LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 14

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: A single blind randomized phase 3 study to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (HAPIBEV

    Thuluva, Subhash / Matur, Ramesh / Tsa, Kishore / Gv, Subba Reddy

    Vaccine

    2021  Volume 39, Issue 49, Page(s) 7166–7174

    Abstract: The Biological E inactivated hepatitis A (HAPIBEV™) vaccine was developed by importing the Healive® vaccine bulk from China and fill-finish it in India. Healive® vaccine is approved in China for both children and adults. This study assessed the safety ... ...

    Abstract The Biological E inactivated hepatitis A (HAPIBEV™) vaccine was developed by importing the Healive® vaccine bulk from China and fill-finish it in India. Healive® vaccine is approved in China for both children and adults. This study assessed the safety and immunogenicity of HAPIBEV™ vaccine as compared to the Havrix 720® vaccine of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) pharmaceuticals when administered intramuscularly (IM) 6 months apart in 1-15 years old hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine naive children in India. This Phase 3, single blind, parallel, randomized, active-controlled, two-arm study was conducted at 8 centers in India in healthy HAV vaccine-naive children. Subjects were stratified into 2 age subsets (1-7 and 8-15 years) and randomly assigned to either BE-HAPIBEV™ or GSK's Havrix® vaccine and administered 2 IM injections 6 months apart. The immunogenicity evaluations included: (1) proportion of subjects who achieved the following at Day 210 from baseline: (a) seroconversion (≥20 mIU/mL) with anti-HAV immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies, (b) ≥4-fold increase in anti-HAV IgG antibodies, and (c) ≥2-fold increase in anti-HAV IgG antibodies concentration who were already seroconverted at baseline and (2) geometric mean concentrations (GMC) of anti-HAV IgG antibodies at baseline and Day 210. Safety was evaluated throughout the study. A total of 467 (89.8%) subjects completed the study. The non-inferiority criterion was met by HAPIBEV™ vaccine as seroconversion rates in both vaccine groups were 100%. Overall, other immunogenicity evaluations were either similar in both vaccine groups or higher in the HAPIBEV™ group compared with the Havrix® group. The safety profile was also comparable between HAPIBEV™ and Havrix® groups. The most common adverse event (AE) was injection site pain, and the majority of AEs were mild in severity. The HAPIBEV™ vaccine demonstrated an immunological and safety profile on par with Havrix® in 1-15 years old healthy HAV vaccine-naive Indian children. This study is registered with clinical trial registry of India bearing no: CTRI/2019/04/018384 on 02 Apr 2019.
    MeSH term(s) Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Hepatitis A/prevention & control ; Hepatitis A Antibodies ; Hepatitis A Vaccines/adverse effects ; Humans ; Infant ; Single-Blind Method ; Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects
    Chemical Substances Hepatitis A Antibodies ; Hepatitis A Vaccines ; Vaccines, Inactivated
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-11-09
    Publishing country Netherlands
    Document type Clinical Trial, Phase III ; Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 605674-x
    ISSN 1873-2518 ; 0264-410X
    ISSN (online) 1873-2518
    ISSN 0264-410X
    DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.018
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: A multicenter, single-blind, randomized, phase-2/3 study to evaluate immunogenicity and safety of a single intramuscular dose of biological E's Vi-capsular polysaccharide-CRM

    Thuluva, Subhash / Paradkar, Vikram / Matur, Ramesh / Turaga, Kishore / Gv, Subba Reddy

    Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics

    2022  Volume 18, Issue 5, Page(s) 2043103

    Abstract: The current scenario of typhoid fever warrants early prevention with typhoid conjugate vaccines in susceptible populations to provide lifelong protection. We conducted a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, Phase 2/3 study to assess the immunogenicity ... ...

    Abstract The current scenario of typhoid fever warrants early prevention with typhoid conjugate vaccines in susceptible populations to provide lifelong protection. We conducted a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, Phase 2/3 study to assess the immunogenicity and safety of Biological E's Typhoid Vi-CRM
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Child ; Humans ; Immunogenicity, Vaccine ; Infant ; Single-Blind Method ; Typhoid Fever/prevention & control ; Typhoid-Paratyphoid Vaccines/adverse effects ; Vaccines, Conjugate/adverse effects
    Chemical Substances Typhoid-Paratyphoid Vaccines ; Vaccines, Conjugate
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-03-25
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Clinical Trial, Phase II ; Clinical Trial, Phase III ; Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2664176-8
    ISSN 2164-554X ; 2164-5515
    ISSN (online) 2164-554X
    ISSN 2164-5515
    DOI 10.1080/21645515.2022.2043103
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: A phase II/III randomised, comparative study evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of Biological E's live, attenuated Measles-Rubella vaccine in 9-12 month old healthy infants.

