LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 21

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Intraoperatively local infiltration anesthesia in hemiarthroplasty patients reduces the needs of opioids: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 96 patients in a fast-track hip fracture setting.

    Hofstad, Janne K / Klaksvik, Jomar / Wik, Tina S

    Acta orthopaedica

    2022  Volume 93, Page(s) 111–116

    Abstract: Background and purpose - Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is commonly used as a component in multimodal analgesia. Pain management directed towards hip fracture patients operated on with hemiarthroplasty is often based on knowledge regarding pain ... ...

    Abstract Background and purpose - Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is commonly used as a component in multimodal analgesia. Pain management directed towards hip fracture patients operated on with hemiarthroplasty is often based on knowledge regarding pain treatment following elective surgery. In this elderly patient population, it is of value to clarify whether adding local infiltration analgesia (LIA) to the postoperative analgesic regimen might reduce postoperative pain or have an opioid-reducing effect. Patients and methods - 96 hip fracture patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty in spinal anesthesia were included. All patients received a multimodal pain regimen and were randomized to receive either ropivacaine or placebo. All patients received morphine depot-opioid and morphine as rescue medication postoperatively. The primary endpoint was pain during mobilization in the recovery unit on the day of surgery. Secondary endpoints were pain during mobilization the day after surgery and postoperative opioid requirements on the first postoperative day. Results - The levels of pain (NRS) during mobilization both in the recovery unit and on the day after surgery were similar in the 2 groups, with median 4 and 0.5 in the placebo group and median 3.5 and 1 in the ropivacaine group respectively. Total consumption of opioids on day 0 and day 1 were 4.6 mg lower in the ropivacaine group (p = 0.04). Pain during mobilization was registered for only 44 of 96 patients for several reasons, including lack of mobilization. Interpretation - There were similar pain scores in both the local infiltration and placebo group postoperatively. However, substantially reduced opioid consumption was found in patients receiving LIA.
    MeSH term(s) Aged ; Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use ; Anesthesia, Local ; Anesthetics, Local ; Double-Blind Method ; Hemiarthroplasty/adverse effects ; Hip Fractures/surgery ; Humans ; Morphine/therapeutic use ; Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy ; Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control ; Ropivacaine
    Chemical Substances Analgesics, Opioid ; Anesthetics, Local ; Morphine (76I7G6D29C) ; Ropivacaine (7IO5LYA57N)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-01-03
    Publishing country Sweden
    Document type Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
    ZDB-ID 2180677-9
    ISSN 1745-3682 ; 1745-3674
    ISSN (online) 1745-3682
    ISSN 1745-3674
    DOI 10.2340/17453674.2021.806
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: A Web-Based Communication Tool for Postoperative Follow-up and Pain Assessment at Home After Primary Knee Arthroplasty: Feasibility and Usability Study.

    Rian, Torbjørn / Sand, Kari / Skogvoll, Eirik / Klepstad, Pål / Wik, Tina S

    JMIR formative research

    2022  Volume 6, Issue 4, Page(s) e34543

    Abstract: Background: We report the use of an electronic tool, Eir (Eir Solutions AS, Norway), for symptom registration at home after knee arthroplasty. This electronic tool was used in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing 3 different analgesic regimens ... ...

    Abstract Background: We report the use of an electronic tool, Eir (Eir Solutions AS, Norway), for symptom registration at home after knee arthroplasty. This electronic tool was used in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing 3 different analgesic regimens with respect to postoperative pain and side effects.
    Objective: The aim of this substudy was to investigate this electronic tool for symptom registrations at home with respect to usability (ie, how easy it was to use) and feasibility (ie, how well the tool served its purpose).
    Methods: To assess the tool's usability, all participants were invited to fill out the 10-item System Usability Scale (SUS) after using the tool for 8 days. To assess feasibility, data regarding the participants' ability to use the tool with or without assistance or reminders were collected qualitatively on a daily basis during the study period.
    Results: A total of 134 patients completed the RCT. Data concerning feasibility of the web-based tool were collected from all 134 patients. The SUS was completed by 119 of the 134 patients; 70.2% (94/134) of the patients managed to use the tool at home without any technical support. All technical challenges were related to the login procedure or internet access. The mean SUS score was 89.6 (median 92.5; range 22.5-100).
    Conclusions: This study showed high feasibility and high usability of the Eir web tool. The received reports gave the necessary information needed for both research data and clinical follow-up.
    Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02604446; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02604446.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-04-28
    Publishing country Canada
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2561-326X
    ISSN (online) 2561-326X
    DOI 10.2196/34543
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Patient-reported outcome after primary and aseptic revision hip arthroplasty: 1-year follow-up of 3,559 primary and 406 revision THAs in an institutional registry.

