LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 42

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: All Specialties in Radiology Must Address the Climate Crisis.

    Gross, Jonathan S / Thiel, Cassandra L

    Radiology

    2022  Volume 303, Issue 2, Page(s) E24

    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Radiography ; Radiology
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-02-08
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Letter ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 80324-8
    ISSN 1527-1315 ; 0033-8419
    ISSN (online) 1527-1315
    ISSN 0033-8419
    DOI 10.1148/radiol.211856
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Sustainable Purchasing Practices: A Comparison of Single-use and Reusable Pulse Oximeters in the Emergency Department.

    Duffy, Juliana / Slutzman, Jonathan E / Thiel, Cassandra L / Landes, Meghan

    The western journal of emergency medicine

    2024  Volume 24, Issue 6, Page(s) 1034–1042

    Abstract: Background: Delivering healthcare requires significant resources and creates waste that pollutes the environment, contributes to the climate crisis, and harms human health. Prior studies have generally shown durable, reusable medical devices to be ... ...

    Abstract Background: Delivering healthcare requires significant resources and creates waste that pollutes the environment, contributes to the climate crisis, and harms human health. Prior studies have generally shown durable, reusable medical devices to be environmentally superior to disposables, but this has not been investigated for pulse oximetry probes.
    Objective: Our goal was to compare the daily carbon footprint of single-use and reusable pulse oximeters in the emergency department (ED).
    Methods: Using a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), we analyzed greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from pulse oximeter use in an urban, tertiary care ED, that sees approximately 150 patients per day. Low (387 uses), moderate (474 uses), and high use (561 uses), as well as cleaning scenarios, were modelled for the reusable oximeters and compared to the daily use of single-use oximeters (150 uses). We calculated GHG emissions, measured in kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents (kgCO
    Results: Per day of use, reusable oximeters produced fewer greenhouse gases in low-, moderate-, and high-use scenarios compared to disposable oximeters: 3.9 kgCO
    Conclusion: Reusable pulse oximeters generated fewer greenhouse gas emissions per day of use than their disposable counterparts. Given that the pulse oximeter is an ubiquitous piece of medical equipment used in emergency care globally, carbon emissions could be significantly reduced if EDs used reusable rather than single-use, disposable oximeters.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Greenhouse Gases ; Oxygen ; Oximetry ; Disposable Equipment ; Health Facilities
    Chemical Substances Greenhouse Gases ; Oxygen (S88TT14065)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-01-02
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2375700-0
    ISSN 1936-9018 ; 1936-9018
    ISSN (online) 1936-9018
    ISSN 1936-9018
    DOI 10.5811/westjem.58258
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Differences in reuse of cataract surgical supplies and pharmaceuticals based on type of surgical facility.

    Thiel, Cassandra L / Zhang, Jinchun / Chang, David F

    Journal of cataract and refractive surgery

    2022  Volume 48, Issue 9, Page(s) 1092–1094

    MeSH term(s) Cataract ; Equipment Reuse ; Humans ; Pharmaceutical Preparations
    Chemical Substances Pharmaceutical Preparations
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-04-06
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Letter
    ZDB-ID 632744-8
    ISSN 1873-4502 ; 0886-3350
    ISSN (online) 1873-4502
    ISSN 0886-3350
    DOI 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000951
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article: Life Cycle Assessment in Orthopedics.

    Pollice, Bella / Thiel, Cassandra L / Baratz, Mark E

    Operative techniques in orthopaedics

    2022  Volume 32, Issue 4, Page(s) 100998

    Abstract: Covid-19 has led to an increase in the use of PPE, gowns, masks, sanitizers, air circulators, and much more, all contributing to an increase in medical waste. Waste generation is one issue. Emissions are another. The two are linked because waste and ... ...

