LIVIVO - Das Suchportal für Lebenswissenschaften

switch to English language
Erweiterte Suche

Suchergebnis

Treffer 1 - 5 von insgesamt 5

Suchoptionen

  1. Artikel ; Online: Truth sensitivity and partisan bias in responses to misinformation.

    Gawronski, Bertram / Ng, Nyx L / Luke, Dillon M

    Journal of experimental psychology. General

    2023  Band 152, Heft 8, Seite(n) 2205–2236

    Abstract: Misinformation represents one of the greatest challenges for the functioning of societies in the information age. Drawing on a signal-detection framework, the current research investigated two distinct aspects of misinformation susceptibility: ...

    Abstract Misinformation represents one of the greatest challenges for the functioning of societies in the information age. Drawing on a signal-detection framework, the current research investigated two distinct aspects of misinformation susceptibility:
    Mesh-Begriff(e) Humans ; Communication ; Judgment ; Bias
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2023-03-27
    Erscheinungsland United States
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 189732-9
    ISSN 1939-2222 ; 0096-3445
    ISSN (online) 1939-2222
    ISSN 0096-3445
    DOI 10.1037/xge0001381
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

    Verfügbar in ZB MED Köln/Königswinter

    Zs.A 2255: Hefte anzeigen Standort:
    Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
    bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
    Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (1.OG)
    ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)

    Über subito bestellen

    Dieser Service ist kostenpflichtig (siehe Lieferbedingungen von subito). Bestellungen, die einen Artikel nebst Supplementary Material umfassen, werden grundsätzlich wie mehrfache Bestellungen bearbeitet. Gebühren fallen in diesen Fällen für jede einzelne Bestellung an.

  2. Artikel ; Online: Thinking About Reasons for One's Choices Increases Sensitivity to Moral Norms in Moral-Dilemma Judgments.

    Ng, Nyx L / Luke, Dillon M / Gawronski, Bertram

    Personality & social psychology bulletin

    2023  , Seite(n) 1461672231180760

    Abstract: Whereas norm-conforming (deontological) judgments have been claimed to be rooted in automatic emotional responses, outcome-maximizing (utilitarian) judgments are assumed to require reflective reasoning. Using the CNI model to disentangle factors ... ...

    Abstract Whereas norm-conforming (deontological) judgments have been claimed to be rooted in automatic emotional responses, outcome-maximizing (utilitarian) judgments are assumed to require reflective reasoning. Using the CNI model to disentangle factors underlying moral-dilemma judgments, the current research investigated effects of thinking about reasons on sensitivity to consequences, sensitivity to moral norms, and general action preferences. Three experiments (two preregistered) found that thinking about reasons (vs. responding intuitively or thinking about intuitions) reliably increased sensitivity to moral norms independent of processing time. Thinking about reasons had no reproducible effects on sensitivity to consequences and general action preferences. The results suggest that norm-conforming responses in moral dilemmas can arise from reflective thoughts about reasons, challenging the modal view on the role of cognitive reflection in moral-dilemma judgment. The findings highlight the importance of distinguishing between degree (high vs. low elaboration) and content (intuitions vs. reasons) as distinct aspects of cognitive reflection.
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2023-06-29
    Erscheinungsland United States
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2047603-6
    ISSN 1552-7433 ; 0146-1672
    ISSN (online) 1552-7433
    ISSN 0146-1672
    DOI 10.1177/01461672231180760
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

    Über subito bestellen

    Dieser Service ist kostenpflichtig (siehe Lieferbedingungen von subito). Bestellungen, die einen Artikel nebst Supplementary Material umfassen, werden grundsätzlich wie mehrfache Bestellungen bearbeitet. Gebühren fallen in diesen Fällen für jede einzelne Bestellung an.

  3. Artikel ; Online: Political Ideology and Moral Dilemma Judgments: An Analysis Using the CNI Model.

    Luke, Dillon M / Gawronski, Bertram

    Personality & social psychology bulletin

    2021  Band 47, Heft 10, Seite(n) 1520–1531

    Abstract: Many real-world dilemmas involve disagreement about whether decisions should follow moral norms in an unconditional manner ( ...

    Abstract Many real-world dilemmas involve disagreement about whether decisions should follow moral norms in an unconditional manner (
    Mesh-Begriff(e) Dissent and Disputes ; Ethical Theory ; Humans ; Judgment ; Morals ; Politics
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2021-02-22
    Erscheinungsland United States
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
    ZDB-ID 2047603-6
    ISSN 1552-7433 ; 0146-1672
    ISSN (online) 1552-7433
    ISSN 0146-1672
    DOI 10.1177/0146167220987990
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

    Über subito bestellen

    Dieser Service ist kostenpflichtig (siehe Lieferbedingungen von subito). Bestellungen, die einen Artikel nebst Supplementary Material umfassen, werden grundsätzlich wie mehrfache Bestellungen bearbeitet. Gebühren fallen in diesen Fällen für jede einzelne Bestellung an.