    Thuluva, Subhash / Gunneri, SubbaReddy / Turaga, Kishore / Mogulla, Rammohan Reddy / Yerroju, Vijay / Peta, Kalyankumar / Suneetha, Pothakamuri Venkata / Matur, Ramesh V

    Contemporary clinical trials communications

    2023  Volume 36, Page(s) 101232

    Abstract: Measles is a major cause of childhood mortality and one-third of the world's Measles deaths occur in India. Rubella causes lifelong birth defects (Congenital Rubella Syndrome). Although neither condition has a cure, the MR vaccination can successfully ... ...

    Abstract Measles is a major cause of childhood mortality and one-third of the world's Measles deaths occur in India. Rubella causes lifelong birth defects (Congenital Rubella Syndrome). Although neither condition has a cure, the MR vaccination can successfully prevent both diseases. The safety of Biological E's live attenuated MR vaccine (BE-MR) was established in 4-5-year-old healthy children. This phase-2/3 study was conducted to assess the safety and immunogenicity of BE-MR in 9-12 month old healthy infants. Overall, 600 subjects were enrolled and equally randomized to receive either BE-MR (n = 300) or the comparator vaccine, SII MR-Vac™ (n = 300). Safety profile of BE-MR vaccine was comparable to SII MR-Vac™ with no severe or serious adverse events (AEs) reported across the study groups. The primary objective of demonstrating non inferiority by BE-MR vaccine compared to SIIL's-MR Vac™ was met. The proportion of subjects with ≥ 2-fold and ≥ 4-fold increase in antibody titre against Measles and Rubella in both the study groups was comparable. Overall, BE-MR vaccine elicited robust and protective immune response as demonstrated by high proportion of sero-protected subjects and a large increase in anti-Measles and anti-Rubella antibodies at day 42 and can be administered safely to infants below one-year of age. This study was prospectively registered with the clinical trial registry of India- CTRI/2016/07/007109.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-11-22
    Publishing country Netherlands
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2451-8654
    ISSN (online) 2451-8654
    DOI 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101232
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article: A single blind randomized phase 3 study to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (HAPIBEVTM) in 1-15 years-old healthy hepatitis A vaccine-naïve children

    Thuluva, Subhash / Matur, Ramesh / TSA, Kishore / GV, Subba Reddy

    Vaccine. 2021 Dec. 03, v. 39, no. 49

    2021  

    Abstract: The Biological E inactivated hepatitis A (HAPIBEV™) vaccine was developed by importing the Healive® vaccine bulk from China and fill-finish it in India. Healive® vaccine is approved in China for both children and adults. This study assessed the safety ... ...

    Abstract The Biological E inactivated hepatitis A (HAPIBEV™) vaccine was developed by importing the Healive® vaccine bulk from China and fill-finish it in India. Healive® vaccine is approved in China for both children and adults. This study assessed the safety and immunogenicity of HAPIBEV™ vaccine as compared to the Havrix 720® vaccine of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) pharmaceuticals when administered intramuscularly (IM) 6 months apart in 1–15 years old hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine naive children in India.This Phase 3, single blind, parallel, randomized, active-controlled, two-arm study was conducted at 8 centers in India in healthy HAV vaccine–naive children. Subjects were stratified into 2 age subsets (1–7 and 8–15 years) and randomly assigned to either BE-HAPIBEV™ or GSK’s Havrix® vaccine and administered 2 IM injections 6 months apart. The immunogenicity evaluations included: (1) proportion of subjects who achieved the following at Day 210 from baseline: (a) seroconversion (≥20 mIU/mL) with anti-HAV immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies, (b) ≥4-fold increase in anti-HAV IgG antibodies, and (c) ≥2-fold increase in anti-HAV IgG antibodies concentration who were already seroconverted at baseline and (2) geometric mean concentrations (GMC) of anti-HAV IgG antibodies at baseline and Day 210. Safety was evaluated throughout the study.A total of 467 (89.8%) subjects completed the study. The non-inferiority criterion was met by HAPIBEV™ vaccine as seroconversion rates in both vaccine groups were 100%. Overall, other immunogenicity evaluations were either similar in both vaccine groups or higher in the HAPIBEV™ group compared with the Havrix® group. The safety profile was also comparable between HAPIBEV™ and Havrix® groups. The most common adverse event (AE) was injection site pain, and the majority of AEs were mild in severity. The HAPIBEV™ vaccine demonstrated an immunological and safety profile on par with Havrix® in 1–15 years old healthy HAV vaccine-naive Indian children.This study is registered with clinical trial registry of India bearing no: CTRI/2019/04/018384 on 02 Apr 2019.
    Keywords Hepatovirus A ; clinical trials ; hepatitis A ; immunogenicity ; immunoglobulin G ; injection site ; pain ; seroconversion ; vaccines ; China ; India
    Language English
    Dates of publication 2021-1203
    Size p. 7166-7174.
    Publishing place Elsevier Ltd
    Document type Article
    ZDB-ID 605674-x
    ISSN 1873-2518 ; 0264-410X
    ISSN (online) 1873-2518
    ISSN 0264-410X
    DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.018
    Database NAL-Catalogue (AGRICOLA)

