LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 4 of total 4

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Legal and Regulatory Challenges for Emerging Regenerative Medicine Solutions for Diabetes.

    Thom, Rebecca L / Cronin, Antonia J

    Transplantation

    2023  Volume 108, Issue 5, Page(s) 1072–1079

    Abstract: Regenerative medicine solutions for type 1 diabetes are a rapidly developing field of medical technology. To date, these solutions have been principally cell-based treatments and at present, in Europe, these therapies are regulated under European Union ... ...

    Abstract Regenerative medicine solutions for type 1 diabetes are a rapidly developing field of medical technology. To date, these solutions have been principally cell-based treatments and at present, in Europe, these therapies are regulated under European Union regulations for advanced therapy medicinal products. But now, new emerging technology combining cellular therapy with medical devices is under development. The potential of this novel hybrid model to create a bioartificial pancreas to treat type 1 diabetes is tantalizing. However, incorporating medical devices creates a further layer of regulatory complexity. This article seeks to expose the complexity of this legal and regulatory landscape and demonstrate how evolving technology could challenge the entire existing legal paradigm. We start by summarizing the status of the only established cell-based therapy-transplantation. We set out the regulation of cellular therapies, their classification, and the role of statutory bodies. We examine the bottleneck of therapies moving from bench to bedside, and we consider the additional challenges of products, which use a combination of cells and medical devices. Finally, we argue that for the potential of this rapidly growing area of technology to be realized a seismic shift in how we regulate frontier cellular therapies will be required.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Regenerative Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence ; Regenerative Medicine/methods ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/therapy ; Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/methods ; European Union ; Government Regulation
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-09-26
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Review
    ZDB-ID 208424-7
    ISSN 1534-6080 ; 0041-1337
    ISSN (online) 1534-6080
    ISSN 0041-1337
    DOI 10.1097/TP.0000000000004797
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Clinical Translation of Bio-Artificial Pancreas Therapies: Ethical, Legal and Psychosocial Interdisciplinary Considerations and Key Recommendations.

    de Jongh, Dide / Thom, Rebecca L / Cronin, Antonia J / Bunnik, Eline M / Massey, Emma K

    Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation

    2023  Volume 36, Page(s) 11705

    Abstract: The field of regenerative medicine offers potential therapies for Type 1 Diabetes, whereby metabolically active cellular components are combined with synthetic medical devices. These therapies are sometimes referred to as "bioartificial pancreases." For ... ...

    Abstract The field of regenerative medicine offers potential therapies for Type 1 Diabetes, whereby metabolically active cellular components are combined with synthetic medical devices. These therapies are sometimes referred to as "bioartificial pancreases." For these emerging and rapidly developing therapies to be clinically translated to patients, researchers must overcome not just scientific hurdles, but also navigate complex legal, ethical and psychosocial issues. In this article, we first provide an introductory overview of the key legal, ethical and psychosocial considerations identified in the existing literature and identify areas where research is currently lacking. We then highlight two principal areas of concern in which these discrete disciplines significantly overlap: 1) individual autonomy and 2) access and equality. Using the example of beta-cell provenance, we demonstrate how, by harnessing an interdisciplinary approach we can address these key areas of concern. Moreover, we provide practical recommendations to researchers, clinicians, and policymakers which will help to facilitate the clinical translation of this cutting-edge technology for Type 1 Diabetes patients. Finally, we emphasize the importance of exploring patient perspectives to ensure their responsible and acceptable translation from bench to body.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/surgery ; Pancreas, Artificial ; Regenerative Medicine
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-09-18
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 639435-8
    ISSN 1432-2277 ; 0934-0874
    ISSN (online) 1432-2277
    ISSN 0934-0874
    DOI 10.3389/ti.2023.11705
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Inequitable Access to Transplants: Adults With Impaired Decision-Making Capacity.

    Thom, Rebecca L / Dalle-Ave, Anne / Bunnik, Eline M / Krones, Tanja / Van Assche, Kristof / Ruck Keene, Alex / Cronin, Antonia J

    Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation

    2022  Volume 35, Page(s) 10084

    Abstract: Inequitable access to deceased donor organs for transplantation has received considerable scrutiny in recent years. Emerging evidence suggests patients with impaired decision-making capacity (IDC) face inequitable access to transplantation. The "Ethical ... ...

    Abstract Inequitable access to deceased donor organs for transplantation has received considerable scrutiny in recent years. Emerging evidence suggests patients with impaired decision-making capacity (IDC) face inequitable access to transplantation. The "Ethical and Legal Issues" working group of the European Society of Transplantation undertook an expert consensus process. Literature relating to transplantation in patients with IDC was examined and collated to investigate whether IDC is associated with inferior transplant outcomes and the legitimacy of this healthcare inequality was examined. Even though the available evidence of inferior transplant outcomes in these patients is limited, the working group concluded that access to transplantation in patients with IDC may be inequitable. Consequently, we argue that IDC should not in and of itself be considered as a barrier to either registration on the transplant waiting list or allocation of an organ. Strategies for non-discrimination should focus on ensuring eligibility is based upon sound evidence and outcomes without reference to non-medical criteria. Recommendations to support policy makers and healthcare providers to reduce unintended inequity and inadvertent discrimination are set out. We call upon transplant centres and national bodies to include data on decision-making capacity in routine reporting schedules in order to improve the evidence base upon which organ policy decisions are made going forward.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Healthcare Disparities ; Humans
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-03-18
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 639435-8
    ISSN 1432-2277 ; 0934-0874
    ISSN (online) 1432-2277
    ISSN 0934-0874
    DOI 10.3389/ti.2022.10084
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article: Adults With Impaired Decision-Making Capacity

    Thom, Rebecca L. / Dalle-Ave, Anne / Bunnik, Eline M. / Krones, Tanja / Assche, Kristof Van / Ruck Keene, Alex / Cronin, Antonia J.

    Transplant International

    2022  Volume 35, Issue 10084

    Title translation Adults With Impaired Decision-Making Capacity)
    Keywords organ transplantation ; organ donation ; legal aspects ; justice ; decision making ; transplant recipients ; review ; social discrimination ; quality of life ; resource allocation ; ethical theory ; utilitarianism ; autonomy ; treatment outcome
    Subject code AN
    Language English
    Document type Article
    ISSN 09340874
    Database Ethics in Medicine (ETHMED)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top