LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 1 of total 1

Search options

Article: A pilot randomised controlled trial of dressing and securement methods to prevent arterial catheter failure in intensive care.

Larsen, Emily N / Corley, Amanda / Mitchell, Marion / Lye, India / Powell, Madeleine / Tom, Sheena / Mihala, Gabor / Ullman, Amanda J / Gibson, Victoria / Marsh, Nicole / Kleidon, Tricia M / Rapchuk, Ivan L / Rickard, Claire M

Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses

2020  Volume 34, Issue 1, Page(s) 38–46

Abstract: Background: Critically ill patients in an intensive care setting often require arterial catheters for blood pressure monitoring and arterial blood collection. Arterial catheter failure, which manifests in both mechanical and infective forms, remains ... ...

Abstract Background: Critically ill patients in an intensive care setting often require arterial catheters for blood pressure monitoring and arterial blood collection. Arterial catheter failure, which manifests in both mechanical and infective forms, remains common. Dressing and securement inadequacies may impact this failure; however, the best method for dressing and securing arterial catheters is yet to be determined.
Objectives: The objective of this study was to establish the feasibility of a definitive randomised controlled trial comparing methods for dressing and securing arterial catheters and to prevent device failure in an adult intensive care setting.
Methods: A pilot, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial was conducted between April 2017 and June 2018. Patients receiving treatment in two adult intensive care units (Queensland, Australia) were eligible for inclusion and were allocated to receive either (i) an integrated securement dressing or (ii) a simple polyurethane dressing (with gauze/foam), applied to their newly inserted arterial catheters.
Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes were (i) feasibility (defined by pre-established criteria: patient eligibility, consent, protocol adherence, retention, and staff acceptability) and (ii) all-cause arterial catheter failure (a composite of local and bloodstream infection, occlusion, dislodgement, infiltration/extravasation, arterial inflammation, thrombosis, and/or inaccurate trace). Secondary outcomes included: failure type, dwell time, dressing adhesion, adverse event profiles, and staff acceptability.
Results: In total, 109 patients were studied (n = 53 integrated securement dressing; n = 56 simple polyurethane). The feasibility criterion was met by most patients (including rates of consent [86%], protocol adherence [93%], and retention [100%]); however, the criteria for patient eligibility were not met (73%). All-cause device failure did not differ significantly between the integrated securement device group (n = 12/53, 23%) and the simple polyurethane group (n = 6/56, 11%) (hazard ratio = 2.39, 95% confidence interval = 0.89-6.37, p = 0.083).
Conclusions: Findings indicate a larger study is feasible, with minor alterations to recruitment methods required. Arterial catheter failure remains unacceptably common; further research to determine optimal dressing/securement practices is urgently needed.
MeSH term(s) Adult ; Bandages ; Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control ; Catheters, Indwelling ; Critical Care ; Humans ; Pilot Projects
Language English
Publishing date 2020-07-19
Publishing country Australia
Document type Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
ZDB-ID 1159493-7
ISSN 1878-1721 ; 1036-7314
ISSN (online) 1878-1721
ISSN 1036-7314
DOI 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.05.004
Shelf mark
Zs.A 3762: Show issues Location:
Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (2.OG)
ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)
Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

More links

Kategorien

To top