LIVIVO - Das Suchportal für Lebenswissenschaften

switch to English language
Erweiterte Suche

Suchergebnis

Treffer 1 - 4 von insgesamt 4

Suchoptionen

  1. Artikel: Sex, Lies, and Coronary Artery Disease.

    Martínez-Sellés, Helena / Martínez-Sellés, David / Martínez-Sellés, Manuel

    Journal of clinical medicine

    2021  Band 10, Heft 14

    Abstract: Epidemiological and clinical data have shown clear differences in several aspects of cardiovascular disease, particularly in the case of coronary artery disease (CAD), between men and women, including risk factors, response to therapy, quality of care, ... ...

    Abstract Epidemiological and clinical data have shown clear differences in several aspects of cardiovascular disease, particularly in the case of coronary artery disease (CAD), between men and women, including risk factors, response to therapy, quality of care, and natural history.[...].
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2021-07-15
    Erscheinungsland Switzerland
    Dokumenttyp Editorial
    ZDB-ID 2662592-1
    ISSN 2077-0383
    ISSN 2077-0383
    DOI 10.3390/jcm10143114
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  2. Artikel ; Online: Ethical Issues in Decision-making Regarding the Elderly Affected by Coronavirus Disease 2019: An Expert Opinion.

    Martínez-Sellés, David / Martínez-Sellés, Helena / Martinez-Sellés, Manuel

    European cardiology

    2020  Band 15, Seite(n) e48

    Abstract: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is resulting in ethical decisions regarding resource allocation. Prioritisation reflects established practices that regulate the distribution of finite resources when demand exceeds supply. However, ... ...

    Abstract The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is resulting in ethical decisions regarding resource allocation. Prioritisation reflects established practices that regulate the distribution of finite resources when demand exceeds supply. However, discrimination based on sex, race or age has no role in prioritisation unless clearly justified. The risk posed by COVID-19 is higher for elderly people than for younger people, so older adults should be prioritised in preventive measures. In the case of people who already have COVID-19, healthcare professionals might prioritise those most likely to survive. Making decisions based on chronological age alone is not justified; in addition to age, other aspects that determine theoretical life expectancy must be taken into account. Individualised correct prioritisation in the allocation of scarce resources is essential to good clinical practice.
    Schlagwörter covid19
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2020-05-18
    Erscheinungsland England
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article ; Review
    ISSN 1758-3764
    ISSN (online) 1758-3764
    DOI 10.15420/ecr.2020.14
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  3. Artikel ; Online: Ethical Issues in Decision-making Regarding the Elderly Affected by Coronavirus Disease 2019

    Martínez-Sellés, David / Martínez-Sellés, Helena / Martínez-Sellés, Manuel

    European Cardiology Review

    An Expert Opinion

    2020  Band 15

    Abstract: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is resulting in ethical decisions regarding resource allocation. Prioritisation reflects established practices that regulate the distribution of finite resources when demand exceeds supply. However, ... ...

    Abstract The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is resulting in ethical decisions regarding resource allocation. Prioritisation reflects established practices that regulate the distribution of finite resources when demand exceeds supply. However, discrimination based on sex, race or age has no role in prioritisation unless clearly justified. The risk posed by COVID-19 is higher for elderly people than for younger people, so older adults should be prioritised in preventive measures. In the case of people who already have COVID-19, healthcare professionals might prioritise those most likely to survive. Making decisions based on chronological age alone is not justified; in addition to age, other aspects that determine theoretical life expectancy must be taken into account. Individualised correct prioritisation in the allocation of scarce resources is essential to good clinical practice.
    Schlagwörter Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ; covid19
    Sprache Englisch
    Verlag Radcliffe Group Ltd
    Erscheinungsland uk
    Dokumenttyp Artikel ; Online
    ISSN 1758-3764
    DOI 10.15420/ecr.2020.14
    Datenquelle BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (Lebenswissenschaftliche Auswahl)

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  4. Artikel ; Online: Ethical Issues in Decision-making Regarding the Elderly Affected by Coronavirus Disease 2019

    Martínez Sellés, David / Martínez Sellés, Helena / Martínez Sellés Oliveria Soares, Manuel

    An Expert Opinion

    2020  

    Abstract: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is resulting in ethical decisions regarding resource allocation. Prioritisation reflects established practices that regulate the distribution of finite resources when demand exceeds supply. However, ... ...

    Abstract The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is resulting in ethical decisions regarding resource allocation. Prioritisation reflects established practices that regulate the distribution of finite resources when demand exceeds supply. However, discrimination based on sex, race or age has no role in prioritisation unless clearly justified. The risk posed by COVID-19 is higher for elderly people than for younger people, so older adults should be prioritised in preventive measures. In the case of people who already have COVID-19, healthcare professionals might prioritise those most likely to survive. Making decisions based on chronological age alone is not justified; in addition to age, other aspects that determine theoretical life expectancy must be taken into account. Individualised correct prioritisation in the allocation of scarce resources is essential to good clinical practice.

    SIN FINANCIACIÓN

    0.366 SJR (2019) Q3, 227/362 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

    UEM
    Schlagwörter Epidemias ; Ética médica ; COVID-19 ; Epidemia ; Virus ; covid19
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsland es
    Dokumenttyp Artikel ; Online
    Datenquelle BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (Lebenswissenschaftliche Auswahl)

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

Zum Seitenanfang