LIVIVO - Das Suchportal für Lebenswissenschaften

switch to English language
Erweiterte Suche

Suchergebnis

Treffer 1 - 1 von insgesamt 1

Suchoptionen

Artikel ; Online: Efficacy of Repeated Low-Level Red Light (RLRL) therapy on myopia outcomes in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Youssef, Mohamed Ashraf / Shehata, Ahmed Ragab / Adly, Ahmed Moataz / Ahmed, Mohamed Ragab / Abo-Bakr, Hoda Fahmy / Fawzy, Rehab Mahmoud / Gouda, Ahmed Taha

BMC ophthalmology

2024  Band 24, Heft 1, Seite(n) 78

Abstract: Background: Myopia is the most prevalent form of refractive error that has a major negative impact on visual function and causes blurring of vision. We aimed to determine if Repeated Low-Level Red Light (RLRL) treatment is beneficial in treating ... ...

Abstract Background: Myopia is the most prevalent form of refractive error that has a major negative impact on visual function and causes blurring of vision. We aimed to determine if Repeated Low-Level Red Light (RLRL) treatment is beneficial in treating childhood myopia in terms of axial length (AL), spherical equivalent refraction (SER), and sub foveal choroidal thickness (SFCT).
Methods: This systematic review was performed on RLRL for treatment of myopia in children compared to single vision spectacles (SVS). We employed the search strategy with key terms myopia and low-level light therapy then we searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. The mean differences (MD) were used to evaluate the treatment effects. Heterogeneity was quantified using I
Results: Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in our meta-analysis with a total of 833 patients, 407 in treatment group and 426 in control group. At a 3 month follow up period, pooled studies show a statistical difference in AL between RLRL and SVS group (MD = -0.16; 95% CI [-0.19, -0.12], SER (MD = 0.33; 95% CI [0.27, 0.38]), and SFCT (MD = 43.65; 95% CI [23.72, 45.58]). At a 6 month follow up period, pooled studies show a statistical difference in AL between RLRL and SVS group (MD = -0.21; 95% CI [-0.28, -0.15]), SER (MD = 0.46; 95% CI [0.26, 0.65]), and SFCT (MD = 25.07; 95% CI [18.18, 31.95]). At a 12 month follow up period, pooled studies show a statistical difference in AL between RLRL and SVS group (MD = -0.31; 95% CI [-0.42, -0.19]) and SER (MD = 0.63; 95% CI [0.52, 0.73]).
Conclusion: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis investigating only RCTs evidence supporting the efficacy of 650 nm RLRL for myopia control in the short term of 3, 6, and 12 months follow up. The present review revealed the clinical significance of RLRL as a new alternative treatment for myopia control with good user acceptability and no documented functional or structural damage. However, the effect of long-term RLRL treatment and the rebound effect after cessation require further investigations.
Mesh-Begriff(e) Child ; Humans ; Red Light ; Myopia/therapy ; Refractive Errors ; Refraction, Ocular
Sprache Englisch
Erscheinungsdatum 2024-02-20
Erscheinungsland England
Dokumenttyp Meta-Analysis ; Systematic Review ; Journal Article
ZDB-ID 2050436-6
ISSN 1471-2415 ; 1471-2415
ISSN (online) 1471-2415
ISSN 1471-2415
DOI 10.1186/s12886-024-03337-5
Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

Zusatzmaterialien

Kategorien

Zum Seitenanfang