LIVIVO - Das Suchportal für Lebenswissenschaften

switch to English language
Erweiterte Suche

Suchergebnis

Treffer 1 - 1 von insgesamt 1

Suchoptionen

Artikel ; Online: Comparison of the kinetics and magnitude of antibody responses to different SARS-CoV-2 proteins in Sinopharm/BBIBP-CorV vaccinees following the BNT162b2 booster or natural infection.

Jeewandara, Chandima / Aberathna, Inoka Sepali / Dayarathna, Shashika / Nimasha, Thashmi / Ranasinghe, Thushali / Jayamali, Jeewantha / Kamaladasa, Achala / Karunanada, Maneshka / Perera, Lahiru / Ogg, Graham S / Malavige, Gathsaurie Neelika

PloS one

2022  Band 17, Heft 10, Seite(n) e0274845

Abstract: The kinetics and magnitude of antibody responses to different proteins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in Sinopharm/BBIBP-CorV vaccinees has not been previously studied. Therefore, we investigated antibody responses to different SARS-CoV-2 proteins at 2 weeks, 3 ...

Abstract The kinetics and magnitude of antibody responses to different proteins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in Sinopharm/BBIBP-CorV vaccinees has not been previously studied. Therefore, we investigated antibody responses to different SARS-CoV-2 proteins at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-second dose in previously infected (n = 20) and uninfected (n = 20) Sinopharm/BBIBP-CorV vaccinees. The IgG antibodies to the S, S1 and S2 and N were several folds higher in those who had natural infection compared to uninfected individuals at all time points. We then compared the persistence of antibody responses and effect of natural omicron infection or BNT162b2 booster in Sinopharm/BBIBP-CorV vaccinees. We measured the total antibodies to the RBD, ACE2 blocking antibodies and antibody responses to different SARS-CoV-2 proteins in Sinopharm vaccinees at 7 months post second dose, including those who remained uninfected and not boosted (n = 21), or those who had previous infection and who did not obtain the booster (n = 17), those who were not infected, but who received a BNT162b2 booster (n = 30), or those who did not receive the booster but were infected with omicron (n = 29). At 7 months post second dose uninfected (no booster) had the lowest antibody levels to the RBD, while omicron infected vaccinees showed significantly higher anti-RBD antibody levels (p = 0.04) than vaccinees who received the booster. Only 3/21 cohort A (14.3%) had ACE2 blocking antibodies, while higher frequencies were observed in naturally infected individuals (100%), those who received the booster (18/21, 85.7%), and omicron infected individuals (100%). Pre-vaccination, naturally infected had the highest antibody levels to the N protein. These data suggest that those previously infected Sinopharm/BBIBP-CorV vaccinees have a robust antibody response, 7 months post vaccination, while vaccinees who were naturally infected with omicron had a similar immune response to those who received the booster. It will be important to investigate implications for subsequent clinical protection.
Mesh-Begriff(e) Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 ; Antibodies, Blocking ; Antibodies, Viral ; Antibody Formation ; BNT162 Vaccine ; COVID-19 ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin G ; SARS-CoV-2
Chemische Substanzen Antibodies, Blocking ; Antibodies, Viral ; Immunoglobulin G ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (EC 3.4.17.23) ; BNT162 Vaccine (N38TVC63NU)
Sprache Englisch
Erscheinungsdatum 2022-10-13
Erscheinungsland United States
Dokumenttyp Comparative Study ; Journal Article
ZDB-ID 2267670-3
ISSN 1932-6203 ; 1932-6203
ISSN (online) 1932-6203
ISSN 1932-6203
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0274845
Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

Zusatzmaterialien

Kategorien

Zum Seitenanfang