LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 240

Search options

  1. Article: Cost-effectiveness analysis of serplulimab combination therapy versus chemotherapy alone for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

    Zheng, Zhiwei / Chen, Hongcai / Cai, Hongfu

    Frontiers in oncology

    2024  Volume 13, Page(s) 1259574

    Abstract: Background: Serplulimab has shown promising results in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of serplulimab combination therapy compared to chemotherapy alone in patients ... ...

    Abstract Background: Serplulimab has shown promising results in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of serplulimab combination therapy compared to chemotherapy alone in patients with ES-SCLC from the Chinese healthcare system perspective.
    Methods: A partitioned survival model was developed to simulate the costs and outcomes of patients receiving serplulimab combination therapy or chemotherapy alone over a time horizon of 10 years. Data on overall survival, progression-free survival, and adverse events were obtained from the ASTRUM-005 randomized clinical trial. Costs were estimated from a healthcare system perspective and included drug acquisition, administration, monitoring, and management of adverse events. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the impact of uncertainty on the results.
    Results: The base-case analysis showed that the combination of serplulimab and chemotherapy has demonstrated a significant increase in QALYs of 0.626 compared to chemotherapy alone. This improved outcome is accompanied by an additional cost of $10893.995. The ICER for incorporating serplulimab into the treatment regimen is $17402.548 per QALY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the findings. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that serplulimab combination therapy had a 97.40% high probability of being cost-effective compared to chemotherapy alone at the WTP thresholds.
    Conclusion: In contrast to chemotherapy as a standalone treatment, the addition of serplulimab to chemotherapy is believed to offer potential cost-effectiveness as a preferred initial therapeutic approach for patients with ES-SCLC in China.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-01-11
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2649216-7
    ISSN 2234-943X
    ISSN 2234-943X
    DOI 10.3389/fonc.2023.1259574
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Tislelizumab versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

    Zheng, Zhiwei / Lin, Yuxuan / Cai, Hongfu

    Frontiers in public health

    2024  Volume 12, Page(s) 1356244

    Abstract: Objective: The goal of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab and sorafenib as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China.: Methods: A comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken within ... ...

    Abstract Objective: The goal of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab and sorafenib as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China.
    Methods: A comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken within the framework of a partitioned survival model to accurately gage the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of tislelizumab compared to sorafenib. The model incorporated relevant clinical data and all survival rates were from RATIONALE-301 trials. The stability of the partitioned survival model was assessed by performing one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses.
    Results: The total cost incurred for the tislelizumab treatment was $16181.24, whereas the sorafenib was $14306.87. The tislelizumab regimen resulted in a significant increase of 0.18 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and an extra cost of $1874.37 as compared to chemotherapy. The ICER was $10413.17 per QALY, which was found to be below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $37304.34/QALY. The results of the sensitivity analysis found that no fluctuations in any of the factors affected our results, even when these parameters fluctuated.
    Conclusion: Tislelizumab appears to be a cost-effective first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma when compared to sorafenib in China. These findings can inform decision-making processes regarding the selection of the most cost-effective treatment option for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Sorafenib/therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy ; Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use ; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis ; Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
    Chemical Substances Sorafenib (9ZOQ3TZI87) ; tislelizumab (0KVO411B3N) ; Antineoplastic Agents ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-03-18
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2711781-9
    ISSN 2296-2565 ; 2296-2565
    ISSN (online) 2296-2565
    ISSN 2296-2565
    DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1356244
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: The impact and future of edible landscapes on sustainable urban development: A systematic review of the literature

    Zheng, Zhi-Wei / Chou, Rung-Jiun

    Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2023 June, v. 84 p.127930-

    2023  

    Abstract: Edible landscapes provide a series of benefits for the sustainable development of a city, and therefore, in recent years, their development has become a fashion which has stimulated research. However, there is a need for a comprehensive, integrated, ... ...

