LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 4 of total 4

Search options

  1. Article: Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Honghua Injection in the Treatment of Coronary Heart Disease Angina Pectoris.

    Zhai, Jiani / Ji, Zhaochen / Jin, Xinyao / Du, Xuechen / Cao, Lujia / Zheng, Wenke

    Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM

    2022  Volume 2022, Page(s) 4537043

    Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of honghua injection combined with western medicine in the treatment of coronary heart disease angina pectoris.: Methods: Computer extensively searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China Biomedical ... ...

    Abstract Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of honghua injection combined with western medicine in the treatment of coronary heart disease angina pectoris.
    Methods: Computer extensively searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China Biomedical Archives (SinoMed), China Knowledge Network (CNKI), Chinese Journal Full-text Database (VIP), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform (Wanfang), and collected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of honghua injection combined with western medicine in the treatment of coronary heart disease angina pectoris. Use Review Manager5.3 software for meta-analysis.
    Results: 21 RCTs were included, involving 1894 participants. Meta-analysis shows that honghua injection combined with western medicine can significantly improve the clinical efficacy (OR = 4.03, 95% CI[2.96,5.49]), electrocardiographic efficacy (OR = 3.39, 95%CI[2.44, 4.70]), can significantly reduce total cholesterol (TC) levels (MD = -0.39, 95% CI[-0.47, -0.31]), triacylglycerol (TG) levels (MD = -0.45, 95% CI[-0.51, -0.39]), increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels (MD = 0.29,95%CI[0.26,0.32]), reduce low-density lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (MD = -0.59, 95%CI[-0.79, -0.38]). Five articles reported adverse reactions.
    Conclusion: Honghua injection combined with western medicine is more effective than western medicine alone in patients with coronary heart disease angina pectoris. More multicenter, large sample, high-quality RCTs are needed to provide evidence.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-05-25
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 2171158-6
    ISSN 1741-4288 ; 1741-427X
    ISSN (online) 1741-4288
    ISSN 1741-427X
    DOI 10.1155/2022/4537043
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article: [Evaluation methods of clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine].

    Zhuang, Ming / An, Jia-Li / Zhong, Meng-Yuan / Wang, Chun-Yang / DU, Xue-Chen / Zhai, Jia-Ni / Zheng, Wen-Ke

    Zhongguo Zhong yao za zhi = Zhongguo zhongyao zazhi = China journal of Chinese materia medica

    2023  Volume 48, Issue 12, Page(s) 3263–3268

    Abstract: Clinical efficacy is the basis for the development of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM), and the evaluation of clinical efficacy of TCM has always been the focus of attention. The technical and methodological difficulties in the evaluation process often ... ...

    Abstract Clinical efficacy is the basis for the development of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM), and the evaluation of clinical efficacy of TCM has always been the focus of attention. The technical and methodological difficulties in the evaluation process often restrict the generation of high-level evidence. Therefore, methodological research should be deepened and innovative practice should be carried out to study the application of scientific research methods in the evaluation of the advantages of TCM. After more than ten years of development, the clinical efficacy evaluation of TCM, on the basis of the initially classic placebo randomized controlled trials, has successively carried out a series of meaningful attempts and explorations in N-of-1 trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, real world studies, narrative medicine studies, systematic evaluation, and other aspects, laying the foundation for the transformation of TCM from "experience" to "evidence". This paper focused on the clinical efficacy evaluation of TCM, summarized the main connotation and development status of efficacy evaluation indicators, standards, and methods, and put forward corresponding countermeasures and suggestions for the problems of indicator selection, standard formulation, and methodology optimization in the research process. It is clear that scientific and objective evaluation of the efficacy of TCM is an urgent problem to be solved at present.
    MeSH term(s) Medicine, Chinese Traditional ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Case-Control Studies ; Narrative Medicine
    Language Chinese
    Publishing date 2023-06-29
    Publishing country China
    Document type English Abstract ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1004649-5
    ISSN 1001-5302 ; 0254-0029
    ISSN 1001-5302 ; 0254-0029
    DOI 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20230219.502
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article: [Problems and thoughts in clinical safety evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine].

    Zhong, Meng-Yuan / Wang, Chun-Yang / Zhuang, Ming / An, Jia-Li / DU, Xue-Chen / Zhai, Jia-Ni / Zheng, Wen-Ke

    Zhongguo Zhong yao za zhi = Zhongguo zhongyao zazhi = China journal of Chinese materia medica

    2023  Volume 48, Issue 12, Page(s) 3404–3408

    Abstract: Amid the modernization and internationalization of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM), the safety of TCM has attracted much attention. At the moment, the government, scientific research teams, and pharmaceutical enterprises have made great efforts to ... ...

    Abstract Amid the modernization and internationalization of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM), the safety of TCM has attracted much attention. At the moment, the government, scientific research teams, and pharmaceutical enterprises have made great efforts to explore methods and techniques for clinical safety evaluation of TCM. Although considerable achievements have been made, there are still many problems, such as the non-standard terms of adverse reactions of TCM, unclear evaluation indicators, unreasonable judgment methods, lack of evaluation models, out-of-date evaluation standards, and unsound reporting systems. Therefore, it is urgent to further deepen the research mode and method of clinical safety evaluation of TCM. Based on the current national requirements for the life-cycle management of drugs, this study focused on the problems in the five dimensions of clinical safety evaluation of TCM, including normative terms, evaluation modes, judgment methods, evaluation standards, and reporting systems, and proposed suggestions on the development of a life-cycle clinical safety evaluation method that conformed to the characteristics of TCM, hoping to provide a reference for future research.
    MeSH term(s) Medicine, Chinese Traditional/standards ; Drug Evaluation/methods ; Drug Evaluation/standards ; Drug Evaluation/trends ; Drug Industry/standards ; Drug Industry/trends ; Research/standards ; Research/trends ; Humans
    Language Chinese
    Publishing date 2023-06-29
    Publishing country China
    Document type English Abstract ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1004649-5
    ISSN 1001-5302 ; 0254-0029
    ISSN 1001-5302 ; 0254-0029
    DOI 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20230123.503
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article: Efficacy and safety of zhibitai in the treatment of hyperlipidemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Wang, Chunyang / Pang, Wentai / Du, Xuechen / Zhai, Jiani / Zhong, Mengyuan / Zhuang, Ming / An, Jiali / Cao, Lujia / Zhang, Li / Zheng, Wenke / Zhang, Junhua

    Frontiers in pharmacology

    2022  Volume 13, Page(s) 974995

    Abstract: Objective: ...

    Abstract Objective:
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-09-02
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Systematic Review
    ZDB-ID 2587355-6
    ISSN 1663-9812
    ISSN 1663-9812
    DOI 10.3389/fphar.2022.974995
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top