LIVIVO - Das Suchportal für Lebenswissenschaften

switch to English language
Erweiterte Suche

Ihre letzten Suchen

  1. AU="Mainstone, Penelope"
  2. AU="Andrew W. Taylor"

Suchergebnis

Treffer 1 - 3 von insgesamt 3

Suchoptionen

  1. Artikel ; Online: Understanding experiences, unmet needs and priorities related to post-stroke aphasia care: stage one of an experience-based co-design project.

    Anemaat, Lisa N / Palmer, Victoria J / Copland, David A / Binge, Geoffrey / Druery, Kent / Druery, Julia / Mainstone, Kathryn / Aisthorpe, Bruce / Mainstone, Penelope / Burton, Bridget / Wallace, Sarah J

    BMJ open

    2024  Band 14, Heft 5, Seite(n) e081680

    Abstract: Objective: People with post-stroke aphasia (language/communication impairment) and their supporters report mixed satisfaction with stroke and aphasia care. To date, however, their journey of care and the key service interactions that shape their ... ...

    Abstract Objective: People with post-stroke aphasia (language/communication impairment) and their supporters report mixed satisfaction with stroke and aphasia care. To date, however, their journey of care and the key service interactions that shape their experience have not been comprehensively explored. We aimed to investigate the lived experience of post-stroke aphasia care, across the continuum of care and by geographical location, to establish priorities for service design.
    Design: This is the first stage of an experience-based co-design study. We purposively sampled people with aphasia (PWA) and significant others (SOs) across 21 hospital and health service sites, community groups and by self-referral. Participants shared experiences of care in online interviews and focus groups. Touchpoints (key moments that shape experience) and unmet needs were identified using qualitative thematic analysis. Priorities for service design were established using an adapted nominal group technique.
    Setting: Sites spanned remote, regional and metropolitan areas in Queensland, Australia.
    Participants: PWA (n=32; mild=56%; moderate=31%; severe=13%) and SOs (n=30) shared 124 experiences of acute, rehabilitation and community-based care in 23 focus groups and 13 interviews.
    Results: Both positive and negative healthcare experiences occurred most frequently in hospital settings. Negative experiences regularly related to communication with health professionals, while positive experiences related to the interpersonal qualities of healthcare providers (eg, providing hope) for PWA, or witnessing good rapport between a PWA and their health professional for SOs. To improve services, PWA prioritised communicatively accessible education and information and SOs prioritised access to psychological and peer support.
    Conclusions: We identified key aspects of post-stroke aphasia care that shape experience. The needs of PWA and SOs may be better met through health professional training in supported communication, increased service availability in regional and remote areas, communication-accessible hospital environments, increased access to psychological and peer support, and meaningful involvement of SOs in rehabilitation.
    Mesh-Begriff(e) Humans ; Aphasia/etiology ; Aphasia/rehabilitation ; Aphasia/therapy ; Female ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Focus Groups ; Stroke/complications ; Stroke Rehabilitation/methods ; Queensland ; Adult ; Qualitative Research ; Health Services Needs and Demand ; Aged, 80 and over ; Patient Satisfaction
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2024-05-20
    Erscheinungsland England
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2599832-8
    ISSN 2044-6055 ; 2044-6055
    ISSN (online) 2044-6055
    ISSN 2044-6055
    DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081680
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  2. Artikel ; Online: Comprehensive quality assessment for aphasia rehabilitation after stroke: protocol for a multicentre, mixed-methods study.

    Harvey, Sam / Stone, Marissa / Zingelman, Sally / Copland, David A / Kilkenny, Monique F / Godecke, Erin / Cadilhac, Dominique A / Kim, Joosup / Olaiya, Muideen T / Rose, Miranda L / Breitenstein, Caterina / Shrubsole, Kirstine / O'Halloran, Robyn / Hill, Annie J / Hersh, Deborah / Mainstone, Kathryn / Mainstone, Penelope / Unsworth, Carolyn A / Brogan, Emily /
    Short, Kylie J / Burns, Clare L / Baker, Caroline / Wallace, Sarah J

    BMJ open

    2024  Band 14, Heft 3, Seite(n) e080532

    Abstract: Introduction: People with aphasia following stroke experience disproportionally poor outcomes, yet there is no comprehensive approach to measuring the quality of aphasia services. The Meaningful Evaluation of Aphasia SeRvicES (MEASuRES) minimum dataset ... ...