    Abstract Edible landscapes provide a series of benefits for the sustainable development of a city, and therefore, in recent years, their development has become a fashion which has stimulated research. However, there is a need for a comprehensive, integrated, literature review, to increase people's knowledge of edible landscapes for a sustainable future. Therefore, this paper conducts a systematic review through the Preferred Reporting Initiative for Systematic Evaluation and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). This study was conducted using Web of Science and Google Scholar, and 41 eligible articles were selected from the 2004 articles originally identified from the years 1975–2022. These articles were related to the topics of (1) ecology, (2) food safety, (3) social, economic and healing benefits, (4) construction, and (5) understanding, motivation, and evaluation. The findings suggest that, first, the creation of edible landscapes in different urban areas of the world can have different effects, with most studies showing that the creation of edible landscapes in urban areas can increase ecological diversity. Despite this, some individual studies draw different conclusions. Secondly, most studies show that the development of edible landscapes in urban areas is beneficial for increasing food production and thus improving urban food security, provided that the land is not contaminated. Again, some studies have found that developing edible landscapes in urban areas has social and economic benefits. However, without a reasonable management mechanism, this process is prone to contradictions and thus unproductive. Therefore, urban land policies, land contamination, and management issues in different countries have limited the further development of urban edible landscapes. This study suggests that future research on edible landscapes can be conducted in the areas of land policy, land pollution control, and management mechanisms to solve these problems and promote further development.
    Keywords ecology ; food production ; food safety ; food security ; land policy ; meta-analysis ; motivation ; people ; pollution control ; sustainable development ; systematic review ; urban development ; urban forestry ; Edible landscape ; Sustainability ; Systematic literature review
    Language English
    Dates of publication 2023-06
    Publishing place Elsevier GmbH
    Document type Article ; Online
    Note Pre-press version
    ISSN 1618-8667
    DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127930
    Database NAL-Catalogue (AGRICOLA)

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article: Preoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index Predict Survival in Patients with Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Gastroesophageal Junction: A Retrospective Study Based on Propensity Score Matching Analyses.

    Xu, Siqi / Zhu, Huide / Zheng, Zhiwei

    Cancer management and research

    2023  Volume 15, Page(s) 591–599

    Abstract: Background: This study evaluated the value of PNI to predicting relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with resectable gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (AGE).: Methods: Between 2016 and 2020, there were 236 ... ...

    Abstract Background: This study evaluated the value of PNI to predicting relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with resectable gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (AGE).
    Methods: Between 2016 and 2020, there were 236 resectable AGE patients underwent a retrospective review via propensity score matched (PSM) analysis. The PNI values were computed for each patient prior to surgery [PNI= 10×albumin (gr/dL) + 0.005×total lymphocyte count (mm3)]. By using disease progression and mortality as the end points, a receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was plotted to identify the PNI cut-off value. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used for survival analysis.
    Results: The ROC curve indicated that the ideal cutoff value was 45.60. After propensity score matching, there were 143 patients in our retrospective study, which included 58 patients in the low-PNI group and 85 patients in the high-PNI group. When compared to the low PNI group, the high PNI group substantially increased RFS and OS (p<0.001, p=0.003, respectively) according to the Kaplan-Meier analysis and Log rank test. Advanced pathological N stage (p=0.011) and poor PNI (p=0.004) were also significant risk factors for a shorter OS, according to a univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed that the N0 plus N1 group had an endpoint mortality risk that was 0.39 times lower than the N2 plus N3 group's (p=0.008). In comparison to the high PNI group, the hazard of endpoint mortality was 2.442 times greater in the low PNI group (p = 0.003).
    Conclusion: PNI is a simplistic and practical predictive predictor of the RFS and OS time in patients with resectable AGE.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-07-05
    Publishing country New Zealand
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2508013-1
    ISSN 1179-1322
    ISSN 1179-1322
    DOI 10.2147/CMAR.S415618
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: First-line treatment with durvalumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer in the USA: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

    Zheng, Zhiwei / Fang, Ling / Cai, Hongfu

    BMJ open

    2023  Volume 13, Issue 12, Page(s) e076383

    Abstract: Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab in combination with chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone as first-line therapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the perspective of ...

    Abstract Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab in combination with chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone as first-line therapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the perspective of the US payer.
    Methods: Based on the POSEIDON clinical trial, a partition survival model was developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for the first-line treatment of metastatic NSCLC. The model's primary outcomes were costs, life years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The analysis only considered direct medical costs, and health utility value was determined using published literature. The robustness of the model was tested by probabilistic sensitivity analyses.
    Results: The combination therapy of durvalumab and chemotherapy improved survival by 0.713 QALYs at an incremental cost of $64 104.638 compared with chemotherapy alone, resulting in an ICER of $89 908.328 per QALY gained from the US payer perspective. The combination therapy had a 92.3% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000 per QALY based on incremental net health benefits. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the model's consistency, and none of the parameters significantly influenced the findings.
    Conclusion: Durvalumab in combination with chemotherapy represents a more cost-effective strategy for first-line therapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC in the USA compared with chemotherapy alone.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis ; Lung Neoplasms/therapy ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Clinical Trials as Topic
    Chemical Substances durvalumab (28X28X9OKV)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-12-14
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2599832-8
    ISSN 2044-6055 ; 2044-6055
    ISSN (online) 2044-6055
    ISSN 2044-6055
    DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076383
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article: Cemiplimab combined with chemotherapy

    Zhu, Gaofeng / Cai, Hongfu / Zheng, Zhiwei

    Therapeutic advances in medical oncology

    2023  Volume 15, Page(s) 17588359231213619

    Abstract: Objective: Cemiplimab combined with chemotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Accordingly, this study has been conducted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this combination therapy in ... ...