    Wik, Tina S / Klaksvik, Jomar / Husby, Otto S / Rasch, Astrid / Winther, Siri B

    Acta orthopaedica

    2022  Volume 93, Page(s) 132–137

    Abstract: Background and purpose - Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and revision THA are important information in the preoperative shared decision-making process. We present 1-year results on pain, function, and quality ... ...

    Abstract Background and purpose - Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and revision THA are important information in the preoperative shared decision-making process. We present 1-year results on pain, function, and quality of life following primary and revision THA. Patients and methods - From 2010 to 2018, 3,559 primary THA and 406 revision THAs were included in our institutional quality registry. PROMs were registered preoperatively, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery, numeric rating scale (0-10) for pain during mobilization and at rest, healthrelated quality of life (EQ-5D), and a hip-specific physical function score (HOOS-PS). 2 anchor questions were asked 1 year after surgery concerning joint function and willingness to go through surgery again. Results - There were statistically significant improvements in all PROMs at the 3-month follow-up in both groups. All PROMs improved more in the primary group relative to the revision group. 1 year after surgery, pain during mobilization was reduced with a mean change of 5.1 (SD 2.6) for primary THA and 2.9 (SD 3.0) for revision THA. 93% of primary THA patients reported both better function 1 year after surgery and that they would have gone through surgery again, compared with 78% and 79% in the revision THA group. Interpretation - Primary THA patients reported better function and more pain relief than the revision THA group 1 year after surgery. Pain during mobilization shows the most marked improvement in both groups, which is important preoperative information for patients.
    MeSH term(s) Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; Pain ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Quality of Life ; Registries ; Reoperation ; Treatment Outcome
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-01-03
    Publishing country Sweden
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2180677-9
    ISSN 1745-3682 ; 1745-3674
    ISSN (online) 1745-3682
    ISSN 1745-3674
    DOI 10.2340/17453674.2021.852
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Higher Dissatisfaction Rate Following Revision Compared With Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: 1-Year Follow-up of 2151 Primary and 235 Aseptic Revision Surgeries.

    Winther, Siri B / Klaksvik, Jomar / Wik, Tina S / Husby, Otto S / Egeberg, Tarjei / Snildalsli, Sølvi / Liabakk-Selli, Sølvi / Foss, Olav A

    Orthopedics

    2022  , Page(s) 1–7

    Abstract: Postoperative patient satisfaction is related to preoperative expectations. Information regarding expected results following surgery is therefore important. This study evaluated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient satisfaction up to 1 ... ...

    Abstract Postoperative patient satisfaction is related to preoperative expectations. Information regarding expected results following surgery is therefore important. This study evaluated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient satisfaction up to 1 year after primary and aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The study included 2151 primary and 235 aseptic revision TKA surgeries conducted between 2010 and 2018. Pain, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function-Short Form and European Quality of Life-5 Dimension surveys were recorded preoperatively and at 8 weeks and 1 year. To determine satisfaction, patients were asked to rate their knee function compared with that before surgery and to answer whether they would undergo the surgery again given their current knowledge. Patients who had primary TKA improved in all PROMs in each follow-up up to 1 year, whereas patients who had revision TKA showed improvement at 8 weeks with no further improvement at 1 year. In terms of patient satisfaction, 88% of patients in the primary TKA group reported better knee function, and 87% were willing to have the surgery again at 1 year; the proportions were lower for patients who underwent revision TKA (66% and 68%, respectively). Aseptic revision TKA demonstrates inferior PROMs compared with those of primary TKA 1 year after surgery, and more than 30% of the patients who underwent revision TKA stated that they would not have their TKA revised or were uncertain, given the outcome of the procedure. Thus, patients who are candidates for revision TKA should be informed to expect less of an improvement following revision surgery than with the primary TKA. Our findings can facilitate the shared decision-making process by surgeons and patients based on realistic expectations of surgical outcomes. [
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-11-07
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 424447-3
    ISSN 1938-2367 ; 0147-7447
    ISSN (online) 1938-2367
    ISSN 0147-7447
    DOI 10.3928/01477447-20221031-09
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Virus transmission during orthopedic surgery on patients with COVID-19 - a brief narrative review.

