LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 13

Search options

  1. Article: The United States Drug Enforcement Administration and Prescription Opioid Production Quotas: An End Game of Eradication?

    Schatman, Michael E / Wegrzyn, Erica L

    Journal of pain research

    2020  Volume 13, Page(s) 2629–2631

    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-10-19
    Publishing country New Zealand
    Document type Editorial
    ZDB-ID 2495284-9
    ISSN 1178-7090
    ISSN 1178-7090
    DOI 10.2147/JPR.S285835
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Questionable Conceptualizations of Nonmedical Use Can Contribute to Needless Distress.

    Schatman, Michael E / Shapiro, Hannah / Wegrzyn, Erica L

    JAMA oncology

    2021  Volume 7, Issue 6, Page(s) 941–942

    MeSH term(s) Central Nervous System Stimulants ; Concept Formation ; Humans
    Chemical Substances Central Nervous System Stimulants
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-04-15
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Letter ; Comment
    ISSN 2374-2445
    ISSN (online) 2374-2445
    DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0569
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: The United States Drug Enforcement Administration and Prescription Opioid Production Quotas

    Schatman, Michael E / Wegrzyn, Erica L

    An End Game of Eradication?

    2020  

    Abstract: Michael E Schatman,1,2 Erica L Wegrzyn3 1Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; 2Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Ma, USA; ... ...

    Abstract Michael E Schatman,1,2 Erica L Wegrzyn3 1Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; 2Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Ma, USA; 3Department of Pharmacy, Stratton VA Medical Center, Albany, NY, USACorrespondence: Michael E Schatman Tel +1 425 647-4880Email Michael.Schatman@tufts.edu As a means of mitigating the now concluded prescription opioid crisis in the United States, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has, in its infinite wisdom, embarked on a campaign of annually reducing the Aggregate Production Quota (APQ) of opioids each year since 2017. According to the DEA, they began reducing the APQ because there was no longer the need for a 25% “buffer” of excess opioids due to decreases in prescribing each year.1 In 2017, production of almost every opioid manufactured in the United States was reduced by at least 25%.1 In 2018, APQs of opioids – including oxycodone, hydrocodone, oxymorphone, hydromorphone, morphine, codeine, meperidine, and fentanyl – were reduced by 20% compared to 2017 production.2 For 2019, DEA reduced APQs only of “more commonly prescribed schedule II opioids, including oxycodone, hydrocodone, oxymorphone, hydromorphone, morphine, and fentanyl”.3 The 2020 production decreases affected 5 commonly-used opioids: Oxycodone production was decreased by 9%, hydrocodone by 19%, hydromorphone by 25%, fentanyl by 31%, and oxymorphone by 55%.4 Given, in response to the need for increased availability of opioids associated with the COVID-19 crisis, DEA made small adjustments (increases of 10–15%) in production APQs in April of 2020 of analgesics including codeine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, and morphine.5 Unfortunately, this action was too little, too late. Hospitals that had already been sounding the alarm for the past several years regarding routine shortages of parenteral opioids suddenly were faced with inadequate supplies essential for treating patients on ventilators amidst COVID-19, with the need for IV formulations increasing more than twofold.6
    Keywords Journal of Pain Research ; covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-10-19
    Publisher Dove Press
    Publishing country us
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article: Fentalogues.

    Persico, Amelia L / Wegrzyn, Erica L / Fudin, Jeffrey / Schatman, Michael E

    Journal of pain research

    2020  Volume 13, Page(s) 2131–2133

    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-08-20
    Publishing country New Zealand
    Document type Editorial
    ZDB-ID 2495284-9
    ISSN 1178-7090
    ISSN 1178-7090
    DOI 10.2147/JPR.S265901
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article: Opioid Taper Practices Among Clinicians.

    Persico, Amelia L / Bettinger, Jeffrey J / Wegrzyn, Erica L / Fudin, Jeffrey / Strassels, Scott A

    Journal of pain research

    2021  Volume 14, Page(s) 3353–3358

    Abstract: Introduction: Opioid dose tapers are used frequently when cross-titrating from one or more opioids to another or when discontinuing therapy. Currently, there is no universally accepted evidence-based standard of care for this procedure which can leave ... ...

