LIVIVO - Das Suchportal für Lebenswissenschaften

switch to English language
Erweiterte Suche

Ihre letzten Suchen

  1. AU="William M. Trochim"
  2. AU="Castrillo, Gabriel"
  3. AU="Molina-Sánchez, José Raúl"
  4. AU="Maestre, Michael"
  5. AU="Kang, Adrian Ez"
  6. AU="Nolan, Mark"
  7. AU="Sangha, Sonia"
  8. AU="Shekhar, Nishant" AU="Shekhar, Nishant"
  9. AU="Barrington, Sally F"
  10. AU="Ríos, D Balaguer"
  11. AU="Aikaterini Emmanouilidi"
  12. AU="Rocha-Filho, Francisco Dário" AU="Rocha-Filho, Francisco Dário"
  13. AU="René F Ketting"
  14. AU="Mohammed, Shabber"
  15. AU="Frösen, Juhana"
  16. AU="Walter, Annette O"
  17. AU=de Groot Yorick J
  18. AU="Sánchez-González, Cristina"

Suchergebnis

Treffer 1 - 5 von insgesamt 5

Suchoptionen

  1. Artikel ; Online: A protocol for retrospective translational science case studies of health interventions

    Sara E. Dodson / Ira Kukic / Linda Scholl / Clara M. Pelfrey / William M. Trochim

    Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, Vol

    2021  Band 5

    Abstract: The critical processes driving successful research translation remain understudied. We describe a mixed-method case study protocol for analyzing translational research that has led to the successful development and implementation of innovative health ... ...

    Abstract The critical processes driving successful research translation remain understudied. We describe a mixed-method case study protocol for analyzing translational research that has led to the successful development and implementation of innovative health interventions. An overarching goal of these case studies is to describe systematically the chain of events between basic, fundamental scientific discoveries and the adoption of evidence-based health applications, including description of varied, long-term impacts. The case study approach isolates many of the key factors that enable the successful translation of research into practice and provides compelling evidence connecting the intervention to measurable changes in health and medical practice, public health outcomes, and other broader societal impacts. The goal of disseminating this protocol is to systematize a rigorous approach, which can enhance reproducibility, promote the development of a large collection of comparable studies, and enable cross-case analyses. This approach, an application of the “science of translational science,” will lead to a better understanding of key research process markers, timelines, and potential points of leverage for intervention that may help facilitate decisions, processes, and policies to speed the sustainable translational process. Case studies are effective communication vehicles to demonstrate both accountability and the impacts of the public’s investment in research.
    Schlagwörter Mixed-method case study ; impact ; translational research evaluation ; translational science ; health intervention ; Medicine ; R
    Thema/Rubrik (Code) 306
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Verlag Cambridge University Press
    Dokumenttyp Artikel ; Online
    Datenquelle BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (Lebenswissenschaftliche Auswahl)

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  2. Artikel ; Online: Opportunities for strengthening CTSA evaluation — CORRIGENDUM

    Tanha Patel / Julie Rainwater / William M. Trochim / Julie T. Elworth / Linda Scholl / Gaurav Dave

    Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, Vol 4, Pp 74-

    2020  Band 74

    Schlagwörter Medicine ; R
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2020-02-01T00:00:00Z
    Verlag Cambridge University Press
    Dokumenttyp Artikel ; Online
    Datenquelle BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (Lebenswissenschaftliche Auswahl)

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  3. Artikel ; Online: Benefits of a college STEM faculty development initiative

    Mary F Durham / Oriana R Aragon / Meghan E Bathgate / Aiyana Bobrownicki / Andrew J Cavanaugh / Xinnian Chen / William M Trochim / Jonathan Waterhouse / Mark J Graham / Brian A Couch

    Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, Vol 21, Iss

    Instructors report increased and sustained implementation of research-based instructional strategies

    2020  Band 2

    Abstract: The Summer Institutes on Scientific Teaching (SI) is a faculty development workshop in which science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) instructors, particularly from biology, are trained in the Scientific Teaching (ST) pedagogy. While ... ...

