LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 14

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Adjustment of the spontaneous abortion rate following COVID-19 vaccination.

    Trostle, Megan E / Penfield, Christina A / Roman, Ashley S

    American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM

    2021  Volume 4, Issue 1, Page(s) 100511

    MeSH term(s) Abortion, Spontaneous ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 Vaccines ; Female ; Humans ; Pregnancy ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Vaccination
    Chemical Substances COVID-19 Vaccines
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-10-14
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Letter ; Comment
    ISSN 2589-9333
    ISSN (online) 2589-9333
    DOI 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100511
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article: A Pregnant Adolescent with COVID-19 and Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children.

    Trostle, Megan E / Grossman, Tracy B / Penfield, Christina A / Phoon, Colin K L / Raabe, Vanessa N / Sloane, Mark F / Roman, Ashley S

    AJP reports

    2024  Volume 14, Issue 1, Page(s) e66–e68

    Abstract: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), a new condition related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the pediatric population, was recognized by physicians in the United Kingdom in April 2020. Given those up to the age of 21 years can ...

    Abstract Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), a new condition related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the pediatric population, was recognized by physicians in the United Kingdom in April 2020. Given those up to the age of 21 years can be affected, pregnant adolescents and young adults are susceptible. However, there is scant information on how MIS-C may affect pregnancy and whether the presentation differs in the pregnant population. We report a case of a pregnant adolescent with COVID-19 and MIS-C with a favorable outcome. This case highlights the considerations in managing a critically ill pregnant patient with a novel illness and the importance of a multidisciplinary team in coordinating care.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-02-18
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Case Reports
    ZDB-ID 2628074-7
    ISSN 2157-7005 ; 2157-6998
    ISSN (online) 2157-7005
    ISSN 2157-6998
    DOI 10.1055/s-0044-1779032
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Perinatal depression before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City.

    Lantigua-Martinez, Meralis / Trostle, Megan E / Torres, Anthony Melendez / Rajeev, Pournami / Dennis, Alyson / Silverstein, Jenna S / Talib, Mahino

    AJOG global reports

    2023  Volume 3, Issue 3, Page(s) 100253

    Abstract: Background: Quarantining and isolation during previous pandemics have been associated with higher levels of depression symptomatology. Studies in other countries found elevated rates of anxiety and/or depression among pregnant people during the COVID-19 ...

    Abstract Background: Quarantining and isolation during previous pandemics have been associated with higher levels of depression symptomatology. Studies in other countries found elevated rates of anxiety and/or depression among pregnant people during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with prepandemic rates. New York City was the initial epicenter of the pandemic in the United States, and the effects of the pandemic on perinatal depression in this population are not well known.
    Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the rates of perinatal depression before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Study design: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients screened for perinatal depression with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale at 2 private academic practices in New York City. This screen is done in these practices at the time of the glucose challenge test and at the postpartum visit. Patients aged ≥18 years who completed a screen at a postpartum visit and/or glucose challenge test from February 1, 2019 to July 31, 2019 and from February 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020 were identified, and the 2019 and 2020 groups were compared. The primary outcome was a positive screen, defined as ≥13 and ≥15 for postnatal and prenatal screens, respectively. Secondary outcomes included monthly changes in rates of positive screens and factors associated with perinatal depression. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square, or Fisher exact test, and univariate and multivariate analyses with
    Results: A total of 1366 records met the inclusion criteria; 75% of the prepandemic (2019) records were included, as opposed to 65% of pandemic (2020) records due to a lower screen completion rate in the pandemic cohort. The 2020 cohort had a higher proportion of Hispanic patients (
    Conclusion: There were no differences in the rates of perinatal depression between the periods before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The rate of perinatal depression in this cohort was below the reported averages in the literature. Fewer women were screened for perinatal depression in 2020, which likely underestimated the prevalence of depression in our cohort. These findings highlight potential gaps in care in a pandemic setting.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-07-16
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2666-5778
    ISSN (online) 2666-5778
    DOI 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100253
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Acceptance of Routine Vaccines in Pregnancy during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

    Perelman, Allison D / Trostle, Megan E / Pecoriello, Jillian / Quinn, Gwendolyn P / Roman, Ashley S / Penfield, Christina A

    American journal of perinatology

    2023  

    Abstract: Objective:  This study aimed to evaluate the rates of vaccination against infectious diseases (Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Pertussis [Tdap] and influenza) in pregnancy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic compared to contemporary ... ...

