LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 3 of total 3

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Computerized tomography scan in acute appendicitis with eventual negative appendectomy.

    Chia, Ming Li / Justin, Kwan / Hong, Hui Terrence Chi / Vishal, G Shelat

    Journal of clinical and translational research

    2021  Volume 7, Issue 3, Page(s) 326–332

    Abstract: Background and aim: Acute appendicitis (AA) is traditionally considered a clinical diagnosis and negative appendectomy (NA) rates vary across health-care systems. Computed tomography (CT) scans have been shown to aid in the reduction of NA rates. Our ... ...

    Abstract Background and aim: Acute appendicitis (AA) is traditionally considered a clinical diagnosis and negative appendectomy (NA) rates vary across health-care systems. Computed tomography (CT) scans have been shown to aid in the reduction of NA rates. Our study aimed to determine the pre-operative imaging characteristics in patients undergoing appendectomy with eventual normal histology.
    Materials and methods: An audit of all patients with a discharge diagnosis of AA was conducted from January 2011 to December 2015. Histology reports of all patients who underwent appendectomies were reviewed, and medical records of patients with NA were included in the study. To study the impact of CT scan reporting in NA patients, CT scan images of patients with NA were reviewed retrospectively by two blinded radiologists.
    Results: A total of 2603 patients underwent appendectomy for suspected AA, and NA rate was 3.34% (n=87). The mean age of patients with NA was 30.3 (14.8-69.8) years with no gender difference (51.7% male). Sixty-six (75.9%) patients had laparoscopic appendectomy with 3.5% open conversion rate. CT scans were done in 47 patients. Pre-operative CT scan report was more likely to report dilated appendix (n=26 [55.3%] vs. n=7 [14.9%], P=0.0001). Post-operative blinded radiology review was more like to report other pathology (n=27 [57.4%] vs. n=2 [4.3%], P=0.0001) and normal appendix (n=26 [55.3%] vs. n=5 (10.6%), P=0.0001).
    Conclusion: The NA rate is low. There needs to be standardized reporting for imaging features of prominent/dilated appendix.
    Relevance for patients: Appendectomy must be avoided in patients with a normal CT scan and when another pathological diagnosis is established. Liberal imaging policy assists to reduce NA rates. Imaging features of prominent or dilated appendix can be subjective and international collaboration is needed to define thresholds for imaging diagnosis of AA.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-05-27
    Publishing country Singapore
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 3019815-X
    ISSN 2424-810X ; 2382-6533
    ISSN (online) 2424-810X
    ISSN 2382-6533
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Role of staging laparoscopy in gastric malignancies - our institutional experience

    Vishal G Shelat / Juin Fong Thong / Melanie Seah / Khong Hee Lim

    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vol 4, Iss 9, Pp 214-

    2012  Volume 219

    Abstract: AIM: To investigate the value of staging laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) and peritoneal lavage cytology in patients with newly-diagnosed gastric tumours in our department. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively-collected data was ... ...

    Abstract AIM: To investigate the value of staging laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) and peritoneal lavage cytology in patients with newly-diagnosed gastric tumours in our department. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively-collected data was conducted in all patients with newly-diagnosed gastric tumours on oesophagogastroduodenoscopy between December 2003 and July 2008. All the patients had a pre-treatment histological diagnosis and were discussed at the hospital multidisciplinary tumour board meeting for their definitive management. Computed tomography scan was performed in all patients as a part of standard preoperative staging work up. Staging laparoscopy was subsequently performed in selected patients and staging by both modalities was compared. RESULTS: Twenty seven patients were included. Majority of patients had cardio-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Thirteen patients (48%) were upstaged following staging laparoscopy and one patient was downstaged (3.7%). None of the patients had procedure-related complications. None of the patients with metastasis detected at laparoscopy underwent laparotomy. Gastrectomy after staging laparoscopy was performed in 13 patients (9 R0 resections, 3 R1 resections and 1 R2 resection). Only one patient did not have gastrectomy at laparotomy because of extensive local invasion. Three patients were subjected to neoadjuvant therapy following laparoscopy but only one patient subsequently underwent gastrectomy. CONCLUSION: In this small series reflecting our institutional experience, staging laparoscopy appears to be safe and more accurate in detecting peritoneal and omental metastases as compared to conventional imaging. Peritoneal cytology provided additional prognostic information although there appeared to be a high false negative rate.
    Keywords Gastric carcinoma ; Staging ; Laparoscopy ; Peritoneal lavage cytology ; Laparoscopic ultrasound ; Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology ; RC799-869 ; Specialties of internal medicine ; RC581-951 ; Internal medicine ; RC31-1245 ; Medicine ; R ; DOAJ:Gastroenterology ; DOAJ:Medicine (General) ; DOAJ:Health Sciences ; Surgery ; RD1-811 ; DOAJ:Surgery
    Subject code 616 ; 610
    Language English
    Publishing date 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: A pandemic recap