    Abstract Introduction: Opioid dose tapers are used frequently when cross-titrating from one or more opioids to another or when discontinuing therapy. Currently, there is no universally accepted evidence-based standard of care for this procedure which can leave patients at risk for withdrawal symptoms, inadequate pain control, or elevated suicide risk.
    Objective: The objective of this study was to examine practices and rationale among clinicians, to determine if there is a difference among respondents in their comfort level, method and rationale for tapering opioids at various morphine milligram equivalents (MME) and to assess the need for the development of a standard of care.
    Methods: Data were derived from an electronic survey developed using SurveyMonkey
    Results: A total of 149 clinicians completed the survey, physicians, NPs, pharmacists, and PAs accounted for 51%, 20%, 19%, and 10% of participants, respectively. Overall, 55% of the respondents self-identified as pain specialists. There were no statistically significant differences in reported comfort level among the different types of providers. Nearly 50% of participants indicated their rationale for tapering or discontinuing opioids was the 2016 CDC guidelines.
    Conclusion: Despite that the majority of providers surveyed self-identified as pain specialists, over 50% were not comfortable tapering opioids at doses greater than 120 MME/day. This observation suggests a need for further education and establishment of consensus guidelines on method and rationale for opioid tapering. Provider motivation for tapering was largely influenced by CDC guidelines based on low quality evidence. This strengthens the argument for the creation of guidelines based on high quality evidence.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-10-20
    Publishing country New Zealand
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2495284-9
    ISSN 1178-7090
    ISSN 1178-7090
    DOI 10.2147/JPR.S322299
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Fentalogues

    Persico, Amelia L / Wegrzyn, Erica L / Fudin, Jeffrey / Schatman, Michael E

    2020  

    Abstract: Amelia L Persico, 1, 2 Erica L Wegrzyn, 1, 2 Jeffrey Fudin, 1, 2 Michael E Schatman 3, 4 1Stratton VA Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA; 2Remitigate Therapeutics, Delmar, NY, USA; 3Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; 4Tufts ... ...

    Abstract Amelia L Persico, 1, 2 Erica L Wegrzyn, 1, 2 Jeffrey Fudin, 1, 2 Michael E Schatman 3, 4 1Stratton VA Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA; 2Remitigate Therapeutics, Delmar, NY, USA; 3Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; 4Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USACorrespondence: Jeffrey Fudin Email jeff@paindr.com The ongoing media maelstrom regarding opioids and classification of an “opioid crisis” during the initial decade of this millennium has stirred awareness, outrage and action among regulatory and other government agencies, professional clinician organizations, community pharmacy policies, legislators, patient advocacy groups, anti-opioid advocate groups, and others. However, mass media reports often skew or misdirect the aggregate facts in a possible effort to abridge or sensationalize stories.1 Discernable distinctions, for example, are rarely drawn between licit pharmaceutical fentanyl, illicit fentanyl analogues, and certain highly potent analogues approved only for ungulates. The omission of this information has resulted in distorted public information that has far reaching consequences in medicine and policy development, as it leads to misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the facts by politicians, lay people and many clinicians.2 It is particularly relevant today, as pharmaceutical fentanyl is often an essential drug for intubationregularly required for ventilation procedures in declining patients that may succumb to novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). These distinctions are critical in the shifting landscape of the opioid crisis as prescriptions for opioids decrease yet overdose deaths remain alarmingly prevalent and continue to rise.
    Keywords Journal of Pain Research ; covid19
    Subject code 020
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-08-20
    Publisher Dove Press
    Publishing country us
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article: A Randomized, Crossover, Pharmacokinetic and Adhesion Performance Study of a Lidocaine Topical System 1.8% During Physical Activity and Heat Treatment in Healthy Subjects.

    Fudin, Jeffrey / Wegrzyn, Erica L / Greuber, Emileigh / Vought, Kip / Patel, Kalpana / Nalamachu, Sri

    Journal of pain research

    2020  Volume 13, Page(s) 1359–1367

    Abstract: Purpose: This study compares the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, adhesion, and safety of lidocaine topical system 1.8%, a novel lidocaine topical system approved to treat postherpetic neuralgia, under conditions of heat and exercise vs normal conditions.!# ...