    Abstract Objective:  This study aimed to evaluate the rates of vaccination against infectious diseases (Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Pertussis [Tdap] and influenza) in pregnancy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic compared to contemporary historical controls.
    Study design:  This was a retrospective cohort study comparing rates of Tdap and influenza vaccination in pregnant people who received care at NYU Langone Health and delivered from September 1, 2020, to January 31, 2021 ("COVID cohort") to the same period the prior year ("2019 cohort"). Demographic information, trimester of initiation of prenatal care, insurance status, and medical comorbidities were evaluated. Outcomes were analyzed using chi-square, Fisher's exact test, and multivariable logistic regression, with significance of
    Results:  In total, 1,713 pregnant people were included. Compared to historical controls, the COVID cohort differed in age, race, timing of initiation of prenatal care, insurance status, and medical comorbidities. After adjusting for these covariates, pregnant people were significantly more likely to accept influenza vaccine in the COVID cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-2.29) and had similar Tdap acceptance (aOR 1.5, 95% CI 0.99-2.17). However, this trend was not observed for the entire obstetric population; public insurance status and medical comorbidities were associated with lower vaccine rates during the pandemic. For those who had public insurance, rates of influenza vaccination decreased from 83% in 2019 to 40% during COVID (aOR 0.16, 95% CI 0.10-0.24) and for Tdap rates decreased from 93 to 54% (aOR 0.13, 95% CI 0.08-0.21).
    Conclusion:  During the COVID-19 pandemic era, pregnant people at large were more likely to accept the influenza vaccine. However, this trend did not apply to Tdap, and high-risk groups with public insurance and medical comorbidities. This study highlights potential disparities in vaccination rates, which need to be accounted for when evaluating national vaccine trends. These data support increased efforts in vaccine counseling for high-risk populations.
    Key points: · Antenatal flu vaccination increased during the pandemic.. · Antenatal Tdap vaccination was unchanged during the pandemic.. · High-risk pregnant patients had decreased vaccine uptake.. · High-risk subgroups were not included in overarching vaccination trends..
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-11-21
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 605671-4
    ISSN 1098-8785 ; 0735-1631
    ISSN (online) 1098-8785
    ISSN 0735-1631
    DOI 10.1055/a-2188-8511
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article: A Pregnant Adolescent with COVID-19 and Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children

    Trostle, Megan E. / Grossman, Tracy B. / Penfield, Christina A. / Phoon, Colin K. L. / Raabe, Vanessa N. / Sloane, Mark F. / Roman, Ashley S.

    American Journal of Perinatology Reports

    2024  Volume 14, Issue 01, Page(s) e66–e68

    Abstract: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), a new condition related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the pediatric population, was recognized by physicians in the United Kingdom in April 2020. Given those up to the age of 21 years can ...

    Abstract Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), a new condition related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the pediatric population, was recognized by physicians in the United Kingdom in April 2020. Given those up to the age of 21 years can be affected, pregnant adolescents and young adults are susceptible. However, there is scant information on how MIS-C may affect pregnancy and whether the presentation differs in the pregnant population. We report a case of a pregnant adolescent with COVID-19 and MIS-C with a favorable outcome. This case highlights the considerations in managing a critically ill pregnant patient with a novel illness and the importance of a multidisciplinary team in coordinating care.
    Keywords multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children ; COVID-19 ; pregnancy ; critical illness
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-01-01
    Publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
    Publishing place Stuttgart ; New York
    Document type Article
    ZDB-ID 2628074-7
    ISSN 2157-7005 ; 2157-6998
    ISSN (online) 2157-7005
    ISSN 2157-6998
    DOI 10.1055/s-0044-1779032
    Database Thieme publisher's database

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: High antibody levels in cord blood from pregnant women vaccinated against COVID-19.

    Trostle, Megan E / Aguero-Rosenfeld, Maria E / Roman, Ashley S / Lighter, Jennifer L

    American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM

    2021  Volume 3, Issue 6, Page(s) 100481

    MeSH term(s) COVID-19 ; Female ; Fetal Blood ; Humans ; Pregnancy ; Pregnant Women ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Vaccination
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-09-22
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Letter
    ISSN 2589-9333
    ISSN (online) 2589-9333
    DOI 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100481
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Postpartum depression, mode of delivery, and indication for unscheduled cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study.

    Lantigua-Martinez, Meralis / Silverstein, Jenna S / Trostle, Megan E / Melendez Torres, Anthony / Rajeev, Pournami / Dennis, Alyson / Talib, Mahino

    Journal of perinatal medicine

    2022  Volume 50, Issue 5, Page(s) 630–633

    Abstract: Objectives: To examine the relationship between postpartum depression (PPD), mode of delivery (MOD), and indication for unscheduled cesarean delivery (uCD).: Methods: Patients with antenatal and postpartum Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) ... ...