    Abstract Objective: Cemiplimab combined with chemotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Accordingly, this study has been conducted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this combination therapy in comparison to chemotherapy alone from the perspective of the United States healthcare system.
    Methods: The present study is based on a partitioned survival model developed from clinical data obtained during the 2-year follow-up of the phase III EMPOWER-Lung 3 part 2 trial. The purpose of this investigation is to estimate the 10-year life expectancy and total healthcare costs of patients with advanced NSCLC by leveraging primary outcomes that evaluated costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).To establish the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold for the analysis, a value of $150,000/QALY was adopted. Sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the impact of varying levels of uncertainty on the results of this study.
    Results: When compared to chemotherapy alone, the addition of cemiplimab to chemotherapy has been demonstrated to result in an incremental gain of 1.593 QALY at an additional cost of $109351.298. This equates to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $68644.883/QALY. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted on the model, which acknowledged the influence of several parameters, such as subsequent costs, the utility of progressive disease, the cost of best supportive care, the cost of cemiplimab per mg, and the utility of progression-free survival on the outcomes. Nonetheless, none of these parameters yielded an ICER lower than the WTP threshold.
    Conclusions: From the perspective of the United States healthcare system, the utilization of cemiplimab in combination with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment option for NSCLC appears to be a cost-effective approach as compared to using chemotherapy as a standalone therapy.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-11-22
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2503443-1
    ISSN 1758-8359 ; 1758-8340
    ISSN (online) 1758-8359
    ISSN 1758-8340
    DOI 10.1177/17588359231213619
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer in China.

    Zheng, Zhiwei / Fang, Ling / Cai, Hongfu

    BMC cancer

    2023  Volume 23, Issue 1, Page(s) 823

    Abstract: Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding pembrolizumab to the standard first-line therapy of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) with gemcitabine and cisplatin from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare ... ...

    Abstract Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding pembrolizumab to the standard first-line therapy of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) with gemcitabine and cisplatin from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.
    Methods: The partitioned survival model developed from clinical data obtained in The KEYNOTE-966 trial served as the basis for a simulation in the TreeAge Pro 2011 software. The objective of the research was to estimate the 10-year life expectancy and total healthcare costs of patients with BTC, utilizing primary outcomes that evaluated costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). To establish the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold, the 2022 Chinese per capita gross domestic product (GDP) of $37304.346/QALY was adopted. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis was conducted to ascertain the study's results under varying levels of uncertainty.
    Results: Compared to chemotherapy alone, the addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy has been shown to yield an incremental gain of 0.184 quality-adjusted life years (QALY) at an additional cost of $103940.706. This translates into an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $564895.141/QALY, which exceeds the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold in China. One-way sensitivity analyses performed on the model recognize the utility of PD, subsequent cost, and the cost of Pembrolizumab 100 mg had a major influence on the outcomes. However, no parameter elicited an ICER lower than the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold.
    Conclusions: Based on the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, the utilization of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy as an first-line treatment option for BTC does not appear to be a cost-effective approach compared to chemotherapy as a standalone therapy.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use ; Bile Duct Neoplasms ; China
    Chemical Substances pembrolizumab (DPT0O3T46P) ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-09-04
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2041352-X
    ISSN 1471-2407 ; 1471-2407
    ISSN (online) 1471-2407
    ISSN 1471-2407
    DOI 10.1186/s12885-023-11255-w
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: First-Line Tislelizumab for Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma:A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

    Zheng, Zhiwei / Chen, Hongcai / Cai, Hongfu / Zhu, Huide

    Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research

    2023  Volume 24, Issue 3, Page(s) 397–404

    Abstract: Objective: The primary objective of this current study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of incorporating tislelizumab into the first-line treatment of metastatic or advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in comparison to placebo with ... ...