  4. Artikel ; Online: Temporal Stability of Moral Dilemma Judgments: A Longitudinal Analysis Using the CNI Model.

    Luke, Dillon M / Gawronski, Bertram

    Personality & social psychology bulletin

    2021  Band 48, Heft 8, Seite(n) 1191–1203

    Abstract: Although moral dilemma judgments are influenced by a variety of situational factors, there is evidence for considerable disagreement between individuals. Using the CNI model to disentangle (a) sensitivity to consequences, (b) sensitivity to moral norms, ... ...

    Abstract Although moral dilemma judgments are influenced by a variety of situational factors, there is evidence for considerable disagreement between individuals. Using the CNI model to disentangle (a) sensitivity to consequences, (b) sensitivity to moral norms, and (c) general preference for inaction versus action in responses to moral dilemmas, the current research examined the temporal stability of individual differences along the three dimensions. Across two time points 1 month apart, sensitivity to consequences (
    Mesh-Begriff(e) Dissent and Disputes ; Ethical Theory ; Humans ; Individuality ; Judgment/physiology ; Morals
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2021-08-01
    Erscheinungsland United States
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
    ZDB-ID 2047603-6
    ISSN 1552-7433 ; 0146-1672
    ISSN (online) 1552-7433
    ISSN 0146-1672
    DOI 10.1177/01461672211035024
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

    Über subito bestellen

    Dieser Service ist kostenpflichtig (siehe Lieferbedingungen von subito). Bestellungen, die einen Artikel nebst Supplementary Material umfassen, werden grundsätzlich wie mehrfache Bestellungen bearbeitet. Gebühren fallen in diesen Fällen für jede einzelne Bestellung an.

  5. Artikel ; Online: Consensus, controversy, and chaos in the attribution of characteristics to the morally exceptional.

    Fleeson, William / Furr, R Michael / Jayawickreme, Eranda / Luke, Dillon / Prentice, Mike / Reynolds, Caleb J / Parham, Ashley Hawkins

    Journal of personality

    2023  Band 92, Heft 3, Seite(n) 715–734

    Abstract: Objective: What do people see as distinguishing the morally exceptional from others? To handle the problem that people may disagree about who qualifies as morally exceptional, we asked subjects to select and rate their own examples of morally ... ...

    Abstract Objective: What do people see as distinguishing the morally exceptional from others? To handle the problem that people may disagree about who qualifies as morally exceptional, we asked subjects to select and rate their own examples of morally exceptional, morally average, and immoral people.
    Method: Subjects rated each selected exemplar on several enablers of moral action and several directions of moral action. By applying the logic underlying stimulus sampling in experimental design, we evaluated perceivers' level of agreement about the characteristics of the morally exceptional, even though perceivers rated different targets.
    Results: Across three studies, there was strong subjective consensus on who is morally exceptional: those who are empathetic and prone to guilt, those who reflect on moral issues and identify with morality, those who have self-control and actually enact moral behaviors, and those who care about harm, compassion, fairness, and honesty. Deep controversies also existed about the moral directions pursued by those seen as morally exceptional: People evaluated those who pursued similar values and made similar decisions more favorably.
    Conclusion: Strong consensus suggests characteristics that may push a person to go beyond normal expectations, that the study of moral exceptionality is not overly hindered by disagreement over who is morally exceptional, and that there is some common ground between disagreeing camps.
    Mesh-Begriff(e) Humans ; Morals ; Female ; Male ; Consensus ; Adult ; Social Perception ; Young Adult
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2023-08-08
    Erscheinungsland United States
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 420745-2
    ISSN 1467-6494 ; 0022-3506
    ISSN (online) 1467-6494
    ISSN 0022-3506
    DOI 10.1111/jopy.12867
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Volltext online

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

    Verfügbar in ZB MED Köln/Königswinter

    Zs.A 1363: Hefte anzeigen Standort:
    Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
    bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
    Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (1.OG)
    ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)

    Über subito bestellen

    Dieser Service ist kostenpflichtig (siehe Lieferbedingungen von subito). Bestellungen, die einen Artikel nebst Supplementary Material umfassen, werden grundsätzlich wie mehrfache Bestellungen bearbeitet. Gebühren fallen in diesen Fällen für jede einzelne Bestellung an.

Zum Seitenanfang