LIVIVO - Das Suchportal für Lebenswissenschaften

switch to English language
Erweiterte Suche

Ihre letzten Suchen

  1. AU="Chang, Hanxuan" AU="Chang, Hanxuan"
  2. AU="Bellamy, Kyle" AU="Bellamy, Kyle"
  3. AU="Jensen, Kara L"
  4. AU=Wang Yun
  5. AU=Seimiya H
  6. AU="Victor Babos, Diego"
  7. AU="Giuseppe Sergi"
  8. AU="Nackers, Elke"
  9. AU=Grobler Chistine
  10. AU="Norman H. L. Chiu"
  11. AU="Ioannis Politis"
  12. AU="Scott Nugent"
  13. AU="Sepideh MONSEF"
  14. AU="Wang, Zhaoqi"

Suchergebnis

Treffer 1 - 1 von insgesamt 1

Suchoptionen

Artikel ; Online: Association between reversal agents (sugammadex vs. neostigmine) for neuromuscular block and postoperative pulmonary complications: A retrospective analysis.

Ren, Aolin / Fan, Meihan / Gu, Zhen / Liang, Xiao / Xu, Liuhang / Liu, Chengjun / Wang, Dutian / Chang, Hanxuan / Zhu, Minmin

British journal of clinical pharmacology

2024  

Abstract: Aims: Residual neuromuscular blockade has been linked to pulmonary complications in the postoperative period. This study aimed to determine whether sugammadex was associated with a lower risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) compared with ...

Abstract Aims: Residual neuromuscular blockade has been linked to pulmonary complications in the postoperative period. This study aimed to determine whether sugammadex was associated with a lower risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) compared with neostigmine.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary academic medical center. Patients ≥18 year of age undergoing noncardiac surgical procedures with general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation were enrolled between January 2019 and September 2021. We identified all patients receiving rocuronium and reversal with neostigmine or sugammadex via electronic medical record review. The primary endpoint was a composite of PPCs (including pneumonia, atelectasis, respiratory failure, pulmonary embolism, pleural effusion, or pneumothorax). The incidence of PPCs was compared using propensity score analysis.
Results: A total of 1786 patients were included in this study. Among these patients, 976 (54.6%) received neostigmine, and 810 (45.4%) received sugammadex. In the whole sample, PPCs occurred in 81 (4.54%) subjects (7.04% sugammadex vs. 2.46% neostigmine). Baseline covariates were well balanced between groups after overlap weighting. Patients in the sugammadex group had similar risk (overlap weighting OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.40 to 1.41) compared to neostigmine. The sensitivity analysis showed consistent results. In subgroup analysis, the interaction P-value for the reversal agents stratified by surgery duration was 0.011.
Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the rate of PPCs when the neuromuscular blockade was reversed with sugammadex compared to neostigmine. Patients undergoing prolonged surgery may benefit from sugammadex, which needs to be further investigated.
Sprache Englisch
Erscheinungsdatum 2024-04-07
Erscheinungsland England
Dokumenttyp Journal Article
ZDB-ID 188974-6
ISSN 1365-2125 ; 0306-5251 ; 0264-3774
ISSN (online) 1365-2125
ISSN 0306-5251 ; 0264-3774
DOI 10.1111/bcp.16056
Signatur
Zs.A 1118: Hefte anzeigen Standort:
Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (1.OG)
ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)
Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

Zusatzmaterialien

Kategorien

Zum Seitenanfang