LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 5 of total 5

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: 399 Advanced Practice Provider Perspectives on Advanced Care Planning

    Christopher Johnson / Alexis Colley / Jeanette Broering / Tasce Bongiovanni / Sanziana Roman / Elizabeth Wick

    Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, Vol 6, Pp 75-

    2022  Volume 76

    Abstract: OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Perioperative surgical care is team-based with close partnership between surgeons, residents, advanced practice professionals (APPs), and others. The objective is to develop an understanding of the current state and implementation needs ...

    Abstract OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Perioperative surgical care is team-based with close partnership between surgeons, residents, advanced practice professionals (APPs), and others. The objective is to develop an understanding of the current state and implementation needs required for APPs to engage surgical patients in advanced care planning (ACP) to promote goal concordant care. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We will conduct a mixed methods evaluation of ACP knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs amongst surgical APPs to identify barriers and facilitators of APPs engaging in a team-based approach to engaging surgical patients in ACP. We will conduct an online survey and qualitative interviews in the following 4 domains: 1) knowledge, skills, and attitudes about engaging in ACP with a patient or their surrogate decision maker during their perioperative care; 2) prior ACP-specific education; 3) experiences conducting ACP discussions with patients; and 4) perceived training needs to increase ACP uptake and documentation. The findings will provide the foundations to design team-based interventions focused on addressing the barriers and inform training and coaching needs to develop expertise and comfort in the ACP process. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We expect variability in the knowledge, skills, attitudes, and experiences with the ACP process. We anticipate gaining a better understanding of the educational materials best suited to support APPs as they begin engaging patients in ACP. Possible barriers to APP-led ACP discussions include inconsistent role delineation, uncertainty about the value of pre-operative vs. post-operative ACP discussions, lack of experience engaging in ACP discussion, and lack of familiarity with electronic health records ACP tools. Possible facilitators of APP-led ACP discussions may be related to past work experience settings, exposure to ACP in educational preparation, hands-on observation of value of ACP in surgical patients and influences from attending and residents. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: While current ACP ...
    Keywords Medicine ; R
    Subject code 360
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-04-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Cambridge University Press
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Electronic health record intervention to increase use of NSAIDs as analgesia for hospitalised patients

    Li Zhang / Mark J Pletcher / Andrew Robinson / Elizabeth Wick / Tasce Bongiovanni / Matthias Behrends / Elizabeth Lancaster / Andrew Auerbach

    BMJ Health & Care Informatics, Vol 30, Iss

    a cluster randomised controlled study

    2023  Volume 1

    Abstract: Background Prescribing non-opioid pain medications, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAIDs) medications, has been shown to reduce pain and decrease opioid use, but it is unclear how to effectively encourage multimodal pain medication prescribing ...

    Abstract Background Prescribing non-opioid pain medications, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAIDs) medications, has been shown to reduce pain and decrease opioid use, but it is unclear how to effectively encourage multimodal pain medication prescribing for hospitalised patients. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of prechecking non-opioid pain medication orders on clinician prescribing of NSAIDs among hospitalised adults.Methods This was a cluster randomised controlled trial of adult (≥18 years) hospitalised patients admitted to three hospital sites under one quaternary hospital system in the USA from 2 March 2022 to 3 March 2023. A multimodal pain order panel was embedded in the admission order set, with NSAIDs prechecked in the intervention group. The intervention group could uncheck the NSAID order. The control group had access to the same NSAID order. The primary outcome was an increase in NSAID ordering. Secondary outcomes include NSAID administration, inpatient pain scores and opioid use and prescribing and relevant clinical harms including acute kidney injury, new gastrointestinal bleed and in-hospital death.Results Overall, 1049 clinicians were randomised. The study included 6239 patients for a total of 9595 encounters. Both NSAID ordering (36 vs 43%, p<0.001) and administering (30 vs 34%, p=0.001) by the end of the first full hospital day were higher in the intervention (prechecked) group. There was no statistically significant difference in opioid outcomes during the hospitalisation and at discharge. There was a statistically but perhaps not clinically significant difference in pain scores during both the first and last full hospital day.Conclusions This cluster randomised controlled trial showed that prechecking an order for NSAIDs to promote multimodal pain management in the admission order set increased NSAID ordering and administration, although there were no changes to pain scores or opioid use. While prechecking orders is an important way to increase adoption, safety ...
    Keywords Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics ; R858-859.7
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Is there variation in private payor payments to cancer surgeons? A cross-sectional study in the USA

    Tasce Bongiovanni / Simon P Kim / Brigid Killelea / Cary P Gross

    BMJ Open, Vol 10, Iss

    2020  Volume 10

    Abstract: Objectives Although demand for price transparency in healthcare is growing, variation in private payors’ payments to surgeons for oncologic resection has not been well characterised. Our aim was to assess variation of private payors’ payments to surgeons ...