    Abstract The Summer Institutes on Scientific Teaching (SI) is a faculty development workshop in which science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) instructors, particularly from biology, are trained in the Scientific Teaching (ST) pedagogy. While participants have generally reported positive experiences, we aimed to assess how the SI affected participants’ teaching practices. Building on a previously developed taxonomy of ST practices, we surveyed SI participants from the 2004–2014 SI classes regarding specific ST practices. Participants’ self-reported use and implementation of ST practices increased immediately after SI attendance as well as over a longer time frame, suggesting that implementation persisted and even increased with time. However, instructors reported implementation gains for some practices more than others. The practices with the highest gains were engaging students in their own learning, using learning goals in course design, employing formative assessment, developing overarching course learning goals, representing science as a process, and facilitating group discussion activities. We propose that the ST practices showing the greatest gains may serve as beneficial focal points for professional development programs, while practices with smaller gains may require modified dissemination approaches or support structures.
    Schlagwörter Special aspects of education ; LC8-6691 ; Biology (General) ; QH301-705.5
    Thema/Rubrik (Code) 690
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2020-07-01T00:00:00Z
    Verlag American Society for Microbiology
    Dokumenttyp Artikel ; Online
    Datenquelle BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (Lebenswissenschaftliche Auswahl)

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  4. Artikel ; Online: Benefits of a College STEM Faculty Development Initiative

    Mary F. Durham / Oriana R. Aragón / Meghan E. Bathgate / Aiyana Bobrownicki / Andrew J. Cavanagh / Xinnian Chen / William M. Trochim / Jonathan K. Waterhouse / Mark J. Graham / Brian A. Couch

    Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, Vol 21, Iss

    Instructors Report Increased and Sustained Implementation of Research-Based Instructional Strategies

    2020  Band 2

    Abstract: The Summer Institutes on Scientific Teaching (SI) is a faculty development workshop in which science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) instructors, particularly from biology, are trained in the Scientific Teaching (ST) pedagogy. While ... ...

    Abstract The Summer Institutes on Scientific Teaching (SI) is a faculty development workshop in which science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) instructors, particularly from biology, are trained in the Scientific Teaching (ST) pedagogy. While participants have generally reported positive experiences, we aimed to assess how the SI affected participants’ teaching practices. Building on a previously developed taxonomy of ST practices, we surveyed SI participants from the 2004–2014 SI classes regarding specific ST practices. Participants’ self-reported use and implementation of ST practices increased immediately after SI attendance as well as over a longer time frame, suggesting that implementation persisted and even increased with time. However, instructors reported implementation gains for some practices more than others. The practices with the highest gains were engaging students in their own learning, using learning goals in course design, employing formative assessment, developing overarching course learning goals, representing science as a process, and facilitating group discussion activities. We propose that the ST practices showing the greatest gains may serve as beneficial focal points for professional development programs, while practices with smaller gains may require modified dissemination approaches or support structures.
    Schlagwörter Special aspects of education ; LC8-6691 ; Biology (General) ; QH301-705.5
    Thema/Rubrik (Code) 690
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Verlag American Society for Microbiology
    Dokumenttyp Artikel ; Online
    Datenquelle BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (Lebenswissenschaftliche Auswahl)

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  5. Artikel ; Online: Opportunities for strengthening CTSA evaluation

    Tanha Patel / Julie Rainwater / William M. Trochim / Julie T. Elworth / Linda Scholl / Gaurav Dave / the Members of the CTSA Evaluation Guidelines Working Group

    Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, Vol 3, Pp 59-

    2019  Band 64

    Abstract: The purpose of the article is to describe the progress of the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Program to address the evaluation-related recommendations made by the 2013 Institute of Medicine’s review of the CTSA Program and guidelines ... ...

    Abstract The purpose of the article is to describe the progress of the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Program to address the evaluation-related recommendations made by the 2013 Institute of Medicine’s review of the CTSA Program and guidelines published in CTS Journal the same year (Trochim et al., Clinical and Translational Science 2013; 6(4): 303–309). We utilize data from a 2018 national survey of evaluators administered to all 64 CTSA hubs and a content analysis of the role of evaluation in the CTSA Program Funding Opportunity Announcements to document progress. We present four new opportunities for further strengthening CTSA evaluation efforts: (1) continue to build the collaborative evaluation infrastructure at local and national levels; (2) make better use of existing data; (3) strengthen and augment the common metrics initiative; and (4) pursue internal and external opportunities to evaluate the CTSA program at the national level. This article will be of significant interest to the funders of the CTSA Program and the multiple stakeholders in the larger consortium and will promote dialog from the broad range of CTSA stakeholders about further strengthening the CTSA Program’s evaluation.
    Schlagwörter CTSA ; evaluation ; common metrics ; NCATS ; translational science ; evaluation policy ; Medicine ; R
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2019-06-01T00:00:00Z
    Verlag Cambridge University Press
    Dokumenttyp Artikel ; Online
    Datenquelle BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (Lebenswissenschaftliche Auswahl)

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

Zum Seitenanfang