    Basso, Trude / Dale, Håvard / Langvatn, Håkon / Lønne, Greger / Skråmm, Inge / Westberg, Marianne / Wik, Tina S / Witsø, Eivind

    Acta orthopaedica

    2020  Volume 91, Issue 5, Page(s) 534–537

    Abstract: Background and purpose - COVID-19 is among the most impactful pandemics that the society has experienced. Orthopedic surgery involves procedures generating droplets and aerosols and there is concern amongst surgeons that otherwise rational precautionary ... ...

    Abstract Background and purpose - COVID-19 is among the most impactful pandemics that the society has experienced. Orthopedic surgery involves procedures generating droplets and aerosols and there is concern amongst surgeons that otherwise rational precautionary principles are being set aside due to lack of scientific evidence and a shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE). This narrative review attempts to translate relevant knowledge into practical recommendations for healthcare workers involved in orthopedic surgery on patients with known or suspected COVID-19.Patients and methods - We unsystematically searched in PubMed, reference lists, and the WHO's web page for relevant publications concerning problems associated with the PPE used in perioperative practice when a patient is COVID-19 positive or suspected to be. A specific search for literature regarding COVID-19 was extended to include publications from the SARS epidemic in 2002/3.Results - Transmission of infectious viruses from patient to surgeon during surgery is possible, but does not appear to be a considerable problem in clinical practice. Seal-leakage is a problem with surgical masks. Due to the lack of studies and reports, the possibility of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from patient to surgeon during droplet- and aerosol-generating procedures is unknown.Interpretation - Surgical masks should be used only in combination with a widely covering visor and when a respirator (N95, FFP2, P3) is not made available. Furthermore, basic measures to reduce shedding of droplets and aerosols during surgery and correct and consistent use of personal protective equipment is important.
    MeSH term(s) COVID-19/transmission ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control ; Orthopedic Procedures ; Orthopedics ; Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-14
    Publishing country Sweden
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 2180677-9
    ISSN 1745-3682 ; 1745-3674
    ISSN (online) 1745-3682
    ISSN 1745-3674
    DOI 10.1080/17453674.2020.1764234
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article: Transmission of infection from non-isolated patients with COVID-19 to health care workers

    Basso, Trude / Nordbø, Svein Arne / Sundqvist, Erik / Martinsen, Tom Christian / Witsø, Eivind / Wik, Tina S

    J. hosp. infect

    Abstract: Insufficiently protected health care workers (HCWs) defined as high-risk contacts of patients with COVID-19 are routinely quarantined. This study evaluated transmission of infection from a symptomatic patient with COVID-19 to 60 HCWs exposed ≤2 m for ≥15 ...

    Abstract Insufficiently protected health care workers (HCWs) defined as high-risk contacts of patients with COVID-19 are routinely quarantined. This study evaluated transmission of infection from a symptomatic patient with COVID-19 to 60 HCWs exposed ≤2 m for ≥15 minutes, or during aerosol generating procedures. Following ≥106 unique high-risk contacts, none of the HCWs tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA or had developed antibodies. The HCWs reported adherence to basic infection control procedures. These results were in accordance with other reports and should reassure HCWs and further stimulate a broader evaluation of the foundation for the current practice of home-quarantine of non-symptomatic HCWs.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #722123
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: A randomized controlled trial on maximal strength training in 60 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

    Winther, Siri B / Foss, Olav A / Husby, Otto S / Wik, Tina S / Klaksvik, Jomar / Husby, Vigdis S

    Acta orthopaedica

    2018  Volume 89, Issue 3, Page(s) 295–301

    Abstract: Background and purpose - Total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients have reduced muscle strength after rehabilitation. In a previous efficacy trial, 4 weeks' early supervised maximal strength training (MST) increased muscle strength in unilateral THA patients ...