    Abstract Covid-19 has led to an increase in the use of PPE, gowns, masks, sanitizers, air circulators, and much more, all contributing to an increase in medical waste. Waste generation is one issue. Emissions are another. The two are linked because waste and emissions are both indicators of consumption. However, waste is not the biggest driver of environmental emissions for healthcare. It is the production of medical equipment, particularly disposables that have a bigger impact. Energy use during care, including heating and cooling our facilities, is another. Environmental emissions like greenhouse gases may not correlate with waste generation, especially if the waste is plastic. Carbon is stored in plastic. Unless you're burning plastic, you're not emitting carbon. Healthcare has a waste issue and healthcare has an emissions issue. They are not necessarily the same thing, however, the strategies to mitigate each overlap. Life cycle assessment quantifies emissions from the creation to disposal of medical supplies. This allows the medical community to make informed choices with respect to the methods and materials that are used in providing care. As other specialties take the lead in reducing their environmental footprint, so too, must orthopedic surgery.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-09-22
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1085357-1
    ISSN 1048-6666
    ISSN 1048-6666
    DOI 10.1016/j.oto.2022.100998
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Survey of cataract surgeons' and nurses' attitudes toward operating room waste.

    Chang, David F / Thiel, Cassandra L

    Journal of cataract and refractive surgery

    2020  Volume 46, Issue 7, Page(s) 933–940

    Abstract: In an online survey of more than 1300 cataract surgeons and nurses, 93% believed that operating room waste is excessive and should be reduced; 78% believed that we should reuse more supplies; 90% were concerned about global warming; and 87% wanted ... ...

    Abstract In an online survey of more than 1300 cataract surgeons and nurses, 93% believed that operating room waste is excessive and should be reduced; 78% believed that we should reuse more supplies; 90% were concerned about global warming; and 87% wanted medical societies to advocate for reducing the surgical carbon footprint. The most commonly cited reasons for excessive waste were regulatory and manufacturer restrictions on reuse or multiple use of devices, supplies, and pharmaceuticals. More than 90% believed that profit, liability reduction, and failure to consider carbon footprint drive manufacturers to produce more single-use products; more than 90% want more reusable products and more regulatory and manufacturer discretion over when and which products can be reused. Assuming comparable cost, 79% of surgeons preferred reusable over disposable instruments. In order of decreasing consensus, most were interested in reusing topical and intracameral medications, phacoemulsification tips, irrigating solutions/tubing, blades, cannulas, devices, and surgical gowns.
    MeSH term(s) Attitude ; Cataract ; Disposable Equipment ; Equipment Reuse ; Humans ; Nurses ; Operating Rooms ; Surgeons
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-08-07
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 632744-8
    ISSN 1873-4502 ; 0886-3350
    ISSN (online) 1873-4502
    ISSN 0886-3350
    DOI 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000267
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article: The future when we don't do enough

    Thiel, Cassandra L.

    Nature climate change

    2019  Volume 9, Issue 9, Page(s) 646

    Language English
    Document type Article
    ZDB-ID 2614383-5
    ISSN 1758-678x
    Database Current Contents Nutrition, Environment, Agriculture

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Addressing the climate impacts of healthcare.

    Silva, Genevieve S / Schimek, Cassandra A / Lighter, Jennifer L / Thiel, Cassandra L

    Journal of hospital medicine

    2022  Volume 17, Issue 8, Page(s) 661–664

    MeSH term(s) Delivery of Health Care ; Health Facilities ; Humans
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-05-08
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2233783-0
    ISSN 1553-5606 ; 1553-5592
    ISSN (online) 1553-5606
    ISSN 1553-5592
    DOI 10.1002/jhm.12834
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: The Environmental Impacts of Electronic Medical Records Versus Paper Records at a Large Eye Hospital in India: Life Cycle Assessment Study.

    Kwon, Cordelia / Essayei, Lernik / Spencer, Michael / Etheridge, Tom / Venkatesh, Rengaraj / Vengadesan, Natrajan / Thiel, Cassandra L

    Journal of medical Internet research

    2024  Volume 26, Page(s) e42140

    Abstract: Background: Health care providers worldwide are rapidly adopting electronic medical record (EMR) systems, replacing paper record-keeping systems. Despite numerous benefits to EMRs, the environmental emissions associated with medical record-keeping are ... ...