    Abstract Objectives: To examine the relationship between postpartum depression (PPD), mode of delivery (MOD), and indication for unscheduled cesarean delivery (uCD).
    Methods: Patients with antenatal and postpartum Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) scores were compared by MOD and indication for uCD if applicable. Patients with an antenatal EPDS>12 were excluded to ascertain the incidence of new depression. The primary outcome was EPDS≥13 by MOD. The secondary outcome was EPDS≥13 by indication for uCD.
    Results: Seven hundred and thirty eight patients met inclusion criteria. There were statistically significant differences in MOD by age, race, BMI, and multi-gestation pregnancy. Patients delivered via uCD had a higher rate of peripartum complications and NICU admission. There were no differences in medical comorbidities or use of psychiatric medications by MOD. There was no difference in EPDS by MOD. The rate of PPD was higher in patients with uCD for non-reassuring fetal heart tones (NRFHT) compared to other indications for uCD (p=0.02).
    Conclusions: While there was no difference in the incidence of PPD by MOD, the incidence of PPD was higher among patients delivered via uCD for NRFHT. These findings may have implications for patient counseling, post-operative mental health surveillance, and support of postpartum patients.
    MeSH term(s) Cesarean Section/adverse effects ; Cesarean Section/psychology ; Depression, Postpartum/epidemiology ; Depression, Postpartum/etiology ; Depression, Postpartum/psychology ; Female ; Humans ; Postpartum Period ; Pregnancy ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Retrospective Studies
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-02-14
    Publishing country Germany
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 123512-6
    ISSN 1619-3997 ; 0300-5577 ; 0936-174X
    ISSN (online) 1619-3997
    ISSN 0300-5577 ; 0936-174X
    DOI 10.1515/jpm-2021-0575
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article: Acceptance of Routine Vaccines in Pregnancy during the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Perelman, Allison D. / Trostle, Megan E. / Pecoriello, Jillian / Quinn, Gwendolyn P. / Roman, Ashley S. / Penfield, Christina A.

    American Journal of Perinatology

    2023  

    Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the rates of vaccination against infectious diseases (Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Pertussis [Tdap] and influenza) in pregnancy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic compared to contemporary ... ...

    Abstract Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the rates of vaccination against infectious diseases (Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Pertussis [Tdap] and influenza) in pregnancy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic compared to contemporary historical controls.
    Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing rates of Tdap and influenza vaccination in pregnant people who received care at NYU Langone Health and delivered from September 1, 2020, to January 31, 2021 (“COVID cohort”) to the same period the prior year (“2019 cohort”). Demographic information, trimester of initiation of prenatal care, insurance status, and medical comorbidities were evaluated. Outcomes were analyzed using chi-square, Fisher's exact test, and multivariable logistic regression, with significance of p  < 0.05.
    Results: In total, 1,713 pregnant people were included. Compared to historical controls, the COVID cohort differed in age, race, timing of initiation of prenatal care, insurance status, and medical comorbidities. After adjusting for these covariates, pregnant people were significantly more likely to accept influenza vaccine in the COVID cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27–2.29) and had similar Tdap acceptance (aOR 1.5, 95% CI 0.99–2.17). However, this trend was not observed for the entire obstetric population; public insurance status and medical comorbidities were associated with lower vaccine rates during the pandemic. For those who had public insurance, rates of influenza vaccination decreased from 83% in 2019 to 40% during COVID (aOR 0.16, 95% CI 0.10–0.24) and for Tdap rates decreased from 93 to 54% (aOR 0.13, 95% CI 0.08–0.21).
    Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic era, pregnant people at large were more likely to accept the influenza vaccine. However, this trend did not apply to Tdap, and high-risk groups with public insurance and medical comorbidities. This study highlights potential disparities in vaccination rates, which need to be accounted for when evaluating national vaccine trends. These data support increased efforts in vaccine counseling for high-risk populations.
    Key Points: Antenatal flu vaccination increased during the pandemic. Antenatal Tdap vaccination was unchanged during the pandemic. High-risk pregnant patients had decreased vaccine uptake. High-risk subgroups were not included in overarching vaccination trends.
    Keywords coronavirus ; influenza ; maternal immunity ; pandemic ; health care disparities ; pregnancy ; Tdap ; vaccination
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-10-10
    Publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
    Publishing place Stuttgart ; New York
    Document type Article
    ZDB-ID 605671-4
    ISSN 1098-8785 ; 0735-1631
    ISSN (online) 1098-8785
    ISSN 0735-1631
    DOI 10.1055/a-2188-8511
    Database Thieme publisher's database

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy: early experience from a single institution.

    Trostle, Megan E / Limaye, Meghana A / Avtushka, Valeryia / Lighter, Jennifer L / Penfield, Christina A / Roman, Ashley S

    American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM

    2021  Volume 3, Issue 6, Page(s) 100464

    Abstract: Objective: Pregnant women are at increased risk for morbidity owing to infection with the COVID-19 virus.: Study design: This was an institutional review board-approved descriptive study of pregnant women at New York University Langone Health who ... ...