    Federico Coccolini / Enrico Cicuttin / Camilla Cremonini / Dario Tartaglia / Bruno Viaggi / Akira Kuriyama / Edoardo Picetti / Chad Ball / Fikri Abu-Zidan / Marco Ceresoli / Bruno Turri / Sumita Jain / Carlo Palombo / Xavier Guirao / Gabriel Rodrigues / Mahir Gachabayov / Fernando Machado / Lostoridis Eftychios / Souha S. Kanj /
    Isidoro Di Carlo / Salomone Di Saverio / Vladimir Khokha / Andrew Kirkpatrick / Damien Massalou / Francesco Forfori / Francesco Corradi / Samir Delibegovic / Gustavo M. Machain Vega / Massimo Fantoni / Demetrios Demetriades / Garima Kapoor / Yoram Kluger / Shamshul Ansari / Ron Maier / Ari Leppaniemi / Timothy Hardcastle / Andras Vereczkei / Evika Karamagioli / Emmanouil Pikoulis / Mauro Pistello / Boris E. Sakakushev / Pradeep H. Navsaria / Rita Galeiras / Ali I. Yahya / Aleksei V. Osipov / Evgeni Dimitrov / Krstina Doklestić / Michele Pisano / Paolo Malacarne / Paolo Carcoforo / Maria Grazia Sibilla / Igor A. Kryvoruchko / Luigi Bonavina / Jae Il Kim / Vishal G. Shelat / Jacek Czepiel / Emilio Maseda / Sanjay Marwah / Mircea Chirica / Giandomenico Biancofiore / Mauro Podda / Lorenzo Cobianchi / Luca Ansaloni / Paola Fugazzola / Charalampos Seretis / Carlos Augusto Gomez / Fabio Tumietto / Manu Malbrain / Martin Reichert / Goran Augustin / Bruno Amato / Alessandro Puzziello / Andreas Hecker / Angelo Gemignani / Arda Isik / Alessandro Cucchetti / Mirco Nacoti / Doron Kopelman / Cristian Mesina / Wagih Ghannam / Offir Ben-Ishay / Sameer Dhingra / Raul Coimbra / Ernest E. Moore / Yunfeng Cui / Martha A. Quiodettis / Miklosh Bala / Mario Testini / Jose Diaz / Massimo Girardis / Walter L. Biffl / Matthias Hecker / Ibrahima Sall / Ugo Boggi / Gabriele Materazzi / Lorenzo Ghiadoni / Junichi Matsumoto / Wietse P. Zuidema / Rao Ivatury / Mushira A. Enani / Andrey Litvin / Majdi N. Al-Hasan / Zaza Demetrashvili / Oussama Baraket / Carlos A. Ordoñez / Ionut Negoi / Ronald Kiguba / Ziad A. Memish / Mutasim M. Elmangory / Matti Tolonen / Korey Das / Julival Ribeiro / Donal B. O’Connor / Boun Kim Tan / Harry Van Goor / Suman Baral / Belinda De Simone / Davide Corbella / Pietro Brambillasca / Michelangelo Scaglione / Fulvio Basolo / Nicola De’Angelis / Cino Bendinelli / Dieter Weber / Leonardo Pagani / Cinzia Monti / Gianluca Baiocchi / Massimo Chiarugi / Fausto Catena / Massimo Sartelli

    World Journal of Emergency Surgery, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 1-

    lessons we have learned

    2021  Volume 8

    Abstract: Abstract On January 2020, the WHO Director General declared that the outbreak constitutes a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. The world has faced a worldwide spread crisis and is still dealing with it. The present paper represents a white ...

    Abstract Abstract On January 2020, the WHO Director General declared that the outbreak constitutes a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. The world has faced a worldwide spread crisis and is still dealing with it. The present paper represents a white paper concerning the tough lessons we have learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, an international and heterogenous multidisciplinary panel of very differentiated people would like to share global experiences and lessons with all interested and especially those responsible for future healthcare decision making. With the present paper, international and heterogenous multidisciplinary panel of very differentiated people would like to share global experiences and lessons with all interested and especially those responsible for future healthcare decision making.
    Keywords Pandemia ; International ; Thoughts ; Reflection ; Ethics ; Biology ; Surgery ; RD1-811 ; Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid ; RC86-88.9
    Subject code 360
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-09-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMC
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top