    Abstract Objectives Although demand for price transparency in healthcare is growing, variation in private payors’ payments to surgeons for oncologic resection has not been well characterised. Our aim was to assess variation of private payors’ payments to surgeons for cancer resection using data based on fee-for-service allowed amounts, billed by a large mix of commercial payors and third-party administrators.Setting Fair Health (FH), an independent, not-for-profit organisation that collects and compiles claims data from payors nationwide. FH maintains the nation’s largest repository of privately billed medical and dental claims representing over 125 million covered lives in the USA.Participants We performed a cross-sectional study assessing private payer data for five common types of cancer surgery: simple mastectomy (SM), modified radical mastectomy (MRM), open lobectomy, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and radical prostatectomy during 2012 and 2013.Primary and secondary outcome measures To assess variation across regions, we compared regional median allowed payments. To assess intraregion variability, we evaluated the distribution of regional IQRs of allowed payments.Results Median allowed payments varied substantially across regions. For SM, median allowed payments ranged from $550 in the least expensive to $1380 in the costliest region. For MRM, the range was $842–$1760, for lobectomy $326–$3066, for VATS $317–$3307 and for prostatectomy $1716–$4867. There was also substantial variation within geographic areas. For example, the mean IQRs in surgeon payment within regions were: SM $577 (25th percentile) to $1132 (75th percentile); MRM $850–$1620; lobectomy $861–$2767; VATS $1024–$3122; and prostatectomy $2286–$3563.Conclusions There is a wide range of variation both across and within geographic regions in allowed amounts of surgeon payments for common oncologic resections. Transparency about these allowed amounts may have a profound impact on patient and employer choice and facilitate future ...
    Keywords Medicine ; R
    Subject code 336
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-10-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Unplanned hospital visits after ambulatory surgical care.

    Tasce Bongiovanni / Craig Parzynski / Isuru Ranasinghe / Michael A Steinman / Joseph S Ross

    PLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 7, p e

    2021  Volume 0254039

    Abstract: Objectives We sought to assess the rate of unplanned hospital visits among patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. Summary background data The majority of surgeries performed in the United States now take place in outpatient settings. Post-discharge ... ...

    Abstract Objectives We sought to assess the rate of unplanned hospital visits among patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. Summary background data The majority of surgeries performed in the United States now take place in outpatient settings. Post-discharge hospital visit rates have been shown to vary widely, suggesting variation in surgical or discharge care quality. Complicating efforts to address quality, most facilities and surgeons are unaware of their patients' hospital visits after surgery since patients may present to a different hospital. Methods We used state-level, administrative data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project from California to assess unplanned hospital visits after ambulatory surgery. To compare rates across centers, we determined the age, sex, and procedure-adjusted rates of hospital visits for each facility using 2-level, hierarchical, generalized linear models using methods similar to existing Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services measures. Results Among a total of 1,260,619 ambulatory same-day surgeries from 440 surgical facilities, the risk adjusted 30-day rate of unplanned hospital visits was 4.8%, with emergency department visits of 3.1% and hospital admissions of 1.7%. Several patient characteristics were associated with increased risk of unplanned hospitals visits, including increased age, increased number of comorbidities (using the Elixhauser score), and type of procedure (p<0.001). Conclusions The overall rate unplanned hospital visits within 30 days after same-day surgery is low but variable, suggesting a difference in the quality of care provided. Further, these rates are higher among specific patient populations and procedure types, suggesting areas for targeted improvement.
    Keywords Medicine ; R ; Science ; Q
    Subject code 360
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Lessons learned from academic medical centers' response to the COVID-19 pandemic in partnership with the Navajo Nation.

    Tasce Bongiovanni / Sriram Shamasunder / William Brown / Cristina Rivera Carpenter / Matthew Pantell / Bassem Ghali / James D Harrison

    PLoS ONE, Vol 17, Iss 4, p e

    2022  Volume 0265945

    Abstract: Introduction Structural forces that drive health inequalities are magnified in crises. This was especially true during the COVID-19 pandemic, and minority communities were particularly affected. The University of California San Francisco and Health, ... ...

    Abstract Introduction Structural forces that drive health inequalities are magnified in crises. This was especially true during the COVID-19 pandemic, and minority communities were particularly affected. The University of California San Francisco and Health, Equity, Action, Leadership Initiative jointly sent volunteer teams of nurses and doctors to work in the Navajo Nation during the COVID-19 pandemic. This presented an opportunity to explore how academic medical centers (AMCs) could effectively partner with vulnerable communities to provide support during healthcare crises. Therefore, the aims of this study were to describe volunteers' perspectives of academic-community partnerships by exploring their personal, professional and societal insights and lessons learned based on their time in the Navajo Nation during COVID-19. Methods We recruited key informants using purposeful sampling of physicians and nurses who volunteered to go to the Navajo Nation during the spring 2020 COVID-19 surge, as well as hospital administrators and leaders involved in organizing the COVID-19 efforts. We used in-depth qualitative interviews to explore key informants' experiences pre-departure, during their stay, and after their return, as well as perspectives of the partnership between an AMC and the Navajo Nation. We used thematic analysis to systematically identify, analyze and report patterns (themes) within the data. Results In total, 37 clinicians and hospital administrators were interviewed including 14 physicians, 16 nurses, and 7 health system leaders. Overall, we found 4 main themes each with several subthemes that defined the partnership between the AMC and the Navajo Nation. Mission and values incorporated civic duty, community engagement, leadership commitment and employee dedication. Solidarity, trust and humility encompassed pre-existing trust, workforce sustainability, humility and erasure of 'savior narratives.' Coordination included logistical coordination, flexibility, selectivity of who and what traveled to the response and coordination around media response. Workforce preparation and support encompassed understanding of historical context and providing healthcare in limited settings, dangers of inadequate preparation and the need for emotional support. Conclusion This study provides guidelines which AMCs might use to develop and improve partnerships they have or would like to develop with vulnerable communities. These guidelines may even be broadly applied to partnerships outside of a pandemic response. Importantly, such partnerships need to be built with trust and with an eye towards sustainability and long-term relationships as opposed to 'medical missions'.
    Keywords Medicine ; R ; Science ; Q
    Subject code 360
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top