    Abstract Objective: The primary objective of this current study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of incorporating tislelizumab into the first-line treatment of metastatic or advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in comparison to placebo with chemotherapy.
    Method: We conducted a partitioned survival model with a time horizon of 10 years from a Chinese perspective. The direct medical costs were collected from the local setting in China. To enhance the credibility and robustness of the findings, sensitivity analyses were also conducted.
    Results: The inclusion of tislelizumab in conjunction with chemotherapy was shown to significantly enhance quality-adjusted life years (QALY) by 0.328 when compared to chemotherapy alone. This improvement comes at an additional cost of $9833.694. The incorporation of tislelizumab into the treatment regimen for advanced ESCC results in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $29980.774/QALY gained, which falls below the WTP threshold of $37304.346/QALY in China. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that no parameters were found to be adjustable within a specific range without altering the overall outcomes of our study.
    Conclusion: Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic ESCC is may be a cost-effective option compared to chemotherapy alone.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis ; Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/drug therapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
    Chemical Substances tislelizumab (0KVO411B3N) ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-12-06
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2208481-2
    ISSN 1744-8379 ; 1473-7167
    ISSN (online) 1744-8379
    ISSN 1473-7167
    DOI 10.1080/14737167.2023.2290609
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Economic evaluation of toripalimab plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China.

    Zheng, Zhiwei / Fang, Ling / Cai, Hongfu / Zhu, Huide

    Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research

    2023  Volume 23, Issue 6, Page(s) 683–690

    Abstract: Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of toripalimab versus Chemotherapy for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.: Methods: A ... ...

    Abstract Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of toripalimab versus Chemotherapy for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.
    Methods: A partitioned survival model was designed. Clinical data on survival was taken from the JUPITER-06 trials. Direct medical expenditures and utilities were gathered from published literature and a local database. One-way and probability sensitivity methods were used to evaluate the model's robustness.
    Results: Compared with chemotherapy alone, toripalimab offered an incremental cost of $8950.427 with an additional 0.294 QALYs, yielding an ICER of 30,443.629$/QALYs first-line therapy for advanced ESCC. The ICER was below the threshold of willingness to pay in China, indicating that the toripalimab group had a cost-effective advantage. Sensitivity analysis showed that the ICERs were most sensitive to the utility of PD, but all the parameters had no significant impact on the model's outcomes.
    Conclusion: Toripalimab may be a cost-effective first-line treatment choice in our research when compared to chemotherapy alone for patients with advanced ESCC.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/drug therapy ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy ; Markov Chains ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
    Chemical Substances toripalimab (8JXN261VVA)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-04-24
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2208481-2
    ISSN 1744-8379 ; 1473-7167
    ISSN (online) 1744-8379
    ISSN 1473-7167
    DOI 10.1080/14737167.2023.2206570
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus chemotherapy treated in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on the DESTINY-Breast02 trial.

    Zheng, Zhiwei / Chen, Hongcai / Cai, Hongfu / Xu, Siqi

    Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research

    2023  Volume 24, Issue 3, Page(s) 387–395

    Abstract: Objectives: This study aims to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab deruxtecan versus chemotherapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.: Methods: A three-state partitioned ... ...

    Abstract Objectives: This study aims to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab deruxtecan versus chemotherapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.
    Methods: A three-state partitioned survival model was constructed to simulate the treatment. The analysis yielded information on the costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sensitivity analyses have been carried out to scrutinize the model's uncertainties.
    Results: The total cost for the trastuzumab deruxtecan group was found to be $228601.57, while the chemotherapy group incurred a total cost of $84901.38. It was found that the trastuzumab deruxtecan group exhibited an incremental gain of 2.95 QALYs in comparison to the chemotherapy group. However, this additional benefit came at an additional cost of $143700.19 for the trastuzumab deruxtecan treatment, calculated in the ICER at $48711.93/QALY, which surpasses the willingness-to-pay threshold of $37304.34/QALY in China. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the results were robust to variations in key parameters and assumptions.
    Conclusion: Trastuzumab deruxtecan was not a cost-effective treatment option for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in China. However, the use of trastuzumab deruxtecan may offer a cost-effective treatment alternative provided that its price is diminished.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Female ; Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy ; Breast Neoplasms/pathology ; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis ; Receptor, ErbB-2 ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Trastuzumab ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives ; Immunoconjugates
    Chemical Substances trastuzumab deruxtecan (5384HK7574) ; Receptor, ErbB-2 (EC 2.7.10.1) ; Trastuzumab (P188ANX8CK) ; Camptothecin (XT3Z54Z28A) ; Immunoconjugates
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-12-06
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2208481-2
    ISSN 1744-8379 ; 1473-7167
    ISSN (online) 1744-8379
    ISSN 1473-7167
    DOI 10.1080/14737167.2023.2291157
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top