    Abstract Purpose: This study compares the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, adhesion, and safety of lidocaine topical system 1.8%, a novel lidocaine topical system approved to treat postherpetic neuralgia, under conditions of heat and exercise vs normal conditions.
    Materials and methods: This open-label, 3-period, 3-treatment crossover study randomized 12 healthy adults to receive three lidocaine topical systems 1.8% during each of three treatment periods, with 7-day washouts between treatments. The product was applied to the mid-lower back and was removed after 12 hours. During Treatment A, subjects exercised on a bicycle for 30 minutes at 0, 2.5, 5.5, and 8.5 hours. During Treatment B, heat (temperature set at 36.7-40.3°C) was applied at 0 and 8.5 hours. Treatment C was normal conditions. The PK profile of each subject under exercise and heat conditions was compared to normal conditions. Skin irritation, adhesion, and adverse events were assessed.
    Results: Twelve subjects completed the study. Exposure to external heat resulted in increased peak plasma concentration of lidocaine with a mean C
    Conclusion: Transient heat exposure resulted in increased lidocaine plasma concentrations compared to normal conditions, whereas exercise had no effect. The effects of heat appear to be immediate, reversible, and below systemic therapeutic threshold in antiarrhythmic treatment (1000-1500 ng/mL), and well below the safe systemic threshold of 5000 ng/mL. Lidocaine topical system 1.8% remained adhered to the skin and was well tolerated under all conditions. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04150536.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-06-10
    Publishing country New Zealand
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2495284-9
    ISSN 1178-7090
    ISSN 1178-7090
    DOI 10.2147/JPR.S238268
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: The CDC Opioid Guideline: Proponent Interpretation Has Led to Misinformation.

    Wegrzyn, Erica L / Chaghtai, Ausim M / Argoff, Charles E / Fudin, Jeffrey

    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics

    2018  Volume 103, Issue 6, Page(s) 950–953

    Abstract: Pain management epitomizes the value of a multidisciplinary approach to caring for patients, yet regrettably, the term pain management has too often become synonymous with prescribing opioids only. Optimal chronic pain management requires a skillset most ...

    Abstract Pain management epitomizes the value of a multidisciplinary approach to caring for patients, yet regrettably, the term pain management has too often become synonymous with prescribing opioids only. Optimal chronic pain management requires a skillset most conducive to a multidisciplinary team approach and should be performed in a scientifically and clinically sound manner. It is with these facts in mind that we offer our view of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain.
    MeSH term(s) Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)/standards ; Chronic Pain/drug therapy ; Chronic Pain/therapy ; Communication ; Guideline Adherence ; Humans ; Pain Management/methods ; Patient Care Planning ; Patient Care Team/organization & administration ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' ; Risk Assessment ; United States
    Chemical Substances Analgesics, Opioid
    Language English
    Publishing date 2018-04-02
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 123793-7
    ISSN 1532-6535 ; 0009-9236
    ISSN (online) 1532-6535
    ISSN 0009-9236
    DOI 10.1002/cpt.1062
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article: OxyContin was submitted and justifiably approved by the agency as a 12-hour dosage form.

    Fudin, Jeffrey / Raouf, Mena / Wegrzyn, Erica L

    Journal of pain research

    2016  Volume 9, Page(s) 609–612

    Language English
    Publishing date 2016-09-07
    Publishing country New Zealand
    Document type Editorial
    ZDB-ID 2495284-9
    ISSN 1178-7090
    ISSN 1178-7090
    DOI 10.2147/JPR.S117219
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article: Fentalogues

    Persico, Amelia L. / Wegrzyn, Erica L. / Fudin, Jeffrey / Schatman, Michael E.

    Journal of Pain Research

    Abstract: Amelia L Persico,1,2 Erica L Wegrzyn,1,2 Jeffrey Fudin,1,2 Michael E Schatman3,4 1Stratton VA Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA;2Remitigate Therapeutics, Delmar, NY, USA;3Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA;4Tufts University School ... ...

    Abstract Amelia L Persico,1,2 Erica L Wegrzyn,1,2 Jeffrey Fudin,1,2 Michael E Schatman3,4 1Stratton VA Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA;2Remitigate Therapeutics, Delmar, NY, USA;3Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA;4Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA Correspondence: Jeffrey Fudin Email jeff@paindr com The ongoing media maelstrom regarding opioids and classification of an “opioid crisis” during the initial decade of this millennium has stirred awareness, outrage and action among regulatory and other government agencies, professional clinician organizations, community pharmacy policies, legislators, patient advocacy groups, anti-opioid advocate groups, and others However, mass media reports often skew or misdirect the aggregate facts in a possible effort to abridge or sensationalize stories 1 Discernable distinctions, for example, are rarely drawn between licit pharmaceutical fentanyl, illicit fentanyl analogues, and certain highly potent analogues approved only for ungulates The omission of this information has resulted in distorted public information that has far reaching consequences in medicine and policy development, as it leads to misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the facts by politicians, lay people and many clinicians 2 It is particularly relevant today, as pharmaceutical fentanyl is often an essential drug for intubation regularly required for ventilation procedures in declining patients that may succumb to novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) These distinctions are critical in the shifting landscape of the opioid crisis as prescriptions for opioids decrease yet overdose deaths remain alarmingly prevalent and continue to rise
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #829904
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

To top