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Immunogenicity and safety of a 14-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (PNEUBEVAX 14™) administered to 6-8 weeks old healthy Indian Infants: A single blind, randomized, active-controlled, Phase-III study.

    Matur, Ramesh V / Thuluva, Subhash / Gunneri, Subbareddy / Yerroju, Vijay / Reddy Mogulla, Rammohan / Thammireddy, Kamal / Paliwal, Piyush / Mahantshetty, Niranjana S / Ravi, Mandyam Dhati / Prashanth, S / Verma, Savita / Narayan, Jai Prakash

    Vaccine

    2024  Volume 42, Issue 13, Page(s) 3157–3165

    Abstract: Background: Introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) reduced the number of cases of pneumococcal disease (PD). However, there is an increase in clinical and economic burden of PD from serotypes that are not part of the existing ... ...

    Abstract Background: Introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) reduced the number of cases of pneumococcal disease (PD). However, there is an increase in clinical and economic burden of PD from serotypes that are not part of the existing pneumococcal vaccines, particularly impacting pediatric and elder population. In addition, the regions where the PCV is not available, the disease burden remains high. In this study, immunogenicity and safety of the BE's 14-valent PCV (PNEUBEVAX 14™; BE-PCV-14) containing two additional epidemiologically important serotypes (22F and 33F) was evaluated in infants in comparison to licensed vaccine, Prevenar-13 (PCV-13).
    Methods: This is a pivotal phase-3 single blind randomized active-controlled study conducted at 12 sites across India in 6-8 weeks old healthy infants at 6-10-14 weeks dosing schedule to assess immunogenic non-inferiority and safety of a candidate BE-PCV-14. In total, 1290 infants were equally randomized to receive either BE-PCV-14 or PCV-13. Solicited local reactions and systemic events, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and medically attended AEs (MAAEs) were recorded. Immunogenicity was assessed by measuring anti-PnCPS (anti-pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide) IgG concentration and functional antibody titers through opsonophagocytic activity (OPA), one month after completing three dose schedule. Cross protection to serotype 6A offered by serotype 6B was also assessed in this study.
    Findings: The safety profile of BE-PCV-14 was comparable to PCV-13 vaccine. Majority of reported AEs were mild in nature. No severe or serious AEs were reported in both the treatment groups. For the twelve common serotypes and for the additional serotypes (22F and 33F) in BE-PCV-14, NI criteria was demonstrated as defined by WHO TRS-977. Primary immunogenicity endpoint was met in terms of IgG immune responses for all 14 serotypesof BE-PCV-14. Moreover, a significant proportion of subjects (69%) seroconverted against serotype 6A, even though this antigen was not present in BE-PCV-14. This indicates that serotype 6B of BE-PCV-14 cross protects serotype 6A. BE-PCV-14 also elicited comparable serotype specific functional OPA immune responses to all the serotypes common to PCV-13.
    Interpretations: BE-PCV-14 was found to be safe and induced robust and functional serotype specific immune responses to all 14 serotypes. It also elicited cross protective immune response against serotype 6B.These findings suggest that BE-PCV-14 can be safely administered to infants and achieve protection against pneumococcal disease caused by serotypes covered in the vaccine. The study was prospectively registered with clinical trial registry of India - CTRI/2020/02/023129.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Pneumococcal Vaccines/immunology ; Pneumococcal Vaccines/adverse effects ; Pneumococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage ; Infant ; India ; Antibodies, Bacterial/blood ; Male ; Vaccines, Conjugate/immunology ; Vaccines, Conjugate/adverse effects ; Vaccines, Conjugate/administration & dosage ; Female ; Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control ; Pneumococcal Infections/immunology ; Single-Blind Method ; Streptococcus pneumoniae/immunology ; Immunogenicity, Vaccine ; Serogroup ; Immunoglobulin G/blood
    Chemical Substances Pneumococcal Vaccines ; Antibodies, Bacterial ; Vaccines, Conjugate ; Immunoglobulin G ; 13-valent pneumococcal vaccine
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-04-17
    Publishing country Netherlands
    Document type Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Clinical Trial, Phase III ; Multicenter Study
    ZDB-ID 605674-x
    ISSN 1873-2518 ; 0264-410X
    ISSN (online) 1873-2518
    ISSN 0264-410X
    DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.056
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Evaluation of safety and immunogenicity of receptor-binding domain-based COVID-19 vaccine (Corbevax) to select the optimum formulation in open-label, multicentre, and randomised phase-1/2 and phase-2 clinical trials.

