LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 18

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: The debrief imperative: building teaming competencies and team effectiveness.

    Tannenbaum, Scott I / Greilich, Philip E

    BMJ quality & safety

    2022  Volume 32, Issue 3, Page(s) 125–128

    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Leadership ; Interprofessional Relations ; Patient Care Team
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-11-02
    Publishing country England
    Document type Editorial ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 2592909-4
    ISSN 2044-5423 ; 2044-5415
    ISSN (online) 2044-5423
    ISSN 2044-5415
    DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015259
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Managing teamwork in the face of pandemic: evidence-based tips.

    Tannenbaum, Scott I / Traylor, Allison M / Thomas, Eric J / Salas, Eduardo

    BMJ quality & safety

    2020  Volume 30, Issue 1, Page(s) 59–63

    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-29
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Review ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
    ZDB-ID 2592909-4
    ISSN 2044-5423 ; 2044-5415
    ISSN (online) 2044-5423
    ISSN 2044-5415
    DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011447
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Helping healthcare teams save lives during COVID-19: Insights and countermeasures from team science.

    Traylor, Allison M / Tannenbaum, Scott I / Thomas, Eric J / Salas, Eduardo

    The American psychologist

    2020  Volume 76, Issue 1, Page(s) 1–13

    Abstract: As the COVID-19 pandemic has ravaged the United States, health care teams are on the frontlines of this global crisis, often navigating harrowing conditions at work, such as a lack of personal protective equipment and staffing shortages, and distractions ...

    Abstract As the COVID-19 pandemic has ravaged the United States, health care teams are on the frontlines of this global crisis, often navigating harrowing conditions at work, such as a lack of personal protective equipment and staffing shortages, and distractions at home, including worries about elderly relatives or making childcare arrangements. While the nature and severity of stressors impacting health care teams are in many ways unprecedented, decades of psychological research exploring teamwork in extreme contexts can provide insights to understand and improve outcomes for teams in a crisis. This review highlights the psychological principles that apply to teams in a crisis and illustrates how psychologists can use this knowledge to improve teamwork for medical teams in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic., The review also provides a glimpse toward the future, noting both how psychologists can help health care teams recover and rebound, as well as how additional research can improve psychologists' understanding of teamwork in times of crisis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
    MeSH term(s) COVID-19 ; Group Processes ; Humans ; Occupational Stress/prevention & control ; Patient Care Team ; Personnel, Hospital/psychology
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-10-29
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 209464-2
    ISSN 1935-990X ; 0003-066X
    ISSN (online) 1935-990X
    ISSN 0003-066X
    DOI 10.1037/amp0000750
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Informal field-based learning and work design.

    Wolfson, Mikhail A / Mathieu, John E / Tannenbaum, Scott I / Maynard, M Travis

    The Journal of applied psychology

    2019  Volume 104, Issue 10, Page(s) 1283–1295

    Abstract: U.S. organizations continue to invest most of their learning budgets in formal training and development programs despite estimates that the majority of learning in the workplace happens informally. In this study we focus on informal field-based learning ( ...

    Abstract U.S. organizations continue to invest most of their learning budgets in formal training and development programs despite estimates that the majority of learning in the workplace happens informally. In this study we focus on informal field-based learning (IFBL), which represents individuals engaging in self-directed, intentional, and field-based development of their knowledge and skills. We build on the informal learning literature to advance a cross-level model of individual and job-level characteristics as influences on IFBL and subsequent changes in job performance. We tested our model using a sample of 378 health care employees who occupied 47 different jobs. The results showed promotion-focused individuals more readily engaged in IFBL, as moderated by job time pressures. Moreover, engaging in IFBL behaviors positively related to performance improvements in jobs that require greater updating and use of relevant information, as well as in jobs with relatively low decision making and problem-solving requirements. Exploratory subdimensional analyses revealed some interesting countervailing relationships between the feedback-seeking and vicarious-learning elements of IFBL. Results are discussed in terms of contingency relationships associated with IFBL behaviors and different job types, as well as theoretical and practical implications. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Employment ; Female ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Learning ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Professional Competence ; Work Performance
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-03-21
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 219157-x
    ISSN 1939-1854 ; 0021-9010
    ISSN (online) 1939-1854
    ISSN 0021-9010
    DOI 10.1037/apl0000408
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article: Helping healthcare teams save lives during COVID-19: Insights and countermeasures from team science

    Traylor, Allison M / Tannenbaum, Scott I / Thomas, Eric J / Salas, Eduardo

    Am. psychol

    Abstract: As the COVID-19 pandemic has ravaged the United States, health care teams are on the frontlines of this global crisis, often navigating harrowing conditions at work, such as a lack of personal protective equipment and staffing shortages, and distractions ...