    Abstract Background: Health care providers worldwide are rapidly adopting electronic medical record (EMR) systems, replacing paper record-keeping systems. Despite numerous benefits to EMRs, the environmental emissions associated with medical record-keeping are unknown. Given the need for urgent climate action, understanding the carbon footprint of EMRs will assist in decarbonizing their adoption and use.
    Objective: We aimed to estimate and compare the environmental emissions associated with paper medical record-keeping and its replacement EMR system at a high-volume eye care facility in southern India.
    Methods: We conducted the life cycle assessment methodology per the ISO (International Organization for Standardization) 14040 standard, with primary data supplied by the eye care facility. Data on the paper record-keeping system include the production, use, and disposal of paper and writing utensils in 2016. The EMR system was adopted at this location in 2018. Data on the EMR system include the allocated production and disposal of capital equipment (such as computers and routers); the production, use, and disposal of consumable goods like paper and writing utensils; and the electricity required to run the EMR system. We excluded built infrastructure and cooling loads (eg. buildings and ventilation) from both systems. We used sensitivity analyses to model the effects of practice variation and data uncertainty and Monte Carlo assessments to statistically compare the 2 systems, with and without renewable electricity sources.
    Results: This location's EMR system was found to emit substantially more greenhouse gases (GHGs) than their paper medical record system (195,000 kg carbon dioxide equivalents [CO
    Conclusions: The climate-changing emissions associated with an EMR system are heavily dependent on the sources of electricity. With a decarbonized electricity source, the EMR system's GHG emissions are on par with paper medical record-keeping, and decarbonized grids would likely have a much broader benefit to society. Though we found that the EMR system produced more emissions than a paper record-keeping system, this study does not account for potential expanded environmental gains from EMRs, including expanding access to care while reducing patient travel and operational efficiencies that can reduce unnecessary or redundant care.
    MeSH term(s) Climate ; Electronic Health Records ; Software ; Environment ; Paper ; Medical Records ; India ; Hospitals, Special ; Ophthalmology ; Carbon Footprint ; Health Care Sector ; Climate Change
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-02-06
    Publishing country Canada
    Document type Comparative Study ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2028830-X
    ISSN 1438-8871 ; 1438-8871
    ISSN (online) 1438-8871
    ISSN 1438-8871
    DOI 10.2196/42140
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Use of Disposable Perioperative Jackets and Surgical Site Infections.

    Thiel, Cassandra L / Sherman, Jodi D / Hopf, Harriet W

    JAMA surgery

    2020  Volume 155, Issue 5, Page(s) 453–454

    MeSH term(s) Delivery of Health Care ; Humans ; Surgical Wound Infection
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-03-04
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Letter ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 2701841-6
    ISSN 2168-6262 ; 2168-6254
    ISSN (online) 2168-6262
    ISSN 2168-6254
    DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.6374
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article: Survey of cataract surgeons' and nurses' attitudes toward operating room waste

    Chang, David F / Thiel, Cassandra L

    J Cataract Refract Surg

    Abstract: In an online survey of more than 1300 cataract surgeons and nurses, 93% believed that operating room waste is excessive and should be reduced; 78% believed that we should reuse more supplies; 90% were concerned about global warming; and 87% wanted ... ...

    Abstract In an online survey of more than 1300 cataract surgeons and nurses, 93% believed that operating room waste is excessive and should be reduced; 78% believed that we should reuse more supplies; 90% were concerned about global warming; and 87% wanted medical societies to advocate for reducing the surgical carbon footprint. The most commonly cited reasons for excessive waste were regulatory and manufacturer restrictions on reuse or multiple use of devices, supplies, and pharmaceuticals. More than 90% believed that profit, liability reduction, and failure to consider carbon footprint drive manufacturers to produce more single-use products; more than 90% want more reusable products and more regulatory and manufacturer discretion over when and which products can be reused. Assuming comparable cost, 79% of surgeons preferred reusable over disposable instruments. In order of decreasing consensus, most were interested in reusing topical and intracameral medications, phacoemulsification tips, irrigating solutions/tubing, blades, cannulas, devices, and surgical gowns.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #681542
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

To top