    Thuluva, Subhash / Paradkar, Vikram / Gunneri, Subba Reddy / Yerroju, Vijay / Mogulla, Rammohan / Turaga, Kishore / Kyasani, Mahesh / Manoharan, Senthil Kumar / Medigeshi, Guruprasad / Singh, Janmejay / Shaman, Heena / Singh, Chandramani / Rao A, Venkateshwar

    EBioMedicine

    2022  Volume 83, Page(s) 104217

    Abstract: Background: We assessed the efficacy of a receptor-binding domain (RBD)-based protein subunit COVID-19 vaccine.: Methods: A randomised Phase-1/2 trial followed by a Phase-2 trial were conducted to assess the safety and immunogenicity of the COVID-19 ... ...

    Abstract Background: We assessed the efficacy of a receptor-binding domain (RBD)-based protein subunit COVID-19 vaccine.
    Methods: A randomised Phase-1/2 trial followed by a Phase-2 trial were conducted to assess the safety and immunogenicity of the COVID-19 vaccine Corbevax and select to an optimum formulation. Healthy adults (n=460) without COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Phase-1/2 study were randomly divided into four vaccine formulation groups.
    Findings: A low incidence of adverse events was reported post-vaccination. All formulations showed similar profiles of humoral and cellular immune responses that were associated with the content of CpG1018 adjuvant in the vaccine. In the Phase-2 study, 750 µg of CpG1018 showed significant improvement (> 4-fold increase from baseline) in immune responses, including the titres of anti-RBD IgG and neutralising antibody (nAb), and cellular immune responses, while maintaining the safety profile. Antibodies persisted consistently for 12 months after the second dose of vaccine.
    Interpretations: Corbevax (two-dose schedule with 28 days of interval between doses) was well tolerated with no observed safety concerns. Previous observations from efficacy studies by Moderna and AstraZeneca and the correlation between nAb titres post-vaccination and a human convalescent serum panel showed that Corbevax induced significantly high nAb titres. These studies were prospectively registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2021/06/034014 and CTRI/2020/11/029032).
    Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, BIRAC-Division of Department of Biotechnology, Govt of India, and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations funded this study.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Antibodies, Neutralizing ; Antibodies, Viral ; COVID-19/prevention & control ; COVID-19/therapy ; COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects ; Double-Blind Method ; Humans ; Immunization, Passive ; Immunoglobulin G ; Protein Subunits ; SARS-CoV-2
    Chemical Substances Antibodies, Neutralizing ; Antibodies, Viral ; COVID-19 Vaccines ; Immunoglobulin G ; Protein Subunits
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-08-12
    Publishing country Netherlands
    Document type Clinical Trial, Phase I ; Clinical Trial, Phase II ; Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Randomized Controlled Trial
    ZDB-ID 2851331-9
    ISSN 2352-3964
    ISSN (online) 2352-3964
    DOI 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104217
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Book ; Online ; Thesis: Responders and non-responders to the therapy of Hypercholesterolemia