    Abstract As the COVID-19 pandemic has ravaged the United States, health care teams are on the frontlines of this global crisis, often navigating harrowing conditions at work, such as a lack of personal protective equipment and staffing shortages, and distractions at home, including worries about elderly relatives or making childcare arrangements. While the nature and severity of stressors impacting health care teams are in many ways unprecedented, decades of psychological research exploring teamwork in extreme contexts can provide insights to understand and improve outcomes for teams in a crisis. This review highlights the psychological principles that apply to teams in a crisis and illustrates how psychologists can use this knowledge to improve teamwork for medical teams in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic., The review also provides a glimpse toward the future, noting both how psychologists can help health care teams recover and rebound, as well as how additional research can improve psychologists' understanding of teamwork in times of crisis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #894373
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Helping healthcare teams save lives during COVID-19

    Traylor, Allison M. / Tannenbaum, Scott I. / Thomas, Eric J. / Salas, Eduardo

    American Psychologist ; ISSN 1935-990X 0003-066X

    Insights and countermeasures from team science.

    2020  

    Keywords General Psychology ; General Medicine ; covid19
    Language English
    Publisher American Psychological Association (APA)
    Publishing country us
    Document type Article ; Online
    DOI 10.1037/amp0000750
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Team development interventions: Evidence-based approaches for improving teamwork.

    Lacerenza, Christina N / Marlow, Shannon L / Tannenbaum, Scott I / Salas, Eduardo

    The American psychologist

    2018  Volume 73, Issue 4, Page(s) 517–531

    Abstract: The rate of teamwork and collaboration within the workforce has burgeoned over the years, and the use of teams is projected to continue increasing. With the rise of teamwork comes the need for interventions designed to enhance teamwork effectiveness. ... ...

    Abstract The rate of teamwork and collaboration within the workforce has burgeoned over the years, and the use of teams is projected to continue increasing. With the rise of teamwork comes the need for interventions designed to enhance teamwork effectiveness. Successful teams produce desired outcomes; however, it is critical that team members demonstrate effective processes to achieve these outcomes. Team development interventions (TDIs) increase effective team competencies and processes, thereby leading to improvements in proximal and distal outcomes. The effectiveness of TDIs is evident across domains (e.g., education, health care, military, aviation), and they are applicable in a wide range of settings. To stimulate the adoption and effective use of TDIs, the current article provides a review of four types of evidence-based TDIs including team training, leadership training, team building, and team debriefing. In doing so, we aim to provide psychologists with an understanding of the scientific principles underlying TDIs and their impact on team dynamics. Moreover, we provide evidence-based recommendations regarding how to increase the effectiveness of TDIs as well as a discussion on future research needed within this domain. (PsycINFO Database Record
    MeSH term(s) Cooperative Behavior ; Group Processes ; Humans ; Interprofessional Relations ; Intersectoral Collaboration ; Leadership ; Professional Competence ; Staff Development/methods
    Language English
    Publishing date 2018-05-28
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 209464-2
    ISSN 1935-990X ; 0003-066X
    ISSN (online) 1935-990X
    ISSN 0003-066X
    DOI 10.1037/amp0000295
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: A cross-level investigation of informal field-based learning and performance improvements.

    Wolfson, Mikhail A / Tannenbaum, Scott I / Mathieu, John E / Maynard, M Travis

    The Journal of applied psychology

    2018  Volume 103, Issue 1, Page(s) 14–36

    Abstract: Organizations often operate in complex and dynamic environments which place a premium on employees' ongoing learning and acquisition of new competencies. Additionally, the majority of learning in organizations does not take place in formal training ... ...

