Article ; Online: Con: freeze-all for all? One size does not fit all.
Human reproduction (Oxford, England)
2022 Volume 37, Issue 7, Page(s) 1388–1393
Abstract: IVF has traditionally involved transfer of fresh embryos. However, a 'freeze-all' strategy where all embryos are cryopreserved for transfer in subsequent, unstimulated cycles has emerged as an alternative approach. This is thought to eliminate the ... ...
| Abstract | IVF has traditionally involved transfer of fresh embryos. However, a 'freeze-all' strategy where all embryos are cryopreserved for transfer in subsequent, unstimulated cycles has emerged as an alternative approach. This is thought to eliminate the negative effects of controlled ovarian stimulation on the endometrium and reduce the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). There are a growing number of studies evaluating live birth rates after use of a freeze-all versus fresh embryo transfer (ET) strategy. However, results to date are inconsistent. Certainly, the benefits of a freeze-all strategy appear to be less clear cut in ovulatory women with infertility, while those with a good ovarian response (more than 10 or 15 oocytes retrieved) may be suitable candidates. Variable responses to a freeze-all strategy compared with fresh ET have also been reported depending on whether cleavage stage embryos or blastocysts were transferred. In terms of safety, the risk of OHSS appears to be lower with a freeze-all strategy. For other safety endpoints, some appear to be better when a freeze-all approach is used (e.g. rates of pregnancy loss/miscarriage, preterm delivery, low birthweight and small for gestational age) while other complications are more common (e.g. hypertensive disorders of pregnancy/pre-eclampsia, large for gestational age and high birthweight). Preliminary longer-term data suggest that a freeze-all strategy does not have a negative impact on childhood development. Other factors to consider include time to pregnancy (longer after freeze-all) and the relative cost-effectiveness of the two approaches. Available data are too inconsistent to allow a freeze-all approach to be recommended for all patients. Instead, a personalized, balanced approach should be taken based on individual patient characteristics (especially steroid hormone levels on the day of trigger) and incorporating patient preference. While a freeze-all strategy might be the right choice for some patients, freeze-all is definitely not good for all. |
|---|---|
| MeSH term(s) | Abortion, Spontaneous ; Birth Rate ; Birth Weight ; Child ; Embryo Transfer/methods ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro/methods ; Humans ; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/etiology ; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/prevention & control ; Ovulation Induction/adverse effects ; Ovulation Induction/methods ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Retrospective Studies |
| Language | English |
| Publishing date | 2022-05-31 |
| Publishing country | England |
| Document type | Journal Article |
| ZDB-ID | 632776-x |
| ISSN | 1460-2350 ; 0268-1161 ; 1477-741X |
| ISSN (online) | 1460-2350 |
| ISSN | 0268-1161 ; 1477-741X |
| DOI | 10.1093/humrep/deac103 |
| Database | MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE |
More links
Kategorien
In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter
| Zs.B 2892: Show issues | Location: Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand) bis Jg. 2021: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG) |
Order via subito
This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.