    Chandra, Thuluva Subhash

    serum ratio of lathosterol to campesterol predicts the outcome of the therapy with sSitostanol ester margarine and ezetimibe

    2006  

    Author's details vorgelegt von Thuluva Subhash Chandra
    Language English
    Size Online-Ressource
    Document type Book ; Online ; Thesis
    Thesis / German Habilitation thesis Univ., Diss--Bonn, 2006
    Database Former special subject collection: coastal and deep sea fishing

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Immunogenicity and safety of Biological E's CORBEVAX™ vaccine compared to COVISHIELD™ (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccine studied in a phase-3, single blind, multicentre, randomized clinical trial.

    Thuluva, Subhash / Paradkar, Vikram / Gunneri, SubbaReddy / Yerroju, Vijay / Mogulla, Rammohan / Suneetha, Pothakamuri Venkata / Turaga, Kishore / Kyasani, Mahesh / Manoharan, Senthil Kumar / Adabala, Srikanth / Sri Javvadi, Aditya / Medigeshi, Guruprasad / Singh, Janmejay / Shaman, Heena / Binayke, Akshay / Zaheer, Aymaan / Awasthi, Amit / Singh, Chandramani / Rao A, Venkateshwar /
    Basu, Indranil / Kumar, Khobragade Akash Ashok / Pandey, Anil Kumar

    Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics

    2023  Volume 19, Issue 1, Page(s) 2203632

    Abstract: Optimum formulation of Biological-E's protein subunit CORBEVAX™ vaccine was selected in phase-1 and -2 studies and found to be safe and immunogenic in healthy adult population. This is a phase-3 prospective, single-blinded, randomized, active controlled ... ...

    Abstract Optimum formulation of Biological-E's protein subunit CORBEVAX™ vaccine was selected in phase-1 and -2 studies and found to be safe and immunogenic in healthy adult population. This is a phase-3 prospective, single-blinded, randomized, active controlled study conducted at 18 sites across India in 18-80 year-old subjects. This study has two groups; (i) immunogenicity-group, participants randomized either to CORBEVAX™ (
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Humans ; Adolescent ; Young Adult ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 ; COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects ; Leukocytes, Mononuclear ; Prospective Studies ; Single-Blind Method ; COVID-19/prevention & control ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Vaccines ; Immunogenicity, Vaccine ; Antibodies, Viral ; Antibodies, Neutralizing ; Double-Blind Method
    Chemical Substances ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (B5S3K2V0G8) ; COVID-19 Vaccines ; Vaccines ; Antibodies, Viral ; Antibodies, Neutralizing
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-04-27
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Randomized Controlled Trial ; Multicenter Study ; Clinical Trial, Phase III ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2664176-8
    ISSN 2164-554X ; 2164-5515
    ISSN (online) 2164-554X
    ISSN 2164-5515
    DOI 10.1080/21645515.2023.2203632
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Immunogenicity and safety of Biological Es CORBEVAX vaccine as a heterologous booster dose in adult volunteers previously vaccinated with two doses of either COVISHIELD or COVAXIN: A Prospective double-blind randomised phase III clinical study

    Thuluva, Subhash / Paradkar, Vikram / Gunneri, Subbareddy / Yerroju, Vijay / Mogulla, Rammohan Reddy / Venkata Suneetha, Pothakamuri / Turaga, Kishore / Binayke, Akshay / Zaheer, Aymaan / Awasti, Amit / Virkar, Rashmi / Narang, Manish / Nanjappa, Pradeep / Mahantshetti, Niranjan / Garg, BishanSwarup / Mandal, RavindraNath

    medRxiv

    Abstract: Background:Vaccines developed against Covid-19 infection were effective in controlling symptomatic infections and hospitalizations. However, waning immunity was reported within 6 months of primary vaccination series. Due to waning of SARS-CoV-2 specific ... ...