    Abstract Organizations often operate in complex and dynamic environments which place a premium on employees' ongoing learning and acquisition of new competencies. Additionally, the majority of learning in organizations does not take place in formal training settings, but we know relatively little about how informal field-based learning (IFBL) behaviors relate to changes in job performance. In this study, we first clarified the construct of IFBL as a subset of informal learning. Second, on the basis of this clarified construct definition, we developed a measure of IFBL behaviors and demonstrated its psychometric properties using (a) a sample of subject matter experts who made item content validity judgments and (b) both an Amazon Mechanical Turk sample (N = 400) and a sample of 1,707 healthcare employees. Third, we advanced a grounded theory of IFBL in healthcare, and related it to individuals' regulatory foci and contextual moderators of IFBL behaviors-job performance relationships using a cross-level design and lagged nonmethod bound measures. Specifically, using a sample of 407 healthcare workers from 49 hospital units, our results suggested that promotion-focused individuals, especially in well-staffed units, readily engage in IFBL behaviors. Additionally, we found that the IFBL-changes in job performance relationship was strengthened to the extent that individuals worked in units with relatively nonpunitive climates. Interestingly, staffing levels had a weakening moderating effect on the positive IFBL-performance improvements relationship. Detailed follow-up analyses revealed that the peculiar effect was attributable to differential relationships from IFBL subdimensions. Implications for future theory building, research, and practice are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Employment/psychology ; Female ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Learning ; Male ; Organizational Culture ; Work Performance
    Language English
    Publishing date 2018-01
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 219157-x
    ISSN 1939-1854 ; 0021-9010
    ISSN (online) 1939-1854
    ISSN 0021-9010
    DOI 10.1037/apl0000267
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article: Do team and individual debriefs enhance performance? A meta-analysis.

    Tannenbaum, Scott I / Cerasoli, Christopher P

    Human factors

    2013  Volume 55, Issue 1, Page(s) 231–245

    Abstract: Objective: Debriefs (or "after-action reviews") are increasingly used in training and work environments as a means of learning from experience. We sought to unify a fragmented literature and assess the efficacy of debriefs with a quantitative review.: ...

    Abstract Objective: Debriefs (or "after-action reviews") are increasingly used in training and work environments as a means of learning from experience. We sought to unify a fragmented literature and assess the efficacy of debriefs with a quantitative review.
    Background: Used by the U.S. Army to improve performance for decades, and increasingly in medical, aviation, and other communities, debriefs systematize reflection, discussion, and goal setting to promote experiential learning. Unfortunately, research and theory on debriefing has been spread across diverse disciplines, so it has been difficult to definitively ascertain debriefing effectiveness and how to enhance its effectiveness.
    Method: We conducted an extensive quantitative meta-analysis across a diverse body of published and unpublished research on team- and individual-level debriefs.
    Results: Findings from 46 samples (N = 2,136) indicate that on average, debriefs improve effectiveness over a control group by approximately 25% (d = .67). Average effect sizes were similar for teams and individuals, across simulated and real settings, for within- or between-group control designs, and for medical and nonmedical samples. Meta-analytic methods revealed a bolstering effect of alignment and the potential impact of facilitation and structure.
    Conclusion: Organizations can improve individual and team performance by approximately 20% to 25% by using properly conducted debriefs.
    Application: Debriefs are a relatively inexpensive and quick intervention for enhancing performance. Our results lend support for continued and expanded use of debriefing in training and in situ. To gain maximum results, it is important to ensure alignment between participants, focus and intent, and level of measurement.
    MeSH term(s) Databases, Bibliographic ; Efficiency, Organizational ; Group Processes ; Humans ; Problem-Based Learning ; Research Design ; Self Report ; Staff Development/methods
    Language English
    Publishing date 2013-02
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
    ZDB-ID 212725-8
    ISSN 1547-8181 ; 0018-7208
    ISSN (online) 1547-8181
    ISSN 0018-7208
    DOI 10.1177/0018720812448394
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: 100 years of training and development research: What we know and where we should go.

    Bell, Bradford S / Tannenbaum, Scott I / Ford, J Kevin / Noe, Raymond A / Kraiger, Kurt

    The Journal of applied psychology

    2017  Volume 102, Issue 3, Page(s) 305–323

    Abstract: Training and development research has a long tradition within applied psychology dating back to the early 1900s. Over the years, not only has interest in the topic grown but there have been dramatic changes in both the science and practice of training ... ...

    Abstract Training and development research has a long tradition within applied psychology dating back to the early 1900s. Over the years, not only has interest in the topic grown but there have been dramatic changes in both the science and practice of training and development. In the current article, we examine the evolution of training and development research using articles published in the
    MeSH term(s) Behavioral Research/history ; Behavioral Research/methods ; History, 20th Century ; History, 21st Century ; Humans ; Learning ; Psychology, Applied/history ; Psychology, Applied/methods ; Staff Development/history ; Staff Development/methods
    Language English
    Publishing date 2017-03
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Historical Article ; Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 219157-x
    ISSN 1939-1854 ; 0021-9010
    ISSN (online) 1939-1854
    ISSN 0021-9010
    DOI 10.1037/apl0000142
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top