Article ; Online: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials with adaptive and traditional group sequential designs - applications in cardiovascular clinical trials.
BMC medical research methodology
2023 Volume 23, Issue 1, Page(s) 200
Abstract: Background: Trial design plays a key role in clinical trials. Traditional group sequential design has been used in cardiovascular clinical trials over decades as the trials can potentially be stopped early, therefore, it can reduce pre-planned sample ... ...
| Abstract | Background: Trial design plays a key role in clinical trials. Traditional group sequential design has been used in cardiovascular clinical trials over decades as the trials can potentially be stopped early, therefore, it can reduce pre-planned sample size and trial resources. In contrast, trials with adoptive designs provide greater flexibility and are more efficient due to the ability to modify trial design according to the interim analysis results. In this systematic review, we aim to explore characteristics of adaptive and traditional group sequential trials in practice and to gain an understanding how these trial designs are currently being reported in cardiology. Methods: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database were searched from January 1980 to June 2022. Randomised controlled phase 2/3 trials with either adaptive or traditional group sequential design in patients with cardiovascular disease were included. Descriptive statistics were used to present the collected data. Results: Of 456 articles found in the initial search, 56 were identified including 43 (76.8%) trials with traditional group sequential design and 13 (23.2%) with adaptive. Most trials were large, multicentre, led by the USA (50%) and Europe (28.6%), and were funded by companies (78.6%). For trials with group sequential design, frequency of interim analyses was determined mainly by the number of events (47%). 67% of the trials stopped early, in which 14 (32.6%) were due to efficacy, and 5 (11.6%) for futility. The commonly used stopping rule to terminate trials was O'Brien- Fleming-type alpha spending function (10 (23.3%)). For trials with adaptive designs, 54% of the trials stopped early, in which 4 (30.8%) were due to futility, and 2 (15.4%) for efficacy. Sample size re-estimation was commonly used (8 (61.5%)). In 69% of the trials, simulation including Bayesian approach was used to define the statistical stopping rules. The adaptive designs have been increasingly used (from 0 to 1999 to 38.6% after 2015 amongst adaptive trials). 25% of the trials reported "adaptive" in abstract or title of the studies. Conclusions: The application of adaptive trials is increasingly popular in cardiovascular clinical trials. The reporting of adaptive design needs improving. |
|---|---|
| MeSH term(s) | Humans ; Bayes Theorem ; Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy ; Computer Simulation ; Data Collection ; Death ; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic |
| Language | English |
| Publishing date | 2023-09-07 |
| Publishing country | England |
| Document type | Systematic Review ; Journal Article |
| ZDB-ID | 2041362-2 |
| ISSN | 1471-2288 ; 1471-2288 |
| ISSN (online) | 1471-2288 |
| ISSN | 1471-2288 |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-023-02024-1 |
| Database | MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE |
More links
Kategorien
Order via subito
This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.