    Abstract Background:Vaccines developed against Covid-19 infection were effective in controlling symptomatic infections and hospitalizations. However, waning immunity was reported within 6 months of primary vaccination series. Due to waning of SARS-CoV-2 specific primary immunity, protection towards emerging variants of concern (VoC) was low. To rejuvenate the immunogenicity of vaccines, a third or booster dose was highly recommended by many state governments. In this regard, several clinical studies were conducted to evaluate the homologous or heterologous booster dose effectiveness against VoCs and showed that heterologous immune boosting more effective in controlling breakthrough infections. In this study, we studied the safety and immunogenicity of Biological-Es CORBEVAX vaccine in adult population as a heterologous booster dose. Methods: This is a prospective phase-3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study evaluating safety, reactogenicity, tolerability and immunogenicity of CORBEVAX vaccine as a heterologous booster dose administered to adult volunteers previously vaccinated with two doses of either COVISHIELD or COVAXIN at least 6 months ago. Subjects were RT-PCR negative to SARS-CoV-2 prior to enrolment. A total of 416 subjects between 18 to 80 years of age, were enrolled in to one of the two treatment (COVISHIELD or COVAXIN primed subjects) groups (n=208/group) for safety and immunogenicity assessment. Within each group (n=208), subjects were randomized to receive CORBEVAX vaccine or placebo in a 3:1 ratio. Findings: The safety profile of CORBEVAX vaccine administered as booster dose is comparable to the placebo-control group. All the reported adverse events (AEs) were mild to moderate in their intensity. There was no grade 3 or serious or AEs of special interest (AESI) reported during the study period and all the reported AEs resolved without any sequelae. CORBEVAX booster dose administration resulted in significant increase in humoral immune response (nAb titers and Anti-RBD IgG concentration) that was much superior to the placebo in both COVISHIELD and COVAXIN recipient arms. Significant increase in nAb titers against Omicron VOC as well as cellular immune response was also observed post CORBEVAX booster dose administration. Interpretations: Enhancement of immune response coupled with excellent safety profile of the CORBEVAX booster dose demonstrates significant benefit of giving CORBEVAX heterologous booster dose to subjects that have received COVISHIELD or COVAXIN primary vaccination, as early as 6 months post second dose of primary vaccination.
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-01-03
    Publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    Document type Article ; Online
    DOI 10.1101/2022.12.29.22284049
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Selection of optimum formulation of RBD-based protein sub-unit covid19 vaccine (Corbevax) based on safety and immunogenicity in an open-label, randomized Phase-1 and 2 clinical studies

    Thuluva, Subhash / Paradkar, Vikram / Turaga, Kishore / Gunneri, Subbareddy / Yerroju, Vijay / Mogulla, Rammohanreddy / Kyasani, Mahesh / Manoharan, Senthilkumar / Medigeshi, Guruprasad R / Singh, JANMEJAY / Shaman, Heena / Singh, Chandramani / Rao A, Venkateshwar

    medRxiv

    Abstract: Background- We present the data from an open-label study involved in the selection of optimum formulation of RBD-based protein sub-unit COVID-19 vaccine. Methods- The randomized Phase-1/2 trial followed by a Phase-2 trial was carried out to assess safety ...

    Abstract Background- We present the data from an open-label study involved in the selection of optimum formulation of RBD-based protein sub-unit COVID-19 vaccine. Methods- The randomized Phase-1/2 trial followed by a Phase-2 trial was carried out to assess safety and immunogenicity of different formulation of COVID-19 vaccine (Corbevax) and select an optimum formulation for a phase 3 study. Healthy adults without a history of Covid-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection, were enrolled. Findings- Low incidence of AEs were reported post vaccination of different Corbevax formulations and majority were mild in nature and no Grade-3 or serious AEs were observed. All formulations in Phase-1/2 study showed similar profile of humoral and cellular immune-response with higher response associated with increasing CpG1018 adjuvant content at same RBD protein content. Hence, high concentration of CpG1018 was tested in phase-2 study, which showed significant improvement in immune-responses in terms of anti-RBD-IgG concentrations, anti-RBD-IgG1 titers, nAb-titers and cellular immune-responses while maintaining the safety profile. Interestingly, binding and neutralizing antibody titers were persisted consistently till 6 months post second vaccine dose. Interpretations- Corbevax was well tolerated with no observed safety concerns. Neutralizing antibody titers were suggestive of high vaccine effectiveness compared with human convalescent plasma or protective thresholds observed during vaccine efficacy trials of other COVID-19 vaccines. The study was prospectively registered with clinical trial registry of India- CTRI/2021/06/034014 and CTRI/2020/11/029032. Funding: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, BIRAC- division of Department of Biotechnology, Govt of India, and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations funded the study.
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-03-09
    Publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    Document type Article ; Online
    DOI 10.1101/2022.03.08.22271822
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

To top