    Abstract Introduction: People with aphasia following stroke experience disproportionally poor outcomes, yet there is no comprehensive approach to measuring the quality of aphasia services. The Meaningful Evaluation of Aphasia SeRvicES (MEASuRES) minimum dataset was developed in partnership with people with lived experience of aphasia, clinicians and researchers to address this gap. It comprises sociodemographic characteristics, quality indicators, treatment descriptors and outcome measurement instruments. We present a protocol to pilot the MEASuRES minimum dataset in clinical practice, describe the factors that hinder or support implementation and determine meaningful thresholds of clinical change for core outcome measurement instruments.
    Methods and analysis: This research aims to deliver a comprehensive quality assessment toolkit for poststroke aphasia services in four studies. A multicentre pilot study (study 1) will test the administration of the MEASuRES minimum dataset within five Australian health services. An embedded mixed-methods process evaluation (study 2) will evaluate the performance of the minimum dataset and explore its clinical applicability. A consensus study (study 3) will establish consumer-informed thresholds of meaningful change on core aphasia outcome constructs, which will then be used to establish minimal important change values for corresponding core outcome measurement instruments (study 4).
    Ethics and dissemination: Studies 1 and 2 have been registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12623001313628). Ethics approval has been obtained from the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (HREC/2023/MNHB/95293) and The University of Queensland (2022/HE001946 and 2023/HE001175). Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and engagement with relevant stakeholders including healthcare providers, policy-makers, stroke and rehabilitation audit and clinical quality registry custodians, consumer support organisations, and individuals with aphasia and their families.
    Mesh-Begriff(e) Female ; Humans ; Pilot Projects ; Quality of Life ; Australia ; Stroke/complications ; Stroke/therapy ; Aphasia/rehabilitation ; Stroke Rehabilitation ; Multicenter Studies as Topic
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2024-03-21
    Erscheinungsland England
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2599832-8
    ISSN 2044-6055 ; 2044-6055
    ISSN (online) 2044-6055
    ISSN 2044-6055
    DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080532
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  3. Artikel ; Online: Using experience-based codesign to coproduce aphasia rehabilitation services: study protocol.

    Anemaat, Lisa / Palmer, Victoria J / Copland, David A / Mainstone, Kathryn / Druery, Kent / Druery, Julia / Aisthorpe, Bruce / Binge, Geoffrey / Mainstone, Penelope / Wallace, Sarah J

    BMJ open

    2021  Band 11, Heft 11, Seite(n) e047398

    Abstract: Introduction: Aphasia is an impairment of language that occurs in 30%-40% of stroke survivors. This often chronic condition results in poor outcomes for the individual with aphasia and their family. Long-term aphasia management is limited, with few ... ...

    Abstract Introduction: Aphasia is an impairment of language that occurs in 30%-40% of stroke survivors. This often chronic condition results in poor outcomes for the individual with aphasia and their family. Long-term aphasia management is limited, with few people receiving sufficient services by 6-12 months postonset. We present a protocol for the development of coproduced aphasia service elements. We will use experience-based codesign (EBCD), an approach that enables service users and providers to collaboratively develop services and care pathways. Drawing on the experiences of people with aphasia, their families and clinicians we will establish priorities for the development of new services and later work together to codesign them.
    Methods and analysis: This research will be coproduced with people with aphasia (n=30-60), their families (n=30-60) and speech pathologists (n=30-60) in Queensland, Australia, using EBCD. A consumer advisory committee will provide oversight and advice throughout the research. In phase 1, we will use semistructured interviews and the nominal group technique to explore experiences and unmet needs in aphasia rehabilitation. Data will be analysed using thematic analysis and the resulting themes will be prioritised in multistakeholder focus groups. Outcomes of phase 1 will inform future research (phase 2) to codesign services. Financial costs and participant experiences of EBCD will be measured.
    Ethics and dissemination: Human Research Ethics Committee approval for phase 1 has been obtained (HREC/2020/QRBW/61368). Results will be reported in peer-reviewed journal articles, presented at relevant conferences and, following EBCD suggested best practice, fed back to participants and community members at a celebratory event at completion of the project. The inclusion of service users in all stages of research will facilitate an integrated approach to knowledge translation. A summary of research findings will be made available to participating sites.
    Mesh-Begriff(e) Allied Health Personnel ; Aphasia/etiology ; Chronic Disease ; Humans ; Stroke ; Translational Science, Biomedical
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2021-11-18
    Erscheinungsland England
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2599832-8
    ISSN 2044-6055 ; 2044-6055
    ISSN (online) 2044-6055
    ISSN 2044-6055
    DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047398
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

Zum Seitenanfang