    Abstract Background and purpose - Total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients have reduced muscle strength after rehabilitation. In a previous efficacy trial, 4 weeks' early supervised maximal strength training (MST) increased muscle strength in unilateral THA patients <65 years. We have now evaluated muscle strength in an MST and in a conventional physiotherapy (CP) group after rehabilitation in regular clinical practice. Patients and methods - 60 primary THA patients were randomized to MST or CP between August 2015 and February 2016. The MST group trained at 85-90% of their maximal capacity in leg press and abduction of the operated leg (4 × 5 repetitions), 3 times a week at a municipal physiotherapy institute up to 3 months postoperatively. The CP group followed a training program designed by their respective physiotherapist, mainly exercises performed with low or no external loads. Patients were tested pre- 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Primary outcomes were abduction and leg press strength at 3 months. Other parameters evaluated were pain, 6-min walk test, Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) Physical Function Short-form score. Results - 27 patients in each group completed the intervention. MST patients were substantially stronger in leg press and abduction than CP patients 3 (43 kg and 3 kg respectively) and 6 months (30 kg and 3 kg respectively) postoperatively (p ≤ 0.002). 1 year postoperatively, no intergroup differences were found. No other statistically significant intergroup differences were found. Interpretation - MST increases muscle strength more than CP in THA patients up to 6 months postoperatively, after 3 months' rehabilitation in clinical practice. It was well tolerated by the THA patients and seems feasible to conduct within regular clinical practice.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/rehabilitation ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Muscle Strength ; Osteoarthritis, Hip/complications ; Osteoarthritis, Hip/rehabilitation ; Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery ; Prospective Studies ; Recovery of Function ; Resistance Training ; Treatment Outcome
    Language English
    Publishing date 2018-03-01
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
    ZDB-ID 2180677-9
    ISSN 1745-3682 ; 1745-3674
    ISSN (online) 1745-3682
    ISSN 1745-3674
    DOI 10.1080/17453674.2018.1441362
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Muscular strength and function after total hip arthroplasty performed with three different surgical approaches: one-year follow-up study.

    Winther, Siri B / Foss, Olav A / Husby, Otto S / Wik, Tina S / Klaksvik, Jomar / Husby, Vigdis S

    Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy

    2018  Volume 29, Issue 4, Page(s) 405–411

    Abstract: Background: Surgical approach influences short-term muscular strength, and leg-strength asymmetry has been demonstrated after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We evaluated muscular strength, physical function and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) ... ...

    Abstract Background: Surgical approach influences short-term muscular strength, and leg-strength asymmetry has been demonstrated after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We evaluated muscular strength, physical function and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) up to 12 months postoperatively, in patients operated on using 3 different surgical approaches.
    Methods: 60 patients scheduled for primary THA were allocated to the direct lateral (DLA), posterior (PA) or anterior (AA) approach. The following parameters were evaluated: leg press and abduction strength, pain, 6-minute walking test, Harris Hip Score and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical Function Shortform (HOOS-PS).
    Results: Abduction strength in the DLA group was significantly more reduced than the PA and AA groups 12 months postoperatively (
    Conclusion: Patients operated via the DLA had reduced muscular strength, HOOS-PS scores and higher pain scores than those who underwent PA and AA type surgery. The non-operated leg was significantly stronger than the operated leg in all groups 6 months postoperatively and this persisted up to 12 months postoperatively for the DLA and AA groups. Clinical Trial Protocol number: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01506024).
    MeSH term(s) Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Muscle Strength ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Postoperative Period ; Treatment Outcome
    Language English
    Publishing date 2018-11-13
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1162513-2
    ISSN 1724-6067 ; 1120-7000
    ISSN (online) 1724-6067
    ISSN 1120-7000
    DOI 10.1177/1120700018810673
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Increasing but levelling out risk of revision due to infection after total hip arthroplasty: a study on 108,854 primary THAs in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 2005 to 2019.

    Dale, Håvard / Høvding, Pål / Tveit, Sindre M / Graff, Julie B / Lutro, Olav / Schrama, Johannes C / Wik, Tina S / Skråmm, Inge / Westberg, Marianne / Fenstad, Anne Marie / Hallan, Geir / Engesaeter, Lars B / Furnes, Ove

    Acta orthopaedica

    2020  Volume 92, Issue 2, Page(s) 208–214

    Abstract: Background and purpose - Focus on prevention, surveillance, and treatment of infection after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the last decade has resulted in new knowledge and guidelines. Previous publications have suggested an increased incidence of ... ...