    Abstract Objective: Pregnant women are at increased risk for morbidity owing to infection with the COVID-19 virus.
    Study design: This was an institutional review board-approved descriptive study of pregnant women at New York University Langone Health who received at least 1 dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccination approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna) from the time of the FDA Emergency Use Authorization to April 22, 2021. Eligible women were identified via search of the electronic medical record (EMR) system. Vaccine administration was ascertained via immunization records from the New York State Department of Health. Women were excluded if they were vaccinated before conception or during the postpartum period. Charts were reviewed for maternal demographics and pregnancy outcomes. Descriptive analyses were performed using the R software version 4.0.2 (The R Foundation, Boston, MA).
    Results: We identified 424 pregnant women who received an mRNA vaccination. Of those, 348 (82.1%) received both doses and 76 (17.9%) received only 1 dose. The maternal characteristics and vaccination information are shown in Table 1. Of the included women, 4.9% had a history of a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis before vaccination. After vaccination, no patient in our cohort was diagnosed with COVID-19. In terms of the pregnancy outcomes, 9 women had spontaneous abortions, 3 terminated their pregnancies, and 327 have ongoing pregnancies. Of the women included, 85 delivered liveborn infants. There were no stillbirths in our population. Of the 9 spontaneous abortions, 8 occurred during the first trimester at a range of 6 to 13 weeks' gestation. There was 1 second trimester loss. The rate of spontaneous abortion among women vaccinated in the first trimester was 6.5%. The 327 women with ongoing pregnancies have been followed for a median of 4.6 weeks (range, 0-17 weeks) following their most recent dose. A total of 113 (34.6%) women, initiated vaccination during the first trimester, 178 (54.4%) initiated vaccination during the second trimester, and 36 (11.0%) during the third trimester. Following the vaccination, 2 fetuses (0.6%) developed intrauterine growth restriction, whereas 5 (1.5%) were diagnosed with anomalies. Outcomes for the 85 women who delivered are shown in Table 2. Of the women who delivered, 18.8% were diagnosed with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. The rate of preterm birth was 5.9%. One preterm delivery was medically indicated, whereas the remaining 3 were spontaneous. A total of 15.3% of neonates required admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Of the NICU admissions, 61.5% were because of hypoglycemia or an evaluation for sepsis. Other reasons for admission included prematurity, hypothermia, and transient tachypnea of the newborn. Of all the neonates, 12.2% were small for gestational age (SGA) per the World Health Organization standards.
    Conclusion: This series describes our experience with women who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. In line with other published findings,
    MeSH term(s) COVID-19 ; COVID-19 Testing ; COVID-19 Vaccines ; Female ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology ; Premature Birth ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Vaccination
    Chemical Substances COVID-19 Vaccines
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-08-16
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Letter
    ISSN 2589-9333
    ISSN (online) 2589-9333
    DOI 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100464
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Differential Uptake of Telehealth for Prenatal Care in a Large New York City Academic Obstetrical Practice during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

    Limaye, Meghana A / Lantigua-Martinez, Meralis / Trostle, Megan E / Penfield, Christina A / Conroy, Erin M / Roman, Ashley S / Mehta-Lee, Shilpi S

    American journal of perinatology

    2020  Volume 38, Issue 3, Page(s) 304–306

    Abstract: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in New York City, telehealth was rapidly implemented for obstetric patients. Though telehealth for prenatal care is safe and effective, significant concerns exist regarding equity in access among ... ...

    Abstract During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in New York City, telehealth was rapidly implemented for obstetric patients. Though telehealth for prenatal care is safe and effective, significant concerns exist regarding equity in access among low-income populations. We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating utilization of telehealth for prenatal care in a large academic practice in New York City, comparing women with public and private insurance. We found that patients with public insurance were less likely to have at least one telehealth visit than women with private insurance (60.9 vs. 87.3%,
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; COVID-19/epidemiology ; COVID-19/prevention & control ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Health Services Accessibility/standards ; Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data ; Health Services Needs and Demand ; Humans ; Infection Control/methods ; Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data ; New York City/epidemiology ; Obstetrics/economics ; Obstetrics/trends ; Poverty ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Care/methods ; Prenatal Care/organization & administration ; Prenatal Care/trends ; Retrospective Studies ; Telemedicine/economics ; Telemedicine/methods ; Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-12-10
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 605671-4
    ISSN 1098-8785 ; 0735-1631
    ISSN (online) 1098-8785
    ISSN 0735-1631
    DOI 10.1055/s-0040-1721510
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top