treatments, such as adalimumab, ustekinumab and secukinumab.
    Objectives: This study compared the efficacy and safety of risankizumab and apremilast in adults with moderate plaque psoriasis eligible for systemic therapy. It also evaluated the efficacy and safety of switching to risankizumab vs. continuing apremilast in patients who did not achieve ≥ 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75 nonresponders) after 16 weeks of treatment with apremilast.
    Methods: This 52-week, phase IV, multicentre, randomized, open-label, efficacy assessor-blinded study (NCT04908475) enrolled patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of moderate chronic plaque psoriasis (≥ 6 months) and who were candidates for systemic therapy. The enrolled patients (randomized 1 : 2) received subcutaneous risankizumab (150 mg at weeks 0 and 4) or oral apremilast (30 mg twice daily). At week 16, all patients treated with apremilast were re-randomized (1 : 1) to risankizumab or apremilast, stratified by week-16 PASI 75 response. The co-primary outcomes in period A at week 16 were the achievement of ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) and static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) 0/1 with a two-grade or better improvement from baseline. At week 52, the primary endpoint in period B was the achievement of PASI 90 in PASI 75 nonresponders with apremilast at week 16. Safety was monitored throughout the study. All patients who received one dose of treatment were included in the efficacy and safety analysis.
    Results: At baseline, 118 and 234 patients were assigned to receive risankizumab and apremilast, respectively. At week 16, PASI 90 was achieved by 55.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 47.0-64.9] and 5.1% (95% CI 2.3-8.0), and sPGA 0/1 by 75.4% (95% CI 67.7-83.2) and 18.4% (95% CI 13.4-23.3), respectively. In period B, among PASI 75 nonresponders with apremilast at week 16, 83 switched to risankizumab and 78 continued apremilast. At week 52, 72.3% (95% CI 62.7-81.9) who switched to risankizumab achieved PASI 90 vs. 2.6% (95% CI 0.0-6.1) who continued apremilast. The most frequent adverse events (reported in ≥ 5%) in risankizumab-treated patients were COVID-19 infection and nasopharyngitis. Diarrhoea, nausea and headache were most frequent among apremilast-treated patients.
    Conclusions: For patients with moderate psoriasis, treatment with risankizumab demonstrated superior efficacy to those treated with apremilast, including those who did not benefit from prior treatment with apremilast. The safety profile of risankizumab was similar to prior studies, and no new safety signals were identified. These results show that, compared with apremilast, risankizumab treatment can significantly improve clinical outcomes in systemic-eligible patients with moderate psoriasis.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Adult ; Treatment Outcome ; Double-Blind Method ; Psoriasis/drug therapy ; Severity of Illness Index
    Chemical Substances risankizumab (90ZX3Q3FR7) ; apremilast (UP7QBP99PN)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-10-17
    Publishing country England
    Document type Randomized Controlled Trial ; Multicenter Study ; Clinical Trial, Phase IV ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 80076-4
    ISSN 1365-2133 ; 0007-0963
    ISSN (online) 1365-2133
    ISSN 0007-0963
    DOI 10.1093/bjd/ljad252
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Long-term safety and efficacy of risankizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: Interim analysis of the LIMMitless open-label extension trial up to 5 years of follow-up.

    Papp, Kim A / Blauvelt, Andrew / Puig, Lluís / Ohtsuki, Mamitaro / Beissert, Stefan / Gooderham, Melinda / Amin, Ahmad Z / Liu, Jie / Wu, Tianshuang / Azam, Tofial / Stakias, Vassilis / Espaillat, Ramon / Sinvhal, Ranjeeta / Soliman, Ahmed M / Pang, Yinuo / Chen, Michael M / Lebwohl, Mark G

    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

    2023  Volume 89, Issue 6, Page(s) 1149–1158

    Abstract: Background: Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease often requiring long-term therapy.: Objective: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of risankizumab in patients with psoriasis.: Methods: LIMMitless is an ongoing phase 3, open- ...

    Abstract Background: Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease often requiring long-term therapy.
    Objective: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of risankizumab in patients with psoriasis.
    Methods: LIMMitless is an ongoing phase 3, open-label extension study evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of continuous risankizumab 150 mg every 12 weeks for adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis following multiple phase 2/3 base studies. This interim analysis assessed safety (ie, monitored treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]) through 304 weeks. Efficacy assessments included determining the proportion of patients who achieved ≥90% or 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90/100), static Physician's Global Assessment of clear/almost clear (sPGA 0/1), and Dermatology Life Quality Index of no effect on patient's life (DLQI 0/1) through 256 weeks.
    Results: Among 897 patients randomized to risankizumab in the base studies, 706 were still ongoing at data cutoff. Rates of TEAEs, TEAEs leading to discontinuation, and TEAEs of safety interest were low. At week 256, 85.1%/52.3% of patients achieved PASI 90/100, respectively, 85.8% achieved sPGA 0/1, and 76.4% achieved DLQI 0/1.
    Limitations: Open-label study with no placebo or active-comparator group.
    Conclusions: Long-term continuous risankizumab treatment for up to 5 years was well tolerated and demonstrated high and durable efficacy.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Humans ; Chronic Disease ; Double-Blind Method ; Follow-Up Studies ; Psoriasis/diagnosis ; Psoriasis/drug therapy ; Severity of Illness Index ; Treatment Outcome
    Chemical Substances risankizumab (90ZX3Q3FR7)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-08-06
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Clinical Trial, Phase III ; Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 603641-7
    ISSN 1097-6787 ; 0190-9622
    ISSN (online) 1097-6787
    ISSN 0190-9622
    DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.07.1024
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article: Formulation and Profile of FMX101 4% Minocycline Topical Foam for the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris.

    Kircik, Leon / Del Rosso, James Q / Weiss, Jonathan S / Stakias, Vassilis / London, Anat / Keynan, Rita / Hazot, Yohan / Elliott, Russell / Stuart, Iain

    The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology

    2020  Volume 13, Issue 4, Page(s) 14–21

    Abstract: FMX101 4% minocycline is a hydrophobic, topical foam formulation of minocycline recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of non-nodular inflammatory lesions in moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris. It was ... ...

    Abstract FMX101 4% minocycline is a hydrophobic, topical foam formulation of minocycline recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of non-nodular inflammatory lesions in moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris. It was developed to harness the anti-inflammatory and antibiotic activity of minocycline while minimizing potentially serious systemic adverse events associated with oral delivery. The composition and profile of this novel treatment have yet to be described. This article discusses the components of the foam-based product and the rationale for their selection. It reviews microbiologic data for FMX101 4% and presents previously unpublished data regarding sebum penetration, minocycline permeation, and disposition into skin structures. The effects of FMX101 4% were compared with those of several commercially available acne preparations to determine how the FMX101 4% formulation affects the physical properties of model human sebum
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-04-01
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 1941-2789
    ISSN 1941-2789
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top