    Abstract Background and purpose - Focus on prevention, surveillance, and treatment of infection after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the last decade has resulted in new knowledge and guidelines. Previous publications have suggested an increased incidence of surgical revisions due to infection after THA. We assessed whether there have been changes in the risk of revision due to deep infection after primary THAs reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR) over the period 2005-2019.Patients and methods - Primary THAs reported to the NAR from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2019 were included. Adjusted Cox regression analyses with the first revision due to deep infection after primary THA were performed. We investigated changes in the risk of revision as a function of time of primary THA. Time was stratified into 5-year periods. We studied the whole population of THAs, and the subgroups: all-cemented, all-uncemented, reverse hybrid (cemented cup), and hybrid THAs (cemented stem). In addition, we investigated factors that were associated with the risk of revision, and changes in the time span from primary THA to revision.Results - Of the 108,854 primary THAs that met the inclusion criteria, 1,365 (1.3%) were revised due to deep infection. The risk of revision due to infection, at any time after primary surgery, increased through the period studied. Compared with THAs implanted in 2005-2009, the relative risk of revision due to infection was 1.4 (95% CI 1.2-1.7) for 2010-2014, and 1.6 (1.1-1.9) for 2015-2019. We found an increased risk for all types of implant fixation. Compared to 2005-2009, for all THAs, the risk of revision due to infection 0-30 days postoperatively was 2.2 (1.8-2.8) for 2010-2014 and 2.3 (1.8-2.9) for 2015-2019, 31-90 days postoperatively 1.0 (0.7-1.6) for 2010-2014 and 1.6 (1.0-2.5) for 2015-2019, and finally 91 days-1 year postoperatively 1.1 (0.7-1.8) for 2010-2014 and 1.6 (1.0-2.6) for 2015-2019. From 1 to 5 years postoperatively, the risk of revision due to infection was similar to 2005-2009 for both the subsequent time periodsInterpretation - The risk of revision due to deep infection after THA increased throughout the period 2005-2019, but appears to have levelled out after 2010. The increase was mainly due to an increased risk of early revisions, and may partly have been caused by a change of practice rather than a change in the incidence of infection.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Norway/epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications/prevention & control ; Postoperative Complications/surgery ; Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology ; Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control ; Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery ; Registries ; Reoperation ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-11-24
    Publishing country Sweden
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2180677-9
    ISSN 1745-3682 ; 1745-3674
    ISSN (online) 1745-3682
    ISSN 1745-3674
    DOI 10.1080/17453674.2020.1851533
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article: Virus transmission during orthopedic surgery on patients with COVID-19 - a brief narrative review

    Basso, Trude / Dale, Håvard / Langvatn, Håkon / Lønne, Greger / Skråmm, Inge / Westberg, Marianne / Wik, Tina S / Witsø, Eivind

    Acta Orthop

    Abstract: Background and purpose - COVID-19 is among the most impactful pandemics that the society has experienced. Orthopedic surgery involves procedures generating droplets and aerosols and there is concern amongst surgeons that otherwise rational precautionary ... ...

    Abstract Background and purpose - COVID-19 is among the most impactful pandemics that the society has experienced. Orthopedic surgery involves procedures generating droplets and aerosols and there is concern amongst surgeons that otherwise rational precautionary principles are being set aside due to lack of scientific evidence and a shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE). This narrative review attempts to translate relevant knowledge into practical recommendations for healthcare workers involved in orthopedic surgery on patients with known or suspected COVID-19.Patients and methods - We unsystematically searched in PubMed, reference lists, and the WHO's web page for relevant publications concerning problems associated with the PPE used in perioperative practice when a patient is COVID-19 positive or suspected to be. A specific search for literature regarding COVID-19 was extended to include publications from the SARS epidemic in 2002/3.Results - Transmission of infectious viruses from patient to surgeon during surgery is possible, but does not appear to be a considerable problem in clinical practice. Seal-leakage is a problem with surgical masks. Due to the lack of studies and reports, the possibility of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from patient to surgeon during droplet- and aerosol-generating procedures is unknown.Interpretation - Surgical masks should be used only in combination with a widely covering visor and when a respirator (N95, FFP2, P3) is not made available. Furthermore, basic measures to reduce shedding of droplets and aerosols during surgery and correct and consistent use of personal protective equipment is